From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>, maze@google.com, lmb@cloudflare.com, shaun@tigera.io, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>, marek@cloudflare.com, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, eyal.birger@gmail.com, colrack@gmail.com, brouer@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next V11 4/7] bpf: add BPF-helper for MTU checking Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:36:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20210114153607.6eea9b37@carbon> (raw) In-Reply-To: <a14a7490-88c6-9d14-0886-547113242c45@iogearbox.net> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 00:07:14 +0100 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote: > On 1/12/21 6:45 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > This BPF-helper bpf_check_mtu() works for both XDP and TC-BPF programs. > [...] > > + * int bpf_check_mtu(void *ctx, u32 ifindex, u32 *mtu_len, s32 len_diff, u64 flags) > > + * Description > > + * Check ctx packet size against MTU of net device (based on > > + * *ifindex*). This helper will likely be used in combination with > > + * helpers that adjust/change the packet size. The argument > > + * *len_diff* can be used for querying with a planned size > > + * change. This allows to check MTU prior to changing packet ctx. > > + * > > + * Specifying *ifindex* zero means the MTU check is performed > > + * against the current net device. This is practical if this isn't > > + * used prior to redirect. > > + * > > + * The Linux kernel route table can configure MTUs on a more > > + * specific per route level, which is not provided by this helper. > > + * For route level MTU checks use the **bpf_fib_lookup**\ () > > + * helper. > > + * > > + * *ctx* is either **struct xdp_md** for XDP programs or > > + * **struct sk_buff** for tc cls_act programs. > > + * > > + * The *flags* argument can be a combination of one or more of the > > + * following values: > > + * > > + * **BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS** > > + * This flag will only works for *ctx* **struct sk_buff**. > > + * If packet context contains extra packet segment buffers > > + * (often knows as GSO skb), then MTU check is harder to > > + * check at this point, because in transmit path it is > > + * possible for the skb packet to get re-segmented > > + * (depending on net device features). This could still be > > + * a MTU violation, so this flag enables performing MTU > > + * check against segments, with a different violation > > + * return code to tell it apart. Check cannot use len_diff. > > + * > > + * On return *mtu_len* pointer contains the MTU value of the net > > + * device. Remember the net device configured MTU is the L3 size, > > + * which is returned here and XDP and TX length operate at L2. > > + * Helper take this into account for you, but remember when using > > + * MTU value in your BPF-code. On input *mtu_len* must be a valid > > + * pointer and be initialized (to zero), else verifier will reject > > + * BPF program. > > + * > > + * Return > > + * * 0 on success, and populate MTU value in *mtu_len* pointer. > > + * > > + * * < 0 if any input argument is invalid (*mtu_len* not updated) > > + * > > + * MTU violations return positive values, but also populate MTU > > + * value in *mtu_len* pointer, as this can be needed for > > + * implementing PMTU handing: > > + * > > + * * **BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_FRAG_NEEDED** > > + * * **BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_SEGS_TOOBIG** > > + * > > */ > > #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN) \ > > FN(unspec), \ > > @@ -3998,6 +4053,7 @@ union bpf_attr { > > FN(ktime_get_coarse_ns), \ > > FN(ima_inode_hash), \ > > FN(sock_from_file), \ > > + FN(check_mtu), \ > > /* */ > > > > /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper > > @@ -5030,6 +5086,17 @@ struct bpf_redir_neigh { > > }; > > }; > > > > +/* bpf_check_mtu flags*/ > > +enum bpf_check_mtu_flags { > > + BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS = (1U << 0), > > +}; > > + > > +enum bpf_check_mtu_ret { > > + BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_SUCCESS, /* check and lookup successful */ > > + BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_FRAG_NEEDED, /* fragmentation required to fwd */ > > + BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_SEGS_TOOBIG, /* GSO re-segmentation needed to fwd */ > > +}; > > + > > enum bpf_task_fd_type { > > BPF_FD_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, /* tp name */ > > BPF_FD_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, /* tp name */ > > diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c > > index db59ab55572c..3f2e593244ca 100644 > > --- a/net/core/filter.c > > +++ b/net/core/filter.c > > @@ -5604,6 +5604,124 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_skb_fib_lookup_proto = { > > .arg4_type = ARG_ANYTHING, > > }; > > > > +static struct net_device *__dev_via_ifindex(struct net_device *dev_curr, > > + u32 ifindex) > > +{ > > + struct net *netns = dev_net(dev_curr); > > + > > + /* Non-redirect use-cases can use ifindex=0 and save ifindex lookup */ > > + if (ifindex == 0) > > + return dev_curr; > > + > > + return dev_get_by_index_rcu(netns, ifindex); > > +} > > + > > +BPF_CALL_5(bpf_skb_check_mtu, struct sk_buff *, skb, > > + u32, ifindex, u32 *, mtu_len, s32, len_diff, u64, flags) > > +{ > > + int ret = BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_FRAG_NEEDED; > > + struct net_device *dev = skb->dev; > > + int skb_len, dev_len; > > + int mtu; > > + > > + if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS))) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + dev = __dev_via_ifindex(dev, ifindex); > > + if (unlikely(!dev)) > > + return -ENODEV; > > + > > + mtu = READ_ONCE(dev->mtu); > > + > > + dev_len = mtu + dev->hard_header_len; > > + skb_len = skb->len + len_diff; /* minus result pass check */ > > + if (skb_len <= dev_len) { > > + ret = BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_SUCCESS; > > + goto out; > > + } > > + /* At this point, skb->len exceed MTU, but as it include length of all > > + * segments, it can still be below MTU. The SKB can possibly get > > + * re-segmented in transmit path (see validate_xmit_skb). Thus, user > > + * must choose if segs are to be MTU checked. Last SKB "headlen" is > > + * checked against MTU. > > + */ > > + if (skb_is_gso(skb)) { > > + ret = BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_SUCCESS; > > + > > + if (!(flags & BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS)) > > + goto out; > > + > > + if (!skb_gso_validate_network_len(skb, mtu)) { > > + ret = BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_SEGS_TOOBIG; > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > + skb_len = skb_headlen(skb) + len_diff; > > + if (skb_len > dev_len) { Maybe I'm misunderstanding you below? Do you just want the above two lines moved from the patch? (sure I can do that... as it is just an extra check of the "head"/first segment of the packet, and only done if BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS is set) > > This is still not universally correct given drivers could cook up non-linear > skbs (e.g. page frags) on rx. So the result from BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS flag cannot > be relied on. That is why it is a flag, that need to be explicitly set. > Do you have a particular use case for the BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS? The complaint from Maze (and others) were that when skb_is_gso then all the MTU checks are bypassed. This flag enables checking the GSO part via skb_gso_validate_network_len(). We cannot enable it per default, as you say, it is universally correct in all cases. > I also don't see the flag being used anywhere in your selftests, so I presume > not as otherwise you would have added an example there? I'm using the flag in the bpf-examples code[1], this is how I've tested the code path. I've not found a way to generate GSO packet via the selftests infrastructure via bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(). I'm [1] https://github.com/xdp-project/bpf-examples/blob/master/MTU-tests/tc_mtu_enforce.c > I would just drop the flag altogether for the tc helper.. As explain I cannot drop the flag altogether, I would also have to remove the code then. Sorry, but I don't 100% understand the change you are requesting. > > + ret = BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_FRAG_NEEDED; > > + goto out; > > + } > > + } > > +out: > > + /* BPF verifier guarantees valid pointer */ > > + *mtu_len = mtu; > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-01-12 17:45 [PATCH bpf-next V11 0/7] bpf: New approach for BPF MTU handling Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-12 17:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next V11 1/7] bpf: Remove MTU check in __bpf_skb_max_len Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-14 8:18 ` John Fastabend 2021-01-12 17:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next V11 2/7] bpf: fix bpf_fib_lookup helper MTU check for SKB ctx Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-12 17:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next V11 3/7] bpf: bpf_fib_lookup return MTU value as output when looked up Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-12 17:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next V11 4/7] bpf: add BPF-helper for MTU checking Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-12 19:23 ` Andrii Nakryiko 2021-01-14 14:52 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-14 15:33 ` Yonghong Song 2021-01-13 23:07 ` Daniel Borkmann 2021-01-14 14:36 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message] 2021-01-14 22:28 ` Daniel Borkmann 2021-01-18 11:04 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-12 17:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next V11 5/7] bpf: drop MTU check when doing TC-BPF redirect to ingress Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-14 9:03 ` John Fastabend 2021-01-14 16:14 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-12 17:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next V11 6/7] selftests/bpf: use bpf_check_mtu in selftest test_cls_redirect Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-12 17:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next V11 7/7] bpf/selftests: tests using bpf_check_mtu BPF-helper Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-01-12 19:29 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210114153607.6eea9b37@carbon \ --to=brouer@redhat.com \ --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \ --cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \ --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=colrack@gmail.com \ --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \ --cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \ --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \ --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \ --cc=marek@cloudflare.com \ --cc=maze@google.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=shaun@tigera.io \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
BPF Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0 bpf/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 bpf bpf/ https://lore.kernel.org/bpf \ bpf@vger.kernel.org public-inbox-index bpf Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.bpf AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git