From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Matthias Baumgarten <matthias.baumgarten@aixigo.com>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pull.rebase config vs. --ff-only on command line
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 11:57:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq7dhi9nxv.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: fa757764-db25-849d-d8d5-e28908059f6b@aixigo.com
Matthias Baumgarten <matthias.baumgarten@aixigo.com> writes:
> If my assumption were true, and every explicit (cli given) option
> would overwrite implicitly given ones (i.e. configured options),
> wouldn't
>
> * git -c pull.ff=only pull, do a fast-forward (or merge)
This should fast-forward if it can or otherwise fail if it cannot,
right?
> * git -c pull.ff=only pull --merge, force a merge commit
This would fast-forward if it can or otherwise create a merge.
Unlike "pull --no-ff", this should not "force" a merge commit.
> * git -c pull.ff=only pull --rebase, force rebase
This would rebase (we may not have our own commits on top of theirs,
in which case it would end up fast-forwarding plus rebasing 0
commits).
I do not think the phrase "force rebase" makes much sense, though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-22 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-16 14:43 pull.rebase config vs. --ff-only on command line Matthias Baumgarten
2021-07-16 15:03 ` Elijah Newren
2021-07-16 16:44 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-16 16:54 ` Matthias Baumgarten
2021-07-16 18:00 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-19 14:26 ` Matthias Baumgarten
2021-07-19 17:43 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-22 18:57 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-07-22 22:09 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-23 9:36 ` Matthias Baumgarten
2021-07-16 16:39 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq7dhi9nxv.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.baumgarten@aixigo.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).