From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/i915: move and rename i915_runtime_pm
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:16:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf0812aa-b92b-6e7f-1423-561f6edf09da@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <156037764521.10298.12343546015159675260@skylake-alporthouse-com>
On 6/12/19 3:14 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-06-12 19:37:43)
>> Asserts aside, all the code working on this structure is in
>> intel_runtime_pm.c and uses the intel_ prefix, so move the
>> structure to intel_runtime_pm.h and adopt the same prefix.
>>
>> Since all the asserts are now working on the runtime_pm structure,
>> bring them across as well.
>
> Wasn't patch 1 also a rename? Or am I being senile?
> -Chris
>
Patch one replaced i915 with rpm in a bunch of places in the runtime_pm
file, so more of a struct swap than a rename. This is the renaming patch ;)
Daniele
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-12 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 18:37 [PATCH v2 0/8] RPM Encapsulation Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/i915: prefer i915_runtime_pm in intel_runtime function Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 22:10 ` Chris Wilson
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/i915: Remove rpm asserts that use i915 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] drm/i915: make enable/disable rpm assert function use the rpm structure Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/i915: move and rename i915_runtime_pm Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 22:14 ` Chris Wilson
2019-06-12 22:16 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] drm/i915: move a few more functions to accept the rpm structure Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] drm/i915: update rpm_get/put to use " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] drm/i915: update with_intel_runtime_pm " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] drm/i915: make intel_wakeref work on the rpm struct Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 22:18 ` Chris Wilson
2019-06-12 19:24 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for RPM Encapsulation Patchwork
2019-06-12 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] " Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf0812aa-b92b-6e7f-1423-561f6edf09da@intel.com \
--to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.