intel-xe.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Remove unused revid from firmware name
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 22:17:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230324051754.1346390-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230324051754.1346390-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

The rev field is always 0 so it ends up never used. In i915 it was
introduced because of CML: up to rev 5 it reuses the guc and huc
firmware blobs from KBL. After that there is a specific firmware for
that platform.  This can be reintroduced later if ever needed.

With the removal of revid the packed attribute in
uc_fw_platform_requirement, which is there only for reducing the space
these tables take, can also be removed since it has even more limited
usefulness: currently there's only padding of 2 bytes. Remove the
attribute to avoid the unaligned access.

	$ pahole -C uc_fw_platform_requirement build64/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.o
	struct uc_fw_platform_requirement {
		enum xe_platform           p;                    /*     0     4 */
		const struct uc_fw_blob    blob;                 /*     4    10 */

		/* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 2 */
		/* padding: 2 */
		/* last cacheline: 16 bytes */
	};

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c
index e9b30e620fd9..e2c982b37e87 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c
@@ -39,21 +39,21 @@ static struct xe_device *uc_fw_to_xe(struct xe_uc_fw *uc_fw)
 
 /*
  * List of required GuC and HuC binaries per-platform.
- * Must be ordered based on platform + revid, from newer to older.
+ * Must be ordered based on platform, from newer to older.
  */
 #define XE_GUC_FIRMWARE_DEFS(fw_def, guc_def) \
-	fw_def(METEORLAKE,   0, guc_def(mtl,  70, 5, 2)) \
-	fw_def(ALDERLAKE_P,  0, guc_def(adlp,  70, 5, 2)) \
-	fw_def(ALDERLAKE_S,  0, guc_def(tgl,  70, 5, 2)) \
-	fw_def(PVC,          0, guc_def(pvc,  70, 5, 2)) \
-	fw_def(DG2,          0, guc_def(dg2,  70, 5, 2)) \
-	fw_def(DG1,          0, guc_def(dg1,  70, 5, 2)) \
-	fw_def(TIGERLAKE,    0, guc_def(tgl,  70, 5, 2))
+	fw_def(METEORLAKE,   guc_def(mtl,  70, 5, 2)) \
+	fw_def(ALDERLAKE_P,  guc_def(adlp,  70, 5, 2)) \
+	fw_def(ALDERLAKE_S,  guc_def(tgl,  70, 5, 2)) \
+	fw_def(PVC,          guc_def(pvc,  70, 5, 2)) \
+	fw_def(DG2,          guc_def(dg2,  70, 5, 2)) \
+	fw_def(DG1,          guc_def(dg1,  70, 5, 2)) \
+	fw_def(TIGERLAKE,    guc_def(tgl,  70, 5, 2))
 
 #define XE_HUC_FIRMWARE_DEFS(fw_def, huc_def, huc_ver) \
-	fw_def(ALDERLAKE_S,  0, huc_def(tgl)) \
-	fw_def(DG1,          0, huc_def(dg1)) \
-	fw_def(TIGERLAKE,    0, huc_def(tgl))
+	fw_def(ALDERLAKE_S,	huc_def(tgl)) \
+	fw_def(DG1,		huc_def(dg1)) \
+	fw_def(TIGERLAKE,	huc_def(tgl))
 
 #define __MAKE_HUC_FW_PATH(prefix_, name_) \
         "i915/" \
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static struct xe_device *uc_fw_to_xe(struct xe_uc_fw *uc_fw)
 
 
 /* All blobs need to be declared via MODULE_FIRMWARE() */
-#define XE_UC_MODULE_FW(platform_, revid_, uc_) \
+#define XE_UC_MODULE_FW(platform_, uc_) \
 	MODULE_FIRMWARE(uc_);
 
 XE_GUC_FIRMWARE_DEFS(XE_UC_MODULE_FW, MAKE_GUC_FW_PATH)
@@ -109,16 +109,14 @@ struct __packed uc_fw_blob {
 	UC_FW_BLOB(major_, minor_, \
 		   MAKE_HUC_FW_PATH_FULL_VER(prefix_, major_, minor_, bld_num_))
 
-struct __packed uc_fw_platform_requirement {
+struct uc_fw_platform_requirement {
 	enum xe_platform p;
-	u8 rev; /* first platform rev using this FW */
 	const struct uc_fw_blob blob;
 };
 
-#define MAKE_FW_LIST(platform_, revid_, uc_) \
+#define MAKE_FW_LIST(platform_, uc_) \
 { \
 	.p = XE_##platform_, \
-	.rev = revid_, \
 	.blob = uc_, \
 },
 
@@ -143,7 +141,6 @@ uc_fw_auto_select(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_uc_fw *uc_fw)
 	static const struct uc_fw_platform_requirement *fw_blobs;
 	enum xe_platform p = xe->info.platform;
 	u32 fw_count;
-	u8 rev = xe->info.revid;
 	int i;
 
 	XE_BUG_ON(uc_fw->type >= ARRAY_SIZE(blobs_all));
@@ -151,7 +148,7 @@ uc_fw_auto_select(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_uc_fw *uc_fw)
 	fw_count = blobs_all[uc_fw->type].count;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < fw_count && p <= fw_blobs[i].p; i++) {
-		if (p == fw_blobs[i].p && rev >= fw_blobs[i].rev) {
+		if (p == fw_blobs[i].p) {
 			const struct uc_fw_blob *blob = &fw_blobs[i].blob;
 
 			uc_fw->path = blob->path;
-- 
2.39.0


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-24  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-24  5:17 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] drm/xe: Update GuC/HuC firmware autoselection Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-24  5:17 ` Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2023-03-27 16:59   ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Remove unused revid from firmware name Matt Roper
2023-03-31 21:35     ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-24  5:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Fix platform order Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-27 17:02   ` Matt Roper
2023-03-31 13:22     ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-31 20:47       ` Matt Roper
2023-03-31 21:13         ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-24  5:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Update GuC/HuC firmware autoselect logic Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-28 23:31   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2023-03-30  3:46     ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-03 18:09       ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2023-04-04 18:59         ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-24  5:27 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Update GuC/HuC firmware autoselection Patchwork
2023-03-24  5:28 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-03-24  5:32 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-03-24  5:54 ` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230324051754.1346390-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=anusha.srivatsa@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).