bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/8] libbpf: Add bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts for multi kprobes
Date: Wed,  2 Feb 2022 14:53:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220202135333.190761-7-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220202135333.190761-1-jolsa@kernel.org>

Adding support to bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts to load kprobes
to multiple functions.

If the kprobe program has BPF_TRACE_FPROBE as expected_attach_type
it will use the new fprobe link to attach the program. In this case
it will use 'func_name' as pattern for functions to attach.

Adding also support to use '*' wildcard in 'kprobe/kretprobe' section
name by SEC macro, like:

  SEC("kprobe/bpf_fentry_test*")
  SEC("kretprobe/bpf_fentry_test*")

This will set kprobe's expected_attach_type to BPF_TRACE_FPROBE,
and attach it to provided functions pattern.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 133 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 7d595cfd03bc..6b343ef77ed8 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -8607,13 +8607,15 @@ static struct bpf_link *attach_trace(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie
 static struct bpf_link *attach_lsm(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie);
 static struct bpf_link *attach_iter(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie);
 
+static int init_kprobe(struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie);
+
 static const struct bpf_sec_def section_defs[] = {
 	SEC_DEF("socket",		SOCKET_FILTER, 0, SEC_NONE | SEC_SLOPPY_PFX),
 	SEC_DEF("sk_reuseport/migrate",	SK_REUSEPORT, BPF_SK_REUSEPORT_SELECT_OR_MIGRATE, SEC_ATTACHABLE | SEC_SLOPPY_PFX),
 	SEC_DEF("sk_reuseport",		SK_REUSEPORT, BPF_SK_REUSEPORT_SELECT, SEC_ATTACHABLE | SEC_SLOPPY_PFX),
-	SEC_DEF("kprobe/",		KPROBE,	0, SEC_NONE, attach_kprobe),
+	SEC_DEF("kprobe/",		KPROBE,	0, SEC_NONE, attach_kprobe, .init_fn = init_kprobe),
 	SEC_DEF("uprobe/",		KPROBE,	0, SEC_NONE),
-	SEC_DEF("kretprobe/",		KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE, attach_kprobe),
+	SEC_DEF("kretprobe/",		KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE, attach_kprobe, .init_fn = init_kprobe),
 	SEC_DEF("uretprobe/",		KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE),
 	SEC_DEF("tc",			SCHED_CLS, 0, SEC_NONE),
 	SEC_DEF("classifier",		SCHED_CLS, 0, SEC_NONE | SEC_SLOPPY_PFX | SEC_DEPRECATED),
@@ -10031,6 +10033,123 @@ static int perf_event_kprobe_open_legacy(const char *probe_name, bool retprobe,
 	return pfd;
 }
 
+struct fprobe_resolve {
+	const char *name;
+	__u64 *addrs;
+	__u32 alloc;
+	__u32 cnt;
+};
+
+static bool glob_matches(const char *glob, const char *s)
+{
+	int n = strlen(glob);
+
+	if (n == 1 && glob[0] == '*')
+		return true;
+
+	if (glob[0] == '*' && glob[n - 1] == '*') {
+		const char *subs;
+		/* substring match */
+
+		/* this is hacky, but we don't want to allocate
+		 * for no good reason
+		 */
+		((char *)glob)[n - 1] = '\0';
+		subs = strstr(s, glob + 1);
+		((char *)glob)[n - 1] = '*';
+
+		return subs != NULL;
+	} else if (glob[0] == '*') {
+		size_t nn = strlen(s);
+		/* suffix match */
+
+		/* too short for a given suffix */
+		if (nn < n - 1)
+			return false;
+		return strcmp(s + nn - (n - 1), glob + 1) == 0;
+	} else if (glob[n - 1] == '*') {
+		/* prefix match */
+		return strncmp(s, glob, n - 1) == 0;
+	} else {
+		/* exact match */
+		return strcmp(glob, s) == 0;
+	}
+}
+
+static int resolve_fprobe_cb(void *arg, unsigned long long sym_addr,
+			     char sym_type, const char *sym_name)
+{
+	struct fprobe_resolve *res = arg;
+	__u64 *p;
+
+	if (!glob_matches(res->name, sym_name))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (res->cnt == res->alloc) {
+		res->alloc = max((__u32) 16, res->alloc * 3 / 2);
+		p = libbpf_reallocarray(res->addrs, res->alloc, sizeof(__u32));
+		if (!p)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+		res->addrs = p;
+	}
+	res->addrs[res->cnt++] = sym_addr;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct bpf_link *
+attach_fprobe_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,
+		   const char *func_name,
+		   const struct bpf_kprobe_opts *kopts)
+{
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_create_opts, opts);
+	struct fprobe_resolve res = {
+		.name = func_name,
+	};
+	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
+	char errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
+	int err, link_fd, prog_fd;
+	bool retprobe;
+
+	err = libbpf__kallsyms_parse(&res, resolve_fprobe_cb);
+	if (err)
+		goto error;
+	if (!res.cnt) {
+		err = -ENOENT;
+		goto error;
+	}
+
+	retprobe = OPTS_GET(kopts, retprobe, false);
+
+	opts.fprobe.addrs = (__u64) res.addrs;
+	opts.fprobe.cnt = res.cnt;
+	opts.flags = retprobe ? BPF_F_FPROBE_RETURN : 0;
+
+	link = calloc(1, sizeof(*link));
+	if (!link) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto error;
+	}
+	link->detach = &bpf_link__detach_fd;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog);
+	link_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, 0, BPF_TRACE_FPROBE, &opts);
+	if (link_fd < 0) {
+		err = -errno;
+		pr_warn("prog '%s': failed to attach to %s: %s\n",
+			prog->name, res.name,
+			libbpf_strerror_r(err, errmsg, sizeof(errmsg)));
+		goto error;
+	}
+	link->fd = link_fd;
+	free(res.addrs);
+	return link;
+
+error:
+	free(link);
+	free(res.addrs);
+	return libbpf_err_ptr(err);
+}
+
 struct bpf_link *
 bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,
 				const char *func_name,
@@ -10047,6 +10166,9 @@ bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,
 	if (!OPTS_VALID(opts, bpf_kprobe_opts))
 		return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);
 
+	if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_FPROBE)
+		return attach_fprobe_opts(prog, func_name, opts);
+
 	retprobe = OPTS_GET(opts, retprobe, false);
 	offset = OPTS_GET(opts, offset, 0);
 	pe_opts.bpf_cookie = OPTS_GET(opts, bpf_cookie, 0);
@@ -10112,6 +10234,14 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_kprobe(const struct bpf_program *prog,
 	return bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(prog, func_name, &opts);
 }
 
+static int init_kprobe(struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie)
+{
+	/* If we have wildcard, switch to fprobe link. */
+	if (strchr(prog->sec_name, '*'))
+		bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, BPF_TRACE_FPROBE);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static struct bpf_link *attach_kprobe(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie)
 {
 	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_opts, opts);
@@ -10127,7 +10257,7 @@ static struct bpf_link *attach_kprobe(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cooki
 	else
 		func_name = prog->sec_name + sizeof("kprobe/") - 1;
 
-	n = sscanf(func_name, "%m[a-zA-Z0-9_.]+%li", &func, &offset);
+	n = sscanf(func_name, "%m[a-zA-Z0-9_.*]+%li", &func, &offset);
 	if (n < 1) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		pr_warn("kprobe name is invalid: %s\n", func_name);
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-02 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-02 13:53 [PATCH 0/8] bpf: Add fprobe link Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 13:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] bpf: Add support to attach kprobe program with fprobe Jiri Olsa
2022-02-07 18:59   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-08  8:56     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] bpf: Add bpf_get_func_ip kprobe helper for fprobe link Jiri Olsa
2022-02-07 18:59   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-07 21:01     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-09 15:01     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-09 16:05       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-09 19:14         ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 13:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] bpf: Add bpf_cookie support to fprobe Jiri Olsa
2022-02-07 18:59   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-08  9:07     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-08 23:35       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-08 23:46         ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-08 23:53           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-02 13:53 ` [PATCH 4/8] libbpf: Add libbpf__kallsyms_parse function Jiri Olsa
2022-02-07 18:59   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-08  9:08     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 13:53 ` [PATCH 5/8] libbpf: Add bpf_link_create support for multi kprobes Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 13:53 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2022-02-07 18:59   ` [PATCH 6/8] libbpf: Add bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts " Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-08  9:12     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 13:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] selftest/bpf: Add fprobe attach test Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 13:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] selftest/bpf: Add fprobe test for bpf_cookie values Jiri Olsa
2022-02-07 18:59   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-08  9:15     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-08 23:24       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-02 17:09 ` [PATCH 0/8] bpf: Add fprobe link Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-02 17:24   ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 17:30     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-03 15:06       ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-04  0:46         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-02-04  1:34           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-04  2:07             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-02-04  2:12               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-04  2:19                 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-02-04  2:42                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-04  3:17                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-02-04  3:59                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-02-15 13:21                       ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-16 18:27                         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-17 14:03                           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-02-17 22:01                             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-18  4:07                               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-02-18 19:46                                 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-19  2:10                                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-21  7:18                                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-02-22 12:42                           ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-04  3:14                 ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220202135333.190761-7-jolsa@kernel.org \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).