intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop guc_active move everything into guc_state
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 23:16:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210819061639.21051-26-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210819061639.21051-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>

Now that we have locking hierarchy of sched_engine->lock ->
ce->guc_state everything from guc_active can be moved into guc_state and
protected the guc_state.lock.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c       | 10 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h |  7 +-
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 88 +++++++++----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h             |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
index 87b84c1d5393..adfe49b53b1b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
@@ -394,9 +394,7 @@ intel_context_init(struct intel_context *ce, struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 
 	spin_lock_init(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ce->guc_state.fences);
-
-	spin_lock_init(&ce->guc_active.lock);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ce->guc_active.requests);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ce->guc_state.requests);
 
 	ce->guc_id.id = GUC_INVALID_LRC_ID;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ce->guc_id.link);
@@ -521,15 +519,15 @@ struct i915_request *intel_context_find_active_request(struct intel_context *ce)
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_engine_uses_guc(ce->engine));
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_active.lock, flags);
-	list_for_each_entry_reverse(rq, &ce->guc_active.requests,
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
+	list_for_each_entry_reverse(rq, &ce->guc_state.requests,
 				    sched.link) {
 		if (i915_request_completed(rq))
 			break;
 
 		active = rq;
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_active.lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
 
 	return active;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
index 7a1d1537cf67..66286ce36c84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
@@ -172,11 +172,6 @@ struct intel_context {
 		struct i915_sw_fence blocked_fence;
 		/* GuC committed requests */
 		int number_committed_requests;
-	} guc_state;
-
-	struct {
-		/** lock: protects everything in guc_active */
-		spinlock_t lock;
 		/** requests: active requests on this context */
 		struct list_head requests;
 		/*
@@ -184,7 +179,7 @@ struct intel_context {
 		 */
 		u8 prio;
 		u32 prio_count[GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_NUM];
-	} guc_active;
+	} guc_state;
 
 	struct {
 		/* GuC LRC descriptor ID */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index c4c018348ac0..4b9a2f3774d5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -827,9 +827,9 @@ __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_context *ce)
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
-	spin_lock(&ce->guc_active.lock);
+	spin_lock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(rq, rn,
-					 &ce->guc_active.requests,
+					 &ce->guc_state.requests,
 					 sched.link) {
 		if (i915_request_completed(rq))
 			continue;
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_context *ce)
 		list_add(&rq->sched.link, pl);
 		set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&ce->guc_active.lock);
+	spin_unlock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
 }
 
@@ -945,10 +945,10 @@ static void guc_cancel_context_requests(struct intel_context *ce)
 
 	/* Mark all executing requests as skipped. */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
-	spin_lock(&ce->guc_active.lock);
-	list_for_each_entry(rq, &ce->guc_active.requests, sched.link)
+	spin_lock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(rq, &ce->guc_state.requests, sched.link)
 		i915_request_put(i915_request_mark_eio(rq));
-	spin_unlock(&ce->guc_active.lock);
+	spin_unlock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
 }
 
@@ -1400,7 +1400,7 @@ static int guc_lrc_desc_pin(struct intel_context *ce, bool loop)
 	desc->engine_submit_mask = adjust_engine_mask(engine->class,
 						      engine->mask);
 	desc->hw_context_desc = ce->lrc.lrca;
-	desc->priority = ce->guc_active.prio;
+	desc->priority = ce->guc_state.prio;
 	desc->context_flags = CONTEXT_REGISTRATION_FLAG_KMD;
 	guc_context_policy_init(engine, desc);
 
@@ -1802,10 +1802,10 @@ static inline void guc_lrc_desc_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
 
 static void __guc_context_destroy(struct intel_context *ce)
 {
-	GEM_BUG_ON(ce->guc_active.prio_count[GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_KMD_HIGH] ||
-		   ce->guc_active.prio_count[GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_HIGH] ||
-		   ce->guc_active.prio_count[GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_KMD_NORMAL] ||
-		   ce->guc_active.prio_count[GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_NORMAL]);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(ce->guc_state.prio_count[GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_KMD_HIGH] ||
+		   ce->guc_state.prio_count[GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_HIGH] ||
+		   ce->guc_state.prio_count[GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_KMD_NORMAL] ||
+		   ce->guc_state.prio_count[GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_NORMAL]);
 	GEM_BUG_ON(ce->guc_state.number_committed_requests);
 
 	lrc_fini(ce);
@@ -1915,17 +1915,17 @@ static void guc_context_set_prio(struct intel_guc *guc,
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(prio < GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_KMD_HIGH ||
 		   prio > GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_NORMAL);
-	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_active.lock);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 
-	if (ce->guc_active.prio == prio || submission_disabled(guc) ||
+	if (ce->guc_state.prio == prio || submission_disabled(guc) ||
 	    !context_registered(ce)) {
-		ce->guc_active.prio = prio;
+		ce->guc_state.prio = prio;
 		return;
 	}
 
 	guc_submission_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, true);
 
-	ce->guc_active.prio = prio;
+	ce->guc_state.prio = prio;
 	trace_intel_context_set_prio(ce);
 }
 
@@ -1944,25 +1944,25 @@ static inline u8 map_i915_prio_to_guc_prio(int prio)
 static inline void add_context_inflight_prio(struct intel_context *ce,
 					     u8 guc_prio)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_active.lock);
-	GEM_BUG_ON(guc_prio >= ARRAY_SIZE(ce->guc_active.prio_count));
+	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(guc_prio >= ARRAY_SIZE(ce->guc_state.prio_count));
 
-	++ce->guc_active.prio_count[guc_prio];
+	++ce->guc_state.prio_count[guc_prio];
 
 	/* Overflow protection */
-	GEM_WARN_ON(!ce->guc_active.prio_count[guc_prio]);
+	GEM_WARN_ON(!ce->guc_state.prio_count[guc_prio]);
 }
 
 static inline void sub_context_inflight_prio(struct intel_context *ce,
 					     u8 guc_prio)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_active.lock);
-	GEM_BUG_ON(guc_prio >= ARRAY_SIZE(ce->guc_active.prio_count));
+	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(guc_prio >= ARRAY_SIZE(ce->guc_state.prio_count));
 
 	/* Underflow protection */
-	GEM_WARN_ON(!ce->guc_active.prio_count[guc_prio]);
+	GEM_WARN_ON(!ce->guc_state.prio_count[guc_prio]);
 
-	--ce->guc_active.prio_count[guc_prio];
+	--ce->guc_state.prio_count[guc_prio];
 }
 
 static inline void update_context_prio(struct intel_context *ce)
@@ -1973,10 +1973,10 @@ static inline void update_context_prio(struct intel_context *ce)
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_KMD_HIGH != 0);
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_KMD_HIGH > GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_NORMAL);
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_active.lock);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ce->guc_active.prio_count); ++i) {
-		if (ce->guc_active.prio_count[i]) {
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ce->guc_state.prio_count); ++i) {
+		if (ce->guc_state.prio_count[i]) {
 			guc_context_set_prio(guc, ce, i);
 			break;
 		}
@@ -1996,8 +1996,8 @@ static void add_to_context(struct i915_request *rq)
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(rq->guc_prio == GUC_PRIO_FINI);
 
-	spin_lock(&ce->guc_active.lock);
-	list_move_tail(&rq->sched.link, &ce->guc_active.requests);
+	spin_lock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
+	list_move_tail(&rq->sched.link, &ce->guc_state.requests);
 
 	if (rq->guc_prio == GUC_PRIO_INIT) {
 		rq->guc_prio = new_guc_prio;
@@ -2009,12 +2009,12 @@ static void add_to_context(struct i915_request *rq)
 	}
 	update_context_prio(ce);
 
-	spin_unlock(&ce->guc_active.lock);
+	spin_unlock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 }
 
 static void guc_prio_fini(struct i915_request *rq, struct intel_context *ce)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_active.lock);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 
 	if (rq->guc_prio != GUC_PRIO_INIT &&
 	    rq->guc_prio != GUC_PRIO_FINI) {
@@ -2028,7 +2028,7 @@ static void remove_from_context(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
 	struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&ce->guc_active.lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 
 	list_del_init(&rq->sched.link);
 	clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
@@ -2038,10 +2038,8 @@ static void remove_from_context(struct i915_request *rq)
 
 	guc_prio_fini(rq, ce);
 
-	spin_unlock_irq(&ce->guc_active.lock);
-
-	spin_lock_irq(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 	decr_context_committed_requests(ce);
+
 	spin_unlock_irq(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 
 	atomic_dec(&ce->guc_id.ref);
@@ -2126,7 +2124,7 @@ static void guc_context_init(struct intel_context *ce)
 		prio = ctx->sched.priority;
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
-	ce->guc_active.prio = map_i915_prio_to_guc_prio(prio);
+	ce->guc_state.prio = map_i915_prio_to_guc_prio(prio);
 }
 
 static int guc_request_alloc(struct i915_request *rq)
@@ -2359,7 +2357,7 @@ static void guc_bump_inflight_request_prio(struct i915_request *rq,
 	     !new_guc_prio_higher(rq->guc_prio, new_guc_prio)))
 		return;
 
-	spin_lock(&ce->guc_active.lock);
+	spin_lock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 	if (rq->guc_prio != GUC_PRIO_FINI) {
 		if (rq->guc_prio != GUC_PRIO_INIT)
 			sub_context_inflight_prio(ce, rq->guc_prio);
@@ -2367,16 +2365,16 @@ static void guc_bump_inflight_request_prio(struct i915_request *rq,
 		add_context_inflight_prio(ce, rq->guc_prio);
 		update_context_prio(ce);
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&ce->guc_active.lock);
+	spin_unlock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 }
 
 static void guc_retire_inflight_request_prio(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
 	struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
 
-	spin_lock(&ce->guc_active.lock);
+	spin_lock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 	guc_prio_fini(rq, ce);
-	spin_unlock(&ce->guc_active.lock);
+	spin_unlock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 }
 
 static void sanitize_hwsp(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -2942,7 +2940,7 @@ void intel_guc_find_hung_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 				goto next;
 		}
 
-		list_for_each_entry(rq, &ce->guc_active.requests, sched.link) {
+		list_for_each_entry(rq, &ce->guc_state.requests, sched.link) {
 			if (i915_test_request_state(rq) != I915_REQUEST_ACTIVE)
 				continue;
 
@@ -2993,10 +2991,10 @@ void intel_guc_dump_active_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 				goto next;
 		}
 
-		spin_lock(&ce->guc_active.lock);
-		intel_engine_dump_active_requests(&ce->guc_active.requests,
+		spin_lock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
+		intel_engine_dump_active_requests(&ce->guc_state.requests,
 						  hung_rq, m);
-		spin_unlock(&ce->guc_active.lock);
+		spin_unlock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 
 next:
 		intel_context_put(ce);
@@ -3040,12 +3038,12 @@ static inline void guc_log_context_priority(struct drm_printer *p,
 {
 	int i;
 
-	drm_printf(p, "\t\tPriority: %d\n", ce->guc_active.prio);
+	drm_printf(p, "\t\tPriority: %d\n", ce->guc_state.prio);
 	drm_printf(p, "\t\tNumber Requests (lower index == higher priority)\n");
 	for (i = GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_KMD_HIGH;
 	     i < GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_NUM; ++i) {
 		drm_printf(p, "\t\tNumber requests in priority band[%d]: %d\n",
-			   i, ce->guc_active.prio_count[i]);
+			   i, ce->guc_state.prio_count[i]);
 	}
 	drm_printf(p, "\n");
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
index 0574f5c7a985..ec7fe12b94aa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(intel_context,
 			   __entry->guc_id = ce->guc_id.id;
 			   __entry->pin_count = atomic_read(&ce->pin_count);
 			   __entry->sched_state = ce->guc_state.sched_state;
-			   __entry->guc_prio = ce->guc_active.prio;
+			   __entry->guc_prio = ce->guc_state.prio;
 			   ),
 
 		    TP_printk("guc_id=%d, pin_count=%d sched_state=0x%x, guc_prio=%u",
-- 
2.32.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-19  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-19  6:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/27] Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/27] drm/i915/guc: Fix blocked context accounting Matthew Brost
2021-08-24 23:24   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/27] drm/i915/guc: Fix outstanding G2H accounting Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 21:31   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 21:30     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/27] drm/i915/guc: Unwind context requests in reverse order Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 23:54   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 23:53     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20  0:03       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/27] drm/i915/guc: Don't drop ce->guc_active.lock when unwinding context Matthew Brost
2021-08-20  0:01   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 23:58     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/27] drm/i915/guc: Process all G2H message at once in work queue Matthew Brost
2021-08-20  0:06   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/27] drm/i915/guc: Workaround reset G2H is received after schedule done G2H Matthew Brost
2021-08-24 23:31   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25  4:05     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/27] Revert "drm/i915/gt: Propagate change in error status to children on unhold" Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 19:47   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/27] drm/i915/selftests: Add a cancel request selftest that triggers a reset Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/27] drm/i915/guc: Kick tasklet after queuing a request Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 18:31   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-20 18:36     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/27] drm/i915/guc: Don't enable scheduling on a banned context, guc_id invalid, not registered Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 18:42   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-20 18:42     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/27] drm/i915/selftests: Fix memory corruption in live_lrc_isolation Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  0:07   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25 20:03     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/27] drm/i915/selftests: Add initial GuC selftest for scrubbing lost G2H Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  0:58   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/27] drm/i915/guc: Take context ref when cancelling request Matthew Brost
2021-08-21  0:07   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-24 15:42     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  1:21       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/27] drm/i915/guc: Don't touch guc_state.sched_state without a lock Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  1:20   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25  1:44     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  1:51       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/27] drm/i915/guc: Reset LRC descriptor if register returns -ENODEV Matthew Brost
2021-08-21  0:14   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/27] drm/i915: Allocate error capture in nowait context Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/27] drm/i915/guc: Flush G2H work queue during reset Matthew Brost
2021-08-21  0:25   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-24 15:44     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  1:22       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/27] drm/i915/guc: Release submit fence from an irq_work Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  1:44   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/27] drm/i915/guc: Move guc_blocked fence to struct guc_state Matthew Brost
2021-08-21  0:30   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/27] drm/i915/guc: Rework and simplify locking Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 16:52   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25 19:22     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/27] drm/i915/guc: Proper xarray usage for contexts_lookup Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  0:44   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-26  0:41     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  0:48       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop pin count check trick between sched_disable and re-pin Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  0:50   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/27] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC priority fields in context under guc_active Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 21:51   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25 22:53     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 23:04     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/27] drm/i915/guc: Move fields protected by guc->contexts_lock into sub structure Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  2:00   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-08-26  0:54   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop guc_active move everything into guc_state Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/27] drm/i915/guc: Add GuC kernel doc Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  1:03   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop static inline functions intel_guc_submission.c Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC (rev3) Patchwork
2021-08-19  7:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-08-19  7:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-08-19  9:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-08-26  3:23 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/27] Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  3:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop guc_active move everything into guc_state Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210819061639.21051-26-matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).