From: "Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)" <quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com>
To: "dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org" <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
"Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)" <quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com>
Cc: quic_kalyant <quic_kalyant@quicinc.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"bjorn.andersson@linaro.org" <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
"Abhinav Kumar \(QUIC\)" <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
quic_vproddut <quic_vproddut@quicinc.com>,
"airlied@linux.ie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Kuogee Hsieh \(QUIC\)" <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"sean@poorly.run" <sean@poorly.run>,
"seanpaul@chromium.org" <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
"Aravind Venkateswaran \(QUIC\)" <quic_aravindh@quicinc.com>,
"swboyd@chromium.org" <swboyd@chromium.org>,
"freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org"
<freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 8/8] drm/msm/dp: Handle eDP mode_valid differently from dp
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:05:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW4PR02MB71868617E96D59D659EFD87EE1E69@MW4PR02MB7186.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA8EJpqFh7c9ohDbR_0kG5t106-djE7TYfaoAbiT-W4-294jTw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Dmitry,
> > > > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 19:04, Sankeerth Billakanti
> > > > > <quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The panel-edp driver modes needs to be validated differently
> > > > > > from DP because the link capabilities are not available for EDP by
> that time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sankeerth Billakanti
> > > > > > <quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > This should not be necessary after
> > > > >
> > >
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/479261/?series=101682&rev=1.
> > > > > Could you please check?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The check for DP_MAX_PIXEL_CLK_KHZ is not necessary anymore but
> we
> > > > need to return early for eDP because unlike DP, eDP context will
> > > > not have the information about the number of lanes and link clock.
> > > >
> > > > So, I will modify the patch to return after the
> > > > DP_MAX_PIXEL_CLK_KHZ
> > > check if is_eDP is set.
> > >
> > > I haven't walked through all the relevant code but something you
> > > said above sounds strange. You say that for eDP we don't have info
> > > about the number of lanes? We _should_.
> > >
> > > It's certainly possible to have a panel that supports _either_ 1 or
> > > 2 lanes but then only physically connect 1 lane to it. ...or you
> > > could have a panel that supports 2 or 4 lanes and you only connect 1 lane.
> > > See, for instance, ti_sn_bridge_parse_lanes. There we assume 4 lanes
> > > but if a "data-lanes" property is present then we can use that to
> > > know that fewer lanes are physically connected.
> > >
> > > It's also possible to connect more lanes to a panel than it supports.
> > > You could connect 2 lanes to it but then it only supports 1. This
> > > case needs to be handled as well...
> > >
> >
> > I was referring to the checks we do for DP in dp_bridge_mode_valid. We
> > check if the Link bandwidth can support the pixel bandwidth. For an
> > external DP connection, the Initial DPCD/EDID read after cable
> > connection will return the sink capabilities like link rate, lane
> > count and bpp information that are used to we filter out the unsupported
> modes from the list of modes from EDID.
> >
> > For eDP case, the dp driver performs the first dpcd read during
> > bridge_enable. The dp_bridge_mode_valid function is executed before
> > bridge_enable and hence does not have the full link or the sink
> > capabilities information like external DP connection, by then.
>
> It sounds to me like we should emulate the HPD event for eDP to be handled
> earlier than the get_modes()/prepare() calls are attempted.
> However this might open another can of worms.
>
For DP, the HPD handler mainly initiates link training and gets the EDID.
Before adding support for a separate eDP panel, we had discussed about
this internally and decided to emulate eDP HPD during enable(). Main reason
being, eDP power is guaranteed to be on only after bridge_enable().
So, eDP link training can happen and sustain only after bridge_enable().
Emulating HPD before/during get_modes will not have any effect because:
1. get_modes() will go to panel's get_modes() function to power on read EDID
2. panel power will be turned off after get_modes(). Panel power off will
reset every write transaction in DPCD. anyway invalidating link training
3. mode_valid will land in dp driver but panel will not be powered on at that
time and we cannot do aux transfers or DPCD read writes.
> > So, we need to proceed with the reported mode for eDP.
>
> Well... Even if during the first call to get_modes() the DPCD is not read,
> during subsequent calls the driver has necessary information, so it can
> proceed with all the checks, can't it?
>
get_modes() currently does not land in DP driver. It gets executed in panel
bridge. But the mode_valid() comes to DP driver to check the controller
compatibility.
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
Thank you,
Sankeerth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-30 16:02 [PATCH v6 0/8] Add support for the eDP panel over aux_bus Sankeerth Billakanti
2022-03-30 16:02 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] drm/msm/dp: Add eDP support via aux_bus Sankeerth Billakanti
2022-03-30 23:19 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-03-31 0:33 ` Doug Anderson
2022-03-31 23:22 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-02 10:37 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-02 17:06 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-02 20:26 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-04 20:53 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-05 12:53 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-05 17:02 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-05 17:36 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-05 18:11 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-07 14:19 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)
2022-04-07 17:07 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-07 20:11 ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-07 20:47 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-07 22:03 ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-07 23:34 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-07 23:46 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-08 0:21 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-08 12:19 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-08 13:43 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-08 14:58 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-08 17:23 ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-07 23:35 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-08 0:20 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-08 12:13 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-08 13:56 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-08 14:17 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-03-30 16:02 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] drm/msm/dp: wait for hpd high before aux transaction Sankeerth Billakanti
2022-03-31 23:22 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-04 12:43 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)
2022-03-30 16:02 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] drm/msm/dp: Support only IRQ_HPD and REPLUG interrupts for eDP Sankeerth Billakanti
2022-03-31 23:22 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-04 12:56 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)
2022-03-30 16:02 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] drm/msm/dp: avoid handling masked interrupts Sankeerth Billakanti
2022-03-30 22:16 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-03-31 5:53 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)
2022-03-31 10:10 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-03-31 11:04 ` Sankeerth Billakanti
2022-03-31 11:06 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-04 17:56 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)
2022-03-30 16:02 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] drm/msm/dp: prevent multiple votes for dp resources Sankeerth Billakanti
2022-03-31 23:23 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-08 16:14 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-08 17:12 ` Sankeerth Billakanti
2022-04-08 18:02 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-03-30 16:02 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] drm/msm/dp: remove unnecessary delay during boot Sankeerth Billakanti
2022-03-31 23:23 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-04 13:52 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)
2022-04-04 21:13 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-07 12:40 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)
2022-03-30 16:02 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] drm/msm/dp: Support edp/dp without hpd Sankeerth Billakanti
2022-03-31 23:23 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-04 18:32 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)
2022-04-04 21:15 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-07 12:41 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)
2022-03-30 16:02 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] drm/msm/dp: Handle eDP mode_valid differently from dp Sankeerth Billakanti
2022-03-30 22:08 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-03-31 6:02 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)
2022-03-31 23:24 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-04 18:20 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)
2022-04-04 21:29 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-07 14:05 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC) [this message]
2022-04-08 12:08 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-08 15:50 ` Sankeerth Billakanti
2022-04-08 16:47 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-08 17:38 ` Sankeerth Billakanti
2022-04-08 18:06 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MW4PR02MB71868617E96D59D659EFD87EE1E69@MW4PR02MB7186.namprd02.prod.outlook.com \
--to=quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_aravindh@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_kalyant@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_khsieh@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_vproddut@quicinc.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).