* [PATCH 1/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'sram_write_dma_safe', 'load_firmware_secure' static
2019-10-09 13:03 [PATCH 0/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static zhengbin
@ 2019-10-09 13:03 ` zhengbin
2019-10-09 13:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-09 13:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'wfx_tx_queue_get' static zhengbin
2019-10-09 13:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static in sta.c zhengbin
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: zhengbin @ 2019-10-09 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jerome.pouiller, gregkh, devel; +Cc: zhengbin13
Fix sparse warnings:
drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c:83:5: warning: symbol 'sram_write_dma_safe' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c:229:5: warning: symbol 'load_firmware_secure' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
---
drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
index 8fb4a9f..39e1258 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
@@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ static const char * const fwio_error_strings[] = {
* NOTE: it may also be possible to use 'pages' from struct firmware and avoid
* bounce buffer
*/
-int sram_write_dma_safe(struct wfx_dev *wdev, u32 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
+static int
+sram_write_dma_safe(struct wfx_dev *wdev, u32 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
int ret;
const u8 *tmp;
@@ -226,7 +227,7 @@ static void print_boot_status(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
}
}
-int load_firmware_secure(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
+static int load_firmware_secure(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
{
const struct firmware *fw = NULL;
int header_size;
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'wfx_tx_queue_get' static
2019-10-09 13:03 [PATCH 0/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static zhengbin
2019-10-09 13:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'sram_write_dma_safe', 'load_firmware_secure' static zhengbin
@ 2019-10-09 13:03 ` zhengbin
2019-10-09 13:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static in sta.c zhengbin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: zhengbin @ 2019-10-09 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jerome.pouiller, gregkh, devel; +Cc: zhengbin13
Fix sparse warnings:
drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c:218:16: warning: symbol 'wfx_tx_queue_get' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
---
drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c
index 6f1be4f..4a860227 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c
@@ -215,7 +215,8 @@ void wfx_tx_queue_put(struct wfx_dev *wdev, struct wfx_queue *queue, struct sk_b
spin_unlock_bh(&queue->queue.lock);
}
-struct sk_buff *wfx_tx_queue_get(struct wfx_dev *wdev, struct wfx_queue *queue, u32 link_id_map)
+static struct sk_buff *
+wfx_tx_queue_get(struct wfx_dev *wdev, struct wfx_queue *queue, u32 link_id_map)
{
struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
struct sk_buff *item;
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH 3/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static in sta.c
2019-10-09 13:03 [PATCH 0/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static zhengbin
2019-10-09 13:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'sram_write_dma_safe', 'load_firmware_secure' static zhengbin
2019-10-09 13:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'wfx_tx_queue_get' static zhengbin
@ 2019-10-09 13:03 ` zhengbin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: zhengbin @ 2019-10-09 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jerome.pouiller, gregkh, devel; +Cc: zhengbin13
Fix sparse warnings:
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:269:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_update_filtering_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:475:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_event_handler_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:521:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_bss_loss_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:528:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_bss_params_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:539:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_set_beacon_wakeup_period_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:732:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_unjoin_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:794:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_set_cts_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:1234:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_set_tim_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
---
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
index 2855d14..d19bab6 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ void wfx_update_filtering(struct wfx_vif *wvif)
kfree(bf_tbl);
}
-void wfx_update_filtering_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_update_filtering_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, update_filtering_work);
@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static void wfx_event_report_rssi(struct wfx_vif *wvif, uint8_t raw_rcpi_rssi)
ieee80211_cqm_rssi_notify(wvif->vif, cqm_evt, rcpi_rssi, GFP_KERNEL);
}
-void wfx_event_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_event_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct wfx_vif *wvif =
container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, event_handler_work);
@@ -521,14 +521,14 @@ void wfx_event_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
__wfx_free_event_queue(&list);
}
-void wfx_bss_loss_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_bss_loss_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, bss_loss_work.work);
ieee80211_connection_loss(wvif->vif);
}
-void wfx_bss_params_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_bss_params_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, bss_params_work);
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ void wfx_bss_params_work(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_unlock(&wvif->wdev->conf_mutex);
}
-void wfx_set_beacon_wakeup_period_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_set_beacon_wakeup_period_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, set_beacon_wakeup_period_work);
@@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ static void wfx_do_join(struct wfx_vif *wvif)
cfg80211_put_bss(wvif->wdev->hw->wiphy, bss);
}
-void wfx_unjoin_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_unjoin_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, unjoin_work);
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ int wfx_sta_remove(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
return 0;
}
-void wfx_set_cts_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_set_cts_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, set_cts_work);
u8 erp_ie[3] = { WLAN_EID_ERP_INFO, 1, 0 };
@@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ static int wfx_set_tim_impl(struct wfx_vif *wvif, bool aid0_bit_set)
return 0;
}
-void wfx_set_tim_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_set_tim_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, set_tim_work);
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread