From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> To: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me, axboe@fb.com, kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] nvme-fabrics: avoid double request completion for nvmf_fail_nonready_command Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 09:58:37 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <fda1fdb8-8a9d-2e95-4d08-8d8ee1df450d@suse.de> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210121070330.19701-4-lengchao@huawei.com> On 1/21/21 8:03 AM, Chao Leng wrote: > When reconnect, the request may be completed with NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR > in nvmf_fail_nonready_command. The state of request will be changed to > MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT before call nvme_complete_rq. If free the request > asynchronously such as in nvme_submit_user_cmd, in extreme scenario > the request may be completed again in tear down process. > nvmf_fail_nonready_command do not need calling blk_mq_start_request > before complete the request. nvmf_fail_nonready_command should set > the state of request to MQ_RQ_COMPLETE before complete the request. > So what you are saying is that there is a race condition between blk_mq_start_request() and nvme_complete_request() > Signed-off-by: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c b/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c > index 72ac00173500..874e4320e214 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c > @@ -553,9 +553,7 @@ blk_status_t nvmf_fail_nonready_command(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, > !blk_noretry_request(rq) && !(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NVME_MPATH)) > return BLK_STS_RESOURCE; > > - nvme_req(rq)->status = NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR; > - blk_mq_start_request(rq); > - nvme_complete_rq(rq); > + nvme_complete_failed_req(rq); > return BLK_STS_OK; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmf_fail_nonready_command); > I'd rather have 'nvme_complete_failed_req()' accept the status as argument, like nvme_complete_failed_request(rq, NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR) that way it's obvious what is happening, and the status isn't hidden in the function. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> To: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, axboe@fb.com, sagi@grimberg.me, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] nvme-fabrics: avoid double request completion for nvmf_fail_nonready_command Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 09:58:37 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <fda1fdb8-8a9d-2e95-4d08-8d8ee1df450d@suse.de> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210121070330.19701-4-lengchao@huawei.com> On 1/21/21 8:03 AM, Chao Leng wrote: > When reconnect, the request may be completed with NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR > in nvmf_fail_nonready_command. The state of request will be changed to > MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT before call nvme_complete_rq. If free the request > asynchronously such as in nvme_submit_user_cmd, in extreme scenario > the request may be completed again in tear down process. > nvmf_fail_nonready_command do not need calling blk_mq_start_request > before complete the request. nvmf_fail_nonready_command should set > the state of request to MQ_RQ_COMPLETE before complete the request. > So what you are saying is that there is a race condition between blk_mq_start_request() and nvme_complete_request() > Signed-off-by: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c b/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c > index 72ac00173500..874e4320e214 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c > @@ -553,9 +553,7 @@ blk_status_t nvmf_fail_nonready_command(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, > !blk_noretry_request(rq) && !(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NVME_MPATH)) > return BLK_STS_RESOURCE; > > - nvme_req(rq)->status = NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR; > - blk_mq_start_request(rq); > - nvme_complete_rq(rq); > + nvme_complete_failed_req(rq); > return BLK_STS_OK; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmf_fail_nonready_command); > I'd rather have 'nvme_complete_failed_req()' accept the status as argument, like nvme_complete_failed_request(rq, NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR) that way it's obvious what is happening, and the status isn't hidden in the function. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-21 9:00 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-01-21 7:03 [PATCH v3 0/5] avoid double request completion and IO error Chao Leng 2021-01-21 7:03 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-21 7:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_set_request_complete Chao Leng 2021-01-21 7:03 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-21 8:40 ` Christoph Hellwig 2021-01-21 8:40 ` Christoph Hellwig 2021-01-22 1:46 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-22 1:46 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-21 7:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] nvme-core: introduce complete failed request Chao Leng 2021-01-21 7:03 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-21 8:41 ` Christoph Hellwig 2021-01-21 8:41 ` Christoph Hellwig 2021-01-22 1:46 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-22 1:46 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-21 7:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] nvme-fabrics: avoid double request completion for nvmf_fail_nonready_command Chao Leng 2021-01-21 7:03 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-21 8:58 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message] 2021-01-21 8:58 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-01-21 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig 2021-01-21 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig 2021-01-21 9:27 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-01-21 9:27 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-01-22 1:50 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-22 1:50 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-22 1:48 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-22 1:48 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-21 7:03 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] nvme-rdma: avoid IO error for nvme native multipath Chao Leng 2021-01-21 7:03 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-21 7:03 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] nvme-fc: " Chao Leng 2021-01-21 7:03 ` Chao Leng
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=fda1fdb8-8a9d-2e95-4d08-8d8ee1df450d@suse.de \ --to=hare@suse.de \ --cc=axboe@fb.com \ --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \ --cc=hch@lst.de \ --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \ --cc=lengchao@huawei.com \ --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.