From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/25] drm/i915: switch num_scalers/num_sprites to consider DISPLAY_VER
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:59:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210728215946.1573015-23-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210728215946.1573015-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
The numbers of scalers and sprites depend on the display version, so use
it instead of GRAPHICS_VER. We were mixing both, which let me confused
while removing CNL and GRAPHICS_VER == 10.
v2 (Rodrigo): Switch IS_GEMINILAKE to DISPLAY_VER == 10
v3 (Lucas): Change check to DISPLAY_VER >= 9, to cover the GLK's num_scalers,
otherwise it remains set to 0.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index 99b51c292942..b674d03e6047 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -267,10 +267,10 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
if (IS_ADLS_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_A2))
for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe)
runtime->num_scalers[pipe] = 0;
- else if (GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) >= 10) {
+ else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11) {
for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe)
runtime->num_scalers[pipe] = 2;
- } else if (GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) == 9) {
+ } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9) {
runtime->num_scalers[PIPE_A] = 2;
runtime->num_scalers[PIPE_B] = 2;
runtime->num_scalers[PIPE_C] = 1;
@@ -281,10 +281,10 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 13 || HAS_D12_PLANE_MINIMIZATION(dev_priv))
for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe)
runtime->num_sprites[pipe] = 4;
- else if (GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
+ else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe)
runtime->num_sprites[pipe] = 6;
- else if (GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) == 10 || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
+ else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 10)
for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe)
runtime->num_sprites[pipe] = 3;
else if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) {
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
} else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe)
runtime->num_sprites[pipe] = 2;
- } else if (GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) >= 5 || IS_G4X(dev_priv)) {
+ } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 5 || IS_G4X(dev_priv)) {
for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe)
runtime->num_sprites[pipe] = 1;
}
--
2.31.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-28 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-28 21:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/25] Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/25] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_cdclk.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_color.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_combo_phy.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_crtc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_ddi.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_debugfs.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dmc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dp.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dpll_mgr.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29 23:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1.1 " Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_vdsc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from skl_universal_plane.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_power.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/25] drm/i915/display: remove CNL ddi buf translation tables Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29 16:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1.1 " Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/25] drm/i915/display: rename CNL references in skl_scaler.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from i915_irq.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pch.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_wopcm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/25] drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/25] drm/i915: replace random CNL comments Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/25] drm/i915: remove GRAPHICS_VER == 10 Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/25] drm/i915: rename/remove CNL registers Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/25] drm/i915: finish removal of CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29 0:32 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29 21:56 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2021-07-28 23:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next Patchwork
2021-07-29 20:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-30 0:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next (rev3) Patchwork
2021-07-30 0:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-30 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210728215946.1573015-23-lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).