All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Rafael Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>,
	WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/32] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpuhotplug
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 13:52:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e17627fb-283e-dd42-94c1-f89dea167577@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230203135043.409192-1-james.morse@arm.com>

Hi James,

On 2/3/23 21:50, James Morse wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> This series adds what looks like cpuhotplug support to arm64 for use in
> virtual machines. It does this by moving the cpu_register() calls for
> architectures that support ACPI out of the arch code by using
> GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES, then into the ACPI processor driver.
> 
> The kubernetes folk really want to be able to add CPUs to an existing VM,
> in exactly the same way they do on x86. The use-case is pre-booting guests
> with one CPU, then adding the number that were actually needed when the
> workload is provisioned.
> 
> Wait? Doesn't arm64 support cpuhotplug already!?
> In the arm world, cpuhotplug gets used to mean removing the power from a CPU.
> The CPU is offline, and remains present. For x86, and ACPI, cpuhotplug
> has the additional step of physically removing the CPU, so that it isn't
> present anymore.
> 
> Arm64 doesn't support this, and can't support it: CPUs are really a slice
> of the SoC, and there is not enough information in the existing ACPI tables
> to describe which bits of the slice also got removed. Without a reference
> machine: adding this support to the spec is a wild goose chase.
> 
> Critically: everything described in the firmware tables must remain present.
> 
> For a virtual machine this is easy as all the other bits of 'virtual SoC'
> are emulated, so they can (and do) remain present when a vCPU is 'removed'.
> 
> On a system that supports cpuhotplug the MADT has to describe every possible
> CPU at boot. Under KVM, the vGIC needs to know about every possible vCPU before
> the guest is started.
> With these constraints, virtual-cpuhotplug is really just a hypervisor/firmware
> policy about which CPUs can be brought online.
> 
> This series adds support for virtual-cpuhotplug as exactly that: firmware
> policy. This may even work on a physical machine too; for a guest the part of
> firmware is played by the VMM. (typically Qemu).
> 
> PSCI support is modified to return 'DENIED' if the CPU can't be brought
> online/enabled yet. The CPU object's _STA method's enabled bit is used to
> indicate firmware's current disposition. If the CPU has its enabled bit clear,
> it will not be registered with sysfs, and attempts to bring it online will
> fail. The notifications that _STA has changed its value then work in the same
> way as physical hotplug, and firmware can cause the CPU to be registered some
> time later, allowing it to be brought online.
> 
> This creates something that looks like cpuhotplug to user-space, as the sysfs
> files appear and disappear, and the udev notifications look the same.
> 
> One notable difference is the CPU present mask, which is exposed via sysfs.
> Because the CPUs remain present throughout, they can still be seen in that mask.
> This value does get used by webbrowsers to estimate the number of CPUs
> as the CPU online mask is constantly changed on mobile phones.
> 
> Linux is tolerant of PSCI returning errors, as its always been allowed to do
> that. To avoid confusing OS that can't tolerate this, we needed an additional
> bit in the MADT GICC flags. This series copies ACPI_MADT_ONLINE_CAPABLE, which
> appears to be for this purpose, but calls it ACPI_MADT_GICC_CPU_CAPABLE as it
> has a different bit position in the GICC.
> 
> This code is unconditionally enabled for all ACPI architectures.
> If there are problems with firmware tables on some devices, the CPUs will
> already be online by the time the acpi_processor_make_enabled() is called.
> A mismatch here causes a firmware-bug message and kernel taint. This should
> only affect people with broken firmware who also boot with maxcpus=1, and
> bring CPUs online later.
> 
> I had a go at switching the remaining architectures over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES,
> so that the Kconfig symbol can be removed, but I got stuck with powerpc
> and s390.
> 
> 
> The first patch has already been posted as a fix here:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ia64/msg21920.html
> I've only build tested Loongarch and ia64.
> 
> 
> If folk want to play along at home, you'll need a copy of Qemu that supports this.
> https://github.com/salil-mehta/qemu.git salil/virt-cpuhp-armv8/rfc-v1-port29092022.psci.present
> 
> You'll need to fix the numbers of KVM_CAP_ARM_HVC_TO_USER and KVM_CAP_ARM_PSCI_TO_USER
> to match your host kernel. Replace your '-smp' argument with something like:
> | -smp cpus=1,maxcpus=3,cores=3,threads=1,sockets=1
> 
> then feed the following to the Qemu montior;
> | (qemu) device_add driver=host-arm-cpu,core-id=1,id=cpu1
> | (qemu) device_del cpu1
> 
> 
> This series is based on v6.2-rc3, and can be retrieved from:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git/ virtual_cpu_hotplug/rfc/v1

I applied this patch series on v6.2-rc3 and using the QEMU cloned from 
the salil-mehta/qemu.git repo. But when I try to run the QEMU, it shows:

$ qemu-system-aarch64: -accel kvm: Failed to enable 
KVM_CAP_ARM_PSCI_TO_USER cap.

Here is the command I use:

$ qemu-system-aarch64
-machine virt
-bios /usr/share/qemu-efi-aarch64/QEMU_EFI.fd
-accel kvm
-m 4096
-smp cpus=1,maxcpus=3,cores=3,threads=1,sockets=1
-cpu host
-qmp unix:./src.socket,server,nowait
-hda ./XXX.qcow2
-serial unix:./src.serial,server,nowait
-monitor stdio

It seems something related to your notice: You'll need to fix the 
numbers of KVM_CAP_ARM_HVC_TO_USER and KVM_CAP_ARM_PSCI_TO_USER
to match your host kernel.

But I'm not actually understand what should I fix, since I haven't 
review the patch series. Could you give me some more information? Maybe 
I'm doing something wrong.

Thanks,

> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James Morse (29):
>    ia64: Fix build error due to switch case label appearing next to
>      declaration
>    ACPI: Move ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU to be enabled per architecture
>    drivers: base: Use present CPUs in GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
>    drivers: base: Allow parts of GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES to be overridden
>    drivers: base: Move cpu_dev_init() after node_dev_init()
>    arm64: setup: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES using
>      arch_register_cpu()
>    ia64/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
>    x86/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
>    LoongArch: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
>    arch_topology: Make register_cpu_capacity_sysctl() tolerant to late
>      CPUs
>    ACPI: processor: Add support for processors described as container
>      packages
>    ACPI: processor: Register CPUs that are online, but not described in
>      the DSDT
>    ACPI: processor: Register all CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info()
>    ACPI: Rename ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU to include 'present'
>    ACPI: Move acpi_bus_trim_one() before acpi_scan_hot_remove()
>    ACPI: Rename acpi_processor_hotadd_init and remove pre-processor
>      guards
>    ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug
>    ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present
>    ACPI: Warn when the present bit changes but the feature is not enabled
>    drivers: base: Implement weak arch_unregister_cpu()
>    LoongArch: Use the __weak version of arch_unregister_cpu()
>    arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header
>    ACPICA: Add new MADT GICC flags fields [code first?]
>    arm64, irqchip/gic-v3, ACPI: Move MADT GICC enabled check into a
>      helper
>    irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc()
>    irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable'
>      CPUs
>    ACPI: add support to register CPUs based on the _STA enabled bit
>    arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations
>    cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought
>      online
> 
> Jean-Philippe Brucker (3):
>    arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs
>    KVM: arm64: Pass hypercalls to userspace
>    KVM: arm64: Pass PSCI calls to userspace
> 
>   Documentation/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst       |  79 ++++++++++++
>   Documentation/arm64/index.rst             |   1 +
>   Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst            |  31 ++++-
>   Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.rst |   1 +
>   arch/arm64/Kconfig                        |   1 +
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h             |  11 ++
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h              |   1 -
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h         |   2 +
>   arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c             |  11 --
>   arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c                  |   2 +-
>   arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c                 |  13 +-
>   arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c                   |   5 +-
>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                      |  15 ++-
>   arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c               |  28 ++++-
>   arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c                     |  13 ++
>   arch/ia64/Kconfig                         |   2 +
>   arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h              |   2 +-
>   arch/ia64/include/asm/cpu.h               |  11 --
>   arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c                   |   6 +-
>   arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c                  |   2 +-
>   arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c               |   7 +-
>   arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c               |  35 +-----
>   arch/loongarch/Kconfig                    |   2 +
>   arch/loongarch/kernel/topology.c          |  31 +----
>   arch/x86/Kconfig                          |   2 +
>   arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h                |   6 -
>   arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c               |   4 +-
>   arch/x86/kernel/topology.c                |  19 +--
>   drivers/acpi/Kconfig                      |   5 +-
>   drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c             | 146 +++++++++++++++++-----
>   drivers/acpi/processor_core.c             |   2 +-
>   drivers/acpi/scan.c                       | 116 +++++++++++------
>   drivers/base/arch_topology.c              |  38 ++++--
>   drivers/base/cpu.c                        |  31 ++++-
>   drivers/base/init.c                       |   2 +-
>   drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c              |   2 +
>   drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c              |  38 +++---
>   include/acpi/acpi_bus.h                   |   1 +
>   include/acpi/actbl2.h                     |   1 +
>   include/kvm/arm_hypercalls.h              |   1 +
>   include/kvm/arm_psci.h                    |   4 +
>   include/linux/acpi.h                      |  10 +-
>   include/linux/cpu.h                       |   6 +
>   include/linux/cpumask.h                   |  25 ++++
>   include/uapi/linux/kvm.h                  |   2 +
>   kernel/cpu.c                              |   3 +
>   46 files changed, 532 insertions(+), 244 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst
> 

-- 
Shaoqin


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Rafael Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>,
	WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/32] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpuhotplug
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 13:52:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e17627fb-283e-dd42-94c1-f89dea167577@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230203135043.409192-1-james.morse@arm.com>

Hi James,

On 2/3/23 21:50, James Morse wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> This series adds what looks like cpuhotplug support to arm64 for use in
> virtual machines. It does this by moving the cpu_register() calls for
> architectures that support ACPI out of the arch code by using
> GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES, then into the ACPI processor driver.
> 
> The kubernetes folk really want to be able to add CPUs to an existing VM,
> in exactly the same way they do on x86. The use-case is pre-booting guests
> with one CPU, then adding the number that were actually needed when the
> workload is provisioned.
> 
> Wait? Doesn't arm64 support cpuhotplug already!?
> In the arm world, cpuhotplug gets used to mean removing the power from a CPU.
> The CPU is offline, and remains present. For x86, and ACPI, cpuhotplug
> has the additional step of physically removing the CPU, so that it isn't
> present anymore.
> 
> Arm64 doesn't support this, and can't support it: CPUs are really a slice
> of the SoC, and there is not enough information in the existing ACPI tables
> to describe which bits of the slice also got removed. Without a reference
> machine: adding this support to the spec is a wild goose chase.
> 
> Critically: everything described in the firmware tables must remain present.
> 
> For a virtual machine this is easy as all the other bits of 'virtual SoC'
> are emulated, so they can (and do) remain present when a vCPU is 'removed'.
> 
> On a system that supports cpuhotplug the MADT has to describe every possible
> CPU at boot. Under KVM, the vGIC needs to know about every possible vCPU before
> the guest is started.
> With these constraints, virtual-cpuhotplug is really just a hypervisor/firmware
> policy about which CPUs can be brought online.
> 
> This series adds support for virtual-cpuhotplug as exactly that: firmware
> policy. This may even work on a physical machine too; for a guest the part of
> firmware is played by the VMM. (typically Qemu).
> 
> PSCI support is modified to return 'DENIED' if the CPU can't be brought
> online/enabled yet. The CPU object's _STA method's enabled bit is used to
> indicate firmware's current disposition. If the CPU has its enabled bit clear,
> it will not be registered with sysfs, and attempts to bring it online will
> fail. The notifications that _STA has changed its value then work in the same
> way as physical hotplug, and firmware can cause the CPU to be registered some
> time later, allowing it to be brought online.
> 
> This creates something that looks like cpuhotplug to user-space, as the sysfs
> files appear and disappear, and the udev notifications look the same.
> 
> One notable difference is the CPU present mask, which is exposed via sysfs.
> Because the CPUs remain present throughout, they can still be seen in that mask.
> This value does get used by webbrowsers to estimate the number of CPUs
> as the CPU online mask is constantly changed on mobile phones.
> 
> Linux is tolerant of PSCI returning errors, as its always been allowed to do
> that. To avoid confusing OS that can't tolerate this, we needed an additional
> bit in the MADT GICC flags. This series copies ACPI_MADT_ONLINE_CAPABLE, which
> appears to be for this purpose, but calls it ACPI_MADT_GICC_CPU_CAPABLE as it
> has a different bit position in the GICC.
> 
> This code is unconditionally enabled for all ACPI architectures.
> If there are problems with firmware tables on some devices, the CPUs will
> already be online by the time the acpi_processor_make_enabled() is called.
> A mismatch here causes a firmware-bug message and kernel taint. This should
> only affect people with broken firmware who also boot with maxcpus=1, and
> bring CPUs online later.
> 
> I had a go at switching the remaining architectures over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES,
> so that the Kconfig symbol can be removed, but I got stuck with powerpc
> and s390.
> 
> 
> The first patch has already been posted as a fix here:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ia64/msg21920.html
> I've only build tested Loongarch and ia64.
> 
> 
> If folk want to play along at home, you'll need a copy of Qemu that supports this.
> https://github.com/salil-mehta/qemu.git salil/virt-cpuhp-armv8/rfc-v1-port29092022.psci.present
> 
> You'll need to fix the numbers of KVM_CAP_ARM_HVC_TO_USER and KVM_CAP_ARM_PSCI_TO_USER
> to match your host kernel. Replace your '-smp' argument with something like:
> | -smp cpus=1,maxcpus=3,cores=3,threads=1,sockets=1
> 
> then feed the following to the Qemu montior;
> | (qemu) device_add driver=host-arm-cpu,core-id=1,id=cpu1
> | (qemu) device_del cpu1
> 
> 
> This series is based on v6.2-rc3, and can be retrieved from:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git/ virtual_cpu_hotplug/rfc/v1

I applied this patch series on v6.2-rc3 and using the QEMU cloned from 
the salil-mehta/qemu.git repo. But when I try to run the QEMU, it shows:

$ qemu-system-aarch64: -accel kvm: Failed to enable 
KVM_CAP_ARM_PSCI_TO_USER cap.

Here is the command I use:

$ qemu-system-aarch64
-machine virt
-bios /usr/share/qemu-efi-aarch64/QEMU_EFI.fd
-accel kvm
-m 4096
-smp cpus=1,maxcpus=3,cores=3,threads=1,sockets=1
-cpu host
-qmp unix:./src.socket,server,nowait
-hda ./XXX.qcow2
-serial unix:./src.serial,server,nowait
-monitor stdio

It seems something related to your notice: You'll need to fix the 
numbers of KVM_CAP_ARM_HVC_TO_USER and KVM_CAP_ARM_PSCI_TO_USER
to match your host kernel.

But I'm not actually understand what should I fix, since I haven't 
review the patch series. Could you give me some more information? Maybe 
I'm doing something wrong.

Thanks,

> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James Morse (29):
>    ia64: Fix build error due to switch case label appearing next to
>      declaration
>    ACPI: Move ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU to be enabled per architecture
>    drivers: base: Use present CPUs in GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
>    drivers: base: Allow parts of GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES to be overridden
>    drivers: base: Move cpu_dev_init() after node_dev_init()
>    arm64: setup: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES using
>      arch_register_cpu()
>    ia64/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
>    x86/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
>    LoongArch: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
>    arch_topology: Make register_cpu_capacity_sysctl() tolerant to late
>      CPUs
>    ACPI: processor: Add support for processors described as container
>      packages
>    ACPI: processor: Register CPUs that are online, but not described in
>      the DSDT
>    ACPI: processor: Register all CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info()
>    ACPI: Rename ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU to include 'present'
>    ACPI: Move acpi_bus_trim_one() before acpi_scan_hot_remove()
>    ACPI: Rename acpi_processor_hotadd_init and remove pre-processor
>      guards
>    ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug
>    ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present
>    ACPI: Warn when the present bit changes but the feature is not enabled
>    drivers: base: Implement weak arch_unregister_cpu()
>    LoongArch: Use the __weak version of arch_unregister_cpu()
>    arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header
>    ACPICA: Add new MADT GICC flags fields [code first?]
>    arm64, irqchip/gic-v3, ACPI: Move MADT GICC enabled check into a
>      helper
>    irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc()
>    irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable'
>      CPUs
>    ACPI: add support to register CPUs based on the _STA enabled bit
>    arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations
>    cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought
>      online
> 
> Jean-Philippe Brucker (3):
>    arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs
>    KVM: arm64: Pass hypercalls to userspace
>    KVM: arm64: Pass PSCI calls to userspace
> 
>   Documentation/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst       |  79 ++++++++++++
>   Documentation/arm64/index.rst             |   1 +
>   Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst            |  31 ++++-
>   Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.rst |   1 +
>   arch/arm64/Kconfig                        |   1 +
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h             |  11 ++
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h              |   1 -
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h         |   2 +
>   arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c             |  11 --
>   arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c                  |   2 +-
>   arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c                 |  13 +-
>   arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c                   |   5 +-
>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                      |  15 ++-
>   arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c               |  28 ++++-
>   arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c                     |  13 ++
>   arch/ia64/Kconfig                         |   2 +
>   arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h              |   2 +-
>   arch/ia64/include/asm/cpu.h               |  11 --
>   arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c                   |   6 +-
>   arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c                  |   2 +-
>   arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c               |   7 +-
>   arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c               |  35 +-----
>   arch/loongarch/Kconfig                    |   2 +
>   arch/loongarch/kernel/topology.c          |  31 +----
>   arch/x86/Kconfig                          |   2 +
>   arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h                |   6 -
>   arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c               |   4 +-
>   arch/x86/kernel/topology.c                |  19 +--
>   drivers/acpi/Kconfig                      |   5 +-
>   drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c             | 146 +++++++++++++++++-----
>   drivers/acpi/processor_core.c             |   2 +-
>   drivers/acpi/scan.c                       | 116 +++++++++++------
>   drivers/base/arch_topology.c              |  38 ++++--
>   drivers/base/cpu.c                        |  31 ++++-
>   drivers/base/init.c                       |   2 +-
>   drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c              |   2 +
>   drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c              |  38 +++---
>   include/acpi/acpi_bus.h                   |   1 +
>   include/acpi/actbl2.h                     |   1 +
>   include/kvm/arm_hypercalls.h              |   1 +
>   include/kvm/arm_psci.h                    |   4 +
>   include/linux/acpi.h                      |  10 +-
>   include/linux/cpu.h                       |   6 +
>   include/linux/cpumask.h                   |  25 ++++
>   include/uapi/linux/kvm.h                  |   2 +
>   kernel/cpu.c                              |   3 +
>   46 files changed, 532 insertions(+), 244 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst
> 

-- 
Shaoqin


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Rafael Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>,
	WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/32] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpuhotplug
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 05:52:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e17627fb-283e-dd42-94c1-f89dea167577@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230203135043.409192-1-james.morse@arm.com>

Hi James,

On 2/3/23 21:50, James Morse wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> This series adds what looks like cpuhotplug support to arm64 for use in
> virtual machines. It does this by moving the cpu_register() calls for
> architectures that support ACPI out of the arch code by using
> GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES, then into the ACPI processor driver.
> 
> The kubernetes folk really want to be able to add CPUs to an existing VM,
> in exactly the same way they do on x86. The use-case is pre-booting guests
> with one CPU, then adding the number that were actually needed when the
> workload is provisioned.
> 
> Wait? Doesn't arm64 support cpuhotplug already!?
> In the arm world, cpuhotplug gets used to mean removing the power from a CPU.
> The CPU is offline, and remains present. For x86, and ACPI, cpuhotplug
> has the additional step of physically removing the CPU, so that it isn't
> present anymore.
> 
> Arm64 doesn't support this, and can't support it: CPUs are really a slice
> of the SoC, and there is not enough information in the existing ACPI tables
> to describe which bits of the slice also got removed. Without a reference
> machine: adding this support to the spec is a wild goose chase.
> 
> Critically: everything described in the firmware tables must remain present.
> 
> For a virtual machine this is easy as all the other bits of 'virtual SoC'
> are emulated, so they can (and do) remain present when a vCPU is 'removed'.
> 
> On a system that supports cpuhotplug the MADT has to describe every possible
> CPU at boot. Under KVM, the vGIC needs to know about every possible vCPU before
> the guest is started.
> With these constraints, virtual-cpuhotplug is really just a hypervisor/firmware
> policy about which CPUs can be brought online.
> 
> This series adds support for virtual-cpuhotplug as exactly that: firmware
> policy. This may even work on a physical machine too; for a guest the part of
> firmware is played by the VMM. (typically Qemu).
> 
> PSCI support is modified to return 'DENIED' if the CPU can't be brought
> online/enabled yet. The CPU object's _STA method's enabled bit is used to
> indicate firmware's current disposition. If the CPU has its enabled bit clear,
> it will not be registered with sysfs, and attempts to bring it online will
> fail. The notifications that _STA has changed its value then work in the same
> way as physical hotplug, and firmware can cause the CPU to be registered some
> time later, allowing it to be brought online.
> 
> This creates something that looks like cpuhotplug to user-space, as the sysfs
> files appear and disappear, and the udev notifications look the same.
> 
> One notable difference is the CPU present mask, which is exposed via sysfs.
> Because the CPUs remain present throughout, they can still be seen in that mask.
> This value does get used by webbrowsers to estimate the number of CPUs
> as the CPU online mask is constantly changed on mobile phones.
> 
> Linux is tolerant of PSCI returning errors, as its always been allowed to do
> that. To avoid confusing OS that can't tolerate this, we needed an additional
> bit in the MADT GICC flags. This series copies ACPI_MADT_ONLINE_CAPABLE, which
> appears to be for this purpose, but calls it ACPI_MADT_GICC_CPU_CAPABLE as it
> has a different bit position in the GICC.
> 
> This code is unconditionally enabled for all ACPI architectures.
> If there are problems with firmware tables on some devices, the CPUs will
> already be online by the time the acpi_processor_make_enabled() is called.
> A mismatch here causes a firmware-bug message and kernel taint. This should
> only affect people with broken firmware who also boot with maxcpus=1, and
> bring CPUs online later.
> 
> I had a go at switching the remaining architectures over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES,
> so that the Kconfig symbol can be removed, but I got stuck with powerpc
> and s390.
> 
> 
> The first patch has already been posted as a fix here:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ia64/msg21920.html
> I've only build tested Loongarch and ia64.
> 
> 
> If folk want to play along at home, you'll need a copy of Qemu that supports this.
> https://github.com/salil-mehta/qemu.git salil/virt-cpuhp-armv8/rfc-v1-port29092022.psci.present
> 
> You'll need to fix the numbers of KVM_CAP_ARM_HVC_TO_USER and KVM_CAP_ARM_PSCI_TO_USER
> to match your host kernel. Replace your '-smp' argument with something like:
> | -smp cpus=1,maxcpus=3,cores=3,threads=1,sockets=1
> 
> then feed the following to the Qemu montior;
> | (qemu) device_add driver=host-arm-cpu,core-id=1,id=cpu1
> | (qemu) device_del cpu1
> 
> 
> This series is based on v6.2-rc3, and can be retrieved from:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git/ virtual_cpu_hotplug/rfc/v1

I applied this patch series on v6.2-rc3 and using the QEMU cloned from 
the salil-mehta/qemu.git repo. But when I try to run the QEMU, it shows:

$ qemu-system-aarch64: -accel kvm: Failed to enable 
KVM_CAP_ARM_PSCI_TO_USER cap.

Here is the command I use:

$ qemu-system-aarch64
-machine virt
-bios /usr/share/qemu-efi-aarch64/QEMU_EFI.fd
-accel kvm
-m 4096
-smp cpus=1,maxcpus=3,cores=3,threads=1,sockets=1
-cpu host
-qmp unix:./src.socket,server,nowait
-hda ./XXX.qcow2
-serial unix:./src.serial,server,nowait
-monitor stdio

It seems something related to your notice: You'll need to fix the 
numbers of KVM_CAP_ARM_HVC_TO_USER and KVM_CAP_ARM_PSCI_TO_USER
to match your host kernel.

But I'm not actually understand what should I fix, since I haven't 
review the patch series. Could you give me some more information? Maybe 
I'm doing something wrong.

Thanks,

> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James Morse (29):
>    ia64: Fix build error due to switch case label appearing next to
>      declaration
>    ACPI: Move ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU to be enabled per architecture
>    drivers: base: Use present CPUs in GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
>    drivers: base: Allow parts of GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES to be overridden
>    drivers: base: Move cpu_dev_init() after node_dev_init()
>    arm64: setup: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES using
>      arch_register_cpu()
>    ia64/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
>    x86/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
>    LoongArch: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
>    arch_topology: Make register_cpu_capacity_sysctl() tolerant to late
>      CPUs
>    ACPI: processor: Add support for processors described as container
>      packages
>    ACPI: processor: Register CPUs that are online, but not described in
>      the DSDT
>    ACPI: processor: Register all CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info()
>    ACPI: Rename ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU to include 'present'
>    ACPI: Move acpi_bus_trim_one() before acpi_scan_hot_remove()
>    ACPI: Rename acpi_processor_hotadd_init and remove pre-processor
>      guards
>    ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug
>    ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present
>    ACPI: Warn when the present bit changes but the feature is not enabled
>    drivers: base: Implement weak arch_unregister_cpu()
>    LoongArch: Use the __weak version of arch_unregister_cpu()
>    arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header
>    ACPICA: Add new MADT GICC flags fields [code first?]
>    arm64, irqchip/gic-v3, ACPI: Move MADT GICC enabled check into a
>      helper
>    irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc()
>    irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable'
>      CPUs
>    ACPI: add support to register CPUs based on the _STA enabled bit
>    arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations
>    cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought
>      online
> 
> Jean-Philippe Brucker (3):
>    arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs
>    KVM: arm64: Pass hypercalls to userspace
>    KVM: arm64: Pass PSCI calls to userspace
> 
>   Documentation/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst       |  79 ++++++++++++
>   Documentation/arm64/index.rst             |   1 +
>   Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst            |  31 ++++-
>   Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.rst |   1 +
>   arch/arm64/Kconfig                        |   1 +
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h             |  11 ++
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h              |   1 -
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h         |   2 +
>   arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c             |  11 --
>   arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c                  |   2 +-
>   arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c                 |  13 +-
>   arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c                   |   5 +-
>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                      |  15 ++-
>   arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c               |  28 ++++-
>   arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c                     |  13 ++
>   arch/ia64/Kconfig                         |   2 +
>   arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h              |   2 +-
>   arch/ia64/include/asm/cpu.h               |  11 --
>   arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c                   |   6 +-
>   arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c                  |   2 +-
>   arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c               |   7 +-
>   arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c               |  35 +-----
>   arch/loongarch/Kconfig                    |   2 +
>   arch/loongarch/kernel/topology.c          |  31 +----
>   arch/x86/Kconfig                          |   2 +
>   arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h                |   6 -
>   arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c               |   4 +-
>   arch/x86/kernel/topology.c                |  19 +--
>   drivers/acpi/Kconfig                      |   5 +-
>   drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c             | 146 +++++++++++++++++-----
>   drivers/acpi/processor_core.c             |   2 +-
>   drivers/acpi/scan.c                       | 116 +++++++++++------
>   drivers/base/arch_topology.c              |  38 ++++--
>   drivers/base/cpu.c                        |  31 ++++-
>   drivers/base/init.c                       |   2 +-
>   drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c              |   2 +
>   drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c              |  38 +++---
>   include/acpi/acpi_bus.h                   |   1 +
>   include/acpi/actbl2.h                     |   1 +
>   include/kvm/arm_hypercalls.h              |   1 +
>   include/kvm/arm_psci.h                    |   4 +
>   include/linux/acpi.h                      |  10 +-
>   include/linux/cpu.h                       |   6 +
>   include/linux/cpumask.h                   |  25 ++++
>   include/uapi/linux/kvm.h                  |   2 +
>   kernel/cpu.c                              |   3 +
>   46 files changed, 532 insertions(+), 244 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst
> 

-- 
Shaoqin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-29  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 164+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-03 13:50 [RFC PATCH 00/32] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpuhotplug James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 01/32] ia64: Fix build error due to switch case label appearing next to declaration James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 02/32] ACPI: Move ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU to be enabled per architecture James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-08-30 18:31   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-08-30 18:31     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 03/32] drivers: base: Use present CPUs in GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 04/32] drivers: base: Allow parts of GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES to be overridden James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 05/32] drivers: base: Move cpu_dev_init() after node_dev_init() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 06/32] arm64: setup: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES using arch_register_cpu() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 07/32] ia64/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 08/32] x86/topology: " James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 09/32] LoongArch: " James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 10/32] arch_topology: Make register_cpu_capacity_sysctl() tolerant to late CPUs James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 11/32] ACPI: processor: Add support for processors described as container packages James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 12/32] ACPI: processor: Register CPUs that are online, but not described in the DSDT James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 13/32] ACPI: processor: Register all CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 14/32] ACPI: Rename ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU to include 'present' James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 15/32] ACPI: Move acpi_bus_trim_one() before acpi_scan_hot_remove() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 16/32] ACPI: Rename acpi_processor_hotadd_init and remove pre-processor guards James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 17/32] ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 18/32] ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 19/32] ACPI: Warn when the present bit changes but the feature is not enabled James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 20/32] drivers: base: Implement weak arch_unregister_cpu() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 21/32] LoongArch: Use the __weak version of arch_unregister_cpu() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 22/32] arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 23/32] ACPICA: Add new MADT GICC flags fields [code first?] James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 24/32] arm64, irqchip/gic-v3, ACPI: Move MADT GICC enabled check into a helper James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 25/32] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 26/32] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 27/32] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 28/32] ACPI: add support to register CPUs based on the _STA enabled bit James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 29/32] KVM: arm64: Pass hypercalls to userspace James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 21:08   ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-03 21:08     ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-03 21:08     ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-07 17:50     ` James Morse
2023-02-07 17:50       ` James Morse
2023-02-07 17:50       ` James Morse
2023-02-08  9:02       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-08  9:02         ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-05 10:12   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-05 10:12     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-06 10:10     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-02-06 10:10       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-02-06 10:10       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-02-06 12:31       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-06 12:31         ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-07  9:41         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-02-07  9:41           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-02-07  9:41           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-02-07 11:23           ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-07 11:23             ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-07 12:46             ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-02-07 12:46               ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-02-07 12:46               ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-02-06 17:19     ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-06 17:19       ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-06 17:19       ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-07 17:50     ` James Morse
2023-02-07 17:50       ` James Morse
2023-02-07 17:50       ` James Morse
2023-02-08  8:40       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-08  8:40         ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-08 14:25         ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-08 14:25           ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-11  1:44       ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-11  1:44         ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 30/32] KVM: arm64: Pass PSCI calls " James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-05-23  9:32   ` Salil Mehta
2023-05-23  9:32     ` Salil Mehta
2023-05-23  9:32     ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-12 17:01     ` James Morse
2023-09-12 17:01       ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 31/32] arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 32/32] cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought online James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50   ` James Morse
2023-03-07 12:00 ` [RFC PATCH 00/32] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpuhotplug Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-07 12:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-07 12:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-13 15:50   ` James Morse
2023-03-13 15:50     ` James Morse
2023-03-14 11:02     ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-14 11:02       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-14 11:02       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-29  2:35 ` Gavin Shan
2023-03-29  2:35   ` Gavin Shan
2023-03-29  2:35   ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-12 17:01   ` James Morse
2023-09-12 17:01     ` James Morse
2023-09-12 22:38     ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-12 22:38       ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 15:28       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-13 15:28         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-03-29  5:52 ` Shaoqin Huang [this message]
2023-03-29  5:52   ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-03-29  5:52   ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-03  6:25   ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-03  6:25     ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-03  6:25     ` Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e17627fb-283e-dd42-94c1-f89dea167577@redhat.com \
    --to=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.