All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Maciej Purski <m.purski@samsung.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	Carlos Hernandez <ceh@ti.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Pass max_uV value to regulator_set_voltage_rdev
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 02:51:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d14cc796-8644-41a3-5135-299bd8820204@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea0a59ef-e201-986a-9499-a0638359b1b9@gmail.com>

On 9/29/18 2:17 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 9/29/18 1:41 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> [180928 22:31]:
>>> On 9/28/18 11:22 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>> * Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> [180928 20:13]:
>>>>> Tony, could you please give a try to the patch below?
>>>>>
>>>>> Do the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) git cherry-pick 696861761a58d8c93605b5663824929fb6540f16
>>>>> 2) git cherry-pick 456e7cdf3b1a14e2606b8b687385ab2e3f23a49a
>>>>> 3) Apply this patch:
>>>>
>>>> Seems to be getting closer, system boots up and starts
>>>> init, but then I start getting tons of this on beagle-x15:
>>>
>>> Tony, could you please try this one? Fixed couple more bugs, should be good now.
>>
>> I'm still getting these errors after init:
> 
> Thank you very much again, seems I got what's wrong with your case. The ti-abb-regulator driver sets the "abb->current_info_idx = -EINVAL" on probe and that value is getting updated only after the first voltage change, hence _regulator_get_voltage() returns -22.
> 
> Please try this patch:

I've revised the patch and here is the current final version.


From 0332e230568d5bba470f917f0b36dd9ef9e6e511 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 21:49:20 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Fixup regulator_balance_voltage() v4

---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 282511508698..17dce370f236 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -3099,10 +3099,6 @@ static int regulator_set_voltage_unlocked(struct regulator *regulator,
 	voltage->min_uV = min_uV;
 	voltage->max_uV = max_uV;
 
-	ret = regulator_check_consumers(rdev, &min_uV, &max_uV, state);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		goto out2;
-
 	/* for not coupled regulators this will just set the voltage */
 	ret = regulator_balance_voltage(rdev, state);
 	if (ret < 0)
@@ -3187,7 +3183,9 @@ static int regulator_set_voltage_rdev(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
+					 int *min_uV, int *max_uV,
+					 suspend_state_t state)
 {
 	struct coupling_desc *c_desc = &rdev->coupling_desc;
 	struct regulator_dev **c_rdevs = c_desc->coupled_rdevs;
@@ -3202,7 +3200,8 @@ static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	desired_max_uV = rdev->constraints->max_uV;
 	ret = regulator_check_consumers(rdev,
 					&desired_min_uV,
-					&desired_max_uV, PM_SUSPEND_ON);
+					&desired_max_uV,
+					state);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 
@@ -3210,8 +3209,10 @@ static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	 * If there are no coupled regulators, simply set the voltage demanded
 	 * by consumers.
 	 */
-	if (n_coupled == 1) {
-		ret = desired_min_uV;
+	if (n_coupled == 1 || state != PM_SUSPEND_ON) {
+		*min_uV = desired_min_uV;
+		*max_uV = desired_max_uV;
+		ret = 1;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -3285,8 +3286,10 @@ static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto out;
 	}
-	ret = possible_uV;
+	ret = (possible_uV == desired_min_uV);
 
+	*min_uV = possible_uV;
+	*max_uV = desired_max_uV;
 out:
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -3298,7 +3301,8 @@ static int regulator_balance_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	struct regulator_dev *best_rdev;
 	struct coupling_desc *c_desc = &rdev->coupling_desc;
 	int n_coupled;
-	int i, best_delta, best_uV, ret = 1;
+	int i, best_delta, best_min_uV, best_max_uV, ret = 1;
+	bool last = false;
 
 	c_rdevs = c_desc->coupled_rdevs;
 	n_coupled = c_desc->n_coupled;
@@ -3314,9 +3318,10 @@ static int regulator_balance_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	 * Find the best possible voltage change on each loop. Leave the loop
 	 * if there isn't any possible change.
 	 */
-	while (1) {
+	while (!last) {
 		best_delta = 0;
-		best_uV = 0;
+		best_min_uV = 0;
+		best_max_uV = 0;
 		best_rdev = NULL;
 
 		/*
@@ -3330,24 +3335,29 @@ static int regulator_balance_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 			 * max_spread constraint in order to balance
 			 * the coupled voltages.
 			 */
-			int optimal_uV, current_uV;
+			int optimal_uV, optimal_max_uV, current_uV = 0;
 
-			optimal_uV = regulator_get_optimal_voltage(c_rdevs[i]);
-			if (optimal_uV < 0) {
-				ret = optimal_uV;
+			ret = regulator_get_optimal_voltage(c_rdevs[i],
+							    &optimal_uV,
+							    &optimal_max_uV,
+							    state);
+			if (ret < 0)
 				goto out;
-			}
 
-			current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(c_rdevs[i]);
-			if (current_uV < 0) {
-				ret = optimal_uV;
-				goto out;
+			if (n_coupled > 1) {
+				current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(c_rdevs[i]);
+				if (current_uV < 0) {
+					ret = current_uV;
+					goto out;
+				}
 			}
 
 			if (abs(best_delta) < abs(optimal_uV - current_uV)) {
 				best_delta = optimal_uV - current_uV;
 				best_rdev = c_rdevs[i];
-				best_uV = optimal_uV;
+				best_min_uV = optimal_uV;
+				best_max_uV = optimal_max_uV;
+				last = (best_rdev == rdev && ret > 0);
 			}
 		}
 
@@ -3357,8 +3367,8 @@ static int regulator_balance_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		ret = regulator_set_voltage_rdev(best_rdev, best_uV,
-						 best_uV, state);
+		ret = regulator_set_voltage_rdev(best_rdev, best_min_uV,
+						 best_max_uV, state);
 
 		if (ret < 0)
 			goto out;
-- 
2.19.0




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Maciej Purski <m.purski@samsung.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	Carlos Hernandez <ceh@ti.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Pass max_uV value to regulator_set_voltage_rdev
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 02:51:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d14cc796-8644-41a3-5135-299bd8820204@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea0a59ef-e201-986a-9499-a0638359b1b9@gmail.com>

On 9/29/18 2:17 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 9/29/18 1:41 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> [180928 22:31]:
>>> On 9/28/18 11:22 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>> * Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> [180928 20:13]:
>>>>> Tony, could you please give a try to the patch below?
>>>>>
>>>>> Do the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) git cherry-pick 696861761a58d8c93605b5663824929fb6540f16
>>>>> 2) git cherry-pick 456e7cdf3b1a14e2606b8b687385ab2e3f23a49a
>>>>> 3) Apply this patch:
>>>>
>>>> Seems to be getting closer, system boots up and starts
>>>> init, but then I start getting tons of this on beagle-x15:
>>>
>>> Tony, could you please try this one? Fixed couple more bugs, should be good now.
>>
>> I'm still getting these errors after init:
> 
> Thank you very much again, seems I got what's wrong with your case. The ti-abb-regulator driver sets the "abb->current_info_idx = -EINVAL" on probe and that value is getting updated only after the first voltage change, hence _regulator_get_voltage() returns -22.
> 
> Please try this patch:

I've revised the patch and here is the current final version.


>From 0332e230568d5bba470f917f0b36dd9ef9e6e511 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 21:49:20 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Fixup regulator_balance_voltage() v4

---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 282511508698..17dce370f236 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -3099,10 +3099,6 @@ static int regulator_set_voltage_unlocked(struct regulator *regulator,
 	voltage->min_uV = min_uV;
 	voltage->max_uV = max_uV;
 
-	ret = regulator_check_consumers(rdev, &min_uV, &max_uV, state);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		goto out2;
-
 	/* for not coupled regulators this will just set the voltage */
 	ret = regulator_balance_voltage(rdev, state);
 	if (ret < 0)
@@ -3187,7 +3183,9 @@ static int regulator_set_voltage_rdev(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
+					 int *min_uV, int *max_uV,
+					 suspend_state_t state)
 {
 	struct coupling_desc *c_desc = &rdev->coupling_desc;
 	struct regulator_dev **c_rdevs = c_desc->coupled_rdevs;
@@ -3202,7 +3200,8 @@ static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	desired_max_uV = rdev->constraints->max_uV;
 	ret = regulator_check_consumers(rdev,
 					&desired_min_uV,
-					&desired_max_uV, PM_SUSPEND_ON);
+					&desired_max_uV,
+					state);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 
@@ -3210,8 +3209,10 @@ static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	 * If there are no coupled regulators, simply set the voltage demanded
 	 * by consumers.
 	 */
-	if (n_coupled == 1) {
-		ret = desired_min_uV;
+	if (n_coupled == 1 || state != PM_SUSPEND_ON) {
+		*min_uV = desired_min_uV;
+		*max_uV = desired_max_uV;
+		ret = 1;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -3285,8 +3286,10 @@ static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto out;
 	}
-	ret = possible_uV;
+	ret = (possible_uV == desired_min_uV);
 
+	*min_uV = possible_uV;
+	*max_uV = desired_max_uV;
 out:
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -3298,7 +3301,8 @@ static int regulator_balance_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	struct regulator_dev *best_rdev;
 	struct coupling_desc *c_desc = &rdev->coupling_desc;
 	int n_coupled;
-	int i, best_delta, best_uV, ret = 1;
+	int i, best_delta, best_min_uV, best_max_uV, ret = 1;
+	bool last = false;
 
 	c_rdevs = c_desc->coupled_rdevs;
 	n_coupled = c_desc->n_coupled;
@@ -3314,9 +3318,10 @@ static int regulator_balance_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	 * Find the best possible voltage change on each loop. Leave the loop
 	 * if there isn't any possible change.
 	 */
-	while (1) {
+	while (!last) {
 		best_delta = 0;
-		best_uV = 0;
+		best_min_uV = 0;
+		best_max_uV = 0;
 		best_rdev = NULL;
 
 		/*
@@ -3330,24 +3335,29 @@ static int regulator_balance_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 			 * max_spread constraint in order to balance
 			 * the coupled voltages.
 			 */
-			int optimal_uV, current_uV;
+			int optimal_uV, optimal_max_uV, current_uV = 0;
 
-			optimal_uV = regulator_get_optimal_voltage(c_rdevs[i]);
-			if (optimal_uV < 0) {
-				ret = optimal_uV;
+			ret = regulator_get_optimal_voltage(c_rdevs[i],
+							    &optimal_uV,
+							    &optimal_max_uV,
+							    state);
+			if (ret < 0)
 				goto out;
-			}
 
-			current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(c_rdevs[i]);
-			if (current_uV < 0) {
-				ret = optimal_uV;
-				goto out;
+			if (n_coupled > 1) {
+				current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(c_rdevs[i]);
+				if (current_uV < 0) {
+					ret = current_uV;
+					goto out;
+				}
 			}
 
 			if (abs(best_delta) < abs(optimal_uV - current_uV)) {
 				best_delta = optimal_uV - current_uV;
 				best_rdev = c_rdevs[i];
-				best_uV = optimal_uV;
+				best_min_uV = optimal_uV;
+				best_max_uV = optimal_max_uV;
+				last = (best_rdev == rdev && ret > 0);
 			}
 		}
 
@@ -3357,8 +3367,8 @@ static int regulator_balance_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		ret = regulator_set_voltage_rdev(best_rdev, best_uV,
-						 best_uV, state);
+		ret = regulator_set_voltage_rdev(best_rdev, best_min_uV,
+						 best_max_uV, state);
 
 		if (ret < 0)
 			goto out;
-- 
2.19.0

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: digetx@gmail.com (Dmitry Osipenko)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: Pass max_uV value to regulator_set_voltage_rdev
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 02:51:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d14cc796-8644-41a3-5135-299bd8820204@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea0a59ef-e201-986a-9499-a0638359b1b9@gmail.com>

On 9/29/18 2:17 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 9/29/18 1:41 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> [180928 22:31]:
>>> On 9/28/18 11:22 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>> * Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> [180928 20:13]:
>>>>> Tony, could you please give a try to the patch below?
>>>>>
>>>>> Do the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) git cherry-pick 696861761a58d8c93605b5663824929fb6540f16
>>>>> 2) git cherry-pick 456e7cdf3b1a14e2606b8b687385ab2e3f23a49a
>>>>> 3) Apply this patch:
>>>>
>>>> Seems to be getting closer, system boots up and starts
>>>> init, but then I start getting tons of this on beagle-x15:
>>>
>>> Tony, could you please try this one? Fixed couple more bugs, should be good now.
>>
>> I'm still getting these errors after init:
> 
> Thank you very much again, seems I got what's wrong with your case. The ti-abb-regulator driver sets the "abb->current_info_idx = -EINVAL" on probe and that value is getting updated only after the first voltage change, hence _regulator_get_voltage() returns -22.
> 
> Please try this patch:

I've revised the patch and here is the current final version.


>From 0332e230568d5bba470f917f0b36dd9ef9e6e511 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 21:49:20 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Fixup regulator_balance_voltage() v4

---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 282511508698..17dce370f236 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -3099,10 +3099,6 @@ static int regulator_set_voltage_unlocked(struct regulator *regulator,
 	voltage->min_uV = min_uV;
 	voltage->max_uV = max_uV;
 
-	ret = regulator_check_consumers(rdev, &min_uV, &max_uV, state);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		goto out2;
-
 	/* for not coupled regulators this will just set the voltage */
 	ret = regulator_balance_voltage(rdev, state);
 	if (ret < 0)
@@ -3187,7 +3183,9 @@ static int regulator_set_voltage_rdev(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
+					 int *min_uV, int *max_uV,
+					 suspend_state_t state)
 {
 	struct coupling_desc *c_desc = &rdev->coupling_desc;
 	struct regulator_dev **c_rdevs = c_desc->coupled_rdevs;
@@ -3202,7 +3200,8 @@ static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	desired_max_uV = rdev->constraints->max_uV;
 	ret = regulator_check_consumers(rdev,
 					&desired_min_uV,
-					&desired_max_uV, PM_SUSPEND_ON);
+					&desired_max_uV,
+					state);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 
@@ -3210,8 +3209,10 @@ static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	 * If there are no coupled regulators, simply set the voltage demanded
 	 * by consumers.
 	 */
-	if (n_coupled == 1) {
-		ret = desired_min_uV;
+	if (n_coupled == 1 || state != PM_SUSPEND_ON) {
+		*min_uV = desired_min_uV;
+		*max_uV = desired_max_uV;
+		ret = 1;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -3285,8 +3286,10 @@ static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto out;
 	}
-	ret = possible_uV;
+	ret = (possible_uV == desired_min_uV);
 
+	*min_uV = possible_uV;
+	*max_uV = desired_max_uV;
 out:
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -3298,7 +3301,8 @@ static int regulator_balance_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	struct regulator_dev *best_rdev;
 	struct coupling_desc *c_desc = &rdev->coupling_desc;
 	int n_coupled;
-	int i, best_delta, best_uV, ret = 1;
+	int i, best_delta, best_min_uV, best_max_uV, ret = 1;
+	bool last = false;
 
 	c_rdevs = c_desc->coupled_rdevs;
 	n_coupled = c_desc->n_coupled;
@@ -3314,9 +3318,10 @@ static int regulator_balance_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	 * Find the best possible voltage change on each loop. Leave the loop
 	 * if there isn't any possible change.
 	 */
-	while (1) {
+	while (!last) {
 		best_delta = 0;
-		best_uV = 0;
+		best_min_uV = 0;
+		best_max_uV = 0;
 		best_rdev = NULL;
 
 		/*
@@ -3330,24 +3335,29 @@ static int regulator_balance_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 			 * max_spread constraint in order to balance
 			 * the coupled voltages.
 			 */
-			int optimal_uV, current_uV;
+			int optimal_uV, optimal_max_uV, current_uV = 0;
 
-			optimal_uV = regulator_get_optimal_voltage(c_rdevs[i]);
-			if (optimal_uV < 0) {
-				ret = optimal_uV;
+			ret = regulator_get_optimal_voltage(c_rdevs[i],
+							    &optimal_uV,
+							    &optimal_max_uV,
+							    state);
+			if (ret < 0)
 				goto out;
-			}
 
-			current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(c_rdevs[i]);
-			if (current_uV < 0) {
-				ret = optimal_uV;
-				goto out;
+			if (n_coupled > 1) {
+				current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(c_rdevs[i]);
+				if (current_uV < 0) {
+					ret = current_uV;
+					goto out;
+				}
 			}
 
 			if (abs(best_delta) < abs(optimal_uV - current_uV)) {
 				best_delta = optimal_uV - current_uV;
 				best_rdev = c_rdevs[i];
-				best_uV = optimal_uV;
+				best_min_uV = optimal_uV;
+				best_max_uV = optimal_max_uV;
+				last = (best_rdev == rdev && ret > 0);
 			}
 		}
 
@@ -3357,8 +3367,8 @@ static int regulator_balance_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		ret = regulator_set_voltage_rdev(best_rdev, best_uV,
-						 best_uV, state);
+		ret = regulator_set_voltage_rdev(best_rdev, best_min_uV,
+						 best_max_uV, state);
 
 		if (ret < 0)
 			goto out;
-- 
2.19.0

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-28 23:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-29 22:15 Regression in Linux next again Tony Lindgren
2018-05-29 22:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-05-30  9:13 ` Mark Brown
2018-05-30  9:13   ` Mark Brown
2018-05-30 14:03   ` Maciej Purski
2018-05-30 14:03     ` Maciej Purski
2018-05-30 14:33     ` Mark Brown
2018-05-30 14:33       ` Mark Brown
2018-05-30 14:45       ` Tony Lindgren
2018-05-30 14:45         ` Tony Lindgren
     [not found]         ` <CGME20180604135952eucas1p292f7bcec405e6a1a6261031df36cad32@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2018-06-04 13:59           ` Maciej Purski
2018-06-04 13:59             ` Maciej Purski
     [not found]             ` <CGME20180604135952eucas1p2d76b6aa5d8fc9912113d519b48f7e99a@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2018-06-04 13:59               ` [PATCH 1/7] regulator: core: Add debug messages Maciej Purski
2018-06-04 13:59                 ` Maciej Purski
     [not found]             ` <CGME20180604135952eucas1p2e3fdb68bf31e32b7c9557051671885a9@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2018-06-04 13:59               ` [PATCH 2/7] regulator: core: Add regulator_set_voltage_rdev() Maciej Purski
2018-06-04 13:59                 ` Maciej Purski
     [not found]             ` <CGME20180604135953eucas1p2f2c9dd9581cd114d323c3d64afe5c308@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2018-06-04 13:59               ` [PATCH 3/7] regulator: core: Use re-entrant locks Maciej Purski
2018-06-04 13:59                 ` Maciej Purski
     [not found]             ` <CGME20180604135953eucas1p2ec281df0793bc73e79f3000837abcb04@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2018-06-04 13:59               ` [PATCH 4/7] regulator: core: Implement voltage balancing algorithm Maciej Purski
2018-06-04 13:59                 ` Maciej Purski
2018-06-04 13:59                 ` Maciej Purski
     [not found]             ` <CGME20180604135954eucas1p2156fed3300b5514a4efa2baf9e7b9bc5@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2018-06-04 13:59               ` [PATCH 5/7] regulator: core: Lock dependent regulators Maciej Purski
2018-06-04 13:59                 ` Maciej Purski
2018-06-04 13:59                 ` Maciej Purski
2018-06-04 14:20                 ` Lucas Stach
2018-06-04 14:20                   ` Lucas Stach
2018-06-18 12:37                   ` Maciej Purski
2018-06-18 12:37                     ` Maciej Purski
     [not found]             ` <CGME20180604135954eucas1p2eeb77ada3ca97fecc6caec20d7e8397a@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2018-06-04 13:59               ` [PATCH 6/7] regulator: core: Lock dependent regulators on regulator_enable() Maciej Purski
2018-06-04 13:59                 ` Maciej Purski
     [not found]             ` <CGME20180604135954eucas1p2bebd1c4970401bb957da228056f9a662@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2018-06-04 13:59               ` [PATCH 7/7] regulator: core: Enable voltage balancing Maciej Purski
2018-06-04 13:59                 ` Maciej Purski
2018-06-04 23:13                 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-04 23:13                   ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-04 23:13                   ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-04 23:54                 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-04 23:54                   ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-04 23:54                   ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-05  4:45             ` Regression in Linux next again Tony Lindgren
2018-06-05  4:45               ` Tony Lindgren
     [not found]               ` <CGME20180613103622eucas1p1778ba2c2e5dd85ccb4c488bd0a38386d@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2018-06-13 10:33                 ` [PATCH v2] regulator: core: Enable voltage balancing Maciej Purski
2018-06-13 10:33                   ` Maciej Purski
2018-06-15 11:29                   ` Tony Lindgren
2018-06-15 11:29                     ` Tony Lindgren
2018-06-18 13:17                     ` Maciej Purski
2018-06-18 13:17                       ` Maciej Purski
     [not found]                     ` <CGME20180618140856eucas1p281619f9bf003655a3c2eac356216ab25@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2018-06-18 14:08                       ` [PATCH] regulator: core: Pass max_uV value to regulator_set_voltage_rdev Maciej Purski
2018-06-18 14:08                         ` Maciej Purski
2018-07-02  8:05                         ` Tony Lindgren
2018-07-02  8:05                           ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-28 20:09                           ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-28 20:09                             ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-28 20:09                             ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-28 20:09                             ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-28 20:22                             ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-28 20:22                               ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-28 20:36                               ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-28 20:36                                 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-28 22:26                               ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-28 22:26                                 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-28 22:26                                 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-28 22:41                                 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-28 22:41                                   ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-28 23:17                                   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-28 23:17                                     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-28 23:17                                     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-28 23:51                                     ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2018-09-28 23:51                                       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-28 23:51                                       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-29  0:27                                       ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-29  0:27                                         ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-29  0:44                                         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-29  0:44                                           ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-01  7:25                                           ` Maciej Purski
2018-10-01  7:25                                             ` Maciej Purski
2018-10-01 13:34                                             ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-01 13:34                                               ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-05-30 14:53       ` Regression in Linux next again Naresh Kamboju
2018-05-30 14:53         ` Naresh Kamboju
2018-05-31  5:44         ` Naresh Kamboju
2018-05-31  5:44           ` Naresh Kamboju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d14cc796-8644-41a3-5135-299bd8820204@gmail.com \
    --to=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=ceh@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.purski@samsung.com \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.