alsa-devel.alsa-project.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: "Lu, Brent" <brent.lu@intel.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com>,
	"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
	"Rojewski, Cezary" <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Jie Yang <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>,
	Yu-Hsuan Hsu <yuhsuan@chromium.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
	Sam McNally <sammc@chromium.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"yuhsuan@google.com" <yuhsuan@google.com>,
	Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Stuart <daniel.stuart14@gmail.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Damian van Soelen <dj.vsoelen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: Intel: Add period size constraint on strago board
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:38:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0714b222-d3fc-5744-1147-bfac7df2651e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB364242D3652EDC2F9B8B214897420@DM6PR11MB3642.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>



On 8/12/20 11:08 AM, Lu, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>> I also wonder what's really missing, too :)
>>>
>>> BTW, I took a look back at the thread, and CRAS seems using a very
>>> large buffer, namely:
>>> [   52.434791] sound pcmC1D0p:   PERIOD_SIZE [240:240]
>>> [   52.434802] sound pcmC1D0p:   BUFFER_SIZE [204480:204480]
>>
>> yes, that's 852 periods and 4.260 seconds. Never seen such values :-)
> 
> CRAS calls snd_pcm_hw_params_set_buffer_size_max() to use as large
> buffer as possible. So the period size is an arbitrary number in different
> platforms. Atom SST platform happens to be 256, and CML SOF platform
> is 1056 for example.

ok, but earlier in this thread it was mentioned that values such as 432 
are not suitable. the statement above seems to mean the period actual 
value is a "don't care", so I don't quite see why this specific patch2 
restricting the value to 240 is necessary. Patch1 is needed for sure, 
Patch2 is where Takashi and I are not convinced.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-12 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-29 11:03 [PATCH 0/2] Add period size constraint for Atom Chromebook Brent Lu
2020-07-29 11:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: intel: atom: Add period size constraint Brent Lu
2020-07-29 11:19   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-07-29 11:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: Intel: Add period size constraint on strago board Brent Lu
2020-07-29 14:08   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-07-30  8:02     ` Lu, Brent
2020-07-30 15:27       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-07-30 15:44         ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-07-30 16:17           ` Lu, Brent
2020-07-30 16:56         ` Takashi Iwai
2020-07-31 12:28           ` Lu, Brent
2020-07-29 11:20 ` [PATCH 0/2] Add period size constraint for Atom Chromebook Andy Shevchenko
2020-07-31 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 " Brent Lu
2020-07-31 12:26   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ASoC: intel: atom: Add period size constraint Brent Lu
2020-07-31 12:26   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: Intel: Add period size constraint on strago board Brent Lu
2020-07-31 13:34     ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-01  8:58       ` Lu, Brent
2020-08-01  9:26         ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-03 13:00           ` Lu, Brent
2020-08-03 15:13             ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-03 16:45               ` Lu, Brent
2020-08-03 16:56                 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-04  4:33                   ` Lu, Brent
2020-08-04 14:24                     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-06 16:41                       ` Lu, Brent
2020-08-10 15:03                         ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-10 17:38                           ` Yu-Hsuan Hsu
2020-08-11  2:16                             ` Lu, Brent
2020-08-11  2:29                               ` Yu-Hsuan Hsu
2020-08-11  7:43                                 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-11  8:25                                   ` Yu-Hsuan Hsu
2020-08-11  8:39                                     ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-11  9:35                                       ` Yu-Hsuan Hsu
2020-08-11 14:53                                         ` Mark Brown
2020-08-11 16:54                                           ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-11 17:22                                             ` Mark Brown
2020-08-12  3:09                                               ` Yu-Hsuan Hsu
2020-08-12  6:13                                                 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-12  6:53                                                   ` Yu-Hsuan Hsu
2020-08-12  6:58                                                     ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-12  7:43                                                       ` Yu-Hsuan Hsu
2020-08-12  7:47                                                         ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-12 14:46                                                           ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-12 14:55                                                             ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-12 15:54                                                               ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-12 16:08                                                                 ` Lu, Brent
2020-08-12 16:38                                                                   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2020-08-13  6:24                                                                     ` Yu-Hsuan Hsu
2020-08-13  7:55                                                                       ` Lu, Brent
2020-08-13  8:36                                                                         ` Yu-Hsuan Hsu
2020-08-13  8:45                                                                           ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-13 12:57                                                                             ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-13 17:15                                                                               ` Yu-Hsuan Hsu
2020-08-21 16:40   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Add period size constraint for Atom Chromebook Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0714b222-d3fc-5744-1147-bfac7df2651e@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brent.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.stuart14@gmail.com \
    --cc=dj.vsoelen@gmail.com \
    --cc=guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
    --cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sammc@chromium.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=yang.jie@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=yuhsuan@chromium.org \
    --cc=yuhsuan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).