intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/27] drm/i915/guc: Rework and simplify locking
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:52:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ef5b144-540d-2aad-11a7-3cfab89a1dcf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210819061639.21051-21-matthew.brost@intel.com>



On 8/18/2021 11:16 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Rework and simplify the locking with GuC subission. Drop
> sched_state_no_lock and move all fields under the guc_state.sched_state
> and protect all these fields with guc_state.lock . This requires
> changing the locking hierarchy from guc_state.lock -> sched_engine.lock
> to sched_engine.lock -> guc_state.lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h |   5 +-
>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 186 ++++++++----------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h             |   6 +-
>   3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> index c06171ee8792..d5d643b04d54 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ struct intel_context {
>   		 * sched_state: scheduling state of this context using GuC
>   		 * submission
>   		 */
> -		u16 sched_state;
> +		u32 sched_state;
>   		/*
>   		 * fences: maintains of list of requests that have a submit
>   		 * fence related to GuC submission
> @@ -178,9 +178,6 @@ struct intel_context {
>   		struct list_head requests;
>   	} guc_active;
>   
> -	/* GuC scheduling state flags that do not require a lock. */
> -	atomic_t guc_sched_state_no_lock;
> -
>   	/* GuC LRC descriptor ID */
>   	u16 guc_id;
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index 053f4485d6e9..509b298e7cf3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -72,86 +72,23 @@ guc_create_virtual(struct intel_engine_cs **siblings, unsigned int count);
>   
>   #define GUC_REQUEST_SIZE 64 /* bytes */
>   
> -/*
> - * Below is a set of functions which control the GuC scheduling state which do
> - * not require a lock as all state transitions are mutually exclusive. i.e. It
> - * is not possible for the context pinning code and submission, for the same
> - * context, to be executing simultaneously. We still need an atomic as it is
> - * possible for some of the bits to changing at the same time though.
> - */
> -#define SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED			BIT(0)
> -#define SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_PENDING_ENABLE		BIT(1)
> -#define SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_REGISTERED			BIT(2)
> -static inline bool context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	return (atomic_read(&ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock) &
> -		SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void set_context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	atomic_or(SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED, &ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void clr_context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	atomic_and((u32)~SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED,
> -		   &ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
> -}
> -
> -static inline bool context_pending_enable(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	return (atomic_read(&ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock) &
> -		SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_PENDING_ENABLE);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void set_context_pending_enable(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	atomic_or(SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_PENDING_ENABLE,
> -		  &ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void clr_context_pending_enable(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	atomic_and((u32)~SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_PENDING_ENABLE,
> -		   &ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
> -}
> -
> -static inline bool context_registered(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	return (atomic_read(&ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock) &
> -		SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_REGISTERED);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void set_context_registered(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	atomic_or(SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_REGISTERED,
> -		  &ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void clr_context_registered(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	atomic_and((u32)~SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_REGISTERED,
> -		   &ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
> -}
> -
>   /*
>    * Below is a set of functions which control the GuC scheduling state which
> - * require a lock, aside from the special case where the functions are called
> - * from guc_lrc_desc_pin(). In that case it isn't possible for any other code
> - * path to be executing on the context.
> + * require a lock.
>    */
>   #define SCHED_STATE_WAIT_FOR_DEREGISTER_TO_REGISTER	BIT(0)
>   #define SCHED_STATE_DESTROYED				BIT(1)
>   #define SCHED_STATE_PENDING_DISABLE			BIT(2)
>   #define SCHED_STATE_BANNED				BIT(3)
> -#define SCHED_STATE_BLOCKED_SHIFT			4
> +#define SCHED_STATE_ENABLED				BIT(4)
> +#define SCHED_STATE_PENDING_ENABLE			BIT(5)
> +#define SCHED_STATE_REGISTERED				BIT(6)
> +#define SCHED_STATE_BLOCKED_SHIFT			7
>   #define SCHED_STATE_BLOCKED		BIT(SCHED_STATE_BLOCKED_SHIFT)
>   #define SCHED_STATE_BLOCKED_MASK	(0xfff << SCHED_STATE_BLOCKED_SHIFT)
>   static inline void init_sched_state(struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
>   	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
> -	atomic_set(&ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock, 0);
>   	ce->guc_state.sched_state &= SCHED_STATE_BLOCKED_MASK;
>   }
>   
> @@ -162,9 +99,8 @@ static bool sched_state_is_init(struct intel_context *ce)
>   	 * XXX: Kernel contexts can have SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_REGISTERED after
>   	 * suspend.
>   	 */
> -	return !(atomic_read(&ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock) &
> -		 ~SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_REGISTERED) &&
> -		!(ce->guc_state.sched_state &= ~SCHED_STATE_BLOCKED_MASK);
> +	return !(ce->guc_state.sched_state &=
> +		 ~(SCHED_STATE_BLOCKED_MASK | SCHED_STATE_REGISTERED));
>   }
>   
>   static inline bool
> @@ -237,6 +173,57 @@ static inline void clr_context_banned(struct intel_context *ce)
>   	ce->guc_state.sched_state &= ~SCHED_STATE_BANNED;
>   }
>   
> +static inline bool context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> +	return ce->guc_state.sched_state & SCHED_STATE_ENABLED;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void set_context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
> +	ce->guc_state.sched_state |= SCHED_STATE_ENABLED;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void clr_context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
> +	ce->guc_state.sched_state &= ~SCHED_STATE_ENABLED;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool context_pending_enable(struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> +	return ce->guc_state.sched_state & SCHED_STATE_PENDING_ENABLE;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void set_context_pending_enable(struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
> +	ce->guc_state.sched_state |= SCHED_STATE_PENDING_ENABLE;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void clr_context_pending_enable(struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
> +	ce->guc_state.sched_state &= ~SCHED_STATE_PENDING_ENABLE;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool context_registered(struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> +	return ce->guc_state.sched_state & SCHED_STATE_REGISTERED;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void set_context_registered(struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
> +	ce->guc_state.sched_state |= SCHED_STATE_REGISTERED;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void clr_context_registered(struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
> +	ce->guc_state.sched_state &= ~SCHED_STATE_REGISTERED;
> +}
> +
>   static inline u32 context_blocked(struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
>   	return (ce->guc_state.sched_state & SCHED_STATE_BLOCKED_MASK) >>
> @@ -245,7 +232,6 @@ static inline u32 context_blocked(struct intel_context *ce)
>   
>   static inline void incr_context_blocked(struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
> -	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->engine->sched_engine->lock);
>   	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
>   
>   	ce->guc_state.sched_state += SCHED_STATE_BLOCKED;
> @@ -255,7 +241,6 @@ static inline void incr_context_blocked(struct intel_context *ce)
>   
>   static inline void decr_context_blocked(struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
> -	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->engine->sched_engine->lock);
>   	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
>   
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(!context_blocked(ce));	/* Underflow check */
> @@ -450,6 +435,8 @@ static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
>   	u32 g2h_len_dw = 0;
>   	bool enabled;
>   
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&rq->engine->sched_engine->lock);
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Corner case where requests were sitting in the priority list or a
>   	 * request resubmitted after the context was banned.
> @@ -457,7 +444,7 @@ static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
>   	if (unlikely(intel_context_is_banned(ce))) {
>   		i915_request_put(i915_request_mark_eio(rq));
>   		intel_engine_signal_breadcrumbs(ce->engine);
> -		goto out;
> +		return 0;
>   	}
>   
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&ce->guc_id_ref));
> @@ -470,9 +457,11 @@ static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
>   	if (unlikely(!lrc_desc_registered(guc, ce->guc_id))) {
>   		err = guc_lrc_desc_pin(ce, false);
>   		if (unlikely(err))
> -			goto out;
> +			return err;
>   	}
>   
> +	spin_lock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * The request / context will be run on the hardware when scheduling
>   	 * gets enabled in the unblock.
> @@ -507,6 +496,7 @@ static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
>   		trace_i915_request_guc_submit(rq);
>   
>   out:
> +	spin_unlock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
>   	return err;
>   }
>   
> @@ -727,8 +717,6 @@ void intel_guc_submission_reset_prepare(struct intel_guc *guc)
>   	spin_lock_irq(&guc_to_gt(guc)->irq_lock);
>   	spin_unlock_irq(&guc_to_gt(guc)->irq_lock);
>   
> -	guc_flush_submissions(guc);
> -
>   	flush_work(&guc->ct.requests.worker);
>   
>   	scrub_guc_desc_for_outstanding_g2h(guc);
> @@ -1133,7 +1121,11 @@ static int steal_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc)
>   
>   		list_del_init(&ce->guc_id_link);
>   		guc_id = ce->guc_id;
> +
> +		spin_lock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
>   		clr_context_registered(ce);
> +		spin_unlock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
> +
>   		set_context_guc_id_invalid(ce);
>   		return guc_id;
>   	} else {
> @@ -1169,6 +1161,8 @@ static int pin_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
>   try_again:
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
>   
> +	might_lock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
> +
>   	if (context_guc_id_invalid(ce)) {
>   		ret = assign_guc_id(guc, &ce->guc_id);
>   		if (ret)
> @@ -1248,8 +1242,13 @@ static int register_context(struct intel_context *ce, bool loop)
>   	trace_intel_context_register(ce);
>   
>   	ret = __guc_action_register_context(guc, ce->guc_id, offset, loop);
> -	if (likely(!ret))
> +	if (likely(!ret)) {
> +		unsigned long flags;
> +
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
>   		set_context_registered(ce);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
> +	}
>   
>   	return ret;
>   }
> @@ -1525,7 +1524,6 @@ static u16 prep_context_pending_disable(struct intel_context *ce)
>   static struct i915_sw_fence *guc_context_block(struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
>   	struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
> -	struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine = ce->engine->sched_engine;
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   	struct intel_runtime_pm *runtime_pm = ce->engine->uncore->rpm;
>   	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> @@ -1534,13 +1532,7 @@ static struct i915_sw_fence *guc_context_block(struct intel_context *ce)
>   
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * Sync with submission path, increment before below changes to context
> -	 * state.
> -	 */
> -	spin_lock(&sched_engine->lock);
>   	incr_context_blocked(ce);
> -	spin_unlock(&sched_engine->lock);
>   
>   	enabled = context_enabled(ce);
>   	if (unlikely(!enabled || submission_disabled(guc))) {
> @@ -1569,7 +1561,6 @@ static struct i915_sw_fence *guc_context_block(struct intel_context *ce)
>   static void guc_context_unblock(struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
>   	struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
> -	struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine = ce->engine->sched_engine;
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   	struct intel_runtime_pm *runtime_pm = ce->engine->uncore->rpm;
>   	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> @@ -1594,13 +1585,7 @@ static void guc_context_unblock(struct intel_context *ce)
>   		intel_context_get(ce);
>   	}
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * Sync with submission path, decrement after above changes to context
> -	 * state.
> -	 */
> -	spin_lock(&sched_engine->lock);
>   	decr_context_blocked(ce);
> -	spin_unlock(&sched_engine->lock);
>   
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
>   
> @@ -1710,7 +1695,9 @@ static void guc_context_sched_disable(struct intel_context *ce)
>   
>   	if (submission_disabled(guc) || context_guc_id_invalid(ce) ||
>   	    !lrc_desc_registered(guc, ce->guc_id)) {
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);

We do take this lock a few lines below this. Would it be worth just 
moving that up and do everything under the lock?

Anyway, all calls to the updated set/clr functions have been updated to 
be correctly locked, so:

Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>

Daniele

>   		clr_context_enabled(ce);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
>   		goto unpin;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -1760,7 +1747,6 @@ static inline void guc_lrc_desc_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(ce != __get_context(guc, ce->guc_id));
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(context_enabled(ce));
>   
> -	clr_context_registered(ce);
>   	deregister_context(ce, ce->guc_id, true);
>   }
>   
> @@ -1833,8 +1819,10 @@ static void guc_context_destroy(struct kref *kref)
>   	/* Seal race with Reset */
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
>   	disabled = submission_disabled(guc);
> -	if (likely(!disabled))
> +	if (likely(!disabled)) {
>   		set_context_destroyed(ce);
> +		clr_context_registered(ce);
> +	}
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
>   	if (unlikely(disabled)) {
>   		release_guc_id(guc, ce);
> @@ -2697,8 +2685,7 @@ int intel_guc_sched_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
>   		     (!context_pending_enable(ce) &&
>   		     !context_pending_disable(ce)))) {
>   		drm_err(&guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm,
> -			"Bad context sched_state 0x%x, 0x%x, desc_idx %u",
> -			atomic_read(&ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock),
> +			"Bad context sched_state 0x%x, desc_idx %u",
>   			ce->guc_state.sched_state, desc_idx);
>   		return -EPROTO;
>   	}
> @@ -2713,7 +2700,9 @@ int intel_guc_sched_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
>   		}
>   #endif
>   
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
>   		clr_context_pending_enable(ce);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
>   	} else if (context_pending_disable(ce)) {
>   		bool banned;
>   
> @@ -2987,9 +2976,8 @@ void intel_guc_submission_print_context_info(struct intel_guc *guc,
>   			   atomic_read(&ce->pin_count));
>   		drm_printf(p, "\t\tGuC ID Ref Count: %u\n",
>   			   atomic_read(&ce->guc_id_ref));
> -		drm_printf(p, "\t\tSchedule State: 0x%x, 0x%x\n\n",
> -			   ce->guc_state.sched_state,
> -			   atomic_read(&ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock));
> +		drm_printf(p, "\t\tSchedule State: 0x%x\n\n",
> +			   ce->guc_state.sched_state);
>   
>   		guc_log_context_priority(p, ce);
>   	}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
> index 806ad688274b..0a77eb2944b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
> @@ -903,7 +903,6 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(intel_context,
>   			     __field(u32, guc_id)
>   			     __field(int, pin_count)
>   			     __field(u32, sched_state)
> -			     __field(u32, guc_sched_state_no_lock)
>   			     __field(u8, guc_prio)
>   			     ),
>   
> @@ -911,15 +910,12 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(intel_context,
>   			   __entry->guc_id = ce->guc_id;
>   			   __entry->pin_count = atomic_read(&ce->pin_count);
>   			   __entry->sched_state = ce->guc_state.sched_state;
> -			   __entry->guc_sched_state_no_lock =
> -			   atomic_read(&ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
>   			   __entry->guc_prio = ce->guc_prio;
>   			   ),
>   
> -		    TP_printk("guc_id=%d, pin_count=%d sched_state=0x%x,0x%x, guc_prio=%u",
> +		    TP_printk("guc_id=%d, pin_count=%d sched_state=0x%x, guc_prio=%u",
>   			      __entry->guc_id, __entry->pin_count,
>   			      __entry->sched_state,
> -			      __entry->guc_sched_state_no_lock,
>   			      __entry->guc_prio)
>   );
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-25 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-19  6:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/27] Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/27] drm/i915/guc: Fix blocked context accounting Matthew Brost
2021-08-24 23:24   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/27] drm/i915/guc: Fix outstanding G2H accounting Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 21:31   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 21:30     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/27] drm/i915/guc: Unwind context requests in reverse order Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 23:54   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 23:53     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20  0:03       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/27] drm/i915/guc: Don't drop ce->guc_active.lock when unwinding context Matthew Brost
2021-08-20  0:01   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 23:58     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/27] drm/i915/guc: Process all G2H message at once in work queue Matthew Brost
2021-08-20  0:06   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/27] drm/i915/guc: Workaround reset G2H is received after schedule done G2H Matthew Brost
2021-08-24 23:31   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25  4:05     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/27] Revert "drm/i915/gt: Propagate change in error status to children on unhold" Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 19:47   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/27] drm/i915/selftests: Add a cancel request selftest that triggers a reset Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/27] drm/i915/guc: Kick tasklet after queuing a request Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 18:31   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-20 18:36     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/27] drm/i915/guc: Don't enable scheduling on a banned context, guc_id invalid, not registered Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 18:42   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-20 18:42     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/27] drm/i915/selftests: Fix memory corruption in live_lrc_isolation Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  0:07   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25 20:03     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/27] drm/i915/selftests: Add initial GuC selftest for scrubbing lost G2H Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  0:58   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/27] drm/i915/guc: Take context ref when cancelling request Matthew Brost
2021-08-21  0:07   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-24 15:42     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  1:21       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/27] drm/i915/guc: Don't touch guc_state.sched_state without a lock Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  1:20   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25  1:44     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  1:51       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/27] drm/i915/guc: Reset LRC descriptor if register returns -ENODEV Matthew Brost
2021-08-21  0:14   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/27] drm/i915: Allocate error capture in nowait context Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/27] drm/i915/guc: Flush G2H work queue during reset Matthew Brost
2021-08-21  0:25   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-24 15:44     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  1:22       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/27] drm/i915/guc: Release submit fence from an irq_work Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  1:44   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/27] drm/i915/guc: Move guc_blocked fence to struct guc_state Matthew Brost
2021-08-21  0:30   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/27] drm/i915/guc: Rework and simplify locking Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 16:52   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2021-08-25 19:22     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/27] drm/i915/guc: Proper xarray usage for contexts_lookup Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  0:44   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-26  0:41     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  0:48       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop pin count check trick between sched_disable and re-pin Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  0:50   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/27] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC priority fields in context under guc_active Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 21:51   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25 22:53     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 23:04     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/27] drm/i915/guc: Move fields protected by guc->contexts_lock into sub structure Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  2:00   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop guc_active move everything into guc_state Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  0:54   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/27] drm/i915/guc: Add GuC kernel doc Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  1:03   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop static inline functions intel_guc_submission.c Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC (rev3) Patchwork
2021-08-19  7:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-08-19  7:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-08-19  9:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-08-26  3:23 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/27] Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  3:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/27] drm/i915/guc: Rework and simplify locking Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2ef5b144-540d-2aad-11a7-3cfab89a1dcf@intel.com \
    --to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).