All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb get/set_irqchip_state SGI callbacks
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 22:43:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6b95eeb-b1c7-802b-e29e-a6c6ecf9ea33@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200304203330.4967-12-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

On 3/4/20 9:33 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> To implement the get/set_irqchip_state callbacks (limited to the
> PENDING state), we have to use a particular set of hacks:
> 
> - Reading the pending state is done by using a pair of new redistributor
>   registers (GICR_VSGIR, GICR_VSGIPENDR), which allow the 16 interrupts
>   state to be retrieved.
> - Setting the pending state is done by generating it as we'd otherwise do
>   for a guest (writing to GITS_SGIR).
> - Clearing the pending state is done by emiting a VSGI command with the
emitting
>   "clear" bit set.
> 
> This requires some interesting locking though:
> - When talking to the redistributor, we must make sure that the VPE
>   affinity doesn't change, hence taking the VPE lock.
> - At the same time, we must ensure that nobody accesses the same
>   redistributor's GICR_VSGI*R registers for a different VPE, which
GICR_VSGIR
>   would corrupt the reading of the pending bits. We thus take the
>   per-RD spinlock. Much fun.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c   | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 14 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> index c93f178914ee..fb2b836c31ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> @@ -3962,11 +3962,84 @@ static int its_sgi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> +static int its_sgi_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
> +				     enum irqchip_irq_state which,
> +				     bool state)
> +{
> +	if (which != IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (state) {
> +		struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +		struct its_node *its = find_4_1_its();
> +		u64 val;
> +
> +		val  = FIELD_PREP(GITS_SGIR_VPEID, vpe->vpe_id);
> +		val |= FIELD_PREP(GITS_SGIR_VINTID, d->hwirq);
> +		writeq_relaxed(val, its->sgir_base + GITS_SGIR - SZ_128K);
> +	} else {
> +		its_configure_sgi(d, true);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int its_sgi_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
> +				     enum irqchip_irq_state which, bool *val)
> +{
> +	struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u32 count = 1000000;	/* 1s! */
where does it come from? I did not find any info in the spec about this
delay.
> +	u32 status;
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	if (which != IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Locking galore! We can race against two different events:
> +	 *
> +	 * - Concurent vPE affinity change: we must make sure it cannot
> +         *   happen, or we'll talk to the wrong redistributor. This is
> +         *   identical to what happens with vLPIs.
> +	 *
> +	 * - Concurrent VSGIPENDR access: As it involves accessing two
> +         *   MMIO registers, this must be made atomic one way or another.
> +	 */
> +	cpu = vpe_to_cpuid_lock(vpe, &flags);
> +	raw_spin_lock(&gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->rd_lock);
> +	base = gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->rd_base + SZ_128K;
> +	writel_relaxed(vpe->vpe_id, base + GICR_VSGIR);
> +	do {
> +		status = readl_relaxed(base + GICR_VSGIPENDR);
> +		if (!(status & GICR_VSGIPENDR_BUSY))
> +			goto out;
> +
> +		count--;
> +		if (!count) {
> +			pr_err_ratelimited("Unable to get SGI status\n");
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +		cpu_relax();
> +		udelay(1);
> +	} while(count);
> +
> +out:
> +	raw_spin_unlock(&gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->rd_lock);
> +	vpe_to_cpuid_unlock(vpe, flags);
> +	*val = !!(status & (1 << d->hwirq));
> +
> +	return 0;
cascade an error on timeout?
> +}
> +
>  static struct irq_chip its_sgi_irq_chip = {
>  	.name			= "GICv4.1-sgi",
>  	.irq_mask		= its_sgi_mask_irq,
>  	.irq_unmask		= its_sgi_unmask_irq,
>  	.irq_set_affinity	= its_sgi_set_affinity,
> +	.irq_set_irqchip_state	= its_sgi_set_irqchip_state,
> +	.irq_get_irqchip_state	= its_sgi_get_irqchip_state,
>  };
>  
>  static int its_sgi_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> index fd3be49ac9a5..830d2abf14b3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> @@ -345,6 +345,15 @@
>  #define GICR_VPENDBASER_4_1_VGRP1EN	(1ULL << 58)
>  #define GICR_VPENDBASER_4_1_VPEID	GENMASK_ULL(15, 0)
>  
> +#define GICR_VSGIR			0x0080
> +
> +#define GICR_VSGIR_VPEID		GENMASK(15, 0)
> +
> +#define GICR_VSGIPENDR			0x0088
> +
> +#define GICR_VSGIPENDR_BUSY		(1U << 31)
> +#define GICR_VSGIPENDR_PENDING		GENMASK(15, 0)
> +
>  /*
>   * ITS registers, offsets from ITS_base
>   */
> @@ -368,6 +377,11 @@
>  
>  #define GITS_TRANSLATER			0x10040
>  
> +#define GITS_SGIR			0x20020
> +
> +#define GITS_SGIR_VPEID			GENMASK_ULL(47, 32)
> +#define GITS_SGIR_VINTID		GENMASK_ULL(7, 0)
as spotted by Zenghui 3, 0
> +
>  #define GITS_CTLR_ENABLE		(1U << 0)
>  #define GITS_CTLR_ImDe			(1U << 1)
>  #define	GITS_CTLR_ITS_NUMBER_SHIFT	4
> 

Thanks

Eric


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb get/set_irqchip_state SGI callbacks
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 22:43:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6b95eeb-b1c7-802b-e29e-a6c6ecf9ea33@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200304203330.4967-12-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

On 3/4/20 9:33 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> To implement the get/set_irqchip_state callbacks (limited to the
> PENDING state), we have to use a particular set of hacks:
> 
> - Reading the pending state is done by using a pair of new redistributor
>   registers (GICR_VSGIR, GICR_VSGIPENDR), which allow the 16 interrupts
>   state to be retrieved.
> - Setting the pending state is done by generating it as we'd otherwise do
>   for a guest (writing to GITS_SGIR).
> - Clearing the pending state is done by emiting a VSGI command with the
emitting
>   "clear" bit set.
> 
> This requires some interesting locking though:
> - When talking to the redistributor, we must make sure that the VPE
>   affinity doesn't change, hence taking the VPE lock.
> - At the same time, we must ensure that nobody accesses the same
>   redistributor's GICR_VSGI*R registers for a different VPE, which
GICR_VSGIR
>   would corrupt the reading of the pending bits. We thus take the
>   per-RD spinlock. Much fun.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c   | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 14 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> index c93f178914ee..fb2b836c31ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> @@ -3962,11 +3962,84 @@ static int its_sgi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> +static int its_sgi_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
> +				     enum irqchip_irq_state which,
> +				     bool state)
> +{
> +	if (which != IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (state) {
> +		struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +		struct its_node *its = find_4_1_its();
> +		u64 val;
> +
> +		val  = FIELD_PREP(GITS_SGIR_VPEID, vpe->vpe_id);
> +		val |= FIELD_PREP(GITS_SGIR_VINTID, d->hwirq);
> +		writeq_relaxed(val, its->sgir_base + GITS_SGIR - SZ_128K);
> +	} else {
> +		its_configure_sgi(d, true);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int its_sgi_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
> +				     enum irqchip_irq_state which, bool *val)
> +{
> +	struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u32 count = 1000000;	/* 1s! */
where does it come from? I did not find any info in the spec about this
delay.
> +	u32 status;
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	if (which != IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Locking galore! We can race against two different events:
> +	 *
> +	 * - Concurent vPE affinity change: we must make sure it cannot
> +         *   happen, or we'll talk to the wrong redistributor. This is
> +         *   identical to what happens with vLPIs.
> +	 *
> +	 * - Concurrent VSGIPENDR access: As it involves accessing two
> +         *   MMIO registers, this must be made atomic one way or another.
> +	 */
> +	cpu = vpe_to_cpuid_lock(vpe, &flags);
> +	raw_spin_lock(&gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->rd_lock);
> +	base = gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->rd_base + SZ_128K;
> +	writel_relaxed(vpe->vpe_id, base + GICR_VSGIR);
> +	do {
> +		status = readl_relaxed(base + GICR_VSGIPENDR);
> +		if (!(status & GICR_VSGIPENDR_BUSY))
> +			goto out;
> +
> +		count--;
> +		if (!count) {
> +			pr_err_ratelimited("Unable to get SGI status\n");
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +		cpu_relax();
> +		udelay(1);
> +	} while(count);
> +
> +out:
> +	raw_spin_unlock(&gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->rd_lock);
> +	vpe_to_cpuid_unlock(vpe, flags);
> +	*val = !!(status & (1 << d->hwirq));
> +
> +	return 0;
cascade an error on timeout?
> +}
> +
>  static struct irq_chip its_sgi_irq_chip = {
>  	.name			= "GICv4.1-sgi",
>  	.irq_mask		= its_sgi_mask_irq,
>  	.irq_unmask		= its_sgi_unmask_irq,
>  	.irq_set_affinity	= its_sgi_set_affinity,
> +	.irq_set_irqchip_state	= its_sgi_set_irqchip_state,
> +	.irq_get_irqchip_state	= its_sgi_get_irqchip_state,
>  };
>  
>  static int its_sgi_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> index fd3be49ac9a5..830d2abf14b3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> @@ -345,6 +345,15 @@
>  #define GICR_VPENDBASER_4_1_VGRP1EN	(1ULL << 58)
>  #define GICR_VPENDBASER_4_1_VPEID	GENMASK_ULL(15, 0)
>  
> +#define GICR_VSGIR			0x0080
> +
> +#define GICR_VSGIR_VPEID		GENMASK(15, 0)
> +
> +#define GICR_VSGIPENDR			0x0088
> +
> +#define GICR_VSGIPENDR_BUSY		(1U << 31)
> +#define GICR_VSGIPENDR_PENDING		GENMASK(15, 0)
> +
>  /*
>   * ITS registers, offsets from ITS_base
>   */
> @@ -368,6 +377,11 @@
>  
>  #define GITS_TRANSLATER			0x10040
>  
> +#define GITS_SGIR			0x20020
> +
> +#define GITS_SGIR_VPEID			GENMASK_ULL(47, 32)
> +#define GITS_SGIR_VINTID		GENMASK_ULL(7, 0)
as spotted by Zenghui 3, 0
> +
>  #define GITS_CTLR_ENABLE		(1U << 0)
>  #define GITS_CTLR_ImDe			(1U << 1)
>  #define	GITS_CTLR_ITS_NUMBER_SHIFT	4
> 

Thanks

Eric

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb get/set_irqchip_state SGI callbacks
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 22:43:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6b95eeb-b1c7-802b-e29e-a6c6ecf9ea33@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200304203330.4967-12-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

On 3/4/20 9:33 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> To implement the get/set_irqchip_state callbacks (limited to the
> PENDING state), we have to use a particular set of hacks:
> 
> - Reading the pending state is done by using a pair of new redistributor
>   registers (GICR_VSGIR, GICR_VSGIPENDR), which allow the 16 interrupts
>   state to be retrieved.
> - Setting the pending state is done by generating it as we'd otherwise do
>   for a guest (writing to GITS_SGIR).
> - Clearing the pending state is done by emiting a VSGI command with the
emitting
>   "clear" bit set.
> 
> This requires some interesting locking though:
> - When talking to the redistributor, we must make sure that the VPE
>   affinity doesn't change, hence taking the VPE lock.
> - At the same time, we must ensure that nobody accesses the same
>   redistributor's GICR_VSGI*R registers for a different VPE, which
GICR_VSGIR
>   would corrupt the reading of the pending bits. We thus take the
>   per-RD spinlock. Much fun.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c   | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 14 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> index c93f178914ee..fb2b836c31ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> @@ -3962,11 +3962,84 @@ static int its_sgi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> +static int its_sgi_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
> +				     enum irqchip_irq_state which,
> +				     bool state)
> +{
> +	if (which != IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (state) {
> +		struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +		struct its_node *its = find_4_1_its();
> +		u64 val;
> +
> +		val  = FIELD_PREP(GITS_SGIR_VPEID, vpe->vpe_id);
> +		val |= FIELD_PREP(GITS_SGIR_VINTID, d->hwirq);
> +		writeq_relaxed(val, its->sgir_base + GITS_SGIR - SZ_128K);
> +	} else {
> +		its_configure_sgi(d, true);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int its_sgi_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
> +				     enum irqchip_irq_state which, bool *val)
> +{
> +	struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u32 count = 1000000;	/* 1s! */
where does it come from? I did not find any info in the spec about this
delay.
> +	u32 status;
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	if (which != IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Locking galore! We can race against two different events:
> +	 *
> +	 * - Concurent vPE affinity change: we must make sure it cannot
> +         *   happen, or we'll talk to the wrong redistributor. This is
> +         *   identical to what happens with vLPIs.
> +	 *
> +	 * - Concurrent VSGIPENDR access: As it involves accessing two
> +         *   MMIO registers, this must be made atomic one way or another.
> +	 */
> +	cpu = vpe_to_cpuid_lock(vpe, &flags);
> +	raw_spin_lock(&gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->rd_lock);
> +	base = gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->rd_base + SZ_128K;
> +	writel_relaxed(vpe->vpe_id, base + GICR_VSGIR);
> +	do {
> +		status = readl_relaxed(base + GICR_VSGIPENDR);
> +		if (!(status & GICR_VSGIPENDR_BUSY))
> +			goto out;
> +
> +		count--;
> +		if (!count) {
> +			pr_err_ratelimited("Unable to get SGI status\n");
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +		cpu_relax();
> +		udelay(1);
> +	} while(count);
> +
> +out:
> +	raw_spin_unlock(&gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->rd_lock);
> +	vpe_to_cpuid_unlock(vpe, flags);
> +	*val = !!(status & (1 << d->hwirq));
> +
> +	return 0;
cascade an error on timeout?
> +}
> +
>  static struct irq_chip its_sgi_irq_chip = {
>  	.name			= "GICv4.1-sgi",
>  	.irq_mask		= its_sgi_mask_irq,
>  	.irq_unmask		= its_sgi_unmask_irq,
>  	.irq_set_affinity	= its_sgi_set_affinity,
> +	.irq_set_irqchip_state	= its_sgi_set_irqchip_state,
> +	.irq_get_irqchip_state	= its_sgi_get_irqchip_state,
>  };
>  
>  static int its_sgi_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> index fd3be49ac9a5..830d2abf14b3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> @@ -345,6 +345,15 @@
>  #define GICR_VPENDBASER_4_1_VGRP1EN	(1ULL << 58)
>  #define GICR_VPENDBASER_4_1_VPEID	GENMASK_ULL(15, 0)
>  
> +#define GICR_VSGIR			0x0080
> +
> +#define GICR_VSGIR_VPEID		GENMASK(15, 0)
> +
> +#define GICR_VSGIPENDR			0x0088
> +
> +#define GICR_VSGIPENDR_BUSY		(1U << 31)
> +#define GICR_VSGIPENDR_PENDING		GENMASK(15, 0)
> +
>  /*
>   * ITS registers, offsets from ITS_base
>   */
> @@ -368,6 +377,11 @@
>  
>  #define GITS_TRANSLATER			0x10040
>  
> +#define GITS_SGIR			0x20020
> +
> +#define GITS_SGIR_VPEID			GENMASK_ULL(47, 32)
> +#define GITS_SGIR_VINTID		GENMASK_ULL(7, 0)
as spotted by Zenghui 3, 0
> +
>  #define GITS_CTLR_ENABLE		(1U << 0)
>  #define GITS_CTLR_ImDe			(1U << 1)
>  #define	GITS_CTLR_ITS_NUMBER_SHIFT	4
> 

Thanks

Eric


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-16 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 312+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-04 20:33 [PATCH v5 00/23] irqchip/gic-v4: GICv4.1 architecture support Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 01/23] irqchip/gic-v3: Use SGIs without active state if offered Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12  6:30   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  6:30     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  6:30     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  9:28     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12  9:28       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12  9:28       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12 12:05       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12 12:05         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12 12:05         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-13  1:39         ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-13  1:39           ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-13  1:39           ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12 17:16   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-12 17:16     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-12 17:16     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-12 17:23     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12 17:23       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12 17:23       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-29 20:26   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 02/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Skip absent CPUs while iterating over redistributors Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-16 17:10   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-16 17:10     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-16 17:10     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-29 20:26   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 03/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure mutual exclusion between vPE affinity change and RD access Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12  6:56   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  6:56     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  6:56     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-29 20:26   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 04/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Wait for completion of redistributor's INVALL operation Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 14:23   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 14:23     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 14:23     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 05/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure mutual exclusion betwen invalidations on the same RD Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12  7:11   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  7:11     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  7:11     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20 14:23   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 14:23     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 14:23     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-29 20:26   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 06/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Advertise support v4.1 to KVM Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-16 17:10   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-16 17:10     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-16 17:10     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-29 20:26   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 07/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Map the ITS SGIR register page Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-16 17:10   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-16 17:10     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-16 17:10     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-29 20:26   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 08/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb skeletal VSGI irqchip Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-16 17:10   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-16 17:10     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-16 17:10     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 10:03     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 10:03       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 10:03       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-29 20:26   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 09/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add initial SGI configuration Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-16 17:53   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-16 17:53     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-16 17:53     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-17  2:02     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-17  2:02       ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-17  2:02       ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-17  8:36       ` Auger Eric
2020-03-17  8:36         ` Auger Eric
2020-03-17  8:36         ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 10:20     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 10:20       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 10:20       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-29 20:26   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 10/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb mask/unmask SGI callbacks Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-16 18:15   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-16 18:15     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-16 18:15     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-29 20:26   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 11/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb get/set_irqchip_state " Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12  7:41   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  7:41     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  7:41     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-16 21:43   ` Auger Eric [this message]
2020-03-16 21:43     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-16 21:43     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 10:27     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 10:27       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 10:27       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-29 20:26   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 12/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb set_vcpu_affinity " Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-17 10:35   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-17 10:35     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-17 10:35     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-29 20:26   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 13/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Move doorbell management to the GICv4 abstraction layer Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12  8:20   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  8:20     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  8:20     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-29 20:26   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 14/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add VSGI allocation/teardown Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12  8:06   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  8:06     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  8:06     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-29 20:26   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 15/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add VSGI property setup Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12  8:09   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  8:09     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  8:09     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-17 10:30   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-17 10:30     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-17 10:30     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 10:57     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 10:57       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 10:57       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-29 20:26   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 16/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Eagerly vmap vPEs Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12  8:12   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  8:12     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  8:12     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-17  2:49   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-17  2:49     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-17  2:49     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-19 10:55     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 10:55       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 10:55       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20  2:31       ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  2:31         ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  2:31         ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-29 20:26   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 17/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Let doorbells be auto-enabled Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12  8:15   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  8:15     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12  8:15     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-17 11:04   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-17 11:04     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-17 11:04     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 18/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Add direct injection capability to SGI registers Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-18  3:28   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-18  3:28     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-18  3:28     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  8:11   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20  8:11     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20  8:11     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 10:05     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 10:05       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 10:05       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 10:56       ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 10:56         ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 10:56         ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 19/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Allow SGIs to switch between HW and SW interrupts Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 16:16   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 16:16     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 16:16     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 19:52     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 19:52       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 19:52       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 20:13       ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 20:13         ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 20:13         ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20  9:17         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20  9:17           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20  9:17           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20  4:22   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  4:22     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  4:22     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 20/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Plumb SGI implementation selection in the distributor Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-18  6:34   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-18  6:34     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-18  6:34     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-19 12:10     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 12:10       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 12:10       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 20:38       ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 20:38         ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 20:38         ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20  3:08         ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  3:08           ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  3:08           ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  7:59           ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20  7:59             ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20  7:59             ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20  9:46             ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20  9:46               ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20  9:46               ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 11:09               ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 11:09                 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 11:09                 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 11:20                 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 11:20                   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 11:20                   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20  3:53       ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  3:53         ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  3:53         ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  9:01         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20  9:01           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20  9:01           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-23  8:11           ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-23  8:11             ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-23  8:11             ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-23  8:25             ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-23  8:25               ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-23  8:25               ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-23 12:40               ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-23 12:40                 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-23 12:40                 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 21/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Reload VLPI configuration on distributor enable/disable Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-18  3:17   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-18  3:17     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-18  3:17     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-19 12:18     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 12:18       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 12:18       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 22/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Allow non-trapping WFI when using HW SGIs Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20  4:23   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  4:23     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  4:23     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  8:12   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20  8:12     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20  8:12     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 23/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Expose HW-based SGIs in debugfs Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-18  3:19   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-18  3:19     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-18  3:19     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-19 15:05   ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 15:05     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 15:05     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 15:21     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 15:21       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 15:21       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 15:43       ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 15:43         ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 15:43         ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 16:16         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 16:16           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 16:16           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 16:17           ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 16:17             ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 16:17             ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20  4:38       ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  4:38         ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  4:38         ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20  9:09         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20  9:09           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20  9:09           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 11:35           ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20 11:35             ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20 11:35             ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20 11:46             ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 11:46               ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 11:46               ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 12:09               ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20 12:09                 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20 12:09                 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-05  3:39 ` [PATCH v5 00/23] irqchip/gic-v4: GICv4.1 architecture support Zenghui Yu
2020-03-05  3:39   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-05  3:39   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-09  8:17 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-09  8:17   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-09  8:17   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-09  8:46   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-09  8:46     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-09  8:46     ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d6b95eeb-b1c7-802b-e29e-a6c6ecf9ea33@redhat.com \
    --to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rrichter@marvell.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.