From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
thuth@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 4/4] s390x: SCLP unit test
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:17:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200113171715.7334c1be@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f0bee07-28bc-8154-3c67-402c82da8f89@redhat.com>
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:06:05 +0100
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
> >>> this would be solved by adding special logic to the pgm interrupt
> >>> handler (as we have discussed in your previous email)
> >>>
> >>
> >> I see, so the issue should hold for all SCLP checks where we don't
> >> expect an exception ... hmmm
> >
> > which is why my wrapper in the unit test is so complicated :)
> >
>
> so .... if we would implement my suggestion (if we get an exception
> on a servc instruction, clear sclp_busy) that code would get
> simplified as well? :)
sure, as I said, that can be done. The question is if we really want to
change something in the interrupt handler (shared by all s390x unit
tests) just for the benefit of this one unit test.
Also consider that the changes to the interrupt handler would not
necessarily be trivial. i.e. you need to check that the origin of the
pgm interrupt is a SERVC instruction, and then act accordingly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-13 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-10 18:40 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 0/4] s390x: SCLP Unit test Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-10 18:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 1/4] s390x: export sclp_setup_int Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-10 18:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 2/4] s390x: sclp: add service call instruction wrapper Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-10 18:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 3/4] s390x: lib: add SPX and STPX " Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 9:42 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-13 12:27 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 10:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-10 18:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 4/4] s390x: SCLP unit test Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 11:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 12:33 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 12:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 12:58 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 13:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 14:05 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 14:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 15:24 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 16:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 16:17 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2020-01-15 9:57 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200113171715.7334c1be@p-imbrenda \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).