* [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: don't allocate 16M for log buffer by default @ 2020-03-24 23:31 Stanislav Fomichev 2020-03-24 23:45 ` Andrii Nakryiko 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2020-03-24 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev, bpf; +Cc: davem, ast, daniel, Stanislav Fomichev For each prog/btf load we allocate and free 16 megs of verifier buffer. On production systems it doesn't really make sense because the programs/btf have gone through extensive testing and (mostly) guaranteed to successfully load. Let's switch to a much smaller buffer by default (128 bytes, sys_bpf doesn't accept smaller log buffer) and resize it if the kernel returns ENOSPC. On the first ENOSPC error we resize the buffer to BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE and then, on each subsequent ENOSPC, we keep doubling the buffer. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> --- tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 10 +++++++++- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 10 ++++++++-- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c index 3d1c25fc97ae..53c7efc3b347 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c @@ -657,13 +657,14 @@ int btf__finalize_data(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf) int btf__load(struct btf *btf) { - __u32 log_buf_size = BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE; + __u32 log_buf_size = BPF_MIN_LOG_BUF_SIZE; char *log_buf = NULL; int err = 0; if (btf->fd >= 0) return -EEXIST; +retry_load: log_buf = malloc(log_buf_size); if (!log_buf) return -ENOMEM; @@ -673,6 +674,13 @@ int btf__load(struct btf *btf) btf->fd = bpf_load_btf(btf->data, btf->data_size, log_buf, log_buf_size, false); if (btf->fd < 0) { + if (errno == ENOSPC) { + log_buf_size = max((__u32)BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE, + log_buf_size << 1); + free(log_buf); + goto retry_load; + } + err = -errno; pr_warn("Error loading BTF: %s(%d)\n", strerror(errno), errno); if (*log_buf) diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c index 085e41f9b68e..793c81b35ccc 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c @@ -4855,7 +4855,7 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt, { struct bpf_load_program_attr load_attr; char *cp, errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE]; - int log_buf_size = BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE; + size_t log_buf_size = BPF_MIN_LOG_BUF_SIZE; char *log_buf; int btf_fd, ret; @@ -4911,7 +4911,13 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt, } if (errno == ENOSPC) { - log_buf_size <<= 1; + if (errno == ENOSPC) { + log_buf_size = max((size_t)BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE, + log_buf_size << 1); + free(log_buf); + goto retry_load; + } + free(log_buf); goto retry_load; } diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h index 8c3afbd97747..2720f3366798 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ #define BTF_PARAM_ENC(name, type) (name), (type) #define BTF_VAR_SECINFO_ENC(type, offset, size) (type), (offset), (size) +#define BPF_MIN_LOG_BUF_SIZE 128 + #ifndef min # define min(x, y) ((x) < (y) ? (x) : (y)) #endif -- 2.25.1.696.g5e7596f4ac-goog ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: don't allocate 16M for log buffer by default 2020-03-24 23:31 [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: don't allocate 16M for log buffer by default Stanislav Fomichev @ 2020-03-24 23:45 ` Andrii Nakryiko 2020-03-24 23:59 ` Stanislav Fomichev 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2020-03-24 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stanislav Fomichev Cc: Networking, bpf, David S. Miller, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:31 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote: > > For each prog/btf load we allocate and free 16 megs of verifier buffer. > On production systems it doesn't really make sense because the > programs/btf have gone through extensive testing and (mostly) guaranteed > to successfully load. > > Let's switch to a much smaller buffer by default (128 bytes, sys_bpf > doesn't accept smaller log buffer) and resize it if the kernel returns > ENOSPC. On the first ENOSPC error we resize the buffer to BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE > and then, on each subsequent ENOSPC, we keep doubling the buffer. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> > --- > tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 10 +++++++++- > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 10 ++++++++-- > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 2 ++ > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c > index 3d1c25fc97ae..53c7efc3b347 100644 > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c > @@ -657,13 +657,14 @@ int btf__finalize_data(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf) > > int btf__load(struct btf *btf) > { > - __u32 log_buf_size = BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE; > + __u32 log_buf_size = BPF_MIN_LOG_BUF_SIZE; > char *log_buf = NULL; > int err = 0; > > if (btf->fd >= 0) > return -EEXIST; > > +retry_load: > log_buf = malloc(log_buf_size); > if (!log_buf) > return -ENOMEM; I'd argue that on first try we shouldn't allocate log_buf at all, then start allocating it using reasonable starting size (see below). > @@ -673,6 +674,13 @@ int btf__load(struct btf *btf) > btf->fd = bpf_load_btf(btf->data, btf->data_size, > log_buf, log_buf_size, false); > if (btf->fd < 0) { > + if (errno == ENOSPC) { > + log_buf_size = max((__u32)BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE, > + log_buf_size << 1); > + free(log_buf); > + goto retry_load; > + } > + > err = -errno; > pr_warn("Error loading BTF: %s(%d)\n", strerror(errno), errno); > if (*log_buf) > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > index 085e41f9b68e..793c81b35ccc 100644 > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > @@ -4855,7 +4855,7 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt, > { > struct bpf_load_program_attr load_attr; > char *cp, errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE]; > - int log_buf_size = BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE; > + size_t log_buf_size = BPF_MIN_LOG_BUF_SIZE; > char *log_buf; > int btf_fd, ret; > > @@ -4911,7 +4911,13 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt, > } > > if (errno == ENOSPC) { same, doing if (!log_buf || errno == ENOSPC) should handle this without any other major changes? > - log_buf_size <<= 1; > + if (errno == ENOSPC) { > + log_buf_size = max((size_t)BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE, > + log_buf_size << 1); > + free(log_buf); > + goto retry_load; > + } > + > free(log_buf); > goto retry_load; > } > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h > index 8c3afbd97747..2720f3366798 100644 > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h > @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ > #define BTF_PARAM_ENC(name, type) (name), (type) > #define BTF_VAR_SECINFO_ENC(type, offset, size) (type), (offset), (size) > > +#define BPF_MIN_LOG_BUF_SIZE 128 This seems way too low, if there is some error it almost certainly will be too short, probably for few iterations, just causing waste. Let's make it something a bit more reasonable, like 32KB or something? > + > #ifndef min > # define min(x, y) ((x) < (y) ? (x) : (y)) > #endif > -- > 2.25.1.696.g5e7596f4ac-goog > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: don't allocate 16M for log buffer by default 2020-03-24 23:45 ` Andrii Nakryiko @ 2020-03-24 23:59 ` Stanislav Fomichev 2020-03-25 0:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2020-03-24 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Stanislav Fomichev, Networking, bpf, David S. Miller, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann On 03/24, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:31 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote: > > > > For each prog/btf load we allocate and free 16 megs of verifier buffer. > > On production systems it doesn't really make sense because the > > programs/btf have gone through extensive testing and (mostly) guaranteed > > to successfully load. > > > > Let's switch to a much smaller buffer by default (128 bytes, sys_bpf > > doesn't accept smaller log buffer) and resize it if the kernel returns > > ENOSPC. On the first ENOSPC error we resize the buffer to BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE > > and then, on each subsequent ENOSPC, we keep doubling the buffer. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> > > --- > > tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 10 +++++++++- > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 10 ++++++++-- > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 2 ++ > > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c > > index 3d1c25fc97ae..53c7efc3b347 100644 > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c > > @@ -657,13 +657,14 @@ int btf__finalize_data(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf) > > > > int btf__load(struct btf *btf) > > { > > - __u32 log_buf_size = BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE; > > + __u32 log_buf_size = BPF_MIN_LOG_BUF_SIZE; > > char *log_buf = NULL; > > int err = 0; > > > > if (btf->fd >= 0) > > return -EEXIST; > > > > +retry_load: > > log_buf = malloc(log_buf_size); > > if (!log_buf) > > return -ENOMEM; > > I'd argue that on first try we shouldn't allocate log_buf at all, then > start allocating it using reasonable starting size (see below). Agreed, makes sense. > > @@ -673,6 +674,13 @@ int btf__load(struct btf *btf) > > btf->fd = bpf_load_btf(btf->data, btf->data_size, > > log_buf, log_buf_size, false); > > if (btf->fd < 0) { > > + if (errno == ENOSPC) { > > + log_buf_size = max((__u32)BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE, > > + log_buf_size << 1); > > + free(log_buf); > > + goto retry_load; > > + } > > + > > err = -errno; > > pr_warn("Error loading BTF: %s(%d)\n", strerror(errno), errno); > > if (*log_buf) > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > index 085e41f9b68e..793c81b35ccc 100644 > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > @@ -4855,7 +4855,7 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt, > > { > > struct bpf_load_program_attr load_attr; > > char *cp, errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE]; > > - int log_buf_size = BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE; > > + size_t log_buf_size = BPF_MIN_LOG_BUF_SIZE; > > char *log_buf; > > int btf_fd, ret; > > > > @@ -4911,7 +4911,13 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt, > > } > > > > if (errno == ENOSPC) { > > same, doing if (!log_buf || errno == ENOSPC) should handle this > without any other major changes? Yeah, I don't see why it shouldn't. Let me try to see if I hit something in the selftests with that approach. > > - log_buf_size <<= 1; > > + if (errno == ENOSPC) { > > + log_buf_size = max((size_t)BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE, > > + log_buf_size << 1); > > + free(log_buf); > > + goto retry_load; > > + } > > + > > free(log_buf); > > goto retry_load; > > } > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h > > index 8c3afbd97747..2720f3366798 100644 > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h > > @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ > > #define BTF_PARAM_ENC(name, type) (name), (type) > > #define BTF_VAR_SECINFO_ENC(type, offset, size) (type), (offset), (size) > > > > +#define BPF_MIN_LOG_BUF_SIZE 128 > > This seems way too low, if there is some error it almost certainly > will be too short, probably for few iterations, just causing waste. > Let's make it something a bit more reasonable, like 32KB or something? In this case, maybe start with the existing 16M BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE? My goal here is optimize for the successful case. If there is an error the size shouldn't matter that much. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: don't allocate 16M for log buffer by default 2020-03-24 23:59 ` Stanislav Fomichev @ 2020-03-25 0:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko 2020-03-25 9:54 ` Daniel Borkmann 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2020-03-25 0:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stanislav Fomichev Cc: Stanislav Fomichev, Networking, bpf, David S. Miller, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:59 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me> wrote: > > On 03/24, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:31 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote: > > > > > > For each prog/btf load we allocate and free 16 megs of verifier buffer. > > > On production systems it doesn't really make sense because the > > > programs/btf have gone through extensive testing and (mostly) guaranteed > > > to successfully load. > > > > > > Let's switch to a much smaller buffer by default (128 bytes, sys_bpf > > > doesn't accept smaller log buffer) and resize it if the kernel returns > > > ENOSPC. On the first ENOSPC error we resize the buffer to BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE > > > and then, on each subsequent ENOSPC, we keep doubling the buffer. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> > > > --- > > > tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 10 +++++++++- > > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 10 ++++++++-- > > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 2 ++ > > > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c > > > index 3d1c25fc97ae..53c7efc3b347 100644 > > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c > > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c > > > @@ -657,13 +657,14 @@ int btf__finalize_data(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf) > > > > > > int btf__load(struct btf *btf) > > > { > > > - __u32 log_buf_size = BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE; > > > + __u32 log_buf_size = BPF_MIN_LOG_BUF_SIZE; > > > char *log_buf = NULL; > > > int err = 0; > > > > > > if (btf->fd >= 0) > > > return -EEXIST; > > > > > > +retry_load: > > > log_buf = malloc(log_buf_size); > > > if (!log_buf) > > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > I'd argue that on first try we shouldn't allocate log_buf at all, then > > start allocating it using reasonable starting size (see below). > Agreed, makes sense. > > > > @@ -673,6 +674,13 @@ int btf__load(struct btf *btf) > > > btf->fd = bpf_load_btf(btf->data, btf->data_size, > > > log_buf, log_buf_size, false); > > > if (btf->fd < 0) { > > > + if (errno == ENOSPC) { > > > + log_buf_size = max((__u32)BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE, > > > + log_buf_size << 1); > > > + free(log_buf); > > > + goto retry_load; > > > + } > > > + > > > err = -errno; > > > pr_warn("Error loading BTF: %s(%d)\n", strerror(errno), errno); > > > if (*log_buf) > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > > index 085e41f9b68e..793c81b35ccc 100644 > > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > > @@ -4855,7 +4855,7 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt, > > > { > > > struct bpf_load_program_attr load_attr; > > > char *cp, errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE]; > > > - int log_buf_size = BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE; > > > + size_t log_buf_size = BPF_MIN_LOG_BUF_SIZE; > > > char *log_buf; > > > int btf_fd, ret; > > > > > > @@ -4911,7 +4911,13 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt, > > > } > > > > > > if (errno == ENOSPC) { > > > > same, doing if (!log_buf || errno == ENOSPC) should handle this > > without any other major changes? > Yeah, I don't see why it shouldn't. Let me try to see if I hit something > in the selftests with that approach. > > > > - log_buf_size <<= 1; > > > + if (errno == ENOSPC) { > > > + log_buf_size = max((size_t)BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE, > > > + log_buf_size << 1); > > > + free(log_buf); > > > + goto retry_load; > > > + } > > > + > > > free(log_buf); > > > goto retry_load; > > > } > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h > > > index 8c3afbd97747..2720f3366798 100644 > > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h > > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h > > > @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ > > > #define BTF_PARAM_ENC(name, type) (name), (type) > > > #define BTF_VAR_SECINFO_ENC(type, offset, size) (type), (offset), (size) > > > > > > +#define BPF_MIN_LOG_BUF_SIZE 128 > > > > This seems way too low, if there is some error it almost certainly > > will be too short, probably for few iterations, just causing waste. > > Let's make it something a bit more reasonable, like 32KB or something? > In this case, maybe start with the existing 16M BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE? > My goal here is optimize for the successful case. If there is an error the > size shouldn't matter that much. Not feeling strongly. But we already will have a retry loop, so not too hard to do it in steps. Then also errors do happen in production as well, and it would be good to not eat too much memory unnecessarily. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: don't allocate 16M for log buffer by default 2020-03-25 0:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko @ 2020-03-25 9:54 ` Daniel Borkmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2020-03-25 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrii Nakryiko, Stanislav Fomichev Cc: Stanislav Fomichev, Networking, bpf, David S. Miller, Alexei Starovoitov On 3/25/20 1:08 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:59 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me> wrote: >> On 03/24, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:31 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> For each prog/btf load we allocate and free 16 megs of verifier buffer. >>>> On production systems it doesn't really make sense because the >>>> programs/btf have gone through extensive testing and (mostly) guaranteed >>>> to successfully load. >>>> >>>> Let's switch to a much smaller buffer by default (128 bytes, sys_bpf >>>> doesn't accept smaller log buffer) and resize it if the kernel returns >>>> ENOSPC. On the first ENOSPC error we resize the buffer to BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE >>>> and then, on each subsequent ENOSPC, we keep doubling the buffer. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> >>>> --- >>>> tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 10 +++++++++- >>>> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 10 ++++++++-- >>>> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 2 ++ >>>> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c >>>> index 3d1c25fc97ae..53c7efc3b347 100644 >>>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c >>>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c >>>> @@ -657,13 +657,14 @@ int btf__finalize_data(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf) >>>> >>>> int btf__load(struct btf *btf) >>>> { >>>> - __u32 log_buf_size = BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE; >>>> + __u32 log_buf_size = BPF_MIN_LOG_BUF_SIZE; >>>> char *log_buf = NULL; >>>> int err = 0; >>>> >>>> if (btf->fd >= 0) >>>> return -EEXIST; >>>> >>>> +retry_load: >>>> log_buf = malloc(log_buf_size); >>>> if (!log_buf) >>>> return -ENOMEM; >>> >>> I'd argue that on first try we shouldn't allocate log_buf at all, then >>> start allocating it using reasonable starting size (see below). >> Agreed, makes sense. The iproute2 BPF loader does the first try without any log buffer, and then successively increases the size on failure [0]. libbpf should also assume the success case in the very first run, and only then redo the load attempt with log buffer to avoid the overhead. [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/iproute2/iproute2.git/tree/lib/bpf.c >>>> @@ -673,6 +674,13 @@ int btf__load(struct btf *btf) >>>> btf->fd = bpf_load_btf(btf->data, btf->data_size, >>>> log_buf, log_buf_size, false); >>>> if (btf->fd < 0) { >>>> + if (errno == ENOSPC) { >>>> + log_buf_size = max((__u32)BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE, >>>> + log_buf_size << 1); >>>> + free(log_buf); >>>> + goto retry_load; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> err = -errno; >>>> pr_warn("Error loading BTF: %s(%d)\n", strerror(errno), errno); >>>> if (*log_buf) [...] >>>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h >>>> index 8c3afbd97747..2720f3366798 100644 >>>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h >>>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h >>>> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ >>>> #define BTF_PARAM_ENC(name, type) (name), (type) >>>> #define BTF_VAR_SECINFO_ENC(type, offset, size) (type), (offset), (size) >>>> >>>> +#define BPF_MIN_LOG_BUF_SIZE 128 >>> >>> This seems way too low, if there is some error it almost certainly >>> will be too short, probably for few iterations, just causing waste. >>> Let's make it something a bit more reasonable, like 32KB or something? >> In this case, maybe start with the existing 16M BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE? >> My goal here is optimize for the successful case. If there is an error the >> size shouldn't matter that much. > > Not feeling strongly. But we already will have a retry loop, so not > too hard to do it in steps. Then also errors do happen in production > as well, and it would be good to not eat too much memory > unnecessarily. Yeah, 128 is way too low. Either we should just malloc the max possible size right away, or make it a two-step approach where we first try with half the size and only if that fails we retry with the max size. Given programs can be very complex this will otherwise just prolong the time unnecessarily for the failure verdict and unnecessarily puts load on the verifier. Thanks, Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-25 9:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-03-24 23:31 [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: don't allocate 16M for log buffer by default Stanislav Fomichev 2020-03-24 23:45 ` Andrii Nakryiko 2020-03-24 23:59 ` Stanislav Fomichev 2020-03-25 0:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko 2020-03-25 9:54 ` Daniel Borkmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).