All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"devel@acpica.org" <devel@acpica.org>
Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"steven.price@arm.com" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	"Sami.Mujawar@arm.com" <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>,
	"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:37:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f061e603b440466db26be9baf334f2b0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e58d4e6-83fd-b5cf-b2db-7575cb197058@redhat.com>

[+Lorenzo]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Auger Eric [mailto:eric.auger@redhat.com]
> Sent: 15 April 2021 10:49
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; devel@acpica.org
> Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>; steven.price@arm.com; Guohanjun
> (Hanjun Guo) <guohanjun@huawei.com>; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com;
> robin.murphy@arm.com; wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>;
> Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
> 
> Hi Shameer,
> 
> + Jean-Philippe
> 
> 
> On 11/19/20 1:11 PM, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > RFC v1 --> v2:
> >  - Added a generic interface for IOMMU drivers to retrieve all the
> >    RMR info associated with a given IOMMU.
> >  - SMMUv3 driver gets the RMR list during probe() and installs
> >    bypass STEs for all the SIDs in the RMR list. This is to keep
> >    the ongoing traffic alive(if any) during SMMUv3 reset. This is
> >    based on the suggestions received for v1 to take care of the
> >    EFI framebuffer use case. Only sanity tested for now.
> >  - During the probe/attach device, SMMUv3 driver reserves any
> >    RMR region associated with the device such that there is a unity
> >    mapping for them in SMMU.
> > ---
> >
> > The series adds support to IORT RMR nodes specified in IORT
> > Revision E -ARM DEN 0049E[0]. RMR nodes are used to describe memory
> > ranges that are used by endpoints and require a unity mapping
> > in SMMU.
> >
> > We have faced issues with 3408iMR RAID controller cards which
> > fail to boot when SMMU is enabled. This is because these controllers
> > make use of host memory for various caching related purposes and when
> > SMMU is enabled the iMR firmware fails to access these memory regions
> > as there is no mapping for them. IORT RMR provides a way for UEFI to
> > describe and report these memory regions so that the kernel can make
> > a unity mapping for these in SMMU.
> >
> > RFC because, Patch #1 is to update the actbl2.h and should be done
> > through acpica update. I have send out a pull request[1] for that.
> >
> > Tests:
> >
> > With a UEFI, that reports the RMR for the dev,
> > ....
> > [16F0h 5872   1]                         Type : 06
> > [16F1h 5873   2]                       Length : 007C
> > [16F3h 5875   1]                     Revision : 00
> > [1038h 0056   2]                     Reserved : 00000000
> > [1038h 0056   2]                   Identifier : 00000000
> > [16F8h 5880   4]                Mapping Count : 00000001
> > [16FCh 5884   4]               Mapping Offset : 00000040
> >
> > [1700h 5888   4]    Number of RMR Descriptors : 00000002
> > [1704h 5892   4]        RMR Descriptor Offset : 00000018
> >
> > [1708h 5896   8]          Base Address of RMR : 0000E6400000
> > [1710h 5904   8]                Length of RMR : 000000100000
> > [1718h 5912   4]                     Reserved : 00000000
> >
> > [171Ch 5916   8]          Base Address of RMR : 0000000027B00000
> > [1724h 5924   8]                Length of RMR : 0000000000C00000
> > [172Ch 5932   4]                     Reserved : 00000000
> >
> > [1730h 5936   4]                   Input base : 00000000
> > [1734h 5940   4]                     ID Count : 00000001
> > [1738h 5944   4]                  Output Base : 00000003
> > [173Ch 5948   4]             Output Reference : 00000064
> > [1740h 5952   4]        Flags (decoded below) : 00000001
> >                                Single Mapping : 1
> 
> Following Jean-Philippe's suggestion I have used your series for nested
> stage SMMUv3 integration, ie. to simplify the MSI nested stage mapping.
> 
> Host allocates hIOVA -> physical doorbell (pDB) as it normally does for
> VFIO device passthrough. IOVA Range is 0x8000000 - 0x8100000.
> 
> I expose this MIS IOVA range to the guest as an RMR and as a result
> guest has a flat mapping for this range. As the physical device is
> programmed with hIOVA we have the following mapping:
> 
> IOVA            IPA          PA
> hIOVA   ->     hIOVA     ->  pDB
>         S1               s2
> 
> This works.
> 
> The only weird thing is that I need to expose 256 RMRs due to the
> 'Single Mapping' mandatory flag. I need to have 1 RMR per potential SID
> on the bus.

Please see the discussion here,
https://op-lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-open-discussions/2021-April/000150.html

Hi Lorenzo,

May be this is a use case for relaxing that single mapping requirement.

Thanks,
Shameer

> 
> I will post a new version of SMMUv3 nested stage soon for people to test
> & compare. Obviously this removes a bunch of code on both SMMU/VFIO and
> QEMU code so I think this solution looks better overall.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> > ...
> >
> > Without the series the RAID controller initialization fails as
> > below,
> >
> > ...
> > [   12.631117] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW supports sync
> cache        : Yes
> > [   12.637360] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: megasas_disable_intr_fusion is
> called outbound_intr_mask:0x40000009
> > [   18.776377] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Init cmd return status FAILED
> for SCSI host 0
> > [   23.019383] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Waiting for FW to come to
> ready state
> > [  106.684281] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW in FAULT state, Fault
> code:0x10000 subcode:0x0 func:megasas_transition_to_ready
> > [  106.695186] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: System Register set:
> > [  106.889787] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Failed to transition controller to
> ready for scsi0.
> > [  106.910475] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Failed from megasas_init_fw
> 6407
> > estuary:/$
> >
> > With the series, now the kernel has direct mapping for the dev as
> > below,
> >
> > estuary:/$ cat /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/0/reserved_regions
> > 0x0000000008000000 0x00000000080fffff msi
> > 0x0000000027b00000 0x00000000286fffff direct
> > 0x00000000e6400000 0x00000000e64fffff direct
> > estuary:/$
> >
> > ....
> > [   12.254318] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: megasas_disable_intr_fusion is
> called outbound_intr_mask:0x40000009
> > [   12.739089] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW provided supportMaxExtLDs:
> 0      max_lds: 32
> > [   12.746628] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: controller type       :
> iMR(0MB)
> > [   12.752694] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Online Controller Reset(OCR)  :
> Enabled
> > [   12.759798] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Secure JBOD support   : Yes
> > [   12.765778] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: NVMe passthru support : Yes
> > [   12.771931] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW provided TM
> TaskAbort/Reset timeou: 6 secs/60 secs
> > [   12.780503] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: JBOD sequence map
> support     : Yes
> > [   12.787000] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: PCI Lane Margining
> support    : No
> > [   12.819179] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: NVME page size        :
> (4096)
> > [   12.825672] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: megasas_enable_intr_fusion is
> called outbound_intr_mask:0x40000000
> > [   12.835199] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: INIT adapter done
> > [   12.873932] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: pci id                :
> (0x1000)/(0x0017)/(0x19e5)/(0xd213)
> > [   12.881644] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: unevenspan support    : no
> > [   12.887451] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: firmware crash dump   : no
> > [   12.893344] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: JBOD sequence map     :
> enabled
> >
> > RAID controller init is now success and can detect the drives
> > attached as well.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shameer
> >
> > [0]. https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0049/latest/
> > [1]. https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/638
> >
> > Shameer Kolothum (8):
> >   ACPICA: IORT: Update for revision E
> >   ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing
> >   iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info
> >   ACPI/IORT: Add RMR memory regions reservation helper
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add bypass flag to arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent()
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install bypass STE
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev
> >
> >  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c                   | 182
> +++++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 112 ++++++++++--
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h |   2 +
> >  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c                   |  39 +++++
> >  include/acpi/actbl2.h                       |  25 ++-
> >  include/linux/acpi_iort.h                   |   6 +
> >  include/linux/dma-iommu.h                   |   7 +
> >  include/linux/iommu.h                       |  16 ++
> >  8 files changed, 367 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"devel@acpica.org" <devel@acpica.org>
Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"steven.price@arm.com" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"Guohanjun \(Hanjun Guo\)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	"Sami.Mujawar@arm.com" <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>,
	"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:37:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f061e603b440466db26be9baf334f2b0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e58d4e6-83fd-b5cf-b2db-7575cb197058@redhat.com>

[+Lorenzo]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Auger Eric [mailto:eric.auger@redhat.com]
> Sent: 15 April 2021 10:49
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; devel@acpica.org
> Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>; steven.price@arm.com; Guohanjun
> (Hanjun Guo) <guohanjun@huawei.com>; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com;
> robin.murphy@arm.com; wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>;
> Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
> 
> Hi Shameer,
> 
> + Jean-Philippe
> 
> 
> On 11/19/20 1:11 PM, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > RFC v1 --> v2:
> >  - Added a generic interface for IOMMU drivers to retrieve all the
> >    RMR info associated with a given IOMMU.
> >  - SMMUv3 driver gets the RMR list during probe() and installs
> >    bypass STEs for all the SIDs in the RMR list. This is to keep
> >    the ongoing traffic alive(if any) during SMMUv3 reset. This is
> >    based on the suggestions received for v1 to take care of the
> >    EFI framebuffer use case. Only sanity tested for now.
> >  - During the probe/attach device, SMMUv3 driver reserves any
> >    RMR region associated with the device such that there is a unity
> >    mapping for them in SMMU.
> > ---
> >
> > The series adds support to IORT RMR nodes specified in IORT
> > Revision E -ARM DEN 0049E[0]. RMR nodes are used to describe memory
> > ranges that are used by endpoints and require a unity mapping
> > in SMMU.
> >
> > We have faced issues with 3408iMR RAID controller cards which
> > fail to boot when SMMU is enabled. This is because these controllers
> > make use of host memory for various caching related purposes and when
> > SMMU is enabled the iMR firmware fails to access these memory regions
> > as there is no mapping for them. IORT RMR provides a way for UEFI to
> > describe and report these memory regions so that the kernel can make
> > a unity mapping for these in SMMU.
> >
> > RFC because, Patch #1 is to update the actbl2.h and should be done
> > through acpica update. I have send out a pull request[1] for that.
> >
> > Tests:
> >
> > With a UEFI, that reports the RMR for the dev,
> > ....
> > [16F0h 5872   1]                         Type : 06
> > [16F1h 5873   2]                       Length : 007C
> > [16F3h 5875   1]                     Revision : 00
> > [1038h 0056   2]                     Reserved : 00000000
> > [1038h 0056   2]                   Identifier : 00000000
> > [16F8h 5880   4]                Mapping Count : 00000001
> > [16FCh 5884   4]               Mapping Offset : 00000040
> >
> > [1700h 5888   4]    Number of RMR Descriptors : 00000002
> > [1704h 5892   4]        RMR Descriptor Offset : 00000018
> >
> > [1708h 5896   8]          Base Address of RMR : 0000E6400000
> > [1710h 5904   8]                Length of RMR : 000000100000
> > [1718h 5912   4]                     Reserved : 00000000
> >
> > [171Ch 5916   8]          Base Address of RMR : 0000000027B00000
> > [1724h 5924   8]                Length of RMR : 0000000000C00000
> > [172Ch 5932   4]                     Reserved : 00000000
> >
> > [1730h 5936   4]                   Input base : 00000000
> > [1734h 5940   4]                     ID Count : 00000001
> > [1738h 5944   4]                  Output Base : 00000003
> > [173Ch 5948   4]             Output Reference : 00000064
> > [1740h 5952   4]        Flags (decoded below) : 00000001
> >                                Single Mapping : 1
> 
> Following Jean-Philippe's suggestion I have used your series for nested
> stage SMMUv3 integration, ie. to simplify the MSI nested stage mapping.
> 
> Host allocates hIOVA -> physical doorbell (pDB) as it normally does for
> VFIO device passthrough. IOVA Range is 0x8000000 - 0x8100000.
> 
> I expose this MIS IOVA range to the guest as an RMR and as a result
> guest has a flat mapping for this range. As the physical device is
> programmed with hIOVA we have the following mapping:
> 
> IOVA            IPA          PA
> hIOVA   ->     hIOVA     ->  pDB
>         S1               s2
> 
> This works.
> 
> The only weird thing is that I need to expose 256 RMRs due to the
> 'Single Mapping' mandatory flag. I need to have 1 RMR per potential SID
> on the bus.

Please see the discussion here,
https://op-lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-open-discussions/2021-April/000150.html

Hi Lorenzo,

May be this is a use case for relaxing that single mapping requirement.

Thanks,
Shameer

> 
> I will post a new version of SMMUv3 nested stage soon for people to test
> & compare. Obviously this removes a bunch of code on both SMMU/VFIO and
> QEMU code so I think this solution looks better overall.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> > ...
> >
> > Without the series the RAID controller initialization fails as
> > below,
> >
> > ...
> > [   12.631117] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW supports sync
> cache        : Yes
> > [   12.637360] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: megasas_disable_intr_fusion is
> called outbound_intr_mask:0x40000009
> > [   18.776377] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Init cmd return status FAILED
> for SCSI host 0
> > [   23.019383] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Waiting for FW to come to
> ready state
> > [  106.684281] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW in FAULT state, Fault
> code:0x10000 subcode:0x0 func:megasas_transition_to_ready
> > [  106.695186] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: System Register set:
> > [  106.889787] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Failed to transition controller to
> ready for scsi0.
> > [  106.910475] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Failed from megasas_init_fw
> 6407
> > estuary:/$
> >
> > With the series, now the kernel has direct mapping for the dev as
> > below,
> >
> > estuary:/$ cat /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/0/reserved_regions
> > 0x0000000008000000 0x00000000080fffff msi
> > 0x0000000027b00000 0x00000000286fffff direct
> > 0x00000000e6400000 0x00000000e64fffff direct
> > estuary:/$
> >
> > ....
> > [   12.254318] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: megasas_disable_intr_fusion is
> called outbound_intr_mask:0x40000009
> > [   12.739089] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW provided supportMaxExtLDs:
> 0      max_lds: 32
> > [   12.746628] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: controller type       :
> iMR(0MB)
> > [   12.752694] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Online Controller Reset(OCR)  :
> Enabled
> > [   12.759798] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Secure JBOD support   : Yes
> > [   12.765778] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: NVMe passthru support : Yes
> > [   12.771931] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW provided TM
> TaskAbort/Reset timeou: 6 secs/60 secs
> > [   12.780503] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: JBOD sequence map
> support     : Yes
> > [   12.787000] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: PCI Lane Margining
> support    : No
> > [   12.819179] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: NVME page size        :
> (4096)
> > [   12.825672] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: megasas_enable_intr_fusion is
> called outbound_intr_mask:0x40000000
> > [   12.835199] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: INIT adapter done
> > [   12.873932] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: pci id                :
> (0x1000)/(0x0017)/(0x19e5)/(0xd213)
> > [   12.881644] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: unevenspan support    : no
> > [   12.887451] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: firmware crash dump   : no
> > [   12.893344] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: JBOD sequence map     :
> enabled
> >
> > RAID controller init is now success and can detect the drives
> > attached as well.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shameer
> >
> > [0]. https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0049/latest/
> > [1]. https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/638
> >
> > Shameer Kolothum (8):
> >   ACPICA: IORT: Update for revision E
> >   ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing
> >   iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info
> >   ACPI/IORT: Add RMR memory regions reservation helper
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add bypass flag to arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent()
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install bypass STE
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev
> >
> >  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c                   | 182
> +++++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 112 ++++++++++--
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h |   2 +
> >  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c                   |  39 +++++
> >  include/acpi/actbl2.h                       |  25 ++-
> >  include/linux/acpi_iort.h                   |   6 +
> >  include/linux/dma-iommu.h                   |   7 +
> >  include/linux/iommu.h                       |  16 ++
> >  8 files changed, 367 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"devel@acpica.org" <devel@acpica.org>
Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"steven.price@arm.com" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	"Sami.Mujawar@arm.com" <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>,
	"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:37:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f061e603b440466db26be9baf334f2b0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e58d4e6-83fd-b5cf-b2db-7575cb197058@redhat.com>

[+Lorenzo]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Auger Eric [mailto:eric.auger@redhat.com]
> Sent: 15 April 2021 10:49
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; devel@acpica.org
> Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>; steven.price@arm.com; Guohanjun
> (Hanjun Guo) <guohanjun@huawei.com>; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com;
> robin.murphy@arm.com; wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>;
> Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
> 
> Hi Shameer,
> 
> + Jean-Philippe
> 
> 
> On 11/19/20 1:11 PM, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > RFC v1 --> v2:
> >  - Added a generic interface for IOMMU drivers to retrieve all the
> >    RMR info associated with a given IOMMU.
> >  - SMMUv3 driver gets the RMR list during probe() and installs
> >    bypass STEs for all the SIDs in the RMR list. This is to keep
> >    the ongoing traffic alive(if any) during SMMUv3 reset. This is
> >    based on the suggestions received for v1 to take care of the
> >    EFI framebuffer use case. Only sanity tested for now.
> >  - During the probe/attach device, SMMUv3 driver reserves any
> >    RMR region associated with the device such that there is a unity
> >    mapping for them in SMMU.
> > ---
> >
> > The series adds support to IORT RMR nodes specified in IORT
> > Revision E -ARM DEN 0049E[0]. RMR nodes are used to describe memory
> > ranges that are used by endpoints and require a unity mapping
> > in SMMU.
> >
> > We have faced issues with 3408iMR RAID controller cards which
> > fail to boot when SMMU is enabled. This is because these controllers
> > make use of host memory for various caching related purposes and when
> > SMMU is enabled the iMR firmware fails to access these memory regions
> > as there is no mapping for them. IORT RMR provides a way for UEFI to
> > describe and report these memory regions so that the kernel can make
> > a unity mapping for these in SMMU.
> >
> > RFC because, Patch #1 is to update the actbl2.h and should be done
> > through acpica update. I have send out a pull request[1] for that.
> >
> > Tests:
> >
> > With a UEFI, that reports the RMR for the dev,
> > ....
> > [16F0h 5872   1]                         Type : 06
> > [16F1h 5873   2]                       Length : 007C
> > [16F3h 5875   1]                     Revision : 00
> > [1038h 0056   2]                     Reserved : 00000000
> > [1038h 0056   2]                   Identifier : 00000000
> > [16F8h 5880   4]                Mapping Count : 00000001
> > [16FCh 5884   4]               Mapping Offset : 00000040
> >
> > [1700h 5888   4]    Number of RMR Descriptors : 00000002
> > [1704h 5892   4]        RMR Descriptor Offset : 00000018
> >
> > [1708h 5896   8]          Base Address of RMR : 0000E6400000
> > [1710h 5904   8]                Length of RMR : 000000100000
> > [1718h 5912   4]                     Reserved : 00000000
> >
> > [171Ch 5916   8]          Base Address of RMR : 0000000027B00000
> > [1724h 5924   8]                Length of RMR : 0000000000C00000
> > [172Ch 5932   4]                     Reserved : 00000000
> >
> > [1730h 5936   4]                   Input base : 00000000
> > [1734h 5940   4]                     ID Count : 00000001
> > [1738h 5944   4]                  Output Base : 00000003
> > [173Ch 5948   4]             Output Reference : 00000064
> > [1740h 5952   4]        Flags (decoded below) : 00000001
> >                                Single Mapping : 1
> 
> Following Jean-Philippe's suggestion I have used your series for nested
> stage SMMUv3 integration, ie. to simplify the MSI nested stage mapping.
> 
> Host allocates hIOVA -> physical doorbell (pDB) as it normally does for
> VFIO device passthrough. IOVA Range is 0x8000000 - 0x8100000.
> 
> I expose this MIS IOVA range to the guest as an RMR and as a result
> guest has a flat mapping for this range. As the physical device is
> programmed with hIOVA we have the following mapping:
> 
> IOVA            IPA          PA
> hIOVA   ->     hIOVA     ->  pDB
>         S1               s2
> 
> This works.
> 
> The only weird thing is that I need to expose 256 RMRs due to the
> 'Single Mapping' mandatory flag. I need to have 1 RMR per potential SID
> on the bus.

Please see the discussion here,
https://op-lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-open-discussions/2021-April/000150.html

Hi Lorenzo,

May be this is a use case for relaxing that single mapping requirement.

Thanks,
Shameer

> 
> I will post a new version of SMMUv3 nested stage soon for people to test
> & compare. Obviously this removes a bunch of code on both SMMU/VFIO and
> QEMU code so I think this solution looks better overall.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> > ...
> >
> > Without the series the RAID controller initialization fails as
> > below,
> >
> > ...
> > [   12.631117] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW supports sync
> cache        : Yes
> > [   12.637360] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: megasas_disable_intr_fusion is
> called outbound_intr_mask:0x40000009
> > [   18.776377] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Init cmd return status FAILED
> for SCSI host 0
> > [   23.019383] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Waiting for FW to come to
> ready state
> > [  106.684281] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW in FAULT state, Fault
> code:0x10000 subcode:0x0 func:megasas_transition_to_ready
> > [  106.695186] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: System Register set:
> > [  106.889787] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Failed to transition controller to
> ready for scsi0.
> > [  106.910475] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Failed from megasas_init_fw
> 6407
> > estuary:/$
> >
> > With the series, now the kernel has direct mapping for the dev as
> > below,
> >
> > estuary:/$ cat /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/0/reserved_regions
> > 0x0000000008000000 0x00000000080fffff msi
> > 0x0000000027b00000 0x00000000286fffff direct
> > 0x00000000e6400000 0x00000000e64fffff direct
> > estuary:/$
> >
> > ....
> > [   12.254318] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: megasas_disable_intr_fusion is
> called outbound_intr_mask:0x40000009
> > [   12.739089] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW provided supportMaxExtLDs:
> 0      max_lds: 32
> > [   12.746628] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: controller type       :
> iMR(0MB)
> > [   12.752694] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Online Controller Reset(OCR)  :
> Enabled
> > [   12.759798] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Secure JBOD support   : Yes
> > [   12.765778] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: NVMe passthru support : Yes
> > [   12.771931] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW provided TM
> TaskAbort/Reset timeou: 6 secs/60 secs
> > [   12.780503] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: JBOD sequence map
> support     : Yes
> > [   12.787000] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: PCI Lane Margining
> support    : No
> > [   12.819179] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: NVME page size        :
> (4096)
> > [   12.825672] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: megasas_enable_intr_fusion is
> called outbound_intr_mask:0x40000000
> > [   12.835199] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: INIT adapter done
> > [   12.873932] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: pci id                :
> (0x1000)/(0x0017)/(0x19e5)/(0xd213)
> > [   12.881644] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: unevenspan support    : no
> > [   12.887451] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: firmware crash dump   : no
> > [   12.893344] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: JBOD sequence map     :
> enabled
> >
> > RAID controller init is now success and can detect the drives
> > attached as well.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shameer
> >
> > [0]. https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0049/latest/
> > [1]. https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/638
> >
> > Shameer Kolothum (8):
> >   ACPICA: IORT: Update for revision E
> >   ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing
> >   iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info
> >   ACPI/IORT: Add RMR memory regions reservation helper
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add bypass flag to arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent()
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install bypass STE
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev
> >
> >  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c                   | 182
> +++++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 112 ++++++++++--
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h |   2 +
> >  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c                   |  39 +++++
> >  include/acpi/actbl2.h                       |  25 ++-
> >  include/linux/acpi_iort.h                   |   6 +
> >  include/linux/dma-iommu.h                   |   7 +
> >  include/linux/iommu.h                       |  16 ++
> >  8 files changed, 367 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi at huawei.com>
To: devel@acpica.org
Subject: [Devel] Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:37:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f061e603b440466db26be9baf334f2b0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 2e58d4e6-83fd-b5cf-b2db-7575cb197058@redhat.com

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8965 bytes --]

[+Lorenzo]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Auger Eric [mailto:eric.auger(a)redhat.com]
> Sent: 15 April 2021 10:49
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi(a)huawei.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel(a)lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi(a)vger.kernel.org;
> iommu(a)lists.linux-foundation.org; devel(a)acpica.org
> Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm(a)huawei.com>; steven.price(a)arm.com; Guohanjun
> (Hanjun Guo) <guohanjun(a)huawei.com>; Sami.Mujawar(a)arm.com;
> robin.murphy(a)arm.com; wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang(a)huawei.com>;
> Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe(a)linaro.org>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
> 
> Hi Shameer,
> 
> + Jean-Philippe
> 
> 
> On 11/19/20 1:11 PM, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > RFC v1 --> v2:
> >  - Added a generic interface for IOMMU drivers to retrieve all the
> >    RMR info associated with a given IOMMU.
> >  - SMMUv3 driver gets the RMR list during probe() and installs
> >    bypass STEs for all the SIDs in the RMR list. This is to keep
> >    the ongoing traffic alive(if any) during SMMUv3 reset. This is
> >    based on the suggestions received for v1 to take care of the
> >    EFI framebuffer use case. Only sanity tested for now.
> >  - During the probe/attach device, SMMUv3 driver reserves any
> >    RMR region associated with the device such that there is a unity
> >    mapping for them in SMMU.
> > ---
> >
> > The series adds support to IORT RMR nodes specified in IORT
> > Revision E -ARM DEN 0049E[0]. RMR nodes are used to describe memory
> > ranges that are used by endpoints and require a unity mapping
> > in SMMU.
> >
> > We have faced issues with 3408iMR RAID controller cards which
> > fail to boot when SMMU is enabled. This is because these controllers
> > make use of host memory for various caching related purposes and when
> > SMMU is enabled the iMR firmware fails to access these memory regions
> > as there is no mapping for them. IORT RMR provides a way for UEFI to
> > describe and report these memory regions so that the kernel can make
> > a unity mapping for these in SMMU.
> >
> > RFC because, Patch #1 is to update the actbl2.h and should be done
> > through acpica update. I have send out a pull request[1] for that.
> >
> > Tests:
> >
> > With a UEFI, that reports the RMR for the dev,
> > ....
> > [16F0h 5872   1]                         Type : 06
> > [16F1h 5873   2]                       Length : 007C
> > [16F3h 5875   1]                     Revision : 00
> > [1038h 0056   2]                     Reserved : 00000000
> > [1038h 0056   2]                   Identifier : 00000000
> > [16F8h 5880   4]                Mapping Count : 00000001
> > [16FCh 5884   4]               Mapping Offset : 00000040
> >
> > [1700h 5888   4]    Number of RMR Descriptors : 00000002
> > [1704h 5892   4]        RMR Descriptor Offset : 00000018
> >
> > [1708h 5896   8]          Base Address of RMR : 0000E6400000
> > [1710h 5904   8]                Length of RMR : 000000100000
> > [1718h 5912   4]                     Reserved : 00000000
> >
> > [171Ch 5916   8]          Base Address of RMR : 0000000027B00000
> > [1724h 5924   8]                Length of RMR : 0000000000C00000
> > [172Ch 5932   4]                     Reserved : 00000000
> >
> > [1730h 5936   4]                   Input base : 00000000
> > [1734h 5940   4]                     ID Count : 00000001
> > [1738h 5944   4]                  Output Base : 00000003
> > [173Ch 5948   4]             Output Reference : 00000064
> > [1740h 5952   4]        Flags (decoded below) : 00000001
> >                                Single Mapping : 1
> 
> Following Jean-Philippe's suggestion I have used your series for nested
> stage SMMUv3 integration, ie. to simplify the MSI nested stage mapping.
> 
> Host allocates hIOVA -> physical doorbell (pDB) as it normally does for
> VFIO device passthrough. IOVA Range is 0x8000000 - 0x8100000.
> 
> I expose this MIS IOVA range to the guest as an RMR and as a result
> guest has a flat mapping for this range. As the physical device is
> programmed with hIOVA we have the following mapping:
> 
> IOVA            IPA          PA
> hIOVA   ->     hIOVA     ->  pDB
>         S1               s2
> 
> This works.
> 
> The only weird thing is that I need to expose 256 RMRs due to the
> 'Single Mapping' mandatory flag. I need to have 1 RMR per potential SID
> on the bus.

Please see the discussion here,
https://op-lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-open-discussions/2021-April/000150.html

Hi Lorenzo,

May be this is a use case for relaxing that single mapping requirement.

Thanks,
Shameer

> 
> I will post a new version of SMMUv3 nested stage soon for people to test
> & compare. Obviously this removes a bunch of code on both SMMU/VFIO and
> QEMU code so I think this solution looks better overall.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> > ...
> >
> > Without the series the RAID controller initialization fails as
> > below,
> >
> > ...
> > [   12.631117] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW supports sync
> cache        : Yes
> > [   12.637360] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: megasas_disable_intr_fusion is
> called outbound_intr_mask:0x40000009
> > [   18.776377] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Init cmd return status FAILED
> for SCSI host 0
> > [   23.019383] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Waiting for FW to come to
> ready state
> > [  106.684281] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW in FAULT state, Fault
> code:0x10000 subcode:0x0 func:megasas_transition_to_ready
> > [  106.695186] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: System Register set:
> > [  106.889787] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Failed to transition controller to
> ready for scsi0.
> > [  106.910475] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Failed from megasas_init_fw
> 6407
> > estuary:/$
> >
> > With the series, now the kernel has direct mapping for the dev as
> > below,
> >
> > estuary:/$ cat /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/0/reserved_regions
> > 0x0000000008000000 0x00000000080fffff msi
> > 0x0000000027b00000 0x00000000286fffff direct
> > 0x00000000e6400000 0x00000000e64fffff direct
> > estuary:/$
> >
> > ....
> > [   12.254318] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: megasas_disable_intr_fusion is
> called outbound_intr_mask:0x40000009
> > [   12.739089] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW provided supportMaxExtLDs:
> 0      max_lds: 32
> > [   12.746628] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: controller type       :
> iMR(0MB)
> > [   12.752694] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Online Controller Reset(OCR)  :
> Enabled
> > [   12.759798] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: Secure JBOD support   : Yes
> > [   12.765778] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: NVMe passthru support : Yes
> > [   12.771931] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: FW provided TM
> TaskAbort/Reset timeou: 6 secs/60 secs
> > [   12.780503] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: JBOD sequence map
> support     : Yes
> > [   12.787000] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: PCI Lane Margining
> support    : No
> > [   12.819179] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: NVME page size        :
> (4096)
> > [   12.825672] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: megasas_enable_intr_fusion is
> called outbound_intr_mask:0x40000000
> > [   12.835199] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: INIT adapter done
> > [   12.873932] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: pci id                :
> (0x1000)/(0x0017)/(0x19e5)/(0xd213)
> > [   12.881644] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: unevenspan support    : no
> > [   12.887451] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: firmware crash dump   : no
> > [   12.893344] megaraid_sas 0000:03:00.0: JBOD sequence map     :
> enabled
> >
> > RAID controller init is now success and can detect the drives
> > attached as well.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shameer
> >
> > [0]. https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0049/latest/
> > [1]. https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/638
> >
> > Shameer Kolothum (8):
> >   ACPICA: IORT: Update for revision E
> >   ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing
> >   iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info
> >   ACPI/IORT: Add RMR memory regions reservation helper
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add bypass flag to arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent()
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install bypass STE
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev
> >
> >  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c                   | 182
> +++++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 112 ++++++++++--
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h |   2 +
> >  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c                   |  39 +++++
> >  include/acpi/actbl2.h                       |  25 ++-
> >  include/linux/acpi_iort.h                   |   6 +
> >  include/linux/dma-iommu.h                   |   7 +
> >  include/linux/iommu.h                       |  16 ++
> >  8 files changed, 367 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-15 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-19 12:11 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11 ` [Devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11 ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11 ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] ACPICA: IORT: Update for revision E Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` [Devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-03-22 10:36   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-03-22 10:36     ` [Devel] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-03-22 10:36     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-03-22 10:36     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-03-22 21:57     ` Kaneda, Erik
2021-03-22 21:57       ` Kaneda, Erik
2021-03-22 21:57       ` Kaneda, Erik
2021-03-23 15:53       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-03-23 15:53         ` [Devel] " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-03-23 15:53         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-03-23 15:53         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-03-23 18:51         ` Kaneda, Erik
2021-03-23 18:51           ` Kaneda, Erik
2021-03-23 18:51           ` Kaneda, Erik
2021-03-24  9:50           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-03-24  9:50             ` [Devel] " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-03-24  9:50             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-03-24  9:50             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-03-25  8:40     ` Jon Nettleton
2021-03-25  8:40       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-03-25  8:40       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-03-25 15:54       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-03-25 15:54         ` [Devel] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-03-25 15:54         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-03-25 15:54         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-04-15  7:27   ` Auger Eric
2021-04-15  7:27     ` Auger Eric
2021-04-15  7:27     ` Auger Eric
2020-11-19 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` [Devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-04-15  9:39   ` Auger Eric
2021-04-15  9:39     ` Auger Eric
2021-04-15  9:39     ` Auger Eric
2021-04-15 10:30     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-04-15 10:30       ` [Devel] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-04-15 10:30       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-04-15 10:30       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-11-19 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` [Devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] ACPI/IORT: Add RMR memory regions reservation helper Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` [Devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` [Devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add bypass flag to arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent() Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` [Devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install bypass STE Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` [Devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` [Devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-11-19 12:11   ` Shameer Kolothum
2020-12-10 10:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Steven Price
2020-12-10 10:25   ` Steven Price
2020-12-10 10:25   ` Steven Price
2020-12-14 10:55   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-14 10:55     ` [Devel] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-14 10:55     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-14 10:55     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-14 12:33     ` Robin Murphy
2020-12-14 12:33       ` [Devel] " Robin Murphy
2020-12-14 12:33       ` Robin Murphy
2020-12-14 12:33       ` Robin Murphy
2020-12-14 13:42       ` Steven Price
2020-12-14 13:42         ` Steven Price
2020-12-14 13:42         ` Steven Price
2020-12-14 14:47         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-14 14:47           ` [Devel] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-14 14:47           ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-14 14:47           ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-17 14:47           ` Jon Nettleton
2020-12-17 14:47             ` Jon Nettleton
2020-12-17 14:47             ` Jon Nettleton
2020-12-17 15:42             ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-17 15:42               ` [Devel] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-17 15:42               ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-17 15:42               ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-17 15:53               ` Jon Nettleton
2020-12-17 15:53                 ` Jon Nettleton
2020-12-17 15:53                 ` Jon Nettleton
2020-12-18 10:53                 ` Jon Nettleton
2020-12-18 10:53                   ` Jon Nettleton
2020-12-18 10:53                   ` Jon Nettleton
2021-01-04  8:55                   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-01-04  8:55                     ` [Devel] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-01-04  8:55                     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-01-04  8:55                     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-01-04 10:55                     ` Jon Nettleton
2021-01-04 10:55                       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-01-04 10:55                       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-04-09  9:50 ` Auger Eric
2021-04-09  9:50   ` Auger Eric
2021-04-09  9:50   ` Auger Eric
2021-04-09 10:08   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-04-09 10:08     ` [Devel] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-04-09 10:08     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-04-09 10:08     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-04-15  9:48 ` Auger Eric
2021-04-15  9:48   ` Auger Eric
2021-04-15  9:48   ` Auger Eric
2021-04-15 10:37   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi [this message]
2021-04-15 10:37     ` [Devel] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-04-15 10:37     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-04-15 10:37     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f061e603b440466db26be9baf334f2b0@huawei.com \
    --to=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=Sami.Mujawar@arm.com \
    --cc=devel@acpica.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=wanghuiqiang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.