intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/27] drm/i915/selftests: Add initial GuC selftest for scrubbing lost G2H
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:58:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bcf8faa-9b1d-77d3-61b3-29236d7b5c0b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210819061639.21051-13-matthew.brost@intel.com>



On 8/18/2021 11:16 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> While debugging an issue with full GT resets I went down a rabbit hole
> thinking the scrubbing of lost G2H wasn't working correctly. This proved
> to be incorrect as this was working just fine but this chase inspired me
> to write a selftest to prove that this works. This simple selftest
> injects errors dropping various G2H and then issues a full GT reset
> proving that the scrubbing of these G2H doesn't blow up.
>
> v2:
>   (Daniel Vetter)
>    - Use ifdef instead of macros for selftests
> v3:
>   (Checkpatch)
>    - A space after 'switch' statement
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h |  18 +++
>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c |  25 ++++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c     | 126 ++++++++++++++++++
>   .../drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h  |   1 +
>   .../i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.c  |  12 ++
>   .../i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.h  |   2 +
>   6 files changed, 184 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> index e54351a170e2..3a73f3117873 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> @@ -198,6 +198,24 @@ struct intel_context {
>   	 */
>   	u8 guc_prio;
>   	u32 guc_prio_count[GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_NUM];
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST
> +	/**
> +	 * @drop_schedule_enable: Force drop of schedule enable G2H for selftest
> +	 */
> +	bool drop_schedule_enable;
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * @drop_schedule_disable: Force drop of schedule disable G2H for
> +	 * selftest
> +	 */
> +	bool drop_schedule_disable;
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * @drop_deregister: Force drop of deregister G2H for selftest
> +	 */
> +	bool drop_deregister;
> +#endif
>   };
>   
>   #endif /* __INTEL_CONTEXT_TYPES__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index e53a4ef7d442..e0e85e4ad512 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -2635,6 +2635,13 @@ int intel_guc_deregister_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
>   
>   	trace_intel_context_deregister_done(ce);
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST
> +	if (unlikely(ce->drop_deregister)) {
> +		ce->drop_deregister = false;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +#endif
> +
>   	if (context_wait_for_deregister_to_register(ce)) {
>   		struct intel_runtime_pm *runtime_pm =
>   			&ce->engine->gt->i915->runtime_pm;
> @@ -2689,10 +2696,24 @@ int intel_guc_sched_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
>   	trace_intel_context_sched_done(ce);
>   
>   	if (context_pending_enable(ce)) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST
> +		if (unlikely(ce->drop_schedule_enable)) {
> +			ce->drop_schedule_enable = false;
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +#endif
> +
>   		clr_context_pending_enable(ce);
>   	} else if (context_pending_disable(ce)) {
>   		bool banned;
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST
> +		if (unlikely(ce->drop_schedule_disable)) {
> +			ce->drop_schedule_disable = false;
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +#endif
> +
>   		/*
>   		 * Unpin must be done before __guc_signal_context_fence,
>   		 * otherwise a race exists between the requests getting
> @@ -3069,3 +3090,7 @@ bool intel_guc_virtual_engine_has_heartbeat(const struct intel_engine_cs *ve)
>   
>   	return false;
>   }
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
> +#include "selftest_guc.c"
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..264e2f705c17
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright �� 2021 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include "selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.h"
> +
> +static struct i915_request *nop_user_request(struct intel_context *ce,
> +					     struct i915_request *from)
> +{
> +	struct i915_request *rq;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	rq = intel_context_create_request(ce);
> +	if (IS_ERR(rq))
> +		return rq;
> +
> +	if (from) {
> +		ret = i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(&rq->submit,
> +						    &from->fence, 0,
> +						    I915_FENCE_GFP);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			i915_request_put(rq);
> +			return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	i915_request_get(rq);
> +	i915_request_add(rq);
> +
> +	return rq;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_guc_scrub_ctbs(void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	int i;
> +	struct i915_request *last[3] = {NULL, NULL, NULL}, *rq;
> +	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> +	struct intel_context *ce;
> +
> +	wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(gt->uncore->rpm);
> +	engine = intel_selftest_find_any_engine(gt);
> +
> +	/* Submit requests and inject errors forcing G2H to be dropped */
> +	for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
> +		ce = intel_context_create(engine);
> +		if (IS_ERR(ce)) {
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(ce);
> +			pr_err("Failed to create context, %d: %d\n", i, ret);
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +
> +		switch (i) {
> +		case 0:
> +			ce->drop_schedule_enable = true;
> +			break;
> +		case 1:
> +			ce->drop_schedule_disable = true;
> +			break;
> +		case 2:
> +			ce->drop_deregister = true;
> +			break;
> +		}

Would it be worth making the drop bitmask?

#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST
	/**
	 * @drop_g2h: Force drop of selected G2H for selftest
	 */
	u32 drop_g2h;
#define I915_SELFTEST_DROP_GUC_SCHED_ENABLE BIT(0)
....
#endif


So in the test instead of a switch you can use:

     ce->drop_g2h = BIT(i);


Not a blocker.

> +
> +		rq = nop_user_request(ce, NULL);
> +		intel_context_put(ce);
> +
> +		if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(rq);
> +			pr_err("Failed to create request, %d: %d\n", i, ret);
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +
> +		last[i] = rq;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
> +		ret = i915_request_wait(last[i], 0, HZ);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			pr_err("Last request failed to complete: %d\n", ret);
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +		i915_request_put(last[i]);
> +		last[i] = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Force all H2G / G2H to be submitted / processed */
> +	intel_gt_retire_requests(gt);
> +	msleep(500);
> +
> +	/* Scrub missing G2H */
> +	intel_gt_handle_error(engine->gt, -1, 0, "selftest reset");
> +
> +	ret = intel_gt_wait_for_idle(gt, HZ);

I think here we could use a small comment where we explain that the GT 
won't go idle if the scrubbing was not done correctly.
With that:

Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>

Daniele

> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		pr_err("GT failed to idle: %d\n", ret);
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +err:
> +	for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i)
> +		if (last[i])
> +			i915_request_put(last[i]);
> +	intel_runtime_pm_put(gt->uncore->rpm, wakeref);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int intel_guc_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> +	static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
> +		SUBTEST(intel_guc_scrub_ctbs),
> +	};
> +	struct intel_gt *gt = &i915->gt;
> +
> +	if (intel_gt_is_wedged(gt))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (!intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(&gt->uc))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return intel_gt_live_subtests(tests, gt);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h
> index cfa5c4165a4f..3cf6758931f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h
> @@ -47,5 +47,6 @@ selftest(execlists, intel_execlists_live_selftests)
>   selftest(ring_submission, intel_ring_submission_live_selftests)
>   selftest(perf, i915_perf_live_selftests)
>   selftest(slpc, intel_slpc_live_selftests)
> +selftest(guc, intel_guc_live_selftests)
>   /* Here be dragons: keep last to run last! */
>   selftest(late_gt_pm, intel_gt_pm_late_selftests)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.c
> index 4b328346b48a..310fb83c527e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,18 @@
>   #define REDUCED_PREEMPT		10
>   #define WAIT_FOR_RESET_TIME	10000
>   
> +struct intel_engine_cs *intel_selftest_find_any_engine(struct intel_gt *gt)
> +{
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> +	enum intel_engine_id id;
> +
> +	for_each_engine(engine, gt, id)
> +		return engine;
> +
> +	pr_err("No valid engine found!\n");
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
>   int intel_selftest_modify_policy(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>   				 struct intel_selftest_saved_policy *saved,
>   				 u32 modify_type)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.h
> index 35c098601ac0..ae60bb507f45 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_scheduler_helpers.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>   
>   struct i915_request;
>   struct intel_engine_cs;
> +struct intel_gt;
>   
>   struct intel_selftest_saved_policy {
>   	u32 flags;
> @@ -23,6 +24,7 @@ enum selftest_scheduler_modify {
>   	SELFTEST_SCHEDULER_MODIFY_FAST_RESET,
>   };
>   
> +struct intel_engine_cs *intel_selftest_find_any_engine(struct intel_gt *gt);
>   int intel_selftest_modify_policy(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>   				 struct intel_selftest_saved_policy *saved,
>   				 enum selftest_scheduler_modify modify_type);


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-25  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-19  6:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/27] Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/27] drm/i915/guc: Fix blocked context accounting Matthew Brost
2021-08-24 23:24   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/27] drm/i915/guc: Fix outstanding G2H accounting Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 21:31   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 21:30     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/27] drm/i915/guc: Unwind context requests in reverse order Matthew Brost
2021-08-19 23:54   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 23:53     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-20  0:03       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/27] drm/i915/guc: Don't drop ce->guc_active.lock when unwinding context Matthew Brost
2021-08-20  0:01   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19 23:58     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/27] drm/i915/guc: Process all G2H message at once in work queue Matthew Brost
2021-08-20  0:06   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/27] drm/i915/guc: Workaround reset G2H is received after schedule done G2H Matthew Brost
2021-08-24 23:31   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25  4:05     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/27] Revert "drm/i915/gt: Propagate change in error status to children on unhold" Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 19:47   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/27] drm/i915/selftests: Add a cancel request selftest that triggers a reset Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/27] drm/i915/guc: Kick tasklet after queuing a request Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 18:31   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-20 18:36     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/27] drm/i915/guc: Don't enable scheduling on a banned context, guc_id invalid, not registered Matthew Brost
2021-08-20 18:42   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-20 18:42     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/27] drm/i915/selftests: Fix memory corruption in live_lrc_isolation Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  0:07   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25 20:03     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/27] drm/i915/selftests: Add initial GuC selftest for scrubbing lost G2H Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  0:58   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/27] drm/i915/guc: Take context ref when cancelling request Matthew Brost
2021-08-21  0:07   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-24 15:42     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  1:21       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/27] drm/i915/guc: Don't touch guc_state.sched_state without a lock Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  1:20   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25  1:44     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  1:51       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/27] drm/i915/guc: Reset LRC descriptor if register returns -ENODEV Matthew Brost
2021-08-21  0:14   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/27] drm/i915: Allocate error capture in nowait context Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/27] drm/i915/guc: Flush G2H work queue during reset Matthew Brost
2021-08-21  0:25   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-24 15:44     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  1:22       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/27] drm/i915/guc: Release submit fence from an irq_work Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  1:44   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/27] drm/i915/guc: Move guc_blocked fence to struct guc_state Matthew Brost
2021-08-21  0:30   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/27] drm/i915/guc: Rework and simplify locking Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 16:52   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25 19:22     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/27] drm/i915/guc: Proper xarray usage for contexts_lookup Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  0:44   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-26  0:41     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  0:48       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop pin count check trick between sched_disable and re-pin Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  0:50   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/27] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC priority fields in context under guc_active Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 21:51   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-25 22:53     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-25 23:04     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/27] drm/i915/guc: Move fields protected by guc->contexts_lock into sub structure Matthew Brost
2021-08-25  2:00   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop guc_active move everything into guc_state Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  0:54   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/27] drm/i915/guc: Add GuC kernel doc Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  1:03   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-08-19  6:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop static inline functions intel_guc_submission.c Matthew Brost
2021-08-19  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC (rev3) Patchwork
2021-08-19  7:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-08-19  7:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-08-19  9:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-08-26  3:23 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/27] Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC Matthew Brost
2021-08-26  3:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/27] drm/i915/selftests: Add initial GuC selftest for scrubbing lost G2H Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7bcf8faa-9b1d-77d3-61b3-29236d7b5c0b@intel.com \
    --to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).