* [cip-dev] [cip-core] Package Proposal #2 (Minimum base packages in Debian)
2020-01-23 11:52 ` kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp
@ 2020-01-27 0:33 ` Laurence Urhegyi
2020-01-27 13:52 ` SZ Lin (林上智)
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Laurence Urhegyi @ 2020-01-27 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cip-dev
Hello Kazu-san,
I've been away for a while, and for that I do apologise.
+1 from Codethink for this.
Kind regards,
Laurence
On 23/01/2020 20:52, kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp wrote:
> Hello CIP Core members,
>
> Thank you for your replies.
>
> I need to wait for replies of Codethink, Hitachi, and Moxa,
> so would like to postpone the due date to
> January 31th (Fri)
> (Lunar New Year holiday until Jan 29th)
>
> Codethink
> Cybertrust (Agreed #2)
> Hitachi
> Moxa
> Renesas (Agreed #2)
> Siemens (Agreed #2)
> Toshiba (Agreed #2)
>
> Best regards,
> Kazu
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cip-dev [mailto:cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org] On Behalf Of Takehisa Katayama
>> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 5:07 PM
>> To: cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [cip-dev] [cip-core] Package Proposal #2 (Minimum base packages in Debian)
>>
>> Hi Kazu-san,
>>
>>>> Please reply with you opinion, agree or disagree.
>>
>> Renesas agree.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Takehisa Katayama.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2020/01/21 9:52, kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp wrote:
>>> Hello CIP Core members,
>>>
>>>> Due Date: January 20th (The next TSC meeting)
>>>
>>> If you have not yet replied to this proposal, please send us your opinion by
>>> January 23th (By the next IRC meeting)
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Kazu
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello CIP Core members,
>>>>
>>>> I created a simple package proposal for the packages that are installed in the "minimum base system" of Debian.
>>>> These packages are installed by
>>>> $ debootstrap --variant=minbase buster ...
>>>>
>>>> It consists of 58 source packages and 84 binary packages, including all run-time dependencies.
>>>>
>>>> The common reason to propose:
>>>> "This package is included in the minimum base system of Debian (debootstrap --variant=minbase),
>>>> which is essential for all Debian binary package based systems"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would like to start the "review" phase (Phase 2) of the attached package proposal.
>>>> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/cip-pkglist/blob/master/doc/pdp.md#phase-2-proposal-review
>>>>
>>>> Please reply with you opinion, agree or disagree.
>>>> If you cannot agree to add specific packages, please show the reasons as well.
>>>>
>>>> Due Date: January 20th (The next TSC meeting)
>>>>
>>>> We have only 2-3 working days for this review, but
>>>> I think it may be enough to agree or disagree the very simple reason above.
>>>> (We can extend this due date if more time required for reviews, please let me know if any requests)
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Kazu
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cip-dev mailing list
>>> cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
>>> https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
>>> .
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cip-dev mailing list
>> cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
>> https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cip-dev mailing list
> cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [cip-dev] [cip-core] Package Proposal #2 (Minimum base packages in Debian)
2020-01-23 11:52 ` kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp
2020-01-27 0:33 ` Laurence Urhegyi
@ 2020-01-27 13:52 ` SZ Lin (林上智)
2020-01-31 14:44 ` SZ Lin (林上智)
2020-02-04 11:48 ` kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: SZ Lin (林上智) @ 2020-01-27 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cip-dev
Hi Kazu,
<kazuhiro3.hayashi@toshiba.co.jp> ? 2020?1?23? ?? ??7:52???
>
> Hello CIP Core members,
>
> Thank you for your replies.
>
> I need to wait for replies of Codethink, Hitachi, and Moxa,
> so would like to postpone the due date to
> January 31th (Fri)
> (Lunar New Year holiday until Jan 29th)
Thank you for your understanding, our office is closed until Thursday.
SZ
>
> Codethink
> Cybertrust (Agreed #2)
> Hitachi
> Moxa
> Renesas (Agreed #2)
> Siemens (Agreed #2)
> Toshiba (Agreed #2)
>
> Best regards,
> Kazu
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cip-dev [mailto:cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org] On Behalf Of Takehisa Katayama
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 5:07 PM
> > To: cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] [cip-core] Package Proposal #2 (Minimum base packages in Debian)
> >
> > Hi Kazu-san,
> >
> > >> Please reply with you opinion, agree or disagree.
> >
> > Renesas agree.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Takehisa Katayama.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2020/01/21 9:52, kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp wrote:
> > > Hello CIP Core members,
> > >
> > >> Due Date: January 20th (The next TSC meeting)
> > >
> > > If you have not yet replied to this proposal, please send us your opinion by
> > > January 23th (By the next IRC meeting)
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Kazu
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Hello CIP Core members,
> > >>
> > >> I created a simple package proposal for the packages that are installed in the "minimum base system" of Debian.
> > >> These packages are installed by
> > >> $ debootstrap --variant=minbase buster ...
> > >>
> > >> It consists of 58 source packages and 84 binary packages, including all run-time dependencies.
> > >>
> > >> The common reason to propose:
> > >> "This package is included in the minimum base system of Debian (debootstrap --variant=minbase),
> > >> which is essential for all Debian binary package based systems"
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I would like to start the "review" phase (Phase 2) of the attached package proposal.
> > >> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/cip-pkglist/blob/master/doc/pdp.md#phase-2-proposal-review
> > >>
> > >> Please reply with you opinion, agree or disagree.
> > >> If you cannot agree to add specific packages, please show the reasons as well.
> > >>
> > >> Due Date: January 20th (The next TSC meeting)
> > >>
> > >> We have only 2-3 working days for this review, but
> > >> I think it may be enough to agree or disagree the very simple reason above.
> > >> (We can extend this due date if more time required for reviews, please let me know if any requests)
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Kazu
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cip-dev mailing list
> > > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > > https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
> > > .
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cip-dev mailing list
> > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cip-dev mailing list
> cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [cip-dev] [cip-core] Package Proposal #2 (Minimum base packages in Debian)
2020-01-23 11:52 ` kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp
2020-01-27 0:33 ` Laurence Urhegyi
2020-01-27 13:52 ` SZ Lin (林上智)
@ 2020-01-31 14:44 ` SZ Lin (林上智)
2020-02-04 11:48 ` kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: SZ Lin (林上智) @ 2020-01-31 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cip-dev
Hi,
<kazuhiro3.hayashi@toshiba.co.jp> ? 2020?1?23? ?? ??7:52???
>
> Hello CIP Core members,
>
> Thank you for your replies.
>
> I need to wait for replies of Codethink, Hitachi, and Moxa,
> so would like to postpone the due date to
> January 31th (Fri)
> (Lunar New Year holiday until Jan 29th)
>
> Codethink
> Cybertrust (Agreed #2)
> Hitachi
Moxa (Agreed #2)
SZ
> Renesas (Agreed #2)
> Siemens (Agreed #2)
> Toshiba (Agreed #2)
>
> Best regards,
> Kazu
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cip-dev [mailto:cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org] On Behalf Of Takehisa Katayama
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 5:07 PM
> > To: cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] [cip-core] Package Proposal #2 (Minimum base packages in Debian)
> >
> > Hi Kazu-san,
> >
> > >> Please reply with you opinion, agree or disagree.
> >
> > Renesas agree.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Takehisa Katayama.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2020/01/21 9:52, kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp wrote:
> > > Hello CIP Core members,
> > >
> > >> Due Date: January 20th (The next TSC meeting)
> > >
> > > If you have not yet replied to this proposal, please send us your opinion by
> > > January 23th (By the next IRC meeting)
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Kazu
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Hello CIP Core members,
> > >>
> > >> I created a simple package proposal for the packages that are installed in the "minimum base system" of Debian.
> > >> These packages are installed by
> > >> $ debootstrap --variant=minbase buster ...
> > >>
> > >> It consists of 58 source packages and 84 binary packages, including all run-time dependencies.
> > >>
> > >> The common reason to propose:
> > >> "This package is included in the minimum base system of Debian (debootstrap --variant=minbase),
> > >> which is essential for all Debian binary package based systems"
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I would like to start the "review" phase (Phase 2) of the attached package proposal.
> > >> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/cip-pkglist/blob/master/doc/pdp.md#phase-2-proposal-review
> > >>
> > >> Please reply with you opinion, agree or disagree.
> > >> If you cannot agree to add specific packages, please show the reasons as well.
> > >>
> > >> Due Date: January 20th (The next TSC meeting)
> > >>
> > >> We have only 2-3 working days for this review, but
> > >> I think it may be enough to agree or disagree the very simple reason above.
> > >> (We can extend this due date if more time required for reviews, please let me know if any requests)
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Kazu
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cip-dev mailing list
> > > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > > https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
> > > .
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cip-dev mailing list
> > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cip-dev mailing list
> cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [cip-dev] [cip-core] Package Proposal #2 (Minimum base packages in Debian)
2020-01-23 11:52 ` kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-01-31 14:44 ` SZ Lin (林上智)
@ 2020-02-04 11:48 ` kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp
2020-02-11 5:39 ` kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp
3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp @ 2020-02-04 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cip-dev
Hello CIP Core members,
All CIP Core members agreed this proposal (#2), so
I would like to conclude that this proposal is accepted by CIP Core.
Thank you for your review!
Dear TSC members,
Could you confirm that the attached package list (proposal_minbase_20200204.yml)
can be registered as the (initial) CIP maintained package list?
This is the "Phase 4" in the PDP:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/cip-pkglist/-/blob/master/doc/pdp.md#phase-4-approval
Just in case, I would like to share several discussions in the review process:
Q. What is the policy for the "minimum base"?
A. The "minimum base" means here is the essential "Debian binary" packages needed for booting up.
These packages are installed by:
$ debootstrap --variant=minbase buster ...
and they are essential for CIP Core generic profile.
Q. Some binary packages listed in "depends:" of proposal_minbase_20200116.yml are duplicated, why?
A. This issue was discussed in https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/cip-pkglist/issues/1
then fixed by https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/cip-pkglist/-/merge_requests/6
I has recreated the .yml file after the fix above (=> proposal_minbase_20200204.yml)
then there is no change from proposal_minbase_20200116.yml in the package information
except several minor updates. Please check the attached files (0116-0204.diff) for more details.
Best regards,
Kazu
>
> Hello CIP Core members,
>
> Thank you for your replies.
>
> I need to wait for replies of Codethink, Hitachi, and Moxa,
> so would like to postpone the due date to
> January 31th (Fri)
> (Lunar New Year holiday until Jan 29th)
>
> Codethink
> Cybertrust (Agreed #2)
> Hitachi
> Moxa
> Renesas (Agreed #2)
> Siemens (Agreed #2)
> Toshiba (Agreed #2)
>
> Best regards,
> Kazu
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cip-dev [mailto:cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org] On Behalf Of Takehisa Katayama
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 5:07 PM
> > To: cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] [cip-core] Package Proposal #2 (Minimum base packages in Debian)
> >
> > Hi Kazu-san,
> >
> > >> Please reply with you opinion, agree or disagree.
> >
> > Renesas agree.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Takehisa Katayama.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2020/01/21 9:52, kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp wrote:
> > > Hello CIP Core members,
> > >
> > >> Due Date: January 20th (The next TSC meeting)
> > >
> > > If you have not yet replied to this proposal, please send us your opinion by
> > > January 23th (By the next IRC meeting)
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Kazu
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Hello CIP Core members,
> > >>
> > >> I created a simple package proposal for the packages that are installed in the "minimum base system" of Debian.
> > >> These packages are installed by
> > >> $ debootstrap --variant=minbase buster ...
> > >>
> > >> It consists of 58 source packages and 84 binary packages, including all run-time dependencies.
> > >>
> > >> The common reason to propose:
> > >> "This package is included in the minimum base system of Debian (debootstrap --variant=minbase),
> > >> which is essential for all Debian binary package based systems"
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I would like to start the "review" phase (Phase 2) of the attached package proposal.
> > >> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/cip-pkglist/blob/master/doc/pdp.md#phase-2-proposal-review
> > >>
> > >> Please reply with you opinion, agree or disagree.
> > >> If you cannot agree to add specific packages, please show the reasons as well.
> > >>
> > >> Due Date: January 20th (The next TSC meeting)
> > >>
> > >> We have only 2-3 working days for this review, but
> > >> I think it may be enough to agree or disagree the very simple reason above.
> > >> (We can extend this due date if more time required for reviews, please let me know if any requests)
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Kazu
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cip-dev mailing list
> > > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > > https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
> > > .
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cip-dev mailing list
> > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cip-dev mailing list
> cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: proposal_minbase_20200204.yml
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 22219 bytes
Desc: proposal_minbase_20200204.yml
URL: <http://lists.cip-project.org/pipermail/cip-dev/attachments/20200204/7b7b7826/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0116-0204.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1263 bytes
Desc: 0116-0204.diff
URL: <http://lists.cip-project.org/pipermail/cip-dev/attachments/20200204/7b7b7826/attachment-0003.obj>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [cip-dev] [cip-core] Package Proposal #2 (Minimum base packages in Debian)
2020-02-04 11:48 ` kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp
@ 2020-02-11 5:39 ` kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp @ 2020-02-11 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cip-dev
Hello TSC members,
> Dear TSC members,
> Could you confirm that the attached package list (proposal_minbase_20200204.yml)
> can be registered as the (initial) CIP maintained package list?
How can I proceed this confirmation?
Are there any formal process for this?
Best regards,
Kazu
>
> Hello CIP Core members,
>
> All CIP Core members agreed this proposal (#2), so
> I would like to conclude that this proposal is accepted by CIP Core.
> Thank you for your review!
>
> Dear TSC members,
> Could you confirm that the attached package list (proposal_minbase_20200204.yml)
> can be registered as the (initial) CIP maintained package list?
> This is the "Phase 4" in the PDP:
> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/cip-pkglist/-/blob/master/doc/pdp.md#phase-4-approval
>
>
> Just in case, I would like to share several discussions in the review process:
>
> Q. What is the policy for the "minimum base"?
> A. The "minimum base" means here is the essential "Debian binary" packages needed for booting up.
> These packages are installed by:
> $ debootstrap --variant=minbase buster ...
> and they are essential for CIP Core generic profile.
>
> Q. Some binary packages listed in "depends:" of proposal_minbase_20200116.yml are duplicated, why?
> A. This issue was discussed in https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/cip-pkglist/issues/1
> then fixed by https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/cip-pkglist/-/merge_requests/6
>
> I has recreated the .yml file after the fix above (=> proposal_minbase_20200204.yml)
> then there is no change from proposal_minbase_20200116.yml in the package information
> except several minor updates. Please check the attached files (0116-0204.diff) for more details.
>
> Best regards,
> Kazu
>
> >
> > Hello CIP Core members,
> >
> > Thank you for your replies.
> >
> > I need to wait for replies of Codethink, Hitachi, and Moxa,
> > so would like to postpone the due date to
> > January 31th (Fri)
> > (Lunar New Year holiday until Jan 29th)
> >
> > Codethink
> > Cybertrust (Agreed #2)
> > Hitachi
> > Moxa
> > Renesas (Agreed #2)
> > Siemens (Agreed #2)
> > Toshiba (Agreed #2)
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Kazu
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: cip-dev [mailto:cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org] On Behalf Of Takehisa Katayama
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 5:07 PM
> > > To: cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] [cip-core] Package Proposal #2 (Minimum base packages in Debian)
> > >
> > > Hi Kazu-san,
> > >
> > > >> Please reply with you opinion, agree or disagree.
> > >
> > > Renesas agree.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Takehisa Katayama.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2020/01/21 9:52, kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp wrote:
> > > > Hello CIP Core members,
> > > >
> > > >> Due Date: January 20th (The next TSC meeting)
> > > >
> > > > If you have not yet replied to this proposal, please send us your opinion by
> > > > January 23th (By the next IRC meeting)
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Kazu
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> Hello CIP Core members,
> > > >>
> > > >> I created a simple package proposal for the packages that are installed in the "minimum base system" of Debian.
> > > >> These packages are installed by
> > > >> $ debootstrap --variant=minbase buster ...
> > > >>
> > > >> It consists of 58 source packages and 84 binary packages, including all run-time dependencies.
> > > >>
> > > >> The common reason to propose:
> > > >> "This package is included in the minimum base system of Debian (debootstrap --variant=minbase),
> > > >> which is essential for all Debian binary package based systems"
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> I would like to start the "review" phase (Phase 2) of the attached package proposal.
> > > >> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/cip-pkglist/blob/master/doc/pdp.md#phase-2-proposal-review
> > > >>
> > > >> Please reply with you opinion, agree or disagree.
> > > >> If you cannot agree to add specific packages, please show the reasons as well.
> > > >>
> > > >> Due Date: January 20th (The next TSC meeting)
> > > >>
> > > >> We have only 2-3 working days for this review, but
> > > >> I think it may be enough to agree or disagree the very simple reason above.
> > > >> (We can extend this due date if more time required for reviews, please let me know if any requests)
> > > >>
> > > >> Best regards,
> > > >> Kazu
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > cip-dev mailing list
> > > > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > > > https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cip-dev mailing list
> > > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > > https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > cip-dev mailing list
> > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread