From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com, david@redhat.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 3/4] s390x: lib: add SPX and STPX instruction wrapper
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:42:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <656129b7-68f2-d3ab-7428-91999c896ca5@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200110184050.191506-4-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 987 bytes --]
On 1/10/20 7:40 PM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> Add a wrapper for the SET PREFIX and STORE PREFIX instructions, and
> use it instead of using inline assembly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> @@ -63,14 +60,10 @@ static void test_spx(void)
> * some facility bits there ... at least some of them should be
> * set in our buffer afterwards.
> */
> - asm volatile (
> - " stpx %0\n"
> - " spx %1\n"
> - " stfl 0\n"
> - " spx %0\n"
> - : "+Q"(old_prefix)
> - : "Q"(new_prefix)
> - : "memory");
> + old_prefix = get_prefix();
> + set_prefix(new_prefix);
> + asm volatile(" stfl 0" : : : "memory");
Couldn't we also use stfl from facility.h here?
And do we need to add a memory clobber to it?
> + set_prefix(old_prefix);
> report(pagebuf[GEN_LC_STFL] != 0, "stfl to new prefix");
>
> expect_pgm_int();
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-13 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-10 18:40 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 0/4] s390x: SCLP Unit test Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-10 18:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 1/4] s390x: export sclp_setup_int Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-10 18:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 2/4] s390x: sclp: add service call instruction wrapper Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-10 18:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 3/4] s390x: lib: add SPX and STPX " Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 9:42 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-01-13 12:27 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 10:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-10 18:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 4/4] s390x: SCLP unit test Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 11:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 12:33 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 12:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 12:58 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 13:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 14:05 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 14:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 15:24 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 16:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 16:17 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-15 9:57 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=656129b7-68f2-d3ab-7428-91999c896ca5@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).