From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To: dwarves@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH dwarves v3] libbpf: allow to use packaged version
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:47:05 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YGKtSXsLg4HV7eHL@codewreck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210104221622.256663-1-bluca@debian.org>
Hi,
I see this commit has been reverted just before the 1.20 release in Feb:
---
Revert "libbpf: allow to use packaged version"
This reverts commit 82749180b23d3c9c060108bc290ae26507fc324e.
Getting in the way of releasing 1.20, breaking the build of a dwarves
rpm when a libbpf package is installed in a fedora 33 system:
In file included from /home/acme/rpmbuild/BUILD/dwarves-1.20/strings.c:7:
/home/acme/rpmbuild/BUILD/dwarves-1.20/pahole_strings.h:9:10: fatal error: bpf/btf.h: No such file or directory
9 | #include <bpf/btf.h>
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
I can understand reverting due to other pressure to get a release out
but most distros (including fedora) frown upon vendoring code so I think
it would be good to have back ultimately.
Did you or someone else (Luca?) ever take the time to look at it?
I don't see what would be so different with fedora to make this
unfixable, I'd be happy taking a look if nobody has so far.
Would you take the patch back in if I somehow fix rpmbuild with a libbpf
package installed on fedora33?
Thanks,
--
Dominique
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-30 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-02 18:22 [PATCH dwarves] libbpf: allow to use packaged version Luca Boccassi
2021-01-03 19:10 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-01-03 21:30 ` Luca Boccassi
2021-01-04 20:23 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-01-04 22:17 ` Luca Boccassi
2021-01-21 13:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-01-21 20:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-01-21 20:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-01-21 20:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-01-21 21:19 ` Luca Boccassi
2021-01-15 15:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-01-15 15:40 ` Luca Boccassi
2021-06-09 16:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-06-09 16:11 ` Luca Boccassi
2021-01-03 21:32 ` [PATCH dwarves v2] " Luca Boccassi
2021-01-04 22:16 ` [PATCH dwarves v3] " Luca Boccassi
2021-01-13 11:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-03-30 4:47 ` Dominique Martinet [this message]
2021-03-30 10:50 ` Luca Boccassi
2021-03-30 11:06 ` Luca Boccassi
2021-03-30 11:45 ` Dominique Martinet
2021-03-30 15:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-03-31 1:05 ` Dominique Martinet
2021-04-13 13:42 ` Luca Boccassi
2021-05-18 14:07 ` Luca Boccassi
2021-06-09 4:10 ` Dominique Martinet
2021-06-09 16:25 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-06-09 16:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-06-09 16:43 ` Luca Boccassi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YGKtSXsLg4HV7eHL@codewreck.org \
--to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=dwarves@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).