From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] bpf: Add fprobe link
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 11:07:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220204110704.7c6eaf43ff9c8f5fe9bf3179@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQJYY0Xm6M9O02E5rOkdQPX39NOOS4tM2jpwRLQvP-qDBg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 17:34:54 -0800
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 4:46 PM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > I thought What Alexei pointed was that don't expose the FPROBE name
> > to user space. If so, I agree with that. We can continue to use
> > KPROBE for user space. Using fprobe is just for kernel implementation.
>
> Clearly that intent is not working.
Thanks for confirmation :-)
> The "fprobe" name is already leaking outside of the kernel internals.
> The module interface is being proposed.
Yes, but that is only for making the example module.
It is easy for me to enclose it inside kernel. I'm preparing KUnit
selftest code for next version. After integrated that, we don't need
that example module anymore.
> You'd need to document it, etc.
Yes, I've added a document of the APIs for the series. :-)
> I think it's only causing confusion to users.
> The new name serves no additional purpose other than
> being new and unheard of.
> fprobe is kprobe on ftrace. That's it.
No, fprobe is NOT kprobe on ftrace, kprobe on ftrace is already implemented
transparently.
> Just call it kprobe on ftrace in api and everywhere.
> Please?
Hmm, no, I think that's the work for who provide user-interface, isn't it?.
Inside kernel, IMHO, the interface named from the programing viewpoint, and
from that viewpoint, fprobe and kprobe interface are similar but different.
I'm able to allow kprobe-event (of ftrace) to accept "func*" (yeah, that's
actually good idea), but ftrace interface will not export as fprobe. Even if
it internally uses fprobe, I don't call it fprobe. It's kprobes from the
viewpoint of ftrace user. (Yeah, I think it should be called as
"dynamic-probe-event-for-kernel" but historically, it is called as kprobe-event.)
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-04 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-02 13:53 [PATCH 0/8] bpf: Add fprobe link Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 13:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] bpf: Add support to attach kprobe program with fprobe Jiri Olsa
2022-02-07 18:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-08 8:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] bpf: Add bpf_get_func_ip kprobe helper for fprobe link Jiri Olsa
2022-02-07 18:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-07 21:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-09 15:01 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-09 16:05 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-09 19:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 13:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] bpf: Add bpf_cookie support to fprobe Jiri Olsa
2022-02-07 18:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-08 9:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-08 23:35 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-08 23:46 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-08 23:53 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-02 13:53 ` [PATCH 4/8] libbpf: Add libbpf__kallsyms_parse function Jiri Olsa
2022-02-07 18:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-08 9:08 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 13:53 ` [PATCH 5/8] libbpf: Add bpf_link_create support for multi kprobes Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 13:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] libbpf: Add bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts " Jiri Olsa
2022-02-07 18:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-08 9:12 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 13:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] selftest/bpf: Add fprobe attach test Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 13:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] selftest/bpf: Add fprobe test for bpf_cookie values Jiri Olsa
2022-02-07 18:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-08 9:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-08 23:24 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-02 17:09 ` [PATCH 0/8] bpf: Add fprobe link Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-02 17:24 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-02 17:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-03 15:06 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-04 0:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-02-04 1:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-04 2:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2022-02-04 2:12 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-04 2:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-02-04 2:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-04 3:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-02-04 3:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-02-15 13:21 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-16 18:27 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-17 14:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-02-17 22:01 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-18 4:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-02-18 19:46 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-19 2:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-21 7:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-02-22 12:42 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-04 3:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220204110704.7c6eaf43ff9c8f5fe9bf3179@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).