From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>,
zohar@linux.ibm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com,
jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, eparis@parisplace.org,
reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
nicolas.bouchinet@clip-os.org,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/4] security: Allow all LSMs to provide xattrs for inode_init_security hook
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 16:49:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhTO02CGUt0DUUmx=TUYS7Q81fas_Qy5miOFonaye0NEmw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83ddfcb9-b4a6-71b4-a20c-62f484c8e040@schaufler-ca.com>
On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 4:43 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> On 4/5/2023 12:59 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 5:44 AM Roberto Sassu
> > <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> wrote:
> >> On 4/5/2023 4:08 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >>> On 4/4/2023 11:54 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 8:33 AM Roberto Sassu
> >>>> <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> wrote:
> > ..
> >
> >>>>> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> >>>>> index cfcbb748da2..8392983334b 100644
> >>>>> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> >>>>> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> >>>>> @@ -52,6 +52,15 @@
> >>>>> #define SMK_RECEIVING 1
> >>>>> #define SMK_SENDING 2
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +/*
> >>>>> + * Smack uses multiple xattrs.
> >>>>> + * SMACK64 - for access control, SMACK64EXEC - label for the program,
> >>>> I think it would be good to move SMACK64EXEC to its own line; it took
> >>>> me a minute to figure out why SMACK_INODE_INIT_XATTRS was set to '4'
> >>>> when I only say three comment lines ... ;)
> >>>>
> >>>>> + * SMACK64MMAP - controls library loading,
> >>>>> + * SMACK64TRANSMUTE - label initialization,
> >>>>> + * Not saved on files - SMACK64IPIN and SMACK64IPOUT
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> +#define SMACK_INODE_INIT_XATTRS 4
> >>>> If smack_inode_init_security() only ever populates a single xattr, and
> >>>> that is the only current user of SMACK_INODE_INIT_XATTRS, can we make
> >>>> this '1' and shrink the xattr allocation a bit?
> >>> If the parent directory is marked with SMACK64_TRANSMUTE, the access
> >>> rule allowing the access has the "t" mode, and the object being initialized
> >>> is a directory, the new inode should get the SMACK64_TRANSMUTE attribute.
> >>> The callers of security_inode_init_security() don't seem to care.
> >>> I can't say if the evm code is getting SMACK64_TRANSMUTE or, for that
> >>> matter, SMACK64_EXEC and SMACK64_MMAP, some other way. The older system
> >>> allowed for multiple Smack xattrs, but I'm not clear on exactly how.
> >> If you like to set an additional xattr, that would be possible now.
> >> Since we reserve multiple xattrs, we can call lsm_get_xattr_slot()
> >> another time and set SMACK64_TRANSMUTE.
> >>
> >> I think, if the kernel config has CONFIG_EVM_EXTRA_SMACK_XATTRS set,
> >> EVM would protect SMACK64_TRANSMUTE too.
> >
> > Ooookay, but can someone explain to me how either the current, or
> > patched, smack_inode_init_security() function can return multiple
> > xattrs via the security_inode_init_security() LSM hook?
>
> It can't.
I didn't think so.
To be really specific, that's what we're talking about with this
patch: the number of xattrs that smack_inode_init_security() can
return to the LSM hook (and EVM, and the caller ...). If it's only
ever going to be one, I think we can adjust the
'SMACK_INODE_INIT_XATTRS' down to '1' and save ourselves some
allocation space.
--
paul-moore.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-05 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-31 12:32 [PATCH v10 0/4] evm: Do HMAC of multiple per LSM xattrs for new inodes Roberto Sassu
2023-03-31 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 1/4] reiserfs: Add security prefix to xattr name in reiserfs_security_write() Roberto Sassu
2023-04-04 18:25 ` Paul Moore
2023-03-31 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 2/4] security: Allow all LSMs to provide xattrs for inode_init_security hook Roberto Sassu
2023-04-04 18:54 ` Paul Moore
2023-04-05 2:08 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-04-05 9:43 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-04-05 19:59 ` Paul Moore
2023-04-05 20:43 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-04-05 20:49 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2023-04-05 21:07 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-04-06 9:14 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-04-06 16:17 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-04-06 9:08 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-04-11 7:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-04-11 7:53 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-04-11 16:42 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-04-11 17:23 ` [PATCH] Smack modifications for: " Roberto Sassu
2023-04-11 17:54 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-04-12 7:22 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-04-12 20:29 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-04-13 7:11 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-04-17 16:41 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-04-18 7:05 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-04-18 16:02 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-04-19 13:46 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-04-19 19:25 ` Mengchi Cheng
2023-04-20 8:48 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-05-08 12:29 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-05-09 23:44 ` Mengchi Cheng
2023-05-09 23:56 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-04-19 21:00 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-04-20 8:50 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-04-20 10:44 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-04-20 14:10 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-04-11 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 2/4] " Roberto Sassu
2023-04-11 17:40 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-03-31 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 3/4] evm: Align evm_inode_init_security() definition with LSM infrastructure Roberto Sassu
2023-04-04 18:56 ` Paul Moore
2023-04-11 7:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-04-11 7:58 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-03-31 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 4/4] evm: Support multiple LSMs providing an xattr Roberto Sassu
2023-04-11 7:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-04-03 10:36 ` [PATCH v10 0/4] evm: Do HMAC of multiple per LSM xattrs for new inodes Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHC9VhTO02CGUt0DUUmx=TUYS7Q81fas_Qy5miOFonaye0NEmw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.bouchinet@clip-os.org \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).