From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/27] drm/i915/selftests: Add initial GuC selftest for scrubbing lost G2H
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:58:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bcf8faa-9b1d-77d3-61b3-29236d7b5c0b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210819061639.21051-13-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On 8/18/2021 11:16 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> While debugging an issue with full GT resets I went down a rabbit hole
> thinking the scrubbing of lost G2H wasn't working correctly. This proved
> to be incorrect as this was working just fine but this chase inspired me
> to write a selftest to prove that this works. This simple selftest
> injects errors dropping various G2H and then issues a full GT reset
> proving that the scrubbing of these G2H doesn't blow up.
>
> v2:
> (Daniel Vetter)
> - Use ifdef instead of macros for selftests
> v3:
> (Checkpatch)
> - A space after 'switch' statement
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h | 18 +++
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 25 ++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h | 1 +
> .../i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.c | 12 ++
> .../i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.h | 2 +
> 6 files changed, 184 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> index e54351a170e2..3a73f3117873 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> @@ -198,6 +198,24 @@ struct intel_context {
> */
> u8 guc_prio;
> u32 guc_prio_count[GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_NUM];
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST
> + /**
> + * @drop_schedule_enable: Force drop of schedule enable G2H for selftest
> + */
> + bool drop_schedule_enable;
> +
> + /**
> + * @drop_schedule_disable: Force drop of schedule disable G2H for
> + * selftest
> + */
> + bool drop_schedule_disable;
> +
> + /**
> + * @drop_deregister: Force drop of deregister G2H for selftest
> + */
> + bool drop_deregister;
> +#endif
> };
>
> #endif /* __INTEL_CONTEXT_TYPES__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index e53a4ef7d442..e0e85e4ad512 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -2635,6 +2635,13 @@ int intel_guc_deregister_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
>
> trace_intel_context_deregister_done(ce);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST
> + if (unlikely(ce->drop_deregister)) {
> + ce->drop_deregister = false;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> if (context_wait_for_deregister_to_register(ce)) {
> struct intel_runtime_pm *runtime_pm =
> &ce->engine->gt->i915->runtime_pm;
> @@ -2689,10 +2696,24 @@ int intel_guc_sched_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> trace_intel_context_sched_done(ce);
>
> if (context_pending_enable(ce)) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST
> + if (unlikely(ce->drop_schedule_enable)) {
> + ce->drop_schedule_enable = false;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> clr_context_pending_enable(ce);
> } else if (context_pending_disable(ce)) {
> bool banned;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST
> + if (unlikely(ce->drop_schedule_disable)) {
> + ce->drop_schedule_disable = false;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Unpin must be done before __guc_signal_context_fence,
> * otherwise a race exists between the requests getting
> @@ -3069,3 +3090,7 @@ bool intel_guc_virtual_engine_has_heartbeat(const struct intel_engine_cs *ve)
>
> return false;
> }
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
> +#include "selftest_guc.c"
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..264e2f705c17
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright �� 2021 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include "selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.h"
> +
> +static struct i915_request *nop_user_request(struct intel_context *ce,
> + struct i915_request *from)
> +{
> + struct i915_request *rq;
> + int ret;
> +
> + rq = intel_context_create_request(ce);
> + if (IS_ERR(rq))
> + return rq;
> +
> + if (from) {
> + ret = i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(&rq->submit,
> + &from->fence, 0,
> + I915_FENCE_GFP);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + i915_request_put(rq);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + i915_request_get(rq);
> + i915_request_add(rq);
> +
> + return rq;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_guc_scrub_ctbs(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> + int ret = 0;
> + int i;
> + struct i915_request *last[3] = {NULL, NULL, NULL}, *rq;
> + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> + struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> + struct intel_context *ce;
> +
> + wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(gt->uncore->rpm);
> + engine = intel_selftest_find_any_engine(gt);
> +
> + /* Submit requests and inject errors forcing G2H to be dropped */
> + for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
> + ce = intel_context_create(engine);
> + if (IS_ERR(ce)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(ce);
> + pr_err("Failed to create context, %d: %d\n", i, ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + switch (i) {
> + case 0:
> + ce->drop_schedule_enable = true;
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + ce->drop_schedule_disable = true;
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + ce->drop_deregister = true;
> + break;
> + }
Would it be worth making the drop bitmask?
#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST
/**
* @drop_g2h: Force drop of selected G2H for selftest
*/
u32 drop_g2h;
#define I915_SELFTEST_DROP_GUC_SCHED_ENABLE BIT(0)
....
#endif
So in the test instead of a switch you can use:
ce->drop_g2h = BIT(i);
Not a blocker.
> +
> + rq = nop_user_request(ce, NULL);
> + intel_context_put(ce);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(rq);
> + pr_err("Failed to create request, %d: %d\n", i, ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + last[i] = rq;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
> + ret = i915_request_wait(last[i], 0, HZ);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pr_err("Last request failed to complete: %d\n", ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> + i915_request_put(last[i]);
> + last[i] = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Force all H2G / G2H to be submitted / processed */
> + intel_gt_retire_requests(gt);
> + msleep(500);
> +
> + /* Scrub missing G2H */
> + intel_gt_handle_error(engine->gt, -1, 0, "selftest reset");
> +
> + ret = intel_gt_wait_for_idle(gt, HZ);
I think here we could use a small comment where we explain that the GT
won't go idle if the scrubbing was not done correctly.
With that:
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Daniele
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pr_err("GT failed to idle: %d\n", ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> +err:
> + for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i)
> + if (last[i])
> + i915_request_put(last[i]);
> + intel_runtime_pm_put(gt->uncore->rpm, wakeref);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int intel_guc_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> + static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
> + SUBTEST(intel_guc_scrub_ctbs),
> + };
> + struct intel_gt *gt = &i915->gt;
> +
> + if (intel_gt_is_wedged(gt))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(>->uc))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return intel_gt_live_subtests(tests, gt);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h
> index cfa5c4165a4f..3cf6758931f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h
> @@ -47,5 +47,6 @@ selftest(execlists, intel_execlists_live_selftests)
> selftest(ring_submission, intel_ring_submission_live_selftests)
> selftest(perf, i915_perf_live_selftests)
> selftest(slpc, intel_slpc_live_selftests)
> +selftest(guc, intel_guc_live_selftests)
> /* Here be dragons: keep last to run last! */
> selftest(late_gt_pm, intel_gt_pm_late_selftests)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.c
> index 4b328346b48a..310fb83c527e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,18 @@
> #define REDUCED_PREEMPT 10
> #define WAIT_FOR_RESET_TIME 10000
>
> +struct intel_engine_cs *intel_selftest_find_any_engine(struct intel_gt *gt)
> +{
> + struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> + enum intel_engine_id id;
> +
> + for_each_engine(engine, gt, id)
> + return engine;
> +
> + pr_err("No valid engine found!\n");
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> int intel_selftest_modify_policy(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> struct intel_selftest_saved_policy *saved,
> u32 modify_type)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.h
> index 35c098601ac0..ae60bb507f45 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>
> struct i915_request;
> struct intel_engine_cs;
> +struct intel_gt;
>
> struct intel_selftest_saved_policy {
> u32 flags;
> @@ -23,6 +24,7 @@ enum selftest_scheduler_modify {
> SELFTEST_SCHEDULER_MODIFY_FAST_RESET,
> };
>
> +struct intel_engine_cs *intel_selftest_find_any_engine(struct intel_gt *gt);
> int intel_selftest_modify_policy(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> struct intel_selftest_saved_policy *saved,
> enum selftest_scheduler_modify modify_type);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-25 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-19 6:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/27] Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/27] drm/i915/guc: Fix blocked context accounting Matthew Brost
2021-08-24 23:24 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/27] drm/i915/guc: Fix outstanding G2H accounting Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 21:31 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 21:30 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/27] drm/i915/guc: Unwind context requests in reverse order Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 23:54 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 23:53 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 0:03 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/27] drm/i915/guc: Don't drop ce->guc_active.lock when unwinding context Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 0:01 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 23:58 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/27] drm/i915/guc: Process all G2H message at once in work queue Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 0:06 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/27] drm/i915/guc: Workaround reset G2H is received after schedule done G2H Matthew Brost
2021-08-24 23:31 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25 4:05 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/27] Revert "drm/i915/gt: Propagate change in error status to children on unhold" Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 19:47 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/27] drm/i915/selftests: Add a cancel request selftest that triggers a reset Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/27] drm/i915/guc: Kick tasklet after queuing a request Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 18:31 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-20 18:36 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/27] drm/i915/guc: Don't enable scheduling on a banned context, guc_id invalid, not registered Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 18:42 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-20 18:42 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/27] drm/i915/selftests: Fix memory corruption in live_lrc_isolation Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 0:07 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25 20:03 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/27] drm/i915/selftests: Add initial GuC selftest for scrubbing lost G2H Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 0:58 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/27] drm/i915/guc: Take context ref when cancelling request Matthew Brost
2021-08-21 0:07 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-24 15:42 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 1:21 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/27] drm/i915/guc: Don't touch guc_state.sched_state without a lock Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 1:20 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25 1:44 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 1:51 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/27] drm/i915/guc: Reset LRC descriptor if register returns -ENODEV Matthew Brost
2021-08-21 0:14 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/27] drm/i915: Allocate error capture in nowait context Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/27] drm/i915/guc: Flush G2H work queue during reset Matthew Brost
2021-08-21 0:25 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-24 15:44 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 1:22 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/27] drm/i915/guc: Release submit fence from an irq_work Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 1:44 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/27] drm/i915/guc: Move guc_blocked fence to struct guc_state Matthew Brost
2021-08-21 0:30 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/27] drm/i915/guc: Rework and simplify locking Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 16:52 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25 19:22 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/27] drm/i915/guc: Proper xarray usage for contexts_lookup Matthew Brost
2021-08-26 0:44 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-26 0:41 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-26 0:48 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop pin count check trick between sched_disable and re-pin Matthew Brost
2021-08-26 0:50 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/27] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC priority fields in context under guc_active Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 21:51 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25 22:53 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 23:04 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/27] drm/i915/guc: Move fields protected by guc->contexts_lock into sub structure Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 2:00 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop guc_active move everything into guc_state Matthew Brost
2021-08-26 0:54 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/27] drm/i915/guc: Add GuC kernel doc Matthew Brost
2021-08-26 1:03 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop static inline functions intel_guc_submission.c Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC (rev3) Patchwork
2021-08-19 7:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-08-19 7:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-08-19 9:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-08-26 3:23 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/27] Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC Matthew Brost
2021-08-26 3:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/27] drm/i915/selftests: Add initial GuC selftest for scrubbing lost G2H Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7bcf8faa-9b1d-77d3-61b3-29236d7b5c0b@intel.com \
--to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).