* The meaning of x~0 and x~ as rev-spec.
@ 2008-03-14 13:20 Sergei Organov
2008-03-14 16:24 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Organov @ 2008-03-14 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Hello,
Testing suggests that <name>~0 and <name>~ are the same and are just
synonyms for <name> as rev-specs. Is that correct? Is that by design, or
by accident?
Shouldn't <name>~0 have [the same] special meaning as <name>^0?
Shouldn't <name>~ be a short-cut for <name>~1, similar to <name>^?
Anyway, I think that at least <name>~0 (useful for scripting) should be
explicitly documented, provided that <name>^0 has special (and
documented) meaning.
[
The question arose when I wanted to write something like this to
automate reverting of a few last revisions:
for i in 0 1 2 3; do
git revert -n HEAD~$i
done
git commit -a
]
-- Sergei.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-14 17:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-14 13:20 The meaning of x~0 and x~ as rev-spec Sergei Organov
2008-03-14 16:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-14 17:21 ` Sergei Organov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).