From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 3/9] s390x: Add cpu id to interrupt error prints
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:02:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0eb69c66-5aa7-1609-9de0-c3d0efaed30a@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200121134254.4570-4-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2338 bytes --]
On 1/21/20 2:42 PM, Janosch Frank wrote:
> It's good to know which cpu broke the test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/interrupt.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> index 05f30be..773752a 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> @@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ static void fixup_pgm_int(void)
> void handle_pgm_int(void)
> {
> if (!pgm_int_expected)
> - report_abort("Unexpected program interrupt: %d at %#lx, ilen %d\n",
> - lc->pgm_int_code, lc->pgm_old_psw.addr,
> + report_abort("Unexpected program interrupt: %d on cpu %d at %#lx, ilen %d\n",
> + lc->pgm_int_code, stap(), lc->pgm_old_psw.addr,
> lc->pgm_int_id);
>
> pgm_int_expected = false;
> @@ -119,8 +119,8 @@ void handle_ext_int(void)
> {
> if (!ext_int_expected &&
> lc->ext_int_code != EXT_IRQ_SERVICE_SIG) {
> - report_abort("Unexpected external call interrupt (code %#x): at %#lx",
> - lc->ext_int_code, lc->ext_old_psw.addr);
> + report_abort("Unexpected external call interrupt (code %#x): on cpu %d at %#lx",
> + stap(), lc->ext_int_code, lc->ext_old_psw.addr);
The arguments are in the wrong order, stap() should come after the int
code...
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -137,18 +137,18 @@ void handle_ext_int(void)
>
> void handle_mcck_int(void)
> {
> - report_abort("Unexpected machine check interrupt: at %#lx",
> - lc->mcck_old_psw.addr);
> + report_abort("Unexpected machine check interrupt: on cpu %d at %#lx",
> + stap(), lc->mcck_old_psw.addr);
> }
>
> void handle_io_int(void)
> {
> - report_abort("Unexpected io interrupt: at %#lx",
> - lc->io_old_psw.addr);
> + report_abort("Unexpected io interrupt: on cpu %d at %#lx",
> + stap(), lc->io_old_psw.addr);
> }
>
> void handle_svc_int(void)
> {
> - report_abort("Unexpected supervisor call interrupt: at %#lx",
> - lc->svc_old_psw.addr);
> + report_abort("Unexpected supervisor call interrupt: on cpu %d at %#lx",
> + stap(), lc->svc_old_psw.addr);
> }
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-23 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-21 13:42 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 0/9] s390x: smp: Improve smp code and reset checks Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 1/9] s390x: smp: Cleanup smp.c Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/9] s390x: smp: Only use smp_cpu_setup once Janosch Frank
2020-01-23 13:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-23 13:54 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-23 13:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-24 8:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-24 8:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 3/9] s390x: Add cpu id to interrupt error prints Janosch Frank
2020-01-23 10:02 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-01-23 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] " Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 4/9] s390x: smp: Rework cpu start and active tracking Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 17:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-22 8:25 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-23 9:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] " Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 5/9] s390x: smp: Wait for cpu setup to finish Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 6/9] s390x: smp: Loop if secondary cpu returns into cpu setup again Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 14:28 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-21 17:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-23 13:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-23 13:47 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 7/9] s390x: smp: Remove unneeded cpu loops Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 14:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-21 17:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 8/9] s390x: smp: Test all CRs on initial reset Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 9/9] s390x: smp: Dirty fpc before initial reset test Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0eb69c66-5aa7-1609-9de0-c3d0efaed30a@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).