driverdev-devel.linuxdriverproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux/drivers/staging/pi433/
@ 2020-07-17 11:11 christopher tyerman
  2020-07-17 12:16 ` linux/drivers/staging/pi433/ Greg KH
  2020-07-17 12:28 ` linux/drivers/staging/pi433/ Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: christopher tyerman @ 2020-07-17 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: devel

hello

Im looking for information on the pi433 driver. Who is currently
maintaining the driver? as the original author appears not to have made
any alterations since the original commit, and links are no longer valid.

Im looking to determine what would be necessary to confirm/implement 
functionality using the RFM69HCW and, initially, more specifically the
SparkFun RFM69 Breakout( https://www.sparkfun.com/products/12823).

As a side question can you tell what or where i can find information on
driver naming conventions? as the pi433 driver to me looks like it
should really be named after the RFM69 series of chips/modules rather
than a specific PCB for that module which appears to not be available
and multiple alternatives exist for.

Thank you for your time.

    Christopher tyerman


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: linux/drivers/staging/pi433/
  2020-07-17 11:11 linux/drivers/staging/pi433/ christopher tyerman
@ 2020-07-17 12:16 ` Greg KH
  2020-07-17 12:28 ` linux/drivers/staging/pi433/ Dan Carpenter
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2020-07-17 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christopher tyerman; +Cc: devel

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:11:50PM +0100, christopher tyerman wrote:
> hello
> 
> Im looking for information on the pi433 driver. Who is currently
> maintaining the driver? as the original author appears not to have made
> any alterations since the original commit, and links are no longer valid.

Any reason you didn't cc: that developer here?

> Im looking to determine what would be necessary to confirm/implement 
> functionality using the RFM69HCW and, initially, more specifically the
> SparkFun RFM69 Breakout( https://www.sparkfun.com/products/12823).

No idea, try it and see!

> As a side question can you tell what or where i can find information on
> driver naming conventions? as the pi433 driver to me looks like it
> should really be named after the RFM69 series of chips/modules rather
> than a specific PCB for that module which appears to not be available
> and multiple alternatives exist for.

If you think it should be renamed, and want to do the work here to fix
it up and get it out of staging, great, please do!

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: linux/drivers/staging/pi433/
  2020-07-17 11:11 linux/drivers/staging/pi433/ christopher tyerman
  2020-07-17 12:16 ` linux/drivers/staging/pi433/ Greg KH
@ 2020-07-17 12:28 ` Dan Carpenter
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2020-07-17 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christopher tyerman; +Cc: devel

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:11:50PM +0100, christopher tyerman wrote:
> hello
> 
> Im looking for information on the pi433 driver. Who is currently
> maintaining the driver? as the original author appears not to have made
> any alterations since the original commit, and links are no longer valid.

Looks like no one is.

> 
> Im looking to determine what would be necessary to confirm/implement 
> functionality using the RFM69HCW and, initially, more specifically the
> SparkFun RFM69 Breakout( https://www.sparkfun.com/products/12823).
> 
> As a side question can you tell what or where i can find information on
> driver naming conventions? as the pi433 driver to me looks like it
> should really be named after the RFM69 series of chips/modules rather
> than a specific PCB for that module which appears to not be available
> and multiple alternatives exist for.

That sounds reasonable.  We can't Ack patches we haven't seen but
probably you can rename anything that you want to.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-17 12:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-17 11:11 linux/drivers/staging/pi433/ christopher tyerman
2020-07-17 12:16 ` linux/drivers/staging/pi433/ Greg KH
2020-07-17 12:28 ` linux/drivers/staging/pi433/ Dan Carpenter

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).