From: "Isaac Jurado" <diptongo@gmail.com>
To: "Marcin Kasperski" <Marcin.Kasperski@softax.com.pl>
Cc: mercurial@selenic.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial (for DragonflyBSD)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 18:41:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <123689c10811060941j4a7ffbe7s3cb0bb8c84777800@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878wrwom88.fsf@softax.com.pl>
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Marcin Kasperski
<Marcin.Kasperski@softax.com.pl> wrote:
>
> Are really programming languages that important?
Considering the success of some of them, having the worst possible
syntax and semantics, I believe it does not matter much.
> Main showstoppers in this area are not the programming languages, but
> lack of documentation, miserable APIs, or lack of process. Or ... the
> fact that the tool is so good that it does not really need extensions.
I couldn't agree more. Sorry for such a useless reply, but I felt some
emotion reading "common sense".
Cheers.
--
Isaac Jurado Peinado
http://www.krenel.net
"The noblest pleasure is the joy of understanding"
Leonardo da Vinci
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-06 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-26 4:28 [VOTE] git versus mercurial walt
2008-10-26 14:15 ` [VOTE] git versus mercurial (for DragonflyBSD) Jakub Narebski
2008-10-26 14:30 ` Maxim Vuets
2008-10-26 15:05 ` Leo Razoumov
2008-10-26 18:55 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-27 0:20 ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-27 4:15 ` Leo Razoumov
2008-10-27 7:16 ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-27 7:16 ` dhruva
2008-10-27 0:47 ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-27 1:52 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-27 7:50 ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-27 9:41 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-27 10:12 ` Leslie P. Polzer
2008-10-27 10:14 ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-27 12:48 ` Jakub Narebski
[not found] ` <200810271512.26352.arne_bab@web.de>
2008-10-27 18:01 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-27 20:48 ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-27 21:07 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-10-27 21:30 ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-28 0:13 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-10-28 17:48 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-10-28 19:11 ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-28 19:38 ` SZEDER Gábor
2008-11-06 16:25 ` Marcin Kasperski
2008-11-06 17:41 ` Isaac Jurado [this message]
2008-10-28 19:16 ` Randal L. Schwartz
2008-10-27 23:25 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-27 9:29 ` Benoit Boissinot
2008-10-27 10:57 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-27 14:29 ` 0000 vk
2008-10-27 14:57 ` Jakub Narebski
[not found] ` <1225100597.31813.11.camel@abelardo.lan>
2008-10-27 11:42 ` David Soria Parra
2008-10-27 20:07 ` Brandon Casey
2008-10-27 20:37 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-28 1:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-10-26 15:57 ` Felipe Contreras
2008-10-26 19:07 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-26 19:54 ` Felipe Contreras
2008-10-28 12:31 ` [VOTE] git versus mercurial walt
2008-10-28 14:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-10-28 14:41 ` Git/Mercurial interoperability (and what about bzr?) (was: Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial) Peter Krefting
2008-10-28 14:59 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-10-28 15:02 ` Git/Mercurial interoperability (and what about bzr?) Matthieu Moy
2008-10-28 15:03 ` Git/Mercurial interoperability (and what about bzr?) (was: Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial) Nicolas Pitre
2008-10-28 15:33 ` Pieter de Bie
2008-10-28 19:12 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-10-28 21:10 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-10-28 21:31 ` Theodore Tso
2008-10-28 23:28 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-11-01 8:06 ` Git/Mercurial interoperability (and what about bzr?) Florian Weimer
2008-11-01 10:03 ` Santi Béjar
2008-11-01 10:33 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-01 10:44 ` Florian Weimer
2008-11-01 11:10 ` Florian Weimer
2008-11-01 12:26 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-01 13:39 ` Theodore Tso
2008-11-01 17:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-11-02 1:13 ` Theodore Tso
2008-11-01 10:16 ` Git/Mercurial interoperability (and what about bzr?) (was: Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial) Peter Krefting
2008-10-29 19:11 ` [VOTE] git versus mercurial Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-29 19:36 ` Boyd Lynn Gerber
2008-10-29 19:48 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-10-29 19:51 ` Boyd Lynn Gerber
2008-10-29 8:15 ` Miles Bader
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=123689c10811060941j4a7ffbe7s3cb0bb8c84777800@mail.gmail.com \
--to=diptongo@gmail.com \
--cc=Marcin.Kasperski@softax.com.pl \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mercurial@selenic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).