git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <cel@citi.umich.edu>, Carl Baldwin <cnb@fc.hp.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: auto-packing on kernel.org? please?
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:05:44 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511220904040.13959@g5.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0943d9e0511220613h5978a600l@mail.gmail.com>



On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> > The preferred way would be to just list the references somewhere under
> > .git/refs/stgit, in which case fsck and repack should pick them up
> > automatically (so clearly stgit doesn't do that right now ;).
> 
> I thought about adding .git/refs/patches/<branch>/* files
> corresponding to the every StGIT patch. Are the above git commands
> looking at all depths in the .git/refs/ directory?

Yes. Or at least they're supposed to. If they are not, it's a bug 
regardless, and we'll fix it.

> The 'git repack -a' command would include the applied patches in the
> newly created pack but leave out the unapplied ones. It would be even
> better to leave all of them out since the StGIT patches are frequently
> changed but an independent mechanism for this would complicate GIT -
> 'git repack' shouldn't pack any of the objects found in
> .git/refs/patches/, even if they are reachable via .git/refs/heads/*
> (and maybe call the patches directory something like
> .git/refs/unpackable or volatile).

If we have some default location (and .git/refs/patches/ sounds good), we 
can make git do the right thing - find them for git-fsck-objects, and 
ignore them for git-repack.

		Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-22 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-13 18:44 auto-packing on kernel.org? please? Linus Torvalds
     [not found] ` <434EABFD.5070604@zytor.com>
     [not found]   ` <434EC07C.30505@pobox.com>
2005-10-13 21:23     ` [kernel.org users] " Linus Torvalds
2005-10-16 14:33       ` Dirk Behme
2005-10-16 15:44         ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-10-16 16:12           ` Nick Hengeveld
2005-10-16 16:23             ` Brian Gerst
2005-10-16 16:56               ` Junio C Hamano
2005-10-16 21:33                 ` Nick Hengeveld
2005-10-16 22:12                   ` Junio C Hamano
2005-10-17  6:06                     ` Nick Hengeveld
2005-10-17  8:21                       ` Junio C Hamano
2005-10-17 17:41                         ` Nick Hengeveld
2005-10-17 20:08                           ` Junio C Hamano
2005-10-17 22:56                             ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-10-17 23:19                               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 23:54                             ` Nick Hengeveld
2005-10-17 19:13                   ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-10-16 17:10               ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-10-16 17:15               ` Brian Gerst
2005-11-21 19:01 ` Carl Baldwin
2005-11-21 19:24   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 19:58     ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-21 20:38       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 21:35         ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-22  5:26     ` Chuck Lever
2005-11-22  5:41       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-22 14:13         ` Catalin Marinas
2005-11-22 17:05           ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
     [not found]           ` <7v64qkfwhe.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
     [not found]             ` <b0943d9e0511220946o3b62842ey@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]               ` <7v1x18eddp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
2005-11-23 14:10                 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-11-22 18:18         ` Chuck Lever
2005-11-23 14:18           ` Catalin Marinas
2005-11-22 17:25     ` Carl Baldwin
2005-11-22 17:58       ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0511220904040.13959@g5.osdl.org \
    --to=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
    --cc=cel@citi.umich.edu \
    --cc=cnb@fc.hp.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).