driverdev-devel.linuxdriverproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] staging: wlan-ng: Remove repeated words in comments
@ 2020-08-03  2:20 Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente @ 2020-08-03  2:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh, devel; +Cc: Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente

Remove duplicate words in comments at prism2mib and prism2sta files.

Signed-off-by: Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente <igormtorrente@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mib.c | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2sta.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mib.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mib.c
index 7d7d77b04255..875812a391c9 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mib.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mib.c
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ int prism2mgmt_mibset_mibget(struct wlandevice *wlandev, void *msgp)
 	/*
 	 ** Determine if this is a "mibget" or a "mibset".  If this is a
 	 ** "mibget", then make sure that the MIB may be read.  Otherwise,
-	 ** this is a "mibset" so make make sure that the MIB may be written.
+	 ** this is a "mibset" so make sure that the MIB may be written.
 	 */
 
 	isget = (msg->msgcode == DIDMSG_DOT11REQ_MIBGET);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2sta.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2sta.c
index 8f25496188aa..e6dcb687e7a1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2sta.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2sta.c
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ u32 prism2sta_ifstate(struct wlandevice *wlandev, u32 ifstate)
 		case WLAN_MSD_FWLOAD:
 			wlandev->msdstate = WLAN_MSD_RUNNING_PENDING;
 			/* Initialize the device+driver for full
-			 * operation. Note that this might me an FWLOAD to
+			 * operation. Note that this might me an FWLOAD
 			 * to RUNNING transition so we must not do a chip
 			 * or board level reset.  Note that on failure,
 			 * the MSD state is set to HWPRESENT because we
@@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ void prism2sta_processing_defer(struct work_struct *data)
 		 * we get back in range.  We should block transmits and
 		 * receives in this state.  Do we need an indication here?
 		 * Probably not since a polling user-mode element would
-		 * get this status from from p2PortStatus(FD40). What about
+		 * get this status from p2PortStatus(FD40). What about
 		 * p80211?
 		 * Response:
 		 * Block Transmits, Ignore receives of data frames
-- 
2.27.0

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-08-03  2:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-03  2:20 [PATCH] staging: wlan-ng: Remove repeated words in comments Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).