dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] drm/modes: Apply video parameters with only reflect option
@ 2019-12-16 17:10 Stephan Gerhold
  2019-12-16 17:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Gerhold @ 2019-12-16 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maxime Ripard, Maarten Lankhorst; +Cc: David Airlie, Stephan Gerhold, dri-devel

At the moment, video mode parameters like video=540x960,reflect_x,
(without rotation set) are not taken into account when applying the
mode in drm_client_modeset.c.

One of the reasons for this is that the calculation that
combines the panel_orientation with cmdline->rotation_reflection
does not handle the case when cmdline->rotation_reflection does
not have any rotation set.
(i.e. cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK == 0)

Example:
  *rotation = DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 (no panel_orientation)
  cmdline->rotation_reflection = DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X (video=MODE,reflect_x)

The current code does:
  panel_rot = ilog2(*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
  cmdline_rot = ilog2(cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
  sum_rot = (panel_rot + cmdline_rot) % 4;

and therefore:
  panel_rot = ilog2(DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0) = ilog2(1) = 0
  cmdline_rot = ilog2(0) = -1
  sum_rot = (0 + -1) % 4 = -1 % 4 = 3
   ...
  *rotation = DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270 | DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X

So we incorrectly generate DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270 in this case.
To prevent cmdline_rot from becoming -1, we need to treat
the rotation as DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0.

On the other hand, there is no need to go through that calculation
at all if no rotation is set in rotation_reflection.
A simple XOR is enough to combine the reflections.

Finally, also allow DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 in the if statement below.
DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 means "no rotation" and should therefore not
require any special handling (e.g. specific tiling format).

This makes video parameters with only reflect option work correctly.

Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
---
v1: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2019-December/248145.html

Changes in v2:
  - Clarified commit message - parameters are parsed correctly,
    but not taken into account when applying the mode.
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
index 895b73f23079..cfebce4f19a5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
@@ -859,19 +859,23 @@ bool drm_client_rotation(struct drm_mode_set *modeset, unsigned int *rotation)
 	 */
 	cmdline = &connector->cmdline_mode;
 	if (cmdline->specified && cmdline->rotation_reflection) {
-		unsigned int cmdline_rest, panel_rest;
-		unsigned int cmdline_rot, panel_rot;
-		unsigned int sum_rot, sum_rest;
+		if (cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) {
+			unsigned int cmdline_rest, panel_rest;
+			unsigned int cmdline_rot, panel_rot;
+			unsigned int sum_rot, sum_rest;
 
-		panel_rot = ilog2(*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
-		cmdline_rot = ilog2(cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
-		sum_rot = (panel_rot + cmdline_rot) % 4;
+			panel_rot = ilog2(*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
+			cmdline_rot = ilog2(cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
+			sum_rot = (panel_rot + cmdline_rot) % 4;
 
-		panel_rest = *rotation & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
-		cmdline_rest = cmdline->rotation_reflection & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
-		sum_rest = panel_rest ^ cmdline_rest;
+			panel_rest = *rotation & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
+			cmdline_rest = cmdline->rotation_reflection & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
+			sum_rest = panel_rest ^ cmdline_rest;
 
-		*rotation = (1 << sum_rot) | sum_rest;
+			*rotation = (1 << sum_rot) | sum_rest;
+		} else {
+			*rotation ^= cmdline->rotation_reflection;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -879,7 +883,8 @@ bool drm_client_rotation(struct drm_mode_set *modeset, unsigned int *rotation)
 	 * depending on the hardware this may require the framebuffer
 	 * to be in a specific tiling format.
 	 */
-	if ((*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180 ||
+	if (((*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 &&
+	     (*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180) ||
 	    !plane->rotation_property)
 		return false;
 
-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/modes: Apply video parameters with only reflect option
  2019-12-16 17:10 [PATCH v2] drm/modes: Apply video parameters with only reflect option Stephan Gerhold
@ 2019-12-16 17:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
  2019-12-16 18:08   ` Stephan Gerhold
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2019-12-16 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephan Gerhold; +Cc: David Airlie, dri-devel

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 06:10:17PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> At the moment, video mode parameters like video=540x960,reflect_x,
> (without rotation set) are not taken into account when applying the
> mode in drm_client_modeset.c.

A rotation value without exactly one rotation angle is illegal.
IMO the code should not generate a value like that in the first
place.

> 
> One of the reasons for this is that the calculation that
> combines the panel_orientation with cmdline->rotation_reflection
> does not handle the case when cmdline->rotation_reflection does
> not have any rotation set.
> (i.e. cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK == 0)
> 
> Example:
>   *rotation = DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 (no panel_orientation)
>   cmdline->rotation_reflection = DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X (video=MODE,reflect_x)
> 
> The current code does:
>   panel_rot = ilog2(*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
>   cmdline_rot = ilog2(cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
>   sum_rot = (panel_rot + cmdline_rot) % 4;
> 
> and therefore:
>   panel_rot = ilog2(DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0) = ilog2(1) = 0
>   cmdline_rot = ilog2(0) = -1
>   sum_rot = (0 + -1) % 4 = -1 % 4 = 3
>    ...
>   *rotation = DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270 | DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X
> 
> So we incorrectly generate DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270 in this case.
> To prevent cmdline_rot from becoming -1, we need to treat
> the rotation as DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0.
> 
> On the other hand, there is no need to go through that calculation
> at all if no rotation is set in rotation_reflection.
> A simple XOR is enough to combine the reflections.
> 
> Finally, also allow DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 in the if statement below.
> DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 means "no rotation" and should therefore not
> require any special handling (e.g. specific tiling format).
> 
> This makes video parameters with only reflect option work correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
> ---
> v1: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2019-December/248145.html
> 
> Changes in v2:
>   - Clarified commit message - parameters are parsed correctly,
>     but not taken into account when applying the mode.
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> index 895b73f23079..cfebce4f19a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> @@ -859,19 +859,23 @@ bool drm_client_rotation(struct drm_mode_set *modeset, unsigned int *rotation)
>  	 */
>  	cmdline = &connector->cmdline_mode;
>  	if (cmdline->specified && cmdline->rotation_reflection) {
> -		unsigned int cmdline_rest, panel_rest;
> -		unsigned int cmdline_rot, panel_rot;
> -		unsigned int sum_rot, sum_rest;
> +		if (cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) {
> +			unsigned int cmdline_rest, panel_rest;
> +			unsigned int cmdline_rot, panel_rot;
> +			unsigned int sum_rot, sum_rest;
>  
> -		panel_rot = ilog2(*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
> -		cmdline_rot = ilog2(cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
> -		sum_rot = (panel_rot + cmdline_rot) % 4;
> +			panel_rot = ilog2(*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
> +			cmdline_rot = ilog2(cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
> +			sum_rot = (panel_rot + cmdline_rot) % 4;
>  
> -		panel_rest = *rotation & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
> -		cmdline_rest = cmdline->rotation_reflection & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
> -		sum_rest = panel_rest ^ cmdline_rest;
> +			panel_rest = *rotation & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
> +			cmdline_rest = cmdline->rotation_reflection & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
> +			sum_rest = panel_rest ^ cmdline_rest;
>  
> -		*rotation = (1 << sum_rot) | sum_rest;
> +			*rotation = (1 << sum_rot) | sum_rest;
> +		} else {
> +			*rotation ^= cmdline->rotation_reflection;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -879,7 +883,8 @@ bool drm_client_rotation(struct drm_mode_set *modeset, unsigned int *rotation)
>  	 * depending on the hardware this may require the framebuffer
>  	 * to be in a specific tiling format.
>  	 */
> -	if ((*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180 ||
> +	if (((*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 &&
> +	     (*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180) ||
>  	    !plane->rotation_property)
>  		return false;
>  
> -- 
> 2.24.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/modes: Apply video parameters with only reflect option
  2019-12-16 17:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
@ 2019-12-16 18:08   ` Stephan Gerhold
  2020-01-13 16:30     ` Stephan Gerhold
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Gerhold @ 2019-12-16 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: David Airlie, dri-devel

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 07:27:25PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 06:10:17PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > At the moment, video mode parameters like video=540x960,reflect_x,
> > (without rotation set) are not taken into account when applying the
> > mode in drm_client_modeset.c.
> 
> A rotation value without exactly one rotation angle is illegal.
> IMO the code should not generate a value like that in the first
> place.
> 

You're right. I was thinking about this when creating this patch.
But then I was not sure if "mode->rotation_reflection" is supposed to be
a valid rotation value.The zero value is currently used to check
if any rotation/reflection was specified at all:

[...]
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> > index 895b73f23079..cfebce4f19a5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> > @@ -859,19 +859,23 @@ bool drm_client_rotation(struct drm_mode_set *modeset, unsigned int *rotation)
> >  	 */
> >  	cmdline = &connector->cmdline_mode;
> >  	if (cmdline->specified && cmdline->rotation_reflection) {

I can try to make your suggested change in the cmdline parsing code,
but since this sounds like a larger change I would appreciate
some other opinions first.

Thanks,
Stephan

> > 
> > -		unsigned int cmdline_rest, panel_rest;
> > -		unsigned int cmdline_rot, panel_rot;
> > -		unsigned int sum_rot, sum_rest;
> > +		if (cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) {
> > +			unsigned int cmdline_rest, panel_rest;
> > +			unsigned int cmdline_rot, panel_rot;
> > +			unsigned int sum_rot, sum_rest;
> >  
> > -		panel_rot = ilog2(*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
> > -		cmdline_rot = ilog2(cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
> > -		sum_rot = (panel_rot + cmdline_rot) % 4;
> > +			panel_rot = ilog2(*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
> > +			cmdline_rot = ilog2(cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
> > +			sum_rot = (panel_rot + cmdline_rot) % 4;
> >  
> > -		panel_rest = *rotation & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
> > -		cmdline_rest = cmdline->rotation_reflection & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
> > -		sum_rest = panel_rest ^ cmdline_rest;
> > +			panel_rest = *rotation & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
> > +			cmdline_rest = cmdline->rotation_reflection & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
> > +			sum_rest = panel_rest ^ cmdline_rest;
> >  
> > -		*rotation = (1 << sum_rot) | sum_rest;
> > +			*rotation = (1 << sum_rot) | sum_rest;
> > +		} else {
> > +			*rotation ^= cmdline->rotation_reflection;
> > +		}
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/*
> > @@ -879,7 +883,8 @@ bool drm_client_rotation(struct drm_mode_set *modeset, unsigned int *rotation)
> >  	 * depending on the hardware this may require the framebuffer
> >  	 * to be in a specific tiling format.
> >  	 */
> > -	if ((*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180 ||
> > +	if (((*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 &&
> > +	     (*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180) ||
> >  	    !plane->rotation_property)
> >  		return false;
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.24.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/modes: Apply video parameters with only reflect option
  2019-12-16 18:08   ` Stephan Gerhold
@ 2020-01-13 16:30     ` Stephan Gerhold
  2020-01-16  7:57       ` Maxime Ripard
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Gerhold @ 2020-01-13 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maxime Ripard; +Cc: David Airlie, dri-devel

Hi Maxime,

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 07:08:12PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 07:27:25PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 06:10:17PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > > At the moment, video mode parameters like video=540x960,reflect_x,
> > > (without rotation set) are not taken into account when applying the
> > > mode in drm_client_modeset.c.
> > 
> > A rotation value without exactly one rotation angle is illegal.
> > IMO the code should not generate a value like that in the first
> > place.
> > 

What do you think about Ville's comment?
Should we change the command line parser to generate ROTATE_0 when no
rotate option is specified? This would also require updating a few of
the test cases.

You added the code for parsing the rotation/reflection options,
so I thought I'd ask before I start working on this.

Thanks,
Stephan

> 
> You're right. I was thinking about this when creating this patch.
> But then I was not sure if "mode->rotation_reflection" is supposed to be
> a valid rotation value.The zero value is currently used to check
> if any rotation/reflection was specified at all:
> 
> [...]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> > > index 895b73f23079..cfebce4f19a5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> > > @@ -859,19 +859,23 @@ bool drm_client_rotation(struct drm_mode_set *modeset, unsigned int *rotation)
> > >  	 */
> > >  	cmdline = &connector->cmdline_mode;
> > >  	if (cmdline->specified && cmdline->rotation_reflection) {
> 
> I can try to make your suggested change in the cmdline parsing code,
> but since this sounds like a larger change I would appreciate
> some other opinions first.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stephan
> 
> > > 
> > > -		unsigned int cmdline_rest, panel_rest;
> > > -		unsigned int cmdline_rot, panel_rot;
> > > -		unsigned int sum_rot, sum_rest;
> > > +		if (cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) {
> > > +			unsigned int cmdline_rest, panel_rest;
> > > +			unsigned int cmdline_rot, panel_rot;
> > > +			unsigned int sum_rot, sum_rest;
> > >  
> > > -		panel_rot = ilog2(*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
> > > -		cmdline_rot = ilog2(cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
> > > -		sum_rot = (panel_rot + cmdline_rot) % 4;
> > > +			panel_rot = ilog2(*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
> > > +			cmdline_rot = ilog2(cmdline->rotation_reflection & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
> > > +			sum_rot = (panel_rot + cmdline_rot) % 4;
> > >  
> > > -		panel_rest = *rotation & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
> > > -		cmdline_rest = cmdline->rotation_reflection & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
> > > -		sum_rest = panel_rest ^ cmdline_rest;
> > > +			panel_rest = *rotation & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
> > > +			cmdline_rest = cmdline->rotation_reflection & ~DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK;
> > > +			sum_rest = panel_rest ^ cmdline_rest;
> > >  
> > > -		*rotation = (1 << sum_rot) | sum_rest;
> > > +			*rotation = (1 << sum_rot) | sum_rest;
> > > +		} else {
> > > +			*rotation ^= cmdline->rotation_reflection;
> > > +		}
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	/*
> > > @@ -879,7 +883,8 @@ bool drm_client_rotation(struct drm_mode_set *modeset, unsigned int *rotation)
> > >  	 * depending on the hardware this may require the framebuffer
> > >  	 * to be in a specific tiling format.
> > >  	 */
> > > -	if ((*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180 ||
> > > +	if (((*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 &&
> > > +	     (*rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK) != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180) ||
> > >  	    !plane->rotation_property)
> > >  		return false;
> > >  
> > > -- 
> > > 2.24.1
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/modes: Apply video parameters with only reflect option
  2020-01-13 16:30     ` Stephan Gerhold
@ 2020-01-16  7:57       ` Maxime Ripard
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2020-01-16  7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephan Gerhold; +Cc: David Airlie, dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 896 bytes --]

Hi Stephan,

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 05:30:39PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 07:08:12PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 07:27:25PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 06:10:17PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > > > At the moment, video mode parameters like video=540x960,reflect_x,
> > > > (without rotation set) are not taken into account when applying the
> > > > mode in drm_client_modeset.c.
> > >
> > > A rotation value without exactly one rotation angle is illegal.
> > > IMO the code should not generate a value like that in the first
> > > place.
> > >
>
> What do you think about Ville's comment?
> Should we change the command line parser to generate ROTATE_0 when no
> rotate option is specified? This would also require updating a few of
> the test cases.

I agree with him :)

Maxime

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-16  7:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-12-16 17:10 [PATCH v2] drm/modes: Apply video parameters with only reflect option Stephan Gerhold
2019-12-16 17:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-16 18:08   ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-01-13 16:30     ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-01-16  7:57       ` Maxime Ripard

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).