From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 16/18] ceph: add support to readdir for encrypted filenames
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 22:34:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200908053459.GN68127@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200904160537.76663-17-jlayton@kernel.org>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 12:05:35PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/crypto.h b/fs/ceph/crypto.h
> index 1b11e9af165e..88c672ccdcf8 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/crypto.h
> +++ b/fs/ceph/crypto.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
> #ifndef _CEPH_CRYPTO_H
> #define _CEPH_CRYPTO_H
>
> +#include <linux/fscrypt.h>
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION
>
> #define CEPH_XATTR_NAME_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT "encryption.ctx"
> @@ -16,6 +18,29 @@ int ceph_fscrypt_set_ops(struct super_block *sb);
> int ceph_fscrypt_prepare_context(struct inode *dir, struct inode *inode,
> struct ceph_acl_sec_ctx *as);
>
> +static inline int ceph_fname_alloc_buffer(struct inode *parent, struct fscrypt_str *fname)
> +{
> + if (!IS_ENCRYPTED(parent))
> + return 0;
> + return fscrypt_fname_alloc_buffer(NAME_MAX, fname);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ceph_fname_free_buffer(struct inode *parent, struct fscrypt_str *fname)
> +{
> + if (IS_ENCRYPTED(parent))
> + fscrypt_fname_free_buffer(fname);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int ceph_get_encryption_info(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + if (!IS_ENCRYPTED(inode))
> + return 0;
> + return fscrypt_get_encryption_info(inode);
> +}
> +
> +int ceph_fname_to_usr(struct inode *parent, char *name, u32 len,
> + struct fscrypt_str *tname, struct fscrypt_str *oname);
> +
> #else /* CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION */
>
> #define DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED(fsc) (0)
> @@ -31,6 +56,28 @@ static inline int ceph_fscrypt_prepare_context(struct inode *dir, struct inode *
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline int ceph_fname_alloc_buffer(struct inode *parent, struct fscrypt_str *fname)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ceph_fname_free_buffer(struct inode *parent, struct fscrypt_str *fname)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline int ceph_get_encryption_info(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
This makes it so that readdir will succeed on encrypted directories when
!CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION. The other filesystems instead return an error code,
which seems much better. Can you check what the other filesystems handle
readdir?
> +static bool fscrypt_key_status_change(struct dentry *dentry)
> +{
> + struct inode *dir;
> + bool encrypted_name, have_key;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&dentry->d_lock);
> +
> + dir = d_inode(dentry->d_parent);
> + if (!IS_ENCRYPTED(dir))
> + return false;
> +
> + encrypted_name = dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME;
> + have_key = fscrypt_has_encryption_key(dir);
> +
> + if (encrypted_name == have_key)
> + ceph_dir_clear_complete(dir);
> +
> + dout("%s encrypted_name=%d have_key=%d\n", __func__, encrypted_name, have_key);
> + return encrypted_name == have_key;
> +}
> +
Only the no-key => key case needs to be handled, not key => no-key.
Also, the caller already has 'dir', so there's no need to use ->d_parent.
What's wrong with just:
di = ceph_dentry(dentry);
if (d_unhashed(dentry) ||
d_really_is_negative(dentry) ||
di->lease_shared_gen != shared_gen ||
+ ((dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME) &&
+ fscrypt_has_encryption_key(dir))) {
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
dput(dentry);
err = -EAGAIN;
goto out;
}
> /*
> * When possible, we try to satisfy a readdir by peeking at the
> * dcache. We make this work by carefully ordering dentries on
> @@ -238,11 +261,11 @@ static int __dcache_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
Why delete this spin_lock()?
> + if (IS_ENCRYPTED(inode) && !fscrypt_has_encryption_key(inode)) {
> + spin_lock(&dn->d_lock);
> + dn->d_flags |= DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME;
> + spin_unlock(&dn->d_lock);
> + }
This is racy because fscrypt_has_encryption_key() could have been false when the
dentry was created, then true here.
Take a look at how __fscrypt_prepare_lookup() solves this problem.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-08 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-04 16:05 [RFC PATCH v2 00/18] ceph+fscrypt: context, filename and symlink support Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/18] vfs: export new_inode_pseudo Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 3:38 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 11:27 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 22:31 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 10:47 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-09 16:12 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 16:51 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-09 18:49 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 19:24 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/18] fscrypt: drop unused inode argument from fscrypt_fname_alloc_buffer Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/18] fscrypt: export fscrypt_d_revalidate Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/18] fscrypt: add fscrypt_new_context_from_inode Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 3:48 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 11:29 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 12:29 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 22:34 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] fscrypt: don't balk when inode is already marked encrypted Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 3:52 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 12:54 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 23:08 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/18] fscrypt: move nokey_name conversion to separate function and export it Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 3:55 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 12:50 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 22:53 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 16:02 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/18] lib: lift fscrypt base64 conversion into lib/ Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 3:59 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 12:51 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/18] ceph: add fscrypt ioctls Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/18] ceph: crypto context handling for ceph Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 4:29 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 16:14 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/18] ceph: preallocate inode for ops that may create one Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/18] ceph: add routine to create context prior to RPC Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 4:43 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/18] ceph: set S_ENCRYPTED bit if new inode has encryption.ctx xattr Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 4:57 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 12:20 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-09 15:53 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-09 16:33 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 17:19 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/18] ceph: make ceph_msdc_build_path use ref-walk Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/18] ceph: add encrypted fname handling to ceph_mdsc_build_path Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 5:06 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 12:24 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/18] ceph: make d_revalidate call fscrypt revalidator for encrypted dentries Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 5:12 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 12:26 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-09 16:18 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/18] ceph: add support to readdir for encrypted filenames Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 5:34 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2020-09-09 13:02 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] ceph: add fscrypt support to ceph_fill_trace Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/18] ceph: create symlinks with encrypted and base64-encoded targets Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:11 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 5:43 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/18] ceph+fscrypt: context, filename and symlink support Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 12:09 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200908053459.GN68127@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).