DriverDev-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: linux@jaseg.net (Jan Sebastian Götte)
Subject: [PATCH v2] Staging: fbtft: Fix GPIO handling
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 23:41:37 +0900
Message-ID: <75ada52f-afa1-08bc-d0ce-966fc1110e70@jaseg.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a77c18f-7338-888f-2379-12171b6a545e@jaseg.net>

Commit c440eee1a7a1 ("Staging: fbtft: Switch to the gpio descriptor
interface") breaks GPIO handling. In several places, checks to only set
a GPIO if it was configured ended up backwards.
I have tested this fix. The fixed driver works with a ili9486
display connected to a raspberry pi via SPI.

Fixes: commit c440eee1a7a1d ("Staging: fbtft: Switch to the gpio descriptor interface")
Tested-by: Jan Sebastian G?tte <linux at jaseg.net>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne at suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jan Sebastian G?tte <linux at jaseg.net>
---
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_bd663474.c  | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9163.c   | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9325.c   | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_s6d1121.c   | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ssd1289.c   | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ssd1331.c   | 4 ++--
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_upd161704.c | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c    | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c   | 4 ++--
 9 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_bd663474.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_bd663474.c
index b6c6d66e4eb1..e2c7646588f8 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_bd663474.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_bd663474.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
 
 static int init_display(struct fbtft_par *par)
 {
-	if (!par->gpio.cs)
+	if (par->gpio.cs)
 		gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.cs, 0);  /* Activate chip */
 
 	par->fbtftops.reset(par);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9163.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9163.c
index d609a2b67db9..fd32376700e2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9163.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9163.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static int init_display(struct fbtft_par *par)
 {
 	par->fbtftops.reset(par);
 
-	if (!par->gpio.cs)
+	if (par->gpio.cs)
 		gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.cs, 0);  /* Activate chip */
 
 	write_reg(par, MIPI_DCS_SOFT_RESET); /* software reset */
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9325.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9325.c
index b090e7ab6fdd..85e54a10ed72 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9325.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9325.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int init_display(struct fbtft_par *par)
 {
 	par->fbtftops.reset(par);
 
-	if (!par->gpio.cs)
+	if (par->gpio.cs)
 		gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.cs, 0);  /* Activate chip */
 
 	bt &= 0x07;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_s6d1121.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_s6d1121.c
index b3d0701880fe..5a129b1352cc 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_s6d1121.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_s6d1121.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static int init_display(struct fbtft_par *par)
 {
 	par->fbtftops.reset(par);
 
-	if (!par->gpio.cs)
+	if (par->gpio.cs)
 		gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.cs, 0);  /* Activate chip */
 
 	/* Initialization sequence from Lib_UTFT */
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ssd1289.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ssd1289.c
index bbf75f795234..88a5b6925901 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ssd1289.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ssd1289.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static int init_display(struct fbtft_par *par)
 {
 	par->fbtftops.reset(par);
 
-	if (!par->gpio.cs)
+	if (par->gpio.cs)
 		gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.cs, 0);  /* Activate chip */
 
 	write_reg(par, 0x00, 0x0001);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ssd1331.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ssd1331.c
index 4cfe9f8535d0..37622c9462aa 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ssd1331.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ssd1331.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static void write_reg8_bus8(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, ...)
 	va_start(args, len);
 
 	*buf = (u8)va_arg(args, unsigned int);
-	if (!par->gpio.dc)
+	if (par->gpio.dc)
 		gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.dc, 0);
 	ret = par->fbtftops.write(par, par->buf, sizeof(u8));
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static void write_reg8_bus8(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, ...)
 			return;
 		}
 	}
-	if (!par->gpio.dc)
+	if (par->gpio.dc)
 		gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.dc, 1);
 	va_end(args);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_upd161704.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_upd161704.c
index 564a38e34440..c77832ae5e5b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_upd161704.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_upd161704.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static int init_display(struct fbtft_par *par)
 {
 	par->fbtftops.reset(par);
 
-	if (!par->gpio.cs)
+	if (par->gpio.cs)
 		gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.cs, 0);  /* Activate chip */
 
 	/* Initialization sequence from Lib_UTFT */
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
index 2ea814d0dca5..63c65dd67b17 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int fbtft_write_vmem16_bus8(struct fbtft_par *par, size_t offset, size_t len)
 	remain = len / 2;
 	vmem16 = (u16 *)(par->info->screen_buffer + offset);
 
-	if (!par->gpio.dc)
+	if (par->gpio.dc)
 		gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.dc, 1);
 
 	/* non buffered write */
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
index bc750250ccd6..5127de922f6a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
@@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ static int fbtft_init_display_dt(struct fbtft_par *par)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	par->fbtftops.reset(par);
-	if (!par->gpio.cs)
+	if (par->gpio.cs)
 		gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.cs, 0);  /* Activate chip */
 
 	while (p) {
@@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ int fbtft_init_display(struct fbtft_par *par)
 	}
 
 	par->fbtftops.reset(par);
-	if (!par->gpio.cs)
+	if (par->gpio.cs)
 		gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.cs, 0);  /* Activate chip */
 
 	i = 0;
-- 
2.21.0

      parent reply index

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-15 14:30 [PATCH] Staging: fbtft: Fix wrong check in fbtft_write_wmem16_bus8() nsaenzjulienne
     [not found] ` <7b8242ab-cc0c-d90b-60af-ff1c53789e44@opensynergy.com>
2019-07-15 14:58   ` [PATCH] Staging: fbtft: Fix wrong check in,fbtft_write_wmem16_bus8() Jan Sebastian Götte
2019-07-15 15:04     ` [PATCH] Staging: fbtft: Fix GPIO handling Jan Sebastian Götte
2019-07-15 15:04       ` Jan Sebastian Götte
2019-07-15 15:14       ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-07-17 14:41     ` linux [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=75ada52f-afa1-08bc-d0ce-966fc1110e70@jaseg.net \
    --to=linux@jaseg.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DriverDev-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/driverdev-devel/0 driverdev-devel/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 driverdev-devel driverdev-devel/ https://lore.kernel.org/driverdev-devel \
		driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org devel@driverdev.osuosl.org driverdev-devel@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index driverdev-devel


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.linuxdriverproject.driverdev-devel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox