dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, tony.ye@intel.com, zhengguo.xu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/27] drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:12:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210914011211.GA14967@jons-linux-dev-box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07d15bba-998c-bd03-e0e9-88394053b610@intel.com>

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 03:26:29PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
> On 9/9/2021 17:41, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 03:46:43PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
> > > On 8/20/2021 15:44, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > > Taking a PM reference to prevent intel_gt_wait_for_idle from short
> > > > circuiting while a scheduling of user context could be enabled.
> > > As with earlier PM patch, needs more explanation of what the problem is and
> > > why it is only now a problem.
> > > 
> > > 
> > Same explaination, will add here.
> > 
> > > > v2:
> > > >    (Daniel Vetter)
> > > >     - Add might_lock annotations to pin / unpin function
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c       |  3 ++
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.h     | 15 ++++++++
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h         | 10 ++++++
> > > >    .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++--
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h          | 12 +++++++
> > > >    5 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> > > > index c8595da64ad8..508cfe5770c0 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> > > > @@ -240,6 +240,8 @@ int __intel_context_do_pin_ww(struct intel_context *ce,
> > > >    	if (err)
> > > >    		goto err_post_unpin;
> > > > +	intel_engine_pm_might_get(ce->engine);
> > > > +
> > > >    	if (unlikely(intel_context_is_closed(ce))) {
> > > >    		err = -ENOENT;
> > > >    		goto err_unlock;
> > > > @@ -313,6 +315,7 @@ void __intel_context_do_unpin(struct intel_context *ce, int sub)
> > > >    		return;
> > > >    	CE_TRACE(ce, "unpin\n");
> > > > +	intel_engine_pm_might_put(ce->engine);
> > > >    	ce->ops->unpin(ce);
> > > >    	ce->ops->post_unpin(ce);
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.h
> > > > index 17a5028ea177..3fe2ae1bcc26 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.h
> > > > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > > >    #include "i915_request.h"
> > > >    #include "intel_engine_types.h"
> > > >    #include "intel_wakeref.h"
> > > > +#include "intel_gt_pm.h"
> > > >    static inline bool
> > > >    intel_engine_pm_is_awake(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > > > @@ -31,6 +32,13 @@ static inline bool intel_engine_pm_get_if_awake(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > > >    	return intel_wakeref_get_if_active(&engine->wakeref);
> > > >    }
> > > > +static inline void intel_engine_pm_might_get(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	if (!intel_engine_is_virtual(engine))
> > > > +		intel_wakeref_might_get(&engine->wakeref);
> > > Why doesn't this need to iterate through the physical engines of the virtual
> > > engine?
> > > 
> > Yea, technically it should. This is just an annotation though to check
> > if we do something horribly wrong in our code. If we use any physical
> > engine in our stack this annotation should pop and we can fix it. I just
> > don't see what making this 100% correct for virtual engines buys us. If
> > you want I can fix this but thinking the more complex we make this
> > annotation the less likely it just gets compiled out with lockdep off
> > which is what we are aiming for.
> But if the annotation is missing a fundamental lock then it is surely not
> actually going to do any good? Not sure if you need to iterate over all
> child engines + parent but it seems like you should be calling might_lock()
> on at least one engine's mutex to feed the lockdep annotation.
> 

These are all inline functions so the compiler to be able to compile
this out if lockdep is disabled. I'll fix this in the next rev.

Matt 

> John.
> 
> > Matt
> > 
> > > John.
> > > 
> > > > +	intel_gt_pm_might_get(engine->gt);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >    static inline void intel_engine_pm_put(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	intel_wakeref_put(&engine->wakeref);
> > > > @@ -52,6 +60,13 @@ static inline void intel_engine_pm_flush(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > > >    	intel_wakeref_unlock_wait(&engine->wakeref);
> > > >    }
> > > > +static inline void intel_engine_pm_might_put(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	if (!intel_engine_is_virtual(engine))
> > > > +		intel_wakeref_might_put(&engine->wakeref);
> > > > +	intel_gt_pm_might_put(engine->gt);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >    static inline struct i915_request *
> > > >    intel_engine_create_kernel_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > > >    {
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h
> > > > index a17bf0d4592b..3c173033ce23 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h
> > > > @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ static inline bool intel_gt_pm_get_if_awake(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > > >    	return intel_wakeref_get_if_active(&gt->wakeref);
> > > >    }
> > > > +static inline void intel_gt_pm_might_get(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	intel_wakeref_might_get(&gt->wakeref);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >    static inline void intel_gt_pm_put(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	intel_wakeref_put(&gt->wakeref);
> > > > @@ -41,6 +46,11 @@ static inline void intel_gt_pm_put_async(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > > >    	intel_wakeref_put_async(&gt->wakeref);
> > > >    }
> > > > +static inline void intel_gt_pm_might_put(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	intel_wakeref_might_put(&gt->wakeref);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >    #define with_intel_gt_pm(gt, tmp) \
> > > >    	for (tmp = 1, intel_gt_pm_get(gt); tmp; \
> > > >    	     intel_gt_pm_put(gt), tmp = 0)
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > > > index dbf919801de2..e0eed70f9b92 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > > > @@ -1550,7 +1550,12 @@ static int guc_context_pre_pin(struct intel_context *ce,
> > > >    static int guc_context_pin(struct intel_context *ce, void *vaddr)
> > > >    {
> > > > -	return __guc_context_pin(ce, ce->engine, vaddr);
> > > > +	int ret = __guc_context_pin(ce, ce->engine, vaddr);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (likely(!ret && !intel_context_is_barrier(ce)))
> > > > +		intel_engine_pm_get(ce->engine);
> > > > +
> > > > +	return ret;
> > > >    }
> > > >    static void guc_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
> > > > @@ -1559,6 +1564,9 @@ static void guc_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
> > > >    	unpin_guc_id(guc, ce);
> > > >    	lrc_unpin(ce);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (likely(!intel_context_is_barrier(ce)))
> > > > +		intel_engine_pm_put_async(ce->engine);
> > > >    }
> > > >    static void guc_context_post_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
> > > > @@ -2328,8 +2336,30 @@ static int guc_virtual_context_pre_pin(struct intel_context *ce,
> > > >    static int guc_virtual_context_pin(struct intel_context *ce, void *vaddr)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = guc_virtual_get_sibling(ce->engine, 0);
> > > > +	int ret = __guc_context_pin(ce, engine, vaddr);
> > > > +	intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = ce->engine->mask;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (likely(!ret))
> > > > +		for_each_engine_masked(engine, ce->engine->gt, mask, tmp)
> > > > +			intel_engine_pm_get(engine);
> > > > -	return __guc_context_pin(ce, engine, vaddr);
> > > > +	return ret;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void guc_virtual_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = ce->engine->mask;
> > > > +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> > > > +	struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
> > > > +
> > > > +	GEM_BUG_ON(context_enabled(ce));
> > > > +	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_barrier(ce));
> > > > +
> > > > +	unpin_guc_id(guc, ce);
> > > > +	lrc_unpin(ce);
> > > > +
> > > > +	for_each_engine_masked(engine, ce->engine->gt, mask, tmp)
> > > > +		intel_engine_pm_put_async(engine);
> > > >    }
> > > >    static void guc_virtual_context_enter(struct intel_context *ce)
> > > > @@ -2366,7 +2396,7 @@ static const struct intel_context_ops virtual_guc_context_ops = {
> > > >    	.pre_pin = guc_virtual_context_pre_pin,
> > > >    	.pin = guc_virtual_context_pin,
> > > > -	.unpin = guc_context_unpin,
> > > > +	.unpin = guc_virtual_context_unpin,
> > > >    	.post_unpin = guc_context_post_unpin,
> > > >    	.ban = guc_context_ban,
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h
> > > > index ef7e6a698e8a..dd530ae028e0 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h
> > > > @@ -124,6 +124,12 @@ enum {
> > > >    	__INTEL_WAKEREF_PUT_LAST_BIT__
> > > >    };
> > > > +static inline void
> > > > +intel_wakeref_might_get(struct intel_wakeref *wf)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	might_lock(&wf->mutex);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >    /**
> > > >     * intel_wakeref_put_flags: Release the wakeref
> > > >     * @wf: the wakeref
> > > > @@ -171,6 +177,12 @@ intel_wakeref_put_delay(struct intel_wakeref *wf, unsigned long delay)
> > > >    			    FIELD_PREP(INTEL_WAKEREF_PUT_DELAY, delay));
> > > >    }
> > > > +static inline void
> > > > +intel_wakeref_might_put(struct intel_wakeref *wf)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	might_lock(&wf->mutex);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >    /**
> > > >     * intel_wakeref_lock: Lock the wakeref (mutex)
> > > >     * @wf: the wakeref
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-14  1:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-20 22:44 [PATCH 00/27] Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 01/27] drm/i915/guc: Squash Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 02/27] drm/i915/guc: Allow flexible number of context ids Matthew Brost
2021-09-09 22:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-10  0:14     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 03/27] drm/i915/guc: Connect the number of guc_ids to debugfs Matthew Brost
2021-09-09 22:16   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-10  0:16     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 04/27] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost
2021-09-09 22:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-10  0:21     ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-13  9:55   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-13 17:12     ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-14  8:41       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 05/27] drm/i915: Add GT PM unpark worker Matthew Brost
2021-09-09 22:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-10  0:34     ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-10  8:36   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-10 20:09     ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-13 10:33       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-13 17:20         ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 06/27] drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-09-09 22:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-10  0:41     ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-13 22:26       ` John Harrison
2021-09-14  1:12         ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 07/27] drm/i915/guc: Don't call switch_to_kernel_context " Matthew Brost
2021-09-09 22:51   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-13 16:54     ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-13 22:38       ` John Harrison
2021-09-14  5:02         ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-13 16:55     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 08/27] drm/i915: Add logical engine mapping Matthew Brost
2021-09-10 11:12   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-10 19:49     ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-13  9:24       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-13 16:50         ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-14  8:34           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-14 18:04             ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-15  8:24               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-15 16:58                 ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-16  8:31                   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 09/27] drm/i915: Expose logical engine instance to user Matthew Brost
2021-09-13 23:06   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-14  1:08     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 10/27] drm/i915/guc: Introduce context parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-09-13 23:19   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-14  1:18     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 11/27] drm/i915/guc: Implement parallel context pin / unpin functions Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 12/27] drm/i915/guc: Add multi-lrc context registration Matthew Brost
2021-09-15 19:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-15 19:31     ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-15 20:23       ` John Harrison
2021-09-15 20:33         ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 13/27] drm/i915/guc: Ensure GuC schedule operations do not operate on child contexts Matthew Brost
2021-09-15 19:24   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-15 19:34     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 14/27] drm/i915/guc: Assign contexts in parent-child relationship consecutive guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-09-15 20:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-15 20:55     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 15/27] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc submission Matthew Brost
2021-08-21 14:04   ` kernel test robot
2021-08-22  2:18   ` kernel test robot
2021-09-20 21:48   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-22 16:25     ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-22 20:15       ` John Harrison
2021-09-23  2:44         ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 16/27] drm/i915/guc: Insert submit fences between requests in parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-09-20 21:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 17/27] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc reset Matthew Brost
2021-09-20 22:44   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-22 16:16     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 18/27] drm/i915/guc: Update debugfs for GuC multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-09-20 22:48   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-21 19:13     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 19/27] drm/i915: Fix bug in user proto-context creation that leaked contexts Matthew Brost
2021-09-20 22:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-21 14:49     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-21 19:28       ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-21 19:28     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 20/27] drm/i915/guc: Connect UAPI to GuC multi-lrc interface Matthew Brost
2021-08-29  4:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-08-29 19:59   ` kernel test robot
2021-09-21  0:09   ` John Harrison
2021-09-22 16:38     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 21/27] drm/i915/doc: Update parallel submit doc to point to i915_drm.h Matthew Brost
2021-09-21  0:12   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 22/27] drm/i915/guc: Add basic GuC multi-lrc selftest Matthew Brost
2021-09-28 20:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 23/27] drm/i915/guc: Implement no mid batch preemption for multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-09-10 11:25   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-10 20:49     ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-13 10:52       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-28 22:20   ` John Harrison
2021-09-28 22:33     ` Matthew Brost
2021-09-28 23:33       ` John Harrison
2021-09-29  0:22         ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 24/27] drm/i915: Multi-BB execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-08-21 19:01   ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-08-30  3:46   ` kernel test robot
2021-09-30 22:16   ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 25/27] drm/i915/guc: Handle errors in multi-lrc requests Matthew Brost
2021-09-29 20:44   ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-09-29 20:58     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 26/27] drm/i915: Enable multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 27/27] drm/i915/execlists: Weak parallel submission support for execlists Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210914011211.GA14967@jons-linux-dev-box \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.ye@intel.com \
    --cc=zhengguo.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).