From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>, maze@google.com, lmb@cloudflare.com, shaun@tigera.io, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>, marek@cloudflare.com, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, eyal.birger@gmail.com, colrack@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH bpf-next V11 7/7] bpf/selftests: tests using bpf_check_mtu BPF-helper Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:45:36 +0100 Message-ID: <161047353609.4003084.8490543345104346164.stgit@firesoul> (raw) In-Reply-To: <161047346644.4003084.2653117664787086168.stgit@firesoul> Adding selftest for BPF-helper bpf_check_mtu(). Making sure it can be used from both XDP and TC. V11: - Addresse nitpicks from Andrii Nakryiko V10: - Remove errno non-zero test in CHECK_ATTR() - Addresse comments from Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c | 216 ++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 414 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..9e2fd01b7c65 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c @@ -0,0 +1,216 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2020 Jesper Dangaard Brouer */ + +#include <linux/if_link.h> /* before test_progs.h, avoid bpf_util.h redefines */ +#include <test_progs.h> +#include "test_check_mtu.skel.h" +#include "network_helpers.h" + +#include <stdlib.h> +#include <inttypes.h> + +#define IFINDEX_LO 1 + +static __u32 duration; /* Hint: needed for CHECK macro */ + +static int read_mtu_device_lo(void) +{ + const char *filename = "/sys/class/net/lo/mtu"; + char buf[11] = {}; + int value, n, fd; + + fd = open(filename, 0, O_RDONLY); + if (fd == -1) + return -1; + + n = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf)); + close(fd); + + if (n == -1) + return -2; + + value = strtoimax(buf, NULL, 10); + if (errno == ERANGE) + return -3; + + return value; +} + +static void test_check_mtu_xdp_attach() +{ + struct bpf_link_info link_info; + __u32 link_info_len = sizeof(link_info); + struct test_check_mtu *skel; + struct bpf_program *prog; + struct bpf_link *link; + int err = 0; + int fd; + + skel = test_check_mtu__open_and_load(); + if (CHECK(!skel, "open and load skel", "failed")) + return; /* Exit if e.g. helper unknown to kernel */ + + prog = skel->progs.xdp_use_helper_basic; + + link = bpf_program__attach_xdp(prog, IFINDEX_LO); + if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "link_attach", "failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(link))) + goto out; + skel->links.xdp_use_helper_basic = link; + + memset(&link_info, 0, sizeof(link_info)); + fd = bpf_link__fd(link); + err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fd, &link_info, &link_info_len); + if (CHECK(err, "link_info", "failed: %d\n", err)) + goto out; + + CHECK(link_info.type != BPF_LINK_TYPE_XDP, "link_type", + "got %u != exp %u\n", link_info.type, BPF_LINK_TYPE_XDP); + CHECK(link_info.xdp.ifindex != IFINDEX_LO, "link_ifindex", + "got %u != exp %u\n", link_info.xdp.ifindex, IFINDEX_LO); + + err = bpf_link__detach(link); + CHECK(err, "link_detach", "failed %d\n", err); + +out: + test_check_mtu__destroy(skel); +} + +static void test_check_mtu_run_xdp(struct test_check_mtu *skel, + struct bpf_program *prog, + __u32 mtu_expect) +{ + const char *prog_name = bpf_program__name(prog); + int retval_expect = XDP_PASS; + __u32 mtu_result = 0; + char buf[256] = {}; + int err; + struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr tattr = { + .repeat = 1, + .data_in = &pkt_v4, + .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4), + .data_out = buf, + .data_size_out = sizeof(buf), + .prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog), + }; + + err = bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(&tattr); + CHECK_ATTR(err != 0, "bpf_prog_test_run", + "prog_name:%s (err %d errno %d retval %d)\n", + prog_name, err, errno, tattr.retval); + + CHECK(tattr.retval != retval_expect, "retval", + "progname:%s unexpected retval=%d expected=%d\n", + prog_name, tattr.retval, retval_expect); + + /* Extract MTU that BPF-prog got */ + mtu_result = skel->bss->global_bpf_mtu_xdp; + ASSERT_EQ(mtu_result, mtu_expect, "MTU-compare-user"); +} + + +static void test_check_mtu_xdp(__u32 mtu, __u32 ifindex) +{ + struct test_check_mtu *skel; + int err; + + skel = test_check_mtu__open(); + if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed")) + return; + + /* Update "constants" in BPF-prog *BEFORE* libbpf load */ + skel->rodata->GLOBAL_USER_MTU = mtu; + skel->rodata->GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX = ifindex; + + err = test_check_mtu__load(skel); + if (CHECK(err, "skel_load", "failed: %d\n", err)) + goto cleanup; + + test_check_mtu_run_xdp(skel, skel->progs.xdp_use_helper, mtu); + test_check_mtu_run_xdp(skel, skel->progs.xdp_exceed_mtu, mtu); + test_check_mtu_run_xdp(skel, skel->progs.xdp_minus_delta, mtu); + +cleanup: + test_check_mtu__destroy(skel); +} + +static void test_check_mtu_run_tc(struct test_check_mtu *skel, + struct bpf_program *prog, + __u32 mtu_expect) +{ + const char *prog_name = bpf_program__name(prog); + int retval_expect = BPF_OK; + __u32 mtu_result = 0; + char buf[256] = {}; + int err; + struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr tattr = { + .repeat = 1, + .data_in = &pkt_v4, + .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4), + .data_out = buf, + .data_size_out = sizeof(buf), + .prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog), + }; + + err = bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(&tattr); + CHECK_ATTR(err != 0, "bpf_prog_test_run", + "prog_name:%s (err %d errno %d retval %d)\n", + prog_name, err, errno, tattr.retval); + + CHECK(tattr.retval != retval_expect, "retval", + "progname:%s unexpected retval=%d expected=%d\n", + prog_name, tattr.retval, retval_expect); + + /* Extract MTU that BPF-prog got */ + mtu_result = skel->bss->global_bpf_mtu_tc; + ASSERT_EQ(mtu_result, mtu_expect, "MTU-compare-user"); +} + + +static void test_check_mtu_tc(__u32 mtu, __u32 ifindex) +{ + struct test_check_mtu *skel; + int err; + + skel = test_check_mtu__open(); + if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed")) + return; + + /* Update "constants" in BPF-prog *BEFORE* libbpf load */ + skel->rodata->GLOBAL_USER_MTU = mtu; + skel->rodata->GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX = ifindex; + + err = test_check_mtu__load(skel); + if (CHECK(err, "skel_load", "failed: %d\n", err)) + goto cleanup; + + test_check_mtu_run_tc(skel, skel->progs.tc_use_helper, mtu); + test_check_mtu_run_tc(skel, skel->progs.tc_exceed_mtu, mtu); + test_check_mtu_run_tc(skel, skel->progs.tc_exceed_mtu_da, mtu); + test_check_mtu_run_tc(skel, skel->progs.tc_minus_delta, mtu); +cleanup: + test_check_mtu__destroy(skel); +} + +void test_check_mtu(void) +{ + __u32 mtu_lo; + + if (test__start_subtest("bpf_check_mtu XDP-attach")) + test_check_mtu_xdp_attach(); + + mtu_lo = read_mtu_device_lo(); + if (CHECK(mtu_lo < 0, "reading MTU value", "failed (err:%d)", mtu_lo)) + return; + + if (test__start_subtest("bpf_check_mtu XDP-run")) + test_check_mtu_xdp(mtu_lo, 0); + + if (test__start_subtest("bpf_check_mtu XDP-run ifindex-lookup")) + test_check_mtu_xdp(mtu_lo, IFINDEX_LO); + + if (test__start_subtest("bpf_check_mtu TC-run")) + test_check_mtu_tc(mtu_lo, 0); + + if (test__start_subtest("bpf_check_mtu TC-run ifindex-lookup")) + test_check_mtu_tc(mtu_lo, IFINDEX_LO); +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..1b31d5ceb3c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2020 Jesper Dangaard Brouer */ + +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> +#include <linux/if_ether.h> + +#include <stddef.h> +#include <stdint.h> + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; + +/* Userspace will update with MTU it can see on device */ +static volatile const int GLOBAL_USER_MTU; +static volatile const __u32 GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX; + +/* BPF-prog will update these with MTU values it can see */ +__u32 global_bpf_mtu_xdp = 0; +__u32 global_bpf_mtu_tc = 0; + +SEC("xdp") +int xdp_use_helper_basic(struct xdp_md *ctx) +{ + __u32 mtu_len = 0; + + if (bpf_check_mtu(ctx, 0, &mtu_len, 0, 0)) + return XDP_ABORTED; + + return XDP_PASS; +} + +SEC("xdp") +int xdp_use_helper(struct xdp_md *ctx) +{ + int retval = XDP_PASS; /* Expected retval on successful test */ + __u32 mtu_len = 0; + __u32 ifindex = 0; + int delta = 0; + + /* When ifindex is zero, save net_device lookup and use ctx netdev */ + if (GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX > 0) + ifindex = GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX; + + if (bpf_check_mtu(ctx, ifindex, &mtu_len, delta, 0)) { + /* mtu_len is also valid when check fail */ + retval = XDP_ABORTED; + goto out; + } + + if (mtu_len != GLOBAL_USER_MTU) + retval = XDP_DROP; + +out: + global_bpf_mtu_xdp = mtu_len; + return retval; +} + +SEC("xdp") +int xdp_exceed_mtu(struct xdp_md *ctx) +{ + void *data_end = (void *)(long)ctx->data_end; + void *data = (void *)(long)ctx->data; + __u32 ifindex = GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX; + __u32 data_len = data_end - data; + int retval = XDP_ABORTED; /* Fail */ + __u32 mtu_len = 0; + int delta; + int err; + + /* Exceed MTU with 1 via delta adjust */ + delta = GLOBAL_USER_MTU - (data_len - ETH_HLEN) + 1; + + err = bpf_check_mtu(ctx, ifindex, &mtu_len, delta, 0); + if (err) { + retval = XDP_PASS; /* Success in exceeding MTU check */ + if (err != BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_FRAG_NEEDED) + retval = XDP_DROP; + } + + global_bpf_mtu_xdp = mtu_len; + return retval; +} + +SEC("xdp") +int xdp_minus_delta(struct xdp_md *ctx) +{ + int retval = XDP_PASS; /* Expected retval on successful test */ + void *data_end = (void *)(long)ctx->data_end; + void *data = (void *)(long)ctx->data; + __u32 ifindex = GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX; + __u32 data_len = data_end - data; + __u32 mtu_len = 0; + int delta; + + /* Boarderline test case: Minus delta exceeding packet length allowed */ + delta = -((data_len - ETH_HLEN) + 1); + + /* Minus length (adjusted via delta) still pass MTU check, other helpers + * are responsible for catching this, when doing actual size adjust + */ + if (bpf_check_mtu(ctx, ifindex, &mtu_len, delta, 0)) + retval = XDP_ABORTED; + + global_bpf_mtu_xdp = mtu_len; + return retval; +} + +SEC("classifier") +int tc_use_helper(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + int retval = BPF_OK; /* Expected retval on successful test */ + __u32 mtu_len = 0; + int delta = 0; + + if (bpf_check_mtu(ctx, 0, &mtu_len, delta, 0)) { + retval = BPF_DROP; + goto out; + } + + if (mtu_len != GLOBAL_USER_MTU) + retval = BPF_REDIRECT; +out: + global_bpf_mtu_tc = mtu_len; + return retval; +} + +SEC("classifier") +int tc_exceed_mtu(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + __u32 ifindex = GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX; + int retval = BPF_DROP; /* Fail */ + __u32 skb_len = ctx->len; + __u32 mtu_len = 0; + int delta; + int err; + + /* Exceed MTU with 1 via delta adjust */ + delta = GLOBAL_USER_MTU - (skb_len - ETH_HLEN) + 1; + + err = bpf_check_mtu(ctx, ifindex, &mtu_len, delta, 0); + if (err) { + retval = BPF_OK; /* Success in exceeding MTU check */ + if (err != BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_FRAG_NEEDED) + retval = BPF_DROP; + } + + global_bpf_mtu_tc = mtu_len; + return retval; +} + +SEC("classifier") +int tc_exceed_mtu_da(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + /* SKB Direct-Access variant */ + void *data_end = (void *)(long)ctx->data_end; + void *data = (void *)(long)ctx->data; + __u32 ifindex = GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX; + __u32 data_len = data_end - data; + int retval = BPF_DROP; /* Fail */ + __u32 mtu_len = 0; + int delta; + int err; + + /* Exceed MTU with 1 via delta adjust */ + delta = GLOBAL_USER_MTU - (data_len - ETH_HLEN) + 1; + + err = bpf_check_mtu(ctx, ifindex, &mtu_len, delta, 0); + if (err) { + retval = BPF_OK; /* Success in exceeding MTU check */ + if (err != BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_FRAG_NEEDED) + retval = BPF_DROP; + } + + global_bpf_mtu_tc = mtu_len; + return retval; +} + +SEC("classifier") +int tc_minus_delta(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + int retval = BPF_OK; /* Expected retval on successful test */ + __u32 ifindex = GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX; + __u32 skb_len = ctx->len; + __u32 mtu_len = 0; + int delta; + + /* Boarderline test case: Minus delta exceeding packet length allowed */ + delta = -((skb_len - ETH_HLEN) + 1); + + /* Minus length (adjusted via delta) still pass MTU check, other helpers + * are responsible for catching this, when doing actual size adjust + */ + if (bpf_check_mtu(ctx, ifindex, &mtu_len, delta, 0)) + retval = BPF_DROP; + + global_bpf_mtu_xdp = mtu_len; + return retval; +}
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-01-12 17:45 [PATCH bpf-next V11 0/7] bpf: New approach for BPF MTU handling Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-12 17:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next V11 1/7] bpf: Remove MTU check in __bpf_skb_max_len Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-14 8:18 ` John Fastabend 2021-01-12 17:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next V11 2/7] bpf: fix bpf_fib_lookup helper MTU check for SKB ctx Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-12 17:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next V11 3/7] bpf: bpf_fib_lookup return MTU value as output when looked up Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-12 17:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next V11 4/7] bpf: add BPF-helper for MTU checking Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-12 19:23 ` Andrii Nakryiko 2021-01-14 14:52 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-14 15:33 ` Yonghong Song 2021-01-13 23:07 ` Daniel Borkmann 2021-01-14 14:36 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-14 22:28 ` Daniel Borkmann 2021-01-18 11:04 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-12 17:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next V11 5/7] bpf: drop MTU check when doing TC-BPF redirect to ingress Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-14 9:03 ` John Fastabend 2021-01-14 16:14 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-12 17:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next V11 6/7] selftests/bpf: use bpf_check_mtu in selftest test_cls_redirect Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-12 17:45 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message] 2021-01-12 19:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next V11 7/7] bpf/selftests: tests using bpf_check_mtu BPF-helper Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=161047353609.4003084.8490543345104346164.stgit@firesoul \ --to=brouer@redhat.com \ --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \ --cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \ --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=colrack@gmail.com \ --cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \ --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \ --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \ --cc=marek@cloudflare.com \ --cc=maze@google.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=shaun@tigera.io \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
BPF Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0 bpf/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 bpf bpf/ https://lore.kernel.org/bpf \ bpf@vger.kernel.org public-inbox-index bpf Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.bpf AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git