* [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] libbpf: use 100-character limit to make bpf_tracing.h easier to read
2021-12-22 21:39 [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2021-12-22 21:39 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-23 0:27 ` Yonghong Song
2021-12-22 21:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions Andrii Nakryiko
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2021-12-22 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf, ast, daniel
Cc: andrii, kernel-team, Kenta Tada, Hengqi Chen,
Björn Töpel, Ilya Leoshkevich
Improve bpf_tracing.h's macro definition readability by keeping them
single-line and better aligned. This makes it easier to follow all those
variadic patterns.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 54 +++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
index 20fe06d0acd9..90f56b0f585f 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
@@ -302,25 +302,23 @@ struct pt_regs;
#define ___bpf_nth(_, _1, _2, _3, _4, _5, _6, _7, _8, _9, _a, _b, _c, N, ...) N
#endif
#ifndef ___bpf_narg
-#define ___bpf_narg(...) \
- ___bpf_nth(_, ##__VA_ARGS__, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)
+#define ___bpf_narg(...) ___bpf_nth(_, ##__VA_ARGS__, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)
#endif
-#define ___bpf_ctx_cast0() ctx
-#define ___bpf_ctx_cast1(x) ___bpf_ctx_cast0(), (void *)ctx[0]
-#define ___bpf_ctx_cast2(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast1(args), (void *)ctx[1]
-#define ___bpf_ctx_cast3(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast2(args), (void *)ctx[2]
-#define ___bpf_ctx_cast4(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast3(args), (void *)ctx[3]
-#define ___bpf_ctx_cast5(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast4(args), (void *)ctx[4]
-#define ___bpf_ctx_cast6(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast5(args), (void *)ctx[5]
-#define ___bpf_ctx_cast7(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast6(args), (void *)ctx[6]
-#define ___bpf_ctx_cast8(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast7(args), (void *)ctx[7]
-#define ___bpf_ctx_cast9(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast8(args), (void *)ctx[8]
+#define ___bpf_ctx_cast0() ctx
+#define ___bpf_ctx_cast1(x) ___bpf_ctx_cast0(), (void *)ctx[0]
+#define ___bpf_ctx_cast2(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast1(args), (void *)ctx[1]
+#define ___bpf_ctx_cast3(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast2(args), (void *)ctx[2]
+#define ___bpf_ctx_cast4(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast3(args), (void *)ctx[3]
+#define ___bpf_ctx_cast5(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast4(args), (void *)ctx[4]
+#define ___bpf_ctx_cast6(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast5(args), (void *)ctx[5]
+#define ___bpf_ctx_cast7(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast6(args), (void *)ctx[6]
+#define ___bpf_ctx_cast8(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast7(args), (void *)ctx[7]
+#define ___bpf_ctx_cast9(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast8(args), (void *)ctx[8]
#define ___bpf_ctx_cast10(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast9(args), (void *)ctx[9]
#define ___bpf_ctx_cast11(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast10(args), (void *)ctx[10]
#define ___bpf_ctx_cast12(x, args...) ___bpf_ctx_cast11(args), (void *)ctx[11]
-#define ___bpf_ctx_cast(args...) \
- ___bpf_apply(___bpf_ctx_cast, ___bpf_narg(args))(args)
+#define ___bpf_ctx_cast(args...) ___bpf_apply(___bpf_ctx_cast, ___bpf_narg(args))(args)
/*
* BPF_PROG is a convenience wrapper for generic tp_btf/fentry/fexit and
@@ -353,19 +351,13 @@ ____##name(unsigned long long *ctx, ##args)
struct pt_regs;
-#define ___bpf_kprobe_args0() ctx
-#define ___bpf_kprobe_args1(x) \
- ___bpf_kprobe_args0(), (void *)PT_REGS_PARM1(ctx)
-#define ___bpf_kprobe_args2(x, args...) \
- ___bpf_kprobe_args1(args), (void *)PT_REGS_PARM2(ctx)
-#define ___bpf_kprobe_args3(x, args...) \
- ___bpf_kprobe_args2(args), (void *)PT_REGS_PARM3(ctx)
-#define ___bpf_kprobe_args4(x, args...) \
- ___bpf_kprobe_args3(args), (void *)PT_REGS_PARM4(ctx)
-#define ___bpf_kprobe_args5(x, args...) \
- ___bpf_kprobe_args4(args), (void *)PT_REGS_PARM5(ctx)
-#define ___bpf_kprobe_args(args...) \
- ___bpf_apply(___bpf_kprobe_args, ___bpf_narg(args))(args)
+#define ___bpf_kprobe_args0() ctx
+#define ___bpf_kprobe_args1(x) ___bpf_kprobe_args0(), (void *)PT_REGS_PARM1(ctx)
+#define ___bpf_kprobe_args2(x, args...) ___bpf_kprobe_args1(args), (void *)PT_REGS_PARM2(ctx)
+#define ___bpf_kprobe_args3(x, args...) ___bpf_kprobe_args2(args), (void *)PT_REGS_PARM3(ctx)
+#define ___bpf_kprobe_args4(x, args...) ___bpf_kprobe_args3(args), (void *)PT_REGS_PARM4(ctx)
+#define ___bpf_kprobe_args5(x, args...) ___bpf_kprobe_args4(args), (void *)PT_REGS_PARM5(ctx)
+#define ___bpf_kprobe_args(args...) ___bpf_apply(___bpf_kprobe_args, ___bpf_narg(args))(args)
/*
* BPF_KPROBE serves the same purpose for kprobes as BPF_PROG for
@@ -391,11 +383,9 @@ typeof(name(0)) name(struct pt_regs *ctx) \
static __attribute__((always_inline)) typeof(name(0)) \
____##name(struct pt_regs *ctx, ##args)
-#define ___bpf_kretprobe_args0() ctx
-#define ___bpf_kretprobe_args1(x) \
- ___bpf_kretprobe_args0(), (void *)PT_REGS_RC(ctx)
-#define ___bpf_kretprobe_args(args...) \
- ___bpf_apply(___bpf_kretprobe_args, ___bpf_narg(args))(args)
+#define ___bpf_kretprobe_args0() ctx
+#define ___bpf_kretprobe_args1(x) ___bpf_kretprobe_args0(), (void *)PT_REGS_RC(ctx)
+#define ___bpf_kretprobe_args(args...) ___bpf_apply(___bpf_kretprobe_args, ___bpf_narg(args))(args)
/*
* BPF_KRETPROBE is similar to BPF_KPROBE, except, it only provides optional
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions
2021-12-22 21:39 [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-22 21:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] libbpf: use 100-character limit to make bpf_tracing.h easier to read Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2021-12-22 21:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-23 0:26 ` Yonghong Song
2021-12-23 1:26 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2021-12-22 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Kernel Team,
Kenta Tada, Hengqi Chen, Björn Töpel, Ilya Leoshkevich
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 1:39 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Refactor PT_REGS macros definitions in bpf_tracing.h to avoid excessive
> duplication. We currently have classic PT_REGS_xxx() and CO-RE-enabled
> PT_REGS_xxx_CORE(). We are about to add also _SYSCALL variants, which
> would require excessive copying of all the per-architecture definitions.
>
> Instead, separate architecture-specific field/register names from the
> final macro that utilize them. That way for upcoming _SYSCALL variants
> we'll be able to just define x86_64 exception and otherwise have one
> common set of _SYSCALL macro definitions common for all architectures.
>
> Cc: Kenta Tada <Kenta.Tada@sony.com>
> Cc: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
> Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 377 +++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 152 insertions(+), 225 deletions(-)
>
This is so much easier to review at [0], btw...
[0] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/pull/2327/commits/81afd5f3956f25da06c36d9d6195a7aa59304252
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
> index db05a5937105..20fe06d0acd9 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
> @@ -66,277 +66,204 @@
>
> #if defined(__KERNEL__) || defined(__VMLINUX_H__)
>
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ((x)->di)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) ((x)->si)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3(x) ((x)->dx)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4(x) ((x)->cx)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5(x) ((x)->r8)
> -#define PT_REGS_RET(x) ((x)->sp)
> -#define PT_REGS_FP(x) ((x)->bp)
> -#define PT_REGS_RC(x) ((x)->ax)
> -#define PT_REGS_SP(x) ((x)->sp)
> -#define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->ip)
> -
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), di)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), si)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), dx)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), cx)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), r8)
> -#define PT_REGS_RET_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), sp)
> -#define PT_REGS_FP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), bp)
> -#define PT_REGS_RC_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), ax)
> -#define PT_REGS_SP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), sp)
> -#define PT_REGS_IP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), ip)
> +#define __PT_PARM1_REG di
> +#define __PT_PARM2_REG si
> +#define __PT_PARM3_REG dx
> +#define __PT_PARM4_REG cx
> +#define __PT_PARM5_REG r8
> +#define __PT_RET_REG sp
> +#define __PT_FP_REG bp
> +#define __PT_RC_REG ax
> +#define __PT_SP_REG sp
> +#define __PT_IP_REG ip
>
> #else
>
> #ifdef __i386__
> -/* i386 kernel is built with -mregparm=3 */
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ((x)->eax)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) ((x)->edx)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3(x) ((x)->ecx)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4(x) 0
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5(x) 0
> -#define PT_REGS_RET(x) ((x)->esp)
> -#define PT_REGS_FP(x) ((x)->ebp)
> -#define PT_REGS_RC(x) ((x)->eax)
> -#define PT_REGS_SP(x) ((x)->esp)
> -#define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->eip)
> -
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), eax)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), edx)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), ecx)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4_CORE(x) 0
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5_CORE(x) 0
> -#define PT_REGS_RET_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), esp)
> -#define PT_REGS_FP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), ebp)
> -#define PT_REGS_RC_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), eax)
> -#define PT_REGS_SP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), esp)
> -#define PT_REGS_IP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), eip)
> -
> -#else
>
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ((x)->rdi)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) ((x)->rsi)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3(x) ((x)->rdx)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4(x) ((x)->rcx)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5(x) ((x)->r8)
> -#define PT_REGS_RET(x) ((x)->rsp)
> -#define PT_REGS_FP(x) ((x)->rbp)
> -#define PT_REGS_RC(x) ((x)->rax)
> -#define PT_REGS_SP(x) ((x)->rsp)
> -#define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->rip)
> -
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), rdi)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), rsi)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), rdx)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), rcx)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), r8)
> -#define PT_REGS_RET_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), rsp)
> -#define PT_REGS_FP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), rbp)
> -#define PT_REGS_RC_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), rax)
> -#define PT_REGS_SP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), rsp)
> -#define PT_REGS_IP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), rip)
> -
> -#endif
> -#endif
> +#define __PT_PARM1_REG eax
> +#define __PT_PARM2_REG edx
> +#define __PT_PARM3_REG ecx
> +/* i386 kernel is built with -mregparm=3 */
> +#define __PT_PARM4_REG __unsupported__
> +#define __PT_PARM5_REG __unsupported__
> +#define __PT_RET_REG esp
> +#define __PT_FP_REG ebp
> +#define __PT_RC_REG eax
> +#define __PT_SP_REG esp
> +#define __PT_IP_REG eip
> +
> +#else /* __i386__ */
> +
> +#define __PT_PARM1_REG rdi
> +#define __PT_PARM2_REG rsi
> +#define __PT_PARM3_REG rdx
> +#define __PT_PARM4_REG rcx
> +#define __PT_PARM5_REG r8
> +#define __PT_RET_REG rsp
> +#define __PT_FP_REG rbp
> +#define __PT_RC_REG rax
> +#define __PT_SP_REG rsp
> +#define __PT_IP_REG rip
> +
> +#endif /* __i386__ */
> +
> +#endif /* __KERNEL__ || __VMLINUX_H__ */
>
> #elif defined(bpf_target_s390)
>
> /* s390 provides user_pt_regs instead of struct pt_regs to userspace */
> -struct pt_regs;
> -#define PT_REGS_S390 const volatile user_pt_regs
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) (((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x))->gprs[2])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) (((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x))->gprs[3])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3(x) (((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x))->gprs[4])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4(x) (((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x))->gprs[5])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5(x) (((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x))->gprs[6])
> -#define PT_REGS_RET(x) (((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x))->gprs[14])
> -/* Works only with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER */
> -#define PT_REGS_FP(x) (((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x))->gprs[11])
> -#define PT_REGS_RC(x) (((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x))->gprs[2])
> -#define PT_REGS_SP(x) (((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x))->gprs[15])
> -#define PT_REGS_IP(x) (((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x))->psw.addr)
> -
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x), gprs[2])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x), gprs[3])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x), gprs[4])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x), gprs[5])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x), gprs[6])
> -#define PT_REGS_RET_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x), gprs[14])
> -#define PT_REGS_FP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x), gprs[11])
> -#define PT_REGS_RC_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x), gprs[2])
> -#define PT_REGS_SP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x), gprs[15])
> -#define PT_REGS_IP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_S390 *)(x), psw.addr)
> +#define __PT_REGS_CAST(x) ((const user_pt_regs *)(x))
> +#define __PT_PARM1_REG gprs[2]
> +#define __PT_PARM2_REG gprs[3]
> +#define __PT_PARM3_REG gprs[4]
> +#define __PT_PARM4_REG gprs[5]
> +#define __PT_PARM5_REG gprs[6]
> +#define __PT_RET_REG grps[14]
> +#define __PT_FP_REG gprs[11] /* Works only with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER */
> +#define __PT_RC_REG gprs[2]
> +#define __PT_SP_REG gprs[15]
> +#define __PT_IP_REG psw.addr
>
> #elif defined(bpf_target_arm)
>
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ((x)->uregs[0])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) ((x)->uregs[1])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3(x) ((x)->uregs[2])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4(x) ((x)->uregs[3])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5(x) ((x)->uregs[4])
> -#define PT_REGS_RET(x) ((x)->uregs[14])
> -#define PT_REGS_FP(x) ((x)->uregs[11]) /* Works only with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER */
> -#define PT_REGS_RC(x) ((x)->uregs[0])
> -#define PT_REGS_SP(x) ((x)->uregs[13])
> -#define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->uregs[12])
> -
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), uregs[0])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), uregs[1])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), uregs[2])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), uregs[3])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), uregs[4])
> -#define PT_REGS_RET_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), uregs[14])
> -#define PT_REGS_FP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), uregs[11])
> -#define PT_REGS_RC_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), uregs[0])
> -#define PT_REGS_SP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), uregs[13])
> -#define PT_REGS_IP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), uregs[12])
> +#define __PT_PARM1_REG uregs[0]
> +#define __PT_PARM2_REG uregs[1]
> +#define __PT_PARM3_REG uregs[2]
> +#define __PT_PARM4_REG uregs[3]
> +#define __PT_PARM5_REG uregs[4]
> +#define __PT_RET_REG uregs[14]
> +#define __PT_FP_REG uregs[11] /* Works only with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER */
> +#define __PT_RC_REG uregs[0]
> +#define __PT_SP_REG uregs[13]
> +#define __PT_IP_REG uregs[12]
>
> #elif defined(bpf_target_arm64)
>
> /* arm64 provides struct user_pt_regs instead of struct pt_regs to userspace */
> -struct pt_regs;
> -#define PT_REGS_ARM64 const volatile struct user_pt_regs
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) (((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x))->regs[0])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) (((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x))->regs[1])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3(x) (((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x))->regs[2])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4(x) (((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x))->regs[3])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5(x) (((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x))->regs[4])
> -#define PT_REGS_RET(x) (((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x))->regs[30])
> -/* Works only with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER */
> -#define PT_REGS_FP(x) (((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x))->regs[29])
> -#define PT_REGS_RC(x) (((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x))->regs[0])
> -#define PT_REGS_SP(x) (((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x))->sp)
> -#define PT_REGS_IP(x) (((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x))->pc)
> -
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x), regs[0])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x), regs[1])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x), regs[2])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x), regs[3])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x), regs[4])
> -#define PT_REGS_RET_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x), regs[30])
> -#define PT_REGS_FP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x), regs[29])
> -#define PT_REGS_RC_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x), regs[0])
> -#define PT_REGS_SP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x), sp)
> -#define PT_REGS_IP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_ARM64 *)(x), pc)
> +#define __PT_REGS_CAST(x) ((const struct user_pt_regs *)(x))
> +#define __PT_PARM1_REG regs[0]
> +#define __PT_PARM2_REG regs[1]
> +#define __PT_PARM3_REG regs[2]
> +#define __PT_PARM4_REG regs[3]
> +#define __PT_PARM5_REG regs[4]
> +#define __PT_RET_REG regs[30]
> +#define __PT_FP_REG regs[29] /* Works only with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER */
> +#define __PT_RC_REG regs[0]
> +#define __PT_SP_REG sp
> +#define __PT_IP_REG pc
>
> #elif defined(bpf_target_mips)
>
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ((x)->regs[4])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) ((x)->regs[5])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3(x) ((x)->regs[6])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4(x) ((x)->regs[7])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5(x) ((x)->regs[8])
> -#define PT_REGS_RET(x) ((x)->regs[31])
> -#define PT_REGS_FP(x) ((x)->regs[30]) /* Works only with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER */
> -#define PT_REGS_RC(x) ((x)->regs[2])
> -#define PT_REGS_SP(x) ((x)->regs[29])
> -#define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->cp0_epc)
> -
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), regs[4])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), regs[5])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), regs[6])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), regs[7])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), regs[8])
> -#define PT_REGS_RET_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), regs[31])
> -#define PT_REGS_FP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), regs[30])
> -#define PT_REGS_RC_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), regs[2])
> -#define PT_REGS_SP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), regs[29])
> -#define PT_REGS_IP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), cp0_epc)
> +#define __PT_PARM1_REG regs[4]
> +#define __PT_PARM2_REG regs[5]
> +#define __PT_PARM3_REG regs[6]
> +#define __PT_PARM4_REG regs[7]
> +#define __PT_PARM5_REG regs[8]
> +#define __PT_RET_REG regs[31]
> +#define __PT_FP_REG regs[30] /* Works only with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER */
> +#define __PT_RC_REG regs[2]
> +#define __PT_SP_REG regs[29]
> +#define __PT_IP_REG cp0_epc
>
> #elif defined(bpf_target_powerpc)
>
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ((x)->gpr[3])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) ((x)->gpr[4])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3(x) ((x)->gpr[5])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4(x) ((x)->gpr[6])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5(x) ((x)->gpr[7])
> -#define PT_REGS_RC(x) ((x)->gpr[3])
> -#define PT_REGS_SP(x) ((x)->sp)
> -#define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->nip)
> -
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), gpr[3])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), gpr[4])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), gpr[5])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), gpr[6])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), gpr[7])
> -#define PT_REGS_RC_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), gpr[3])
> -#define PT_REGS_SP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), sp)
> -#define PT_REGS_IP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), nip)
> +#define __PT_PARM1_REG gpr[3]
> +#define __PT_PARM2_REG gpr[4]
> +#define __PT_PARM3_REG gpr[5]
> +#define __PT_PARM4_REG gpr[6]
> +#define __PT_PARM5_REG gpr[7]
> +#define __PT_RET_REG regs[31]
> +#define __PT_FP_REG __unsupported__
> +#define __PT_RC_REG gpr[3]
> +#define __PT_SP_REG sp
> +#define __PT_IP_REG nip
>
> #elif defined(bpf_target_sparc)
>
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ((x)->u_regs[UREG_I0])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) ((x)->u_regs[UREG_I1])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3(x) ((x)->u_regs[UREG_I2])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4(x) ((x)->u_regs[UREG_I3])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5(x) ((x)->u_regs[UREG_I4])
> -#define PT_REGS_RET(x) ((x)->u_regs[UREG_I7])
> -#define PT_REGS_RC(x) ((x)->u_regs[UREG_I0])
> -#define PT_REGS_SP(x) ((x)->u_regs[UREG_FP])
> -
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), u_regs[UREG_I0])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), u_regs[UREG_I1])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), u_regs[UREG_I2])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), u_regs[UREG_I3])
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), u_regs[UREG_I4])
> -#define PT_REGS_RET_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), u_regs[UREG_I7])
> -#define PT_REGS_RC_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), u_regs[UREG_I0])
> -#define PT_REGS_SP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), u_regs[UREG_FP])
> -
> +#define __PT_PARM1_REG u_regs[UREG_I0]
> +#define __PT_PARM2_REG u_regs[UREG_I1]
> +#define __PT_PARM3_REG u_regs[UREG_I2]
> +#define __PT_PARM4_REG u_regs[UREG_I3]
> +#define __PT_PARM5_REG u_regs[UREG_I4]
> +#define __PT_RET_REG u_regs[UREG_I7]
> +#define __PT_FP_REG __unsupported__
> +#define __PT_RC_REG u_regs[UREG_I0]
> +#define __PT_SP_REG u_regs[UREG_FP]
> /* Should this also be a bpf_target check for the sparc case? */
> #if defined(__arch64__)
> -#define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->tpc)
> -#define PT_REGS_IP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), tpc)
> +#define __PT_IP_REG tpc
> #else
> -#define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->pc)
> -#define PT_REGS_IP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((x), pc)
> +#define __PT_IP_REG pc
> #endif
>
> #elif defined(bpf_target_riscv)
>
> +#define __PT_REGS_CAST(x) ((const struct user_regs_struct *)(x))
> +#define __PT_PARM1_REG a0
> +#define __PT_PARM2_REG a1
> +#define __PT_PARM3_REG a2
> +#define __PT_PARM4_REG a3
> +#define __PT_PARM5_REG a4
> +#define __PT_RET_REG ra
> +#define __PT_FP_REG fp
> +#define __PT_RC_REG a5
> +#define __PT_SP_REG sp
> +#define __PT_IP_REG epc
> +
> +#endif
> +
> +#if defined(bpf_target_defined)
> +
> struct pt_regs;
> -#define PT_REGS_RV const volatile struct user_regs_struct
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) (((PT_REGS_RV *)(x))->a0)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) (((PT_REGS_RV *)(x))->a1)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3(x) (((PT_REGS_RV *)(x))->a2)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4(x) (((PT_REGS_RV *)(x))->a3)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5(x) (((PT_REGS_RV *)(x))->a4)
> -#define PT_REGS_RET(x) (((PT_REGS_RV *)(x))->ra)
> -#define PT_REGS_FP(x) (((PT_REGS_RV *)(x))->s5)
> -#define PT_REGS_RC(x) (((PT_REGS_RV *)(x))->a5)
> -#define PT_REGS_SP(x) (((PT_REGS_RV *)(x))->sp)
> -#define PT_REGS_IP(x) (((PT_REGS_RV *)(x))->epc)
> -
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_RV *)(x), a0)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM2_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_RV *)(x), a1)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM3_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_RV *)(x), a2)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM4_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_RV *)(x), a3)
> -#define PT_REGS_PARM5_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_RV *)(x), a4)
> -#define PT_REGS_RET_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_RV *)(x), ra)
> -#define PT_REGS_FP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_RV *)(x), fp)
> -#define PT_REGS_RC_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_RV *)(x), a5)
> -#define PT_REGS_SP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_RV *)(x), sp)
> -#define PT_REGS_IP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ((PT_REGS_RV *)(x), epc)
>
> +/* allow some architecutres to override `struct pt_regs` */
> +#ifndef __PT_REGS_CAST
> +#define __PT_REGS_CAST(x) (x)
> #endif
>
> +#define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) (__PT_REGS_CAST(x)->__PT_PARM1_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) (__PT_REGS_CAST(x)->__PT_PARM2_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_PARM3(x) (__PT_REGS_CAST(x)->__PT_PARM3_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_PARM4(x) (__PT_REGS_CAST(x)->__PT_PARM4_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_PARM5(x) (__PT_REGS_CAST(x)->__PT_PARM5_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_RET(x) (__PT_REGS_CAST(x)->__PT_RET_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_FP(x) (__PT_REGS_CAST(x)->__PT_FP_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_RC(x) (__PT_REGS_CAST(x)->__PT_RC_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_SP(x) (__PT_REGS_CAST(x)->__PT_SP_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_IP(x) (__PT_REGS_CAST(x)->__PT_IP_REG)
> +
> +#define PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ(__PT_REGS_CAST(x), __PT_PARM1_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_PARM2_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ(__PT_REGS_CAST(x), __PT_PARM2_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_PARM3_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ(__PT_REGS_CAST(x), __PT_PARM3_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_PARM4_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ(__PT_REGS_CAST(x), __PT_PARM4_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_PARM5_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ(__PT_REGS_CAST(x), __PT_PARM5_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_RET_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ(__PT_REGS_CAST(x), __PT_RET_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_FP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ(__PT_REGS_CAST(x), __PT_FP_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_RC_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ(__PT_REGS_CAST(x), __PT_RC_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_SP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ(__PT_REGS_CAST(x), __PT_SP_REG)
> +#define PT_REGS_IP_CORE(x) BPF_CORE_READ(__PT_REGS_CAST(x), __PT_IP_REG)
> +
> #if defined(bpf_target_powerpc)
> +
> #define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) ({ (ip) = (ctx)->link; })
> #define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP
> +
> #elif defined(bpf_target_sparc)
> +
> #define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) ({ (ip) = PT_REGS_RET(ctx); })
> #define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP
> -#elif defined(bpf_target_defined)
> +
> +#else
> +
> #define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) \
> ({ bpf_probe_read_kernel(&(ip), sizeof(ip), (void *)PT_REGS_RET(ctx)); })
> #define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) \
> - ({ bpf_probe_read_kernel(&(ip), sizeof(ip), \
> - (void *)(PT_REGS_FP(ctx) + sizeof(ip))); })
> + ({ bpf_probe_read_kernel(&(ip), sizeof(ip), (void *)(PT_REGS_FP(ctx) + sizeof(ip))); })
> +
> #endif
>
> -#if !defined(bpf_target_defined)
> +#else /* defined(bpf_target_defined) */
>
> #define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ({ _Pragma(__BPF_TARGET_MISSING); 0l; })
> #define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) ({ _Pragma(__BPF_TARGET_MISSING); 0l; })
> @@ -363,7 +290,7 @@ struct pt_regs;
> #define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) ({ _Pragma(__BPF_TARGET_MISSING); 0l; })
> #define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) ({ _Pragma(__BPF_TARGET_MISSING); 0l; })
>
> -#endif /* !defined(bpf_target_defined) */
> +#endif /* defined(bpf_target_defined) */
>
> #ifndef ___bpf_concat
> #define ___bpf_concat(a, b) a ## b
> --
> 2.30.2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions
2021-12-22 21:39 [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-22 21:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] libbpf: use 100-character limit to make bpf_tracing.h easier to read Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-22 21:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2021-12-23 0:26 ` Yonghong Song
2021-12-23 0:34 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-23 1:26 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2021-12-23 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko, bpf, ast, daniel
Cc: kernel-team, Kenta Tada, Hengqi Chen, Björn Töpel,
Ilya Leoshkevich
On 12/22/21 1:39 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Refactor PT_REGS macros definitions in bpf_tracing.h to avoid excessive
> duplication. We currently have classic PT_REGS_xxx() and CO-RE-enabled
> PT_REGS_xxx_CORE(). We are about to add also _SYSCALL variants, which
> would require excessive copying of all the per-architecture definitions.
>
> Instead, separate architecture-specific field/register names from the
> final macro that utilize them. That way for upcoming _SYSCALL variants
> we'll be able to just define x86_64 exception and otherwise have one
> common set of _SYSCALL macro definitions common for all architectures.
>
> Cc: Kenta Tada <Kenta.Tada@sony.com>
> Cc: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
> Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
I tried my best to compare old and new sources. Except "const volatile
struct user_pt_regs *" becomes "const struct user_pt_regs *", I didn't
spot any other semantic differences. Agree that "volatile" is not really
needed here. So
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions
2021-12-23 0:26 ` Yonghong Song
@ 2021-12-23 0:34 ` Andrii Nakryiko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2021-12-23 0:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yonghong Song
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko, bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
Kernel Team, Kenta Tada, Hengqi Chen, Björn Töpel,
Ilya Leoshkevich
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 4:27 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/22/21 1:39 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > Refactor PT_REGS macros definitions in bpf_tracing.h to avoid excessive
> > duplication. We currently have classic PT_REGS_xxx() and CO-RE-enabled
> > PT_REGS_xxx_CORE(). We are about to add also _SYSCALL variants, which
> > would require excessive copying of all the per-architecture definitions.
> >
> > Instead, separate architecture-specific field/register names from the
> > final macro that utilize them. That way for upcoming _SYSCALL variants
> > we'll be able to just define x86_64 exception and otherwise have one
> > common set of _SYSCALL macro definitions common for all architectures.
> >
> > Cc: Kenta Tada <Kenta.Tada@sony.com>
> > Cc: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
>
> I tried my best to compare old and new sources. Except "const volatile
> struct user_pt_regs *" becomes "const struct user_pt_regs *", I didn't
> spot any other semantic differences. Agree that "volatile" is not really
> needed here. So
Right. I also started out with adding volatile for x86-64 case, but
that immediately triggered compilation warning in selftests, so I
suspect that other arches would be triggering warnings in some cases
due to volatile. So I dropped it everywhere because the load should
still happen due to the pointer dereference.
>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions
2021-12-22 21:39 [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions Andrii Nakryiko
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-12-23 0:26 ` Yonghong Song
@ 2021-12-23 1:26 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-12-29 3:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ilya Leoshkevich @ 2021-12-23 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko, bpf, ast, daniel
Cc: kernel-team, Kenta Tada, Hengqi Chen, Björn Töpel
On Wed, 2021-12-22 at 13:39 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Refactor PT_REGS macros definitions in bpf_tracing.h to avoid
> excessive
> duplication. We currently have classic PT_REGS_xxx() and CO-RE-
> enabled
> PT_REGS_xxx_CORE(). We are about to add also _SYSCALL variants, which
> would require excessive copying of all the per-architecture
> definitions.
>
> Instead, separate architecture-specific field/register names from the
> final macro that utilize them. That way for upcoming _SYSCALL
> variants
> we'll be able to just define x86_64 exception and otherwise have one
> common set of _SYSCALL macro definitions common for all
> architectures.
>
> Cc: Kenta Tada <Kenta.Tada@sony.com>
> Cc: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
> Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 377 +++++++++++++++-------------------
> --
> 1 file changed, 152 insertions(+), 225 deletions(-)
Works fine on s390, and looks good to me.
For both patches:
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Best regards,
Ilya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions
2021-12-23 1:26 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
@ 2021-12-29 3:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2021-12-29 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ilya Leoshkevich
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko, bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
Kernel Team, Kenta Tada, Hengqi Chen, Björn Töpel
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 5:26 PM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-12-22 at 13:39 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > Refactor PT_REGS macros definitions in bpf_tracing.h to avoid
> > excessive
> > duplication. We currently have classic PT_REGS_xxx() and CO-RE-
> > enabled
> > PT_REGS_xxx_CORE(). We are about to add also _SYSCALL variants, which
> > would require excessive copying of all the per-architecture
> > definitions.
> >
> > Instead, separate architecture-specific field/register names from the
> > final macro that utilize them. That way for upcoming _SYSCALL
> > variants
> > we'll be able to just define x86_64 exception and otherwise have one
> > common set of _SYSCALL macro definitions common for all
> > architectures.
> >
> > Cc: Kenta Tada <Kenta.Tada@sony.com>
> > Cc: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 377 +++++++++++++++-------------------
> > --
> > 1 file changed, 152 insertions(+), 225 deletions(-)
>
> Works fine on s390, and looks good to me.
> For both patches:
>
> Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Applied this set and ubuntu kver patch.
Thanks everyone for reviewing and testing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread