* Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
[not found] ` <20210906084947.4f65761d@canb.auug.org.au>
@ 2021-09-06 7:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-08 3:13 ` Masahiro Yamada
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2021-09-06 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell, intel-gfx, Joonas Lahtinen, Nikula, Jani, Rodrigo Vivi
Cc: Masahiro Yamada, Dave Airlie, DRI, John Harrison, Matthew Brost,
Alexey Dobriyan, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 12:49 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 07:50:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:23:34 +0900 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 11:33 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > > failed like this:
> > > >
> > > > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:39:
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h:9:10: fatal error: stddef.h: No such file or directory
> > > > 9 | #include <stddef.h>
> > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > >
> > > > Caused by commit
> > > >
> > > > 564f963eabd1 ("isystem: delete global -isystem compile option")
> > > >
> > > > from the kbuild tree interacting with commit
> > > >
> > > > b97060a99b01 ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC")
> > > >
> > > > I have applied the following patch for today.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > This fix-up does not depend on my kbuild tree in any way.
> > >
> > > So, the drm maintainer can apply it to his tree.
> > >
> > > Perhaps with
> > >
> > > Fixes: b97060a99b01 ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to
> > > work with GuC")
> >
> > OK, so that didn't happen so I will now apply the merge fix up to the
> > merge of the kbuild tree.
> >
> > > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > > > Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:24:19 +1000
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: use linux/stddef.h due to "isystem: trim/fixup stdarg.h and other headers"
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> > > > index 51dbe0e3294e..d2969f68dd64 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> > > > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> > > > #ifndef INTEL_GT_REQUESTS_H
> > > > #define INTEL_GT_REQUESTS_H
> > > >
> > > > -#include <stddef.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/stddef.h>
> > > >
> > > > struct intel_engine_cs;
> > > > struct intel_gt;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.32.0
>
> Ping? I am still applying this ...
Apologies, this fell through a lot of cracks. I applied this to drm-next now.
Matt/John, as author/committer it's your job to make sure issues and
fixes for the stuff you're pushing don't get lost. I'd have expected
John to apply this to at least drm-intel-gt-next (it's not even
there).
Joonas, I think this is the 2nd or 3rd or so issue this release cycle
where some compile fix got stuck a bit because drm-intel-gt-next isn't
in linux-next. Can we please fix that? It probably needs some changes
to the dim script.
Cheers, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
2021-09-06 7:34 ` [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree Daniel Vetter
@ 2021-09-08 3:13 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-09-08 9:07 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Masahiro Yamada @ 2021-09-08 3:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, intel-gfx, Joonas Lahtinen, Nikula, Jani,
Rodrigo Vivi, Dave Airlie, DRI, John Harrison, Matthew Brost,
Alexey Dobriyan, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 4:34 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 12:49 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 07:50:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:23:34 +0900 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 11:33 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > > > failed like this:
> > > > >
> > > > > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:39:
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h:9:10: fatal error: stddef.h: No such file or directory
> > > > > 9 | #include <stddef.h>
> > > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > > >
> > > > > Caused by commit
> > > > >
> > > > > 564f963eabd1 ("isystem: delete global -isystem compile option")
> > > > >
> > > > > from the kbuild tree interacting with commit
> > > > >
> > > > > b97060a99b01 ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC")
> > > > >
> > > > > I have applied the following patch for today.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > This fix-up does not depend on my kbuild tree in any way.
> > > >
> > > > So, the drm maintainer can apply it to his tree.
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps with
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: b97060a99b01 ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to
> > > > work with GuC")
> > >
> > > OK, so that didn't happen so I will now apply the merge fix up to the
> > > merge of the kbuild tree.
> > >
> > > > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > > > > Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:24:19 +1000
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: use linux/stddef.h due to "isystem: trim/fixup stdarg.h and other headers"
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h | 2 +-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> > > > > index 51dbe0e3294e..d2969f68dd64 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> > > > > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> > > > > #ifndef INTEL_GT_REQUESTS_H
> > > > > #define INTEL_GT_REQUESTS_H
> > > > >
> > > > > -#include <stddef.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/stddef.h>
> > > > >
> > > > > struct intel_engine_cs;
> > > > > struct intel_gt;
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.32.0
> >
> > Ping? I am still applying this ...
>
> Apologies, this fell through a lot of cracks. I applied this to drm-next now.
Rather, I was planning to apply this fix to my kbuild tree.
Since you guys did not fix the issue in time,
I ended up with dropping [1] from my pull request.
I want to get [1] merged in this MW.
If I postponed it, somebody would add new
<stddef.h> or <stdint.h> inclusion in the next development
cycle, I will never make it in the mainline.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/YQhY40teUJcTc5H4@localhost.localdomain/
> Matt/John, as author/committer it's your job to make sure issues and
> fixes for the stuff you're pushing don't get lost. I'd have expected
> John to apply this to at least drm-intel-gt-next (it's not even
> there).
>
> Joonas, I think this is the 2nd or 3rd or so issue this release cycle
> where some compile fix got stuck a bit because drm-intel-gt-next isn't
> in linux-next. Can we please fix that? It probably needs some changes
> to the dim script.
>
> Cheers, Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
2021-09-08 3:13 ` Masahiro Yamada
@ 2021-09-08 9:07 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2021-09-08 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Masahiro Yamada
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, intel-gfx, Joonas Lahtinen, Nikula, Jani,
Rodrigo Vivi, Dave Airlie, DRI, John Harrison, Matthew Brost,
Alexey Dobriyan, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 5:14 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 4:34 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 12:49 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 07:50:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:23:34 +0900 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 11:33 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > > > > failed like this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:39:
> > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h:9:10: fatal error: stddef.h: No such file or directory
> > > > > > 9 | #include <stddef.h>
> > > > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Caused by commit
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 564f963eabd1 ("isystem: delete global -isystem compile option")
> > > > > >
> > > > > > from the kbuild tree interacting with commit
> > > > > >
> > > > > > b97060a99b01 ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC")
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have applied the following patch for today.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > This fix-up does not depend on my kbuild tree in any way.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, the drm maintainer can apply it to his tree.
> > > > >
> > > > > Perhaps with
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: b97060a99b01 ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to
> > > > > work with GuC")
> > > >
> > > > OK, so that didn't happen so I will now apply the merge fix up to the
> > > > merge of the kbuild tree.
> > > >
> > > > > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > > > > > Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:24:19 +1000
> > > > > > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: use linux/stddef.h due to "isystem: trim/fixup stdarg.h and other headers"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h | 2 +-
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> > > > > > index 51dbe0e3294e..d2969f68dd64 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> > > > > > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> > > > > > #ifndef INTEL_GT_REQUESTS_H
> > > > > > #define INTEL_GT_REQUESTS_H
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -#include <stddef.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/stddef.h>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > struct intel_engine_cs;
> > > > > > struct intel_gt;
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.32.0
> > >
> > > Ping? I am still applying this ...
> >
> > Apologies, this fell through a lot of cracks. I applied this to drm-next now.
>
>
>
> Rather, I was planning to apply this fix to my kbuild tree.
>
> Since you guys did not fix the issue in time,
> I ended up with dropping [1] from my pull request.
>
> I want to get [1] merged in this MW.
>
> If I postponed it, somebody would add new
> <stddef.h> or <stdint.h> inclusion in the next development
> cycle, I will never make it in the mainline.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/YQhY40teUJcTc5H4@localhost.localdomain/
Yeah no problem if you apply it too. For that:
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
I just figured I make sure this is at least not lost.
-Daniel
>
>
>
>
>
> > Matt/John, as author/committer it's your job to make sure issues and
> > fixes for the stuff you're pushing don't get lost. I'd have expected
> > John to apply this to at least drm-intel-gt-next (it's not even
> > there).
> >
> > Joonas, I think this is the 2nd or 3rd or so issue this release cycle
> > where some compile fix got stuck a bit because drm-intel-gt-next isn't
> > in linux-next. Can we please fix that? It probably needs some changes
> > to the dim script.
> >
> > Cheers, Daniel
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > http://blog.ffwll.ch
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
2023-01-19 2:12 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2023-01-19 22:15 ` Rodrigo Vivi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Rodrigo Vivi @ 2023-01-19 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics, Linux Kernel Mailing List, DRI,
Linux Next Mailing List, Thomas Zimmermann, Dave Airlie
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 01:12:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:33:
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c: In function 'drm_fb_helper_single_fb_probe':
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:1968:24: error: 'dev' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'cdev'?
It's a silent conflict of
cff84bac9922 ("drm/fh-helper: Split fbdev single-probe helper")
with
d1d5101452ab ("drm/fb-helper: Set framebuffer for vga-switcheroo clients")
The resolution is to reintroduce the dev declaration there in
drm_fb_helper_single_fb_probe()
+ struct drm_device *dev = fb_helper->dev;
I hope it helps.
Thanks,
Rodrigo.
> 1968 | if (dev_is_pci(dev->dev))
> | ^~~
> include/linux/pci.h:1151:25: note: in definition of macro 'dev_is_pci'
> 1151 | #define dev_is_pci(d) ((d)->bus == &pci_bus_type)
> | ^
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:1968:24: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> 1968 | if (dev_is_pci(dev->dev))
> | ^~~
> include/linux/pci.h:1151:25: note: in definition of macro 'dev_is_pci'
> 1151 | #define dev_is_pci(d) ((d)->bus == &pci_bus_type)
> | ^
> In file included from include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:20,
> from include/linux/atomic.h:82,
> from include/linux/console.h:17,
> from drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:32:
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:299:27: error: expression in static assertion is not an integer
> 299 | #define __same_type(a, b) __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(a), typeof(b))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/build_bug.h:78:56: note: in definition of macro '__static_assert'
> 78 | #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg)
> | ^~~~
> include/linux/container_of.h:20:9: note: in expansion of macro 'static_assert'
> 20 | static_assert(__same_type(*(ptr), ((type *)0)->member) || \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/container_of.h:20:23: note: in expansion of macro '__same_type'
> 20 | static_assert(__same_type(*(ptr), ((type *)0)->member) || \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/pci.h:541:23: note: in expansion of macro 'container_of'
> 541 | #define to_pci_dev(n) container_of(n, struct pci_dev, dev)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:1969:46: note: in expansion of macro 'to_pci_dev'
> 1969 | vga_switcheroo_client_fb_set(to_pci_dev(dev->dev), fb_helper->info);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>
> Caused by commit
>
> cff84bac9922 ("drm/fh-helper: Split fbdev single-probe helper")
>
> interacting with commit
>
> d1d5101452ab ("drm/fb-helper: Set framebuffer for vga-switcheroo clients")
>
> from the drm-misc-fixes tree.
>
> I have added the following merge fix patch.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:42:56 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "drm/fb-helper: Set framebuffer for vga-switcheroo clients"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
> index 97049a26fca2..5e445c61252d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
> @@ -1942,6 +1942,7 @@ static int drm_fb_helper_single_fb_probe(struct drm_fb_helper *fb_helper,
> int preferred_bpp)
> {
> struct drm_client_dev *client = &fb_helper->client;
> + struct drm_device *dev = fb_helper->dev;
> struct drm_fb_helper_surface_size sizes;
> int ret;
>
> --
> 2.35.1
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
@ 2023-01-19 2:12 Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-19 22:15 ` Rodrigo Vivi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2023-01-19 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Airlie, Daniel Vetter
Cc: Intel Graphics, Linux Next Mailing List, DRI, Thomas Zimmermann,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3631 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:33:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c: In function 'drm_fb_helper_single_fb_probe':
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:1968:24: error: 'dev' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'cdev'?
1968 | if (dev_is_pci(dev->dev))
| ^~~
include/linux/pci.h:1151:25: note: in definition of macro 'dev_is_pci'
1151 | #define dev_is_pci(d) ((d)->bus == &pci_bus_type)
| ^
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:1968:24: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
1968 | if (dev_is_pci(dev->dev))
| ^~~
include/linux/pci.h:1151:25: note: in definition of macro 'dev_is_pci'
1151 | #define dev_is_pci(d) ((d)->bus == &pci_bus_type)
| ^
In file included from include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:20,
from include/linux/atomic.h:82,
from include/linux/console.h:17,
from drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:32:
include/linux/compiler_types.h:299:27: error: expression in static assertion is not an integer
299 | #define __same_type(a, b) __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(a), typeof(b))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:78:56: note: in definition of macro '__static_assert'
78 | #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg)
| ^~~~
include/linux/container_of.h:20:9: note: in expansion of macro 'static_assert'
20 | static_assert(__same_type(*(ptr), ((type *)0)->member) || \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/container_of.h:20:23: note: in expansion of macro '__same_type'
20 | static_assert(__same_type(*(ptr), ((type *)0)->member) || \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/pci.h:541:23: note: in expansion of macro 'container_of'
541 | #define to_pci_dev(n) container_of(n, struct pci_dev, dev)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:1969:46: note: in expansion of macro 'to_pci_dev'
1969 | vga_switcheroo_client_fb_set(to_pci_dev(dev->dev), fb_helper->info);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
Caused by commit
cff84bac9922 ("drm/fh-helper: Split fbdev single-probe helper")
interacting with commit
d1d5101452ab ("drm/fb-helper: Set framebuffer for vga-switcheroo clients")
from the drm-misc-fixes tree.
I have added the following merge fix patch.
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:42:56 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "drm/fb-helper: Set framebuffer for vga-switcheroo clients"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
index 97049a26fca2..5e445c61252d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
@@ -1942,6 +1942,7 @@ static int drm_fb_helper_single_fb_probe(struct drm_fb_helper *fb_helper,
int preferred_bpp)
{
struct drm_client_dev *client = &fb_helper->client;
+ struct drm_device *dev = fb_helper->dev;
struct drm_fb_helper_surface_size sizes;
int ret;
--
2.35.1
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
2021-01-20 12:12 ` Daniel Vetter
@ 2021-01-20 20:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-01-20 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Dave Airlie, Intel Graphics, Sebastian Reichel,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List,
Tomi Valkeinen, DRI
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 411 bytes --]
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:12:21 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> I've pulled drm-misc-next into drm-next now, so as long as all other
> drm trees are merged after drm, this should be solved now.
> drm-intel-next also has their msm build breakage fixed (I acked the
> patch already), so hopefully we should be all clean again.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
2021-01-18 1:06 ` Dave Airlie
@ 2021-01-20 12:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-20 20:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2021-01-20 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Airlie
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Dave Airlie, Intel Graphics, Sebastian Reichel,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List,
Tomi Valkeinen, DRI
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:06 AM Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 at 10:59, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:56:54 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 12:25:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:55:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > > > failed like this:
> > > > >
> > > > > error: the following would cause module name conflict:
> > > > > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm.ko
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-dsi-cm.ko
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe caused by commit
> > > > >
> > > > > cf64148abcfd ("drm/panel: Move OMAP's DSI command mode panel driver")
> > > > >
> > > > > I have used the drm tree from next-20210107 for today.
> > > >
> > > > This has affected the drm-misc tree as well (since it merged in the drm
> > > > tree).
> > > >
> > > > I have used the drm-misc tree from next-20210107 for today.
> > >
> > > And now the drm-intel tree.
> > >
> > > I have used the drm-intel tree from next-20210108 for today.
> >
> > This is still affecting the drm and drm-intel trees.
>
> I think the fix for this is in drm-misc-next, Maarten can you send me
> a -next PR to fix this?
I've pulled drm-misc-next into drm-next now, so as long as all other
drm trees are merged after drm, this should be solved now.
drm-intel-next also has their msm build breakage fixed (I acked the
patch already), so hopefully we should be all clean again.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
2021-01-18 0:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2021-01-18 1:06 ` Dave Airlie
2021-01-20 12:12 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Dave Airlie @ 2021-01-18 1:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell, Maarten Lankhorst
Cc: Dave Airlie, Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics, Sebastian Reichel,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List,
Tomi Valkeinen, DRI
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 at 10:59, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:56:54 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 12:25:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:55:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > > failed like this:
> > > >
> > > > error: the following would cause module name conflict:
> > > > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm.ko
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-dsi-cm.ko
> > > >
> > > > Maybe caused by commit
> > > >
> > > > cf64148abcfd ("drm/panel: Move OMAP's DSI command mode panel driver")
> > > >
> > > > I have used the drm tree from next-20210107 for today.
> > >
> > > This has affected the drm-misc tree as well (since it merged in the drm
> > > tree).
> > >
> > > I have used the drm-misc tree from next-20210107 for today.
> >
> > And now the drm-intel tree.
> >
> > I have used the drm-intel tree from next-20210108 for today.
>
> This is still affecting the drm and drm-intel trees.
I think the fix for this is in drm-misc-next, Maarten can you send me
a -next PR to fix this?
Dave.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
2021-01-10 23:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2021-01-18 0:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-18 1:06 ` Dave Airlie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-01-18 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics, Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen,
Rodrigo Vivi
Cc: Dave Airlie, Tomi Valkeinen, Sebastian Reichel, DRI,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1132 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:56:54 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 12:25:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:55:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > failed like this:
> > >
> > > error: the following would cause module name conflict:
> > > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm.ko
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-dsi-cm.ko
> > >
> > > Maybe caused by commit
> > >
> > > cf64148abcfd ("drm/panel: Move OMAP's DSI command mode panel driver")
> > >
> > > I have used the drm tree from next-20210107 for today.
> >
> > This has affected the drm-misc tree as well (since it merged in the drm
> > tree).
> >
> > I have used the drm-misc tree from next-20210107 for today.
>
> And now the drm-intel tree.
>
> I have used the drm-intel tree from next-20210108 for today.
This is still affecting the drm and drm-intel trees.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
2021-01-08 1:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2021-01-10 23:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-18 0:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-01-10 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics, Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen,
Rodrigo Vivi
Cc: Dave Airlie, Tomi Valkeinen, Sebastian Reichel, DRI,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 932 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 12:25:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:55:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > error: the following would cause module name conflict:
> > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm.ko
> > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-dsi-cm.ko
> >
> > Maybe caused by commit
> >
> > cf64148abcfd ("drm/panel: Move OMAP's DSI command mode panel driver")
> >
> > I have used the drm tree from next-20210107 for today.
>
> This has affected the drm-misc tree as well (since it merged in the drm
> tree).
>
> I have used the drm-misc tree from next-20210107 for today.
And now the drm-intel tree.
I have used the drm-intel tree from next-20210108 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
[not found] <20210108115518.2b3fdf58@canb.auug.org.au>
@ 2021-01-08 1:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-10 23:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-01-08 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics
Cc: Dave Airlie, Tomi Valkeinen, Sebastian Reichel, DRI,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 727 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:55:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> error: the following would cause module name conflict:
> drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm.ko
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-dsi-cm.ko
>
> Maybe caused by commit
>
> cf64148abcfd ("drm/panel: Move OMAP's DSI command mode panel driver")
>
> I have used the drm tree from next-20210107 for today.
This has affected the drm-misc tree as well (since it merged in the drm
tree).
I have used the drm-misc tree from next-20210107 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
@ 2020-12-09 1:53 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2020-12-09 1:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Airlie, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen,
Rodrigo Vivi, Intel Graphics, DRI
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Lucas De Marchi,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Chris Wilson
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1903 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c: In function 'get_mocs_settings':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c:363:22: error: 'GEN11_NUM_MOCS_ENTRIES' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'GEN9_NUM_MOCS_ENTRIES'?
363 | table->n_entries = GEN11_NUM_MOCS_ENTRIES;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| GEN9_NUM_MOCS_ENTRIES
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c:363:22: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
Caused by commit
2606b269234b ("drm/i915/dg1: Define MOCS table for DG1")
interacting with commit
7c5c15dffe1e ("drm/i915/gt: Declare gen9 has 64 mocs entries!")
from the drm-intel-fixes tree.
I have applied the following merge fix patch for today:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:47:45 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fixup for "drm/i915/gt: Declare gen9 has 64 mocs entries!"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
index c60ca62b38df..ab6870242e18 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static unsigned int get_mocs_settings(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
if (IS_DG1(i915)) {
table->size = ARRAY_SIZE(dg1_mocs_table);
table->table = dg1_mocs_table;
- table->n_entries = GEN11_NUM_MOCS_ENTRIES;
+ table->n_entries = GEN9_NUM_MOCS_ENTRIES;
} else if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 12) {
table->size = ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_mocs_table);
table->table = tgl_mocs_table;
--
2.29.2
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
@ 2020-05-08 4:29 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2020-05-08 4:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Airlie, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen,
Rodrigo Vivi, Intel Graphics, DRI
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Chris Wilson
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4395 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:19,
from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:83,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/seq_file.h:7,
from include/drm/drm_print.h:31,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c:25:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c: In function 'intel_engine_print_registers':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c:1428:31: error: 'struct intel_context' has no member named 'lrc_desc'
1428 | upper_32_bits(rq->context->lrc_desc));
| ^~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c:1440:31: error: 'struct intel_context' has no member named 'lrc_desc'
1440 | upper_32_bits(rq->context->lrc_desc));
| ^~
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:6,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c:134:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c: In function 'active_context':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c:2850:32: error: 'struct intel_context' has no member named 'lrc_desc'
2850 | if (upper_32_bits(rq->context->lrc_desc) == ccid) {
| ^~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c:2859:32: error: 'struct intel_context' has no member named 'lrc_desc'
2859 | if (upper_32_bits(rq->context->lrc_desc) == ccid) {
| ^~
Caused by commit
53b2622e7746 ("drm/i915/execlists: Avoid reusing the same logical CCID")
from the drm-intel-fixes tree interacting with commits
606727842d8b ("drm/i915/gt: Include the execlists CCID of each port in the engine dump")
4c977837ba29 ("drm/i915/execlists: Peek at the next submission for error interrupts")
from the drm tree.
I have added teh following merge fix patch.
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 14:21:40 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: fix up for "Avoid reusing the same logical CCID"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
index b1f8527f02c8..7c3cb5aedfdf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
@@ -1425,7 +1425,7 @@ static void intel_engine_print_registers(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
len = scnprintf(hdr, sizeof(hdr),
"\t\tActive[%d]: ccid:%08x, ",
(int)(port - execlists->active),
- upper_32_bits(rq->context->lrc_desc));
+ rq->context->lrc.ccid);
len += print_ring(hdr + len, sizeof(hdr) - len, rq);
scnprintf(hdr + len, sizeof(hdr) - len, "rq: ");
print_request(m, rq, hdr);
@@ -1437,7 +1437,7 @@ static void intel_engine_print_registers(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
len = scnprintf(hdr, sizeof(hdr),
"\t\tPending[%d]: ccid:%08x, ",
(int)(port - execlists->pending),
- upper_32_bits(rq->context->lrc_desc));
+ rq->context->lrc.ccid);
len += print_ring(hdr + len, sizeof(hdr) - len, rq);
scnprintf(hdr + len, sizeof(hdr) - len, "rq: ");
print_request(m, rq, hdr);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 233f815c3c86..456d286c17dd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -2847,7 +2847,7 @@ active_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 ccid)
*/
for (port = el->active; (rq = *port); port++) {
- if (upper_32_bits(rq->context->lrc_desc) == ccid) {
+ if (rq->context->lrc.ccid == ccid) {
ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
"ccid found at active:%zd\n",
port - el->active);
@@ -2856,7 +2856,7 @@ active_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 ccid)
}
for (port = el->pending; (rq = *port); port++) {
- if (upper_32_bits(rq->context->lrc_desc) == ccid) {
+ if (rq->context->lrc.ccid == ccid) {
ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
"ccid found at pending:%zd\n",
port - el->pending);
--
2.26.2
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-19 22:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20210820123348.6535a87e@canb.auug.org.au>
[not found] ` <CAK7LNASv-F1Y7kpaDF+_=TW0Jzvpo1uuNL1B5jUmCCRqv-45bA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20210902075038.7461d3c8@canb.auug.org.au>
[not found] ` <20210906084947.4f65761d@canb.auug.org.au>
2021-09-06 7:34 ` [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree Daniel Vetter
2021-09-08 3:13 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-09-08 9:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-01-19 2:12 Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-19 22:15 ` Rodrigo Vivi
[not found] <20210108115518.2b3fdf58@canb.auug.org.au>
2021-01-08 1:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-10 23:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-18 0:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-18 1:06 ` Dave Airlie
2021-01-20 12:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-20 20:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-12-09 1:53 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-08 4:29 Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).