intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] add remap_pfn_range_notrack instead of reinventing it in i915 v2
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 06:55:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210326055505.1424432-1-hch@lst.de> (raw)

Hi all,

i915 has some reason to want to avoid the track_pfn_remap overhead in
remap_pfn_range.  Add a function to the core VM to do just that rather
than reinventing the functionality poorly in the driver.

Note that the remap_io_sg path does get exercises when using Xorg on my
Thinkpad X1, so this should be considered lightly tested, I've not
managed to hit the remap_io_mapping path at all.

Changes since v1:
 - create a io_mapping_map_user wrapper instead of exporting
   remap_pfn_range_notrack
 - switch to plain remap_pfn_range for remap_sg as it does not use
   a pre-verified pgprot from an iomap

Diffstat:
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig             |    1 
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c |    9 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h          |    3 
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mm.c           |  117 ++++++-------------------------
 include/linux/io-mapping.h               |    3 
 include/linux/mm.h                       |    2 
 mm/Kconfig                               |    3 
 mm/Makefile                              |    1 
 mm/io-mapping.c                          |   29 +++++++
 mm/memory.c                              |   51 ++++++++-----
 10 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2021-03-26  5:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-26  5:55 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-03-26  5:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] mm: add remap_pfn_range_notrack Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-26  5:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] mm: add a io_mapping_map_user helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-20 15:40   ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-10-20 19:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-21  6:18       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-26  5:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] i915: use io_mapping_map_user Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-26  5:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] i915: fix remap_io_sg to verify the pgprot Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-08 19:33   ` youling257
2021-05-10  8:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-16 16:06   ` Serge Belyshev
2021-05-17 12:37     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-17 13:09       ` Serge Belyshev
2021-05-17 13:11         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-17 17:06           ` Matthew Auld
2021-05-18 13:21             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 15:00               ` Matthew Auld
2021-05-19  5:46                 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-05-17 21:46           ` Thomas Hellström
2021-05-18  6:46             ` Thomas Hellström
2021-05-18 13:24               ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 13:33                 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-05-18 13:23             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-19  5:51               ` Thomas Hellström
2021-03-26  7:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/4] mm: add remap_pfn_range_notrack Patchwork
2021-03-26  7:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-26  7:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-26  7:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-04-08 10:36 ` [Intel-gfx] add remap_pfn_range_notrack instead of reinventing it in i915 v2 Daniel Vetter
2021-04-08 11:28   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210326055505.1424432-1-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).