* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] intel-ci: Drop gem_ctx_switch from fast feedback
@ 2020-01-20 11:36 Chris Wilson
2020-01-20 11:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] intel-ci: Reduce variety of gem_sync in BAT Chris Wilson
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2020-01-20 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Only a couple of tests from gem_ctx_switch are run in BAT, to check we
have multiple contexts on RCS. It doesn't actually verify the switch,
just that the execbuf API accepts the context argument.
This test is redundant as actual context switching (and more) is verified by
live_gem_contexts and live_gt_contexts selftests.
Instead of using the mediocre gem_ctx_switch stress test in BAT, use
gem_exec_parallel/contexs and gem_exec_parallel/fds as both ensure
multiple contexts are supported for simultaneous use, in a fraction of
the time.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
index 37a92b4e7..f697eb0cf 100644
--- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
+++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
@@ -14,8 +14,6 @@ igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files
igt@gem_ctx_exec@basic
igt@gem_ctx_param@basic
igt@gem_ctx_param@basic-default
-igt@gem_ctx_switch@legacy-render
-igt@gem_ctx_switch@rcs0
igt@gem_exec_basic@basic
igt@gem_exec_create@basic
igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy-default
@@ -24,6 +22,8 @@ igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await-default
igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-await-default
igt@gem_exec_gttfill@basic
igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic
+igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts
+igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds
igt@gem_exec_store@basic-all
igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic
igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] intel-ci: Reduce variety of gem_sync in BAT
2020-01-20 11:36 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] intel-ci: Drop gem_ctx_switch from fast feedback Chris Wilson
@ 2020-01-20 11:36 ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-20 13:55 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-01-20 11:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] intel-ci: Use one ringfull example Chris Wilson
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2020-01-20 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Historically, we've had many problems with missed interrupt/seqno
syndrome and so have focus on testing with gem_sync. However, these
tests rely on the kernel itself reporting the issue which it no longer
does. So why the extra variety may impose different timing of execution
on the HW (and so different interrupt timings which may or may not help
uncover issues), they do not have any variety in driver coverage. Reduce
the variety (halving the associated runtime) as they are no more likely
to spot an issue than multiple runs through BAT.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
index f697eb0cf..8c574d910 100644
--- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
+++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
@@ -45,9 +45,6 @@ igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default-forked
igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default-fd
igt@gem_sync@basic-all
igt@gem_sync@basic-each
-igt@gem_sync@basic-many-each
-igt@gem_sync@basic-store-all
-igt@gem_sync@basic-store-each
igt@gem_tiled_blits@basic
igt@gem_tiled_fence_blits@basic
igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] intel-ci: Use one ringfull example
2020-01-20 11:36 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] intel-ci: Drop gem_ctx_switch from fast feedback Chris Wilson
2020-01-20 11:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] intel-ci: Reduce variety of gem_sync in BAT Chris Wilson
@ 2020-01-20 11:36 ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-20 13:53 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-01-20 13:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] intel-ci: Drop gem_ctx_switch from fast feedback Mika Kuoppala
2020-01-20 22:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/3] " Patchwork
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2020-01-20 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
The principle under test is that we fill the ring and the kernel waits
rather than overrun the ring buffer. We only need one test to exercise
that basic behaviour in BAT.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
index 8c574d910..40d273c1d 100644
--- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
+++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
@@ -39,10 +39,7 @@ igt@gem_mmap@basic
igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic
igt@gem_render_linear_blits@basic
igt@gem_render_tiled_blits@basic
-igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default
-igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default-interruptible
igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default-forked
-igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default-fd
igt@gem_sync@basic-all
igt@gem_sync@basic-each
igt@gem_tiled_blits@basic
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] intel-ci: Drop gem_ctx_switch from fast feedback
2020-01-20 11:36 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] intel-ci: Drop gem_ctx_switch from fast feedback Chris Wilson
2020-01-20 11:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] intel-ci: Reduce variety of gem_sync in BAT Chris Wilson
2020-01-20 11:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] intel-ci: Use one ringfull example Chris Wilson
@ 2020-01-20 13:50 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-01-20 13:57 ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-20 22:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/3] " Patchwork
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2020-01-20 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Only a couple of tests from gem_ctx_switch are run in BAT, to check we
> have multiple contexts on RCS. It doesn't actually verify the switch,
> just that the execbuf API accepts the context argument.
>
> This test is redundant as actual context switching (and more) is verified by
> live_gem_contexts and live_gt_contexts selftests.
>
> Instead of using the mediocre gem_ctx_switch stress test in BAT, use
> gem_exec_parallel/contexs and gem_exec_parallel/fds as both ensure
s/contexs/contexts
The gem_exec_parallel seems to use new topology api to set the context.
But the aim is to check the context id delivery through rsvd field
into execbuf?
> multiple contexts are supported for simultaneous use, in a fraction of
> the time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> index 37a92b4e7..f697eb0cf 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> @@ -14,8 +14,6 @@ igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files
> igt@gem_ctx_exec@basic
> igt@gem_ctx_param@basic
> igt@gem_ctx_param@basic-default
> -igt@gem_ctx_switch@legacy-render
> -igt@gem_ctx_switch@rcs0
> igt@gem_exec_basic@basic
> igt@gem_exec_create@basic
> igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy-default
> @@ -24,6 +22,8 @@ igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await-default
> igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-await-default
> igt@gem_exec_gttfill@basic
> igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic
> +igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts
> +igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds
> igt@gem_exec_store@basic-all
> igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic
> igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0
> --
> 2.25.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] intel-ci: Use one ringfull example
2020-01-20 11:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] intel-ci: Use one ringfull example Chris Wilson
@ 2020-01-20 13:53 ` Mika Kuoppala
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2020-01-20 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> The principle under test is that we fill the ring and the kernel waits
> rather than overrun the ring buffer. We only need one test to exercise
> that basic behaviour in BAT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> index 8c574d910..40d273c1d 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> @@ -39,10 +39,7 @@ igt@gem_mmap@basic
> igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic
> igt@gem_render_linear_blits@basic
> igt@gem_render_tiled_blits@basic
> -igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default
> -igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default-interruptible
> igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default-forked
> -igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default-fd
> igt@gem_sync@basic-all
> igt@gem_sync@basic-each
> igt@gem_tiled_blits@basic
> --
> 2.25.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] intel-ci: Reduce variety of gem_sync in BAT
2020-01-20 11:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] intel-ci: Reduce variety of gem_sync in BAT Chris Wilson
@ 2020-01-20 13:55 ` Mika Kuoppala
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2020-01-20 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Historically, we've had many problems with missed interrupt/seqno
> syndrome and so have focus on testing with gem_sync. However, these
> tests rely on the kernel itself reporting the issue which it no longer
> does. So why the extra variety may impose different timing of execution
> on the HW (and so different interrupt timings which may or may not help
> uncover issues), they do not have any variety in driver coverage. Reduce
> the variety (halving the associated runtime) as they are no more likely
> to spot an issue than multiple runs through BAT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> index f697eb0cf..8c574d910 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> @@ -45,9 +45,6 @@ igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default-forked
> igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default-fd
> igt@gem_sync@basic-all
> igt@gem_sync@basic-each
> -igt@gem_sync@basic-many-each
> -igt@gem_sync@basic-store-all
> -igt@gem_sync@basic-store-each
> igt@gem_tiled_blits@basic
> igt@gem_tiled_fence_blits@basic
> igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic
> --
> 2.25.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] intel-ci: Drop gem_ctx_switch from fast feedback
2020-01-20 13:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] intel-ci: Drop gem_ctx_switch from fast feedback Mika Kuoppala
@ 2020-01-20 13:57 ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-20 14:02 ` Mika Kuoppala
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2020-01-20 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mika Kuoppala, intel-gfx
Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2020-01-20 13:50:46)
> Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
>
> > Only a couple of tests from gem_ctx_switch are run in BAT, to check we
> > have multiple contexts on RCS. It doesn't actually verify the switch,
> > just that the execbuf API accepts the context argument.
> >
> > This test is redundant as actual context switching (and more) is verified by
> > live_gem_contexts and live_gt_contexts selftests.
> >
> > Instead of using the mediocre gem_ctx_switch stress test in BAT, use
> > gem_exec_parallel/contexs and gem_exec_parallel/fds as both ensure
> s/contexs/contexts
>
> The gem_exec_parallel seems to use new topology api to set the context.
> But the aim is to check the context id delivery through rsvd field
> into execbuf?
gem_ctx_switch was nothing more than see if we can switch without
blowing up, and spitting out a rough number for context switch latency --
mostly it was interesting wrt to signal interrupts (for
intel_ring_submission really). The tests we are _not_ using in BAT.
So as far as basic HW capability goes, we have that covered in selftests.
The question then remains, how best to quickly cover the execbuf.rsvd1
use cases. gem_exec_parallel seems to be quite good as catching edge
cases that we overlooked (i.e. has spotted bugs in pre-merging) so seemed
like the candidate to use here as well.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] intel-ci: Drop gem_ctx_switch from fast feedback
2020-01-20 13:57 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2020-01-20 14:02 ` Mika Kuoppala
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2020-01-20 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2020-01-20 13:50:46)
>> Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
>>
>> > Only a couple of tests from gem_ctx_switch are run in BAT, to check we
>> > have multiple contexts on RCS. It doesn't actually verify the switch,
>> > just that the execbuf API accepts the context argument.
>> >
>> > This test is redundant as actual context switching (and more) is verified by
>> > live_gem_contexts and live_gt_contexts selftests.
>> >
>> > Instead of using the mediocre gem_ctx_switch stress test in BAT, use
>> > gem_exec_parallel/contexs and gem_exec_parallel/fds as both ensure
>> s/contexs/contexts
>>
>> The gem_exec_parallel seems to use new topology api to set the context.
>> But the aim is to check the context id delivery through rsvd field
>> into execbuf?
>
> gem_ctx_switch was nothing more than see if we can switch without
> blowing up, and spitting out a rough number for context switch latency --
> mostly it was interesting wrt to signal interrupts (for
> intel_ring_submission really). The tests we are _not_ using in BAT.
>
> So as far as basic HW capability goes, we have that covered in selftests.
>
> The question then remains, how best to quickly cover the execbuf.rsvd1
> use cases. gem_exec_parallel seems to be quite good as catching edge
> cases that we overlooked (i.e. has spotted bugs in pre-merging) so seemed
> like the candidate to use here as well.
Ok, thanks for explanation. Yeah interruptible was there but not used
in gem_ctx_switch.
Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/3] intel-ci: Drop gem_ctx_switch from fast feedback
2020-01-20 11:36 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] intel-ci: Drop gem_ctx_switch from fast feedback Chris Wilson
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-01-20 13:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] intel-ci: Drop gem_ctx_switch from fast feedback Mika Kuoppala
@ 2020-01-20 22:38 ` Patchwork
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2020-01-20 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [1/3] intel-ci: Drop gem_ctx_switch from fast feedback
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/72275/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_5373 -> IGTPW_3951
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_3951 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in IGTPW_3951, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3951/index.html
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_3951:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@runner@aborted:
- fi-byt-n2820: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1] +1 similar issue
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3951/fi-byt-n2820/igt@runner@aborted.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in IGTPW_3951 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection:
- fi-bxt-dsi: [PASS][2] -> [INCOMPLETE][3] ([fdo#103927])
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5373/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection.html
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3951/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
- fi-hsw-peppy: [PASS][4] -> [DMESG-FAIL][5] ([i915#722])
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5373/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3951/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
- fi-cfl-guc: [PASS][6] -> [INCOMPLETE][7] ([fdo#106070] / [i915#424])
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5373/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3951/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [PASS][8] -> [FAIL][9] ([fdo#111096] / [i915#323])
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5373/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3951/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_close_race@basic-threads:
- fi-byt-j1900: [TIMEOUT][10] ([fdo#112271] / [i915#816]) -> [PASS][11]
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5373/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_close_race@basic-threads.html
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3951/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_close_race@basic-threads.html
* igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [INCOMPLETE][12] ([i915#879]) -> [PASS][13]
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5373/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection.html
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3951/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection.html
- fi-skl-lmem: [INCOMPLETE][14] ([i915#671]) -> [PASS][15]
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5373/fi-skl-lmem/igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection.html
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3951/fi-skl-lmem/igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live_blt:
- fi-ivb-3770: [DMESG-FAIL][16] ([i915#563]) -> [PASS][17]
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5373/fi-ivb-3770/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3951/fi-ivb-3770/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
- fi-hsw-4770: [DMESG-FAIL][18] ([i915#563]) -> [PASS][19]
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5373/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3951/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
[fdo#103927]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103927
[fdo#106070]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106070
[fdo#111096]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111096
[fdo#112271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271
[i915#323]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/323
[i915#424]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/424
[i915#563]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/563
[i915#671]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/671
[i915#722]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/722
[i915#816]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/816
[i915#879]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/879
Participating hosts (49 -> 43)
------------------------------
Missing (6): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 fi-byt-clapper
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* IGT: IGT_5373 -> IGTPW_3951
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_7778: 8442e59b2b3aa0f081ee31fc13dcd0f31e5981e5 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGTPW_3951: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3951/index.html
IGT_5373: 224e565df36693ab8ae8f58eb6ae42600c2464e2 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3951/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-20 22:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-20 11:36 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] intel-ci: Drop gem_ctx_switch from fast feedback Chris Wilson
2020-01-20 11:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] intel-ci: Reduce variety of gem_sync in BAT Chris Wilson
2020-01-20 13:55 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-01-20 11:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] intel-ci: Use one ringfull example Chris Wilson
2020-01-20 13:53 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-01-20 13:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] intel-ci: Drop gem_ctx_switch from fast feedback Mika Kuoppala
2020-01-20 13:57 ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-20 14:02 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-01-20 22:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/3] " Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).