kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@loongson.cn>
Subject: Re: [1/7] irqchip: Fix potential resource leaks
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:42:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ca22645-8bf3-008f-fe55-d432f962cac3@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2111f53-ca52-fedf-0257-71f0aa89b093@loongson.cn>

>> Can it helpful to add jump targets so that a bit of exception handling
>> can be better reused at the end of this function?
>
> OK, no problem, I will do it in the v2.

It seems that the software evolution will be continued with another
update suggestion like the following.

[PATCH v3 10/14 RESEND] irqchip/nvic: Fix potential resource leaks
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/1592984711-3130-11-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1263191/


Can it matter to omit the word “potential” from change descriptions
after you detected that specific function calls were missing
in if branches?

Regards,
Markus

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-24  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-23 15:55 [PATCH 1/7] irqchip: Fix potential resource leaks Markus Elfring
2020-06-24  1:44 ` Tiezhu Yang
2020-06-24  8:42   ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2020-06-24  9:16     ` [1/7] " Tiezhu Yang
2020-06-24  9:23       ` Markus Elfring
2020-06-24  9:56         ` Tiezhu Yang
2020-06-24 10:06           ` Markus Elfring
2020-06-24 11:30             ` Tiezhu Yang
2020-06-24 12:08               ` Markus Elfring
2020-06-28  3:27                 ` Tiezhu Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9ca22645-8bf3-008f-fe55-d432f962cac3@web.de \
    --to=markus.elfring@web.de \
    --cc=chenhc@lemote.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lixuefeng@loongson.cn \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).