RE: [PATCH v6 3/8] drm/msm/dp: Support only IRQ_HPD and REPLUG interrupts for eDP

["Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)" <quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com>]

Hi Doug,

> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:03 AM Sankeerth Billakanti
> <quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com> wrote:
> >
> > @@ -1374,6 +1382,12 @@ static int dp_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
> >         dp_catalog_ctrl_hpd_config(dp->catalog);
> >
> >
> > +       if (dp->dp_display.connector_type ==
> DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort)
> > +               dp_catalog_hpd_config_intr(dp->catalog,
> > +                               DP_DP_HPD_PLUG_INT_MASK |
> > +                               DP_DP_HPD_UNPLUG_INT_MASK,
> > +                               true);
> > +
> 
> nit: why are there two blank lines above?
> 
>

Will remove a blank line.
 
> > @@ -1639,6 +1653,9 @@ void dp_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge
> *drm_bridge)
> >                 return;
> >         }
> >
> > +       if (dp->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
> > +               dp_hpd_plug_handle(dp_display, 0);
> > +
> 
> Should you add a "pre_enable" and do it there? That would make it more
> symmetric with the fact that you have the countertpart in "post_disable".
>

We want to handle the screen off or eDP disable like a cable unplug so that it can be integrated into the dp code.
So, we can move plug_handle into pre_enable and the unplug_handle to pre_disable.

If we do unplug in post_disable, we need to handle the state changes also. It will complicate the driver code.

> 
> Overall: I'm probably not familiar enough with this code to give it a full
> review. I'm hoping that Dmitry knows it well enough... ;-)
> 
> 
> -Doug

Thank you,
Sankeerth