From: Nick Hengeveld <nickh@reactrix.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kernel.org users] Re: auto-packing on kernel.org? please?
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:41:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051017174123.GI5509@reactrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7voe5o366d.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 01:21:14AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> The assumption, which is the property the suggested packing
> strategy has, is that older objects that are needed to complete
> the history leading to the current tip are packed in those
> n-month/n-week packs, so if we do not have them we would likely
> be needing them, although we might not have walked that far back
> in history yet.
Gotcha - I'm still thinking in terms of content distribution, where
you only need a specific version of a tree to be available locally
and explicitly don't want to transfer history. In our case, using
packs doesn't make sense at the moment.
--
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-17 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-13 18:44 auto-packing on kernel.org? please? Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <434EABFD.5070604@zytor.com>
[not found] ` <434EC07C.30505@pobox.com>
2005-10-13 21:23 ` [kernel.org users] " Linus Torvalds
2005-10-16 14:33 ` Dirk Behme
2005-10-16 15:44 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-10-16 16:12 ` Nick Hengeveld
2005-10-16 16:23 ` Brian Gerst
2005-10-16 16:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-10-16 21:33 ` Nick Hengeveld
2005-10-16 22:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-10-17 6:06 ` Nick Hengeveld
2005-10-17 8:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-10-17 17:41 ` Nick Hengeveld [this message]
2005-10-17 20:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-10-17 22:56 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-10-17 23:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 23:54 ` Nick Hengeveld
2005-10-17 19:13 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-10-16 17:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-10-16 17:15 ` Brian Gerst
2005-11-21 19:01 ` Carl Baldwin
2005-11-21 19:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 19:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-21 20:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 21:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-22 5:26 ` Chuck Lever
2005-11-22 5:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-22 14:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-11-22 17:05 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <7v64qkfwhe.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
[not found] ` <b0943d9e0511220946o3b62842ey@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <7v1x18eddp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
2005-11-23 14:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-11-22 18:18 ` Chuck Lever
2005-11-23 14:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-11-22 17:25 ` Carl Baldwin
2005-11-22 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051017174123.GI5509@reactrix.com \
--to=nickh@reactrix.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).