io-uring.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Clay Harris <bugs@claycon.org>,
	io-uring <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Feature request: Please implement IORING_OP_TEE
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:22:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez1fc1_U7AtWAM+Jh6QjV-oAtAW2sQ2XSz9s+53SN_wSFg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c76b09f0-3437-842e-7106-efb2cac38284@kernel.dk>

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 5:56 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> On 4/27/20 9:40 AM, Clay Harris wrote:
> > I was excited to see IORING_OP_SPLICE go in, but disappointed that tee
> > didn't go in at the same time.  It would be very useful to copy pipe
> > buffers in an async program.
>
> Pavel, care to wire up tee? From a quick look, looks like just exposing
> do_tee() and calling that, so should be trivial.

Just out of curiosity:

What's the purpose of doing that via io_uring? Non-blocking sys_tee()
just shoves around some metadata, it doesn't do any I/O, right? Is
this purely for syscall-batching reasons? (And does that mean that you
would also add syscalls like epoll_wait() and futex() to io_uring?) Or
is this because you're worried about blocking on the pipe mutex?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-27 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-27 15:40 Feature request: Please implement IORING_OP_TEE Clay Harris
2020-04-27 15:55 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-27 18:03   ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-04-27 18:11     ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-27 18:22   ` Jann Horn [this message]
2020-04-27 20:02     ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-29 15:57       ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-04-27 20:17     ` Clay Harris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAG48ez1fc1_U7AtWAM+Jh6QjV-oAtAW2sQ2XSz9s+53SN_wSFg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bugs@claycon.org \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).