From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <cel@citi.umich.edu>, Carl Baldwin <cnb@fc.hp.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: auto-packing on kernel.org? please?
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:05:44 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511220904040.13959@g5.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0943d9e0511220613h5978a600l@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> > The preferred way would be to just list the references somewhere under
> > .git/refs/stgit, in which case fsck and repack should pick them up
> > automatically (so clearly stgit doesn't do that right now ;).
>
> I thought about adding .git/refs/patches/<branch>/* files
> corresponding to the every StGIT patch. Are the above git commands
> looking at all depths in the .git/refs/ directory?
Yes. Or at least they're supposed to. If they are not, it's a bug
regardless, and we'll fix it.
> The 'git repack -a' command would include the applied patches in the
> newly created pack but leave out the unapplied ones. It would be even
> better to leave all of them out since the StGIT patches are frequently
> changed but an independent mechanism for this would complicate GIT -
> 'git repack' shouldn't pack any of the objects found in
> .git/refs/patches/, even if they are reachable via .git/refs/heads/*
> (and maybe call the patches directory something like
> .git/refs/unpackable or volatile).
If we have some default location (and .git/refs/patches/ sounds good), we
can make git do the right thing - find them for git-fsck-objects, and
ignore them for git-repack.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-22 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-13 18:44 auto-packing on kernel.org? please? Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <434EABFD.5070604@zytor.com>
[not found] ` <434EC07C.30505@pobox.com>
2005-10-13 21:23 ` [kernel.org users] " Linus Torvalds
2005-10-16 14:33 ` Dirk Behme
2005-10-16 15:44 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-10-16 16:12 ` Nick Hengeveld
2005-10-16 16:23 ` Brian Gerst
2005-10-16 16:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-10-16 21:33 ` Nick Hengeveld
2005-10-16 22:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-10-17 6:06 ` Nick Hengeveld
2005-10-17 8:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-10-17 17:41 ` Nick Hengeveld
2005-10-17 20:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-10-17 22:56 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-10-17 23:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 23:54 ` Nick Hengeveld
2005-10-17 19:13 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-10-16 17:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-10-16 17:15 ` Brian Gerst
2005-11-21 19:01 ` Carl Baldwin
2005-11-21 19:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 19:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-21 20:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 21:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-22 5:26 ` Chuck Lever
2005-11-22 5:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-22 14:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-11-22 17:05 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
[not found] ` <7v64qkfwhe.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
[not found] ` <b0943d9e0511220946o3b62842ey@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <7v1x18eddp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
2005-11-23 14:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-11-22 18:18 ` Chuck Lever
2005-11-23 14:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-11-22 17:25 ` Carl Baldwin
2005-11-22 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0511220904040.13959@g5.osdl.org \
--to=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
--cc=cel@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=cnb@fc.hp.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).