kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 02/21] hw/serial: Use device abstraction for FDT generator function
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:45:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210211174547.2bf5a5a0@slackpad.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0fbeccf-ecf6-5b53-c165-67a531e79e45@arm.com>

On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:05:35 +0000
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote:

Hi,

> On 12/10/20 2:28 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > At the moment we use the .generate_fdt_node member of the ioport ops
> > structure to store the function pointer for the FDT node generator
> > function. ioport__register() will then put a wrapper and this pointer
> > into the device header.
> > The serial device is the only device making use of this special ioport
> > feature, so let's move this over to using the device header directly.
> >
> > This will allow us to get rid of this .generate_fdt_node member in the
> > ops and simplify the code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/serial.c       | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  include/kvm/kvm.h |  2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/serial.c b/hw/serial.c
> > index 13c4663e..b0465d99 100644
> > --- a/hw/serial.c
> > +++ b/hw/serial.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >  #define UART_IIR_TYPE_BITS	0xc0
> >  
> >  struct serial8250_device {
> > +	struct device_header	dev_hdr;
> >  	struct mutex		mutex;
> >  	u8			id;
> >  
> > @@ -53,9 +54,20 @@ struct serial8250_device {
> >  	.msr			= UART_MSR_DCD | UART_MSR_DSR | UART_MSR_CTS, \
> >  	.mcr			= UART_MCR_OUT2,
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_LIBFDT
> > +static
> > +void serial8250_generate_fdt_node(void *fdt, struct device_header *dev_hdr,
> > +				  fdt_irq_fn irq_fn);
> > +#else
> > +#define serial8250_generate_fdt_node	NULL
> > +#endif
> >  static struct serial8250_device devices[] = {
> >  	/* ttyS0 */
> >  	[0]	= {
> > +		.dev_hdr = {
> > +			.bus_type	= DEVICE_BUS_IOPORT,
> > +			.data		= serial8250_generate_fdt_node,
> > +		},
> >  		.mutex			= MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
> >  
> >  		.id			= 0,
> > @@ -66,6 +78,10 @@ static struct serial8250_device devices[] = {
> >  	},
> >  	/* ttyS1 */
> >  	[1]	= {
> > +		.dev_hdr = {
> > +			.bus_type	= DEVICE_BUS_IOPORT,
> > +			.data		= serial8250_generate_fdt_node,
> > +		},
> >  		.mutex			= MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
> >  
> >  		.id			= 1,
> > @@ -76,6 +92,10 @@ static struct serial8250_device devices[] = {
> >  	},
> >  	/* ttyS2 */
> >  	[2]	= {
> > +		.dev_hdr = {
> > +			.bus_type	= DEVICE_BUS_IOPORT,
> > +			.data		= serial8250_generate_fdt_node,
> > +		},
> >  		.mutex			= MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
> >  
> >  		.id			= 2,
> > @@ -86,6 +106,10 @@ static struct serial8250_device devices[] = {
> >  	},
> >  	/* ttyS3 */
> >  	[3]	= {
> > +		.dev_hdr = {
> > +			.bus_type	= DEVICE_BUS_IOPORT,
> > +			.data		= serial8250_generate_fdt_node,
> > +		},
> >  		.mutex			= MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
> >  
> >  		.id			= 3,
> > @@ -371,13 +395,14 @@ char *fdt_stdout_path = NULL;
> >  
> >  #define DEVICE_NAME_MAX_LEN 32
> >  static
> > -void serial8250_generate_fdt_node(struct ioport *ioport, void *fdt,
> > -				  void (*generate_irq_prop)(void *fdt,
> > -							    u8 irq,
> > -							    enum irq_type))
> > +void serial8250_generate_fdt_node(void *fdt, struct device_header *dev_hdr,
> > +				  fdt_irq_fn irq_fn)
> >  {
> >  	char dev_name[DEVICE_NAME_MAX_LEN];
> > -	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> > +	struct serial8250_device *dev = container_of(dev_hdr,
> > +						     struct serial8250_device,
> > +						     dev_hdr);
> > +
> >  	u64 addr = KVM_IOPORT_AREA + dev->iobase;
> >  	u64 reg_prop[] = {
> >  		cpu_to_fdt64(addr),
> > @@ -395,24 +420,26 @@ void serial8250_generate_fdt_node(struct ioport *ioport, void *fdt,
> >  	_FDT(fdt_begin_node(fdt, dev_name));
> >  	_FDT(fdt_property_string(fdt, "compatible", "ns16550a"));
> >  	_FDT(fdt_property(fdt, "reg", reg_prop, sizeof(reg_prop)));
> > -	generate_irq_prop(fdt, dev->irq, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH);
> > +	irq_fn(fdt, dev->irq, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH);
> >  	_FDT(fdt_property_cell(fdt, "clock-frequency", 1843200));
> >  	_FDT(fdt_end_node(fdt));
> >  }
> > -#else
> > -#define serial8250_generate_fdt_node	NULL
> >  #endif
> >  
> >  static struct ioport_operations serial8250_ops = {
> >  	.io_in			= serial8250_in,
> >  	.io_out			= serial8250_out,
> > -	.generate_fdt_node	= serial8250_generate_fdt_node,
> >  };
> >  
> > -static int serial8250__device_init(struct kvm *kvm, struct serial8250_device *dev)
> > +static int serial8250__device_init(struct kvm *kvm,
> > +				   struct serial8250_device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	int r;
> >  
> > +	r = device__register(&dev->dev_hdr);
> > +	if (r < 0)
> > +		return r;
> > +
> >  	ioport__map_irq(&dev->irq);
> >  	r = ioport__register(kvm, dev->iobase, &serial8250_ops, 8, dev);  
> 
> It's unfortunate that we now create two devices for one serial instance: one here,
> and one created by ioport__register(). But I guess that's unavoidable in this
> patch, and later patches will remove it.

Well, we do this already, wherever we register multiple I/O ports per
device, RTC and i8042 are an example (because we register one device
per I/O port). This really isn't a particular problem, it's just ugly,
so just get's a tiny bit more uglier for a few patches that
hopefully nobody will actually use (in anger).

> 
> >  
> > @@ -438,6 +465,7 @@ cleanup:
> >  		struct serial8250_device *dev = &devices[j];
> >  
> >  		ioport__unregister(kvm, dev->iobase);
> > +		device__unregister(&dev->dev_hdr);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return r;
> > @@ -455,6 +483,7 @@ int serial8250__exit(struct kvm *kvm)
> >  		r = ioport__unregister(kvm, dev->iobase);
> >  		if (r < 0)
> >  			return r;
> > +		device__unregister(&dev->dev_hdr);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > diff --git a/include/kvm/kvm.h b/include/kvm/kvm.h
> > index 53373b08..ee99c28e 100644
> > --- a/include/kvm/kvm.h
> > +++ b/include/kvm/kvm.h
> > @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
> >  	.name = #ext,			\
> >  	.code = ext
> >  
> > +typedef void (*fdt_irq_fn)(void *fdt, u8 irq, enum irq_type);  
> 
> Shouldn't that last parameter be enum irq_type irq_type? Would you consider moving
> the typedef to include/kvm/fdt.h?

I think where I came from was that typedef's don't need parameter names,
just the type. But just having (void *, u8, enum irq_type) is really
hard to understand, so I added parameter names where this helps. "enum
irq_type irq_type" looks redundant, but I can certainly add this for
consistency.

> Other than the nitpicks above, the patch looks sound to me. I also did a quick
> test by running kvm-unit-tests:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

Thanks!

Andre

> 
> Thanks,
> Alex
> > +
> >  enum {
> >  	KVM_VMSTATE_RUNNING,
> >  	KVM_VMSTATE_PAUSED,  


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-11 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-10 14:28 [PATCH kvmtool 00/21] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 01/21] ioport: Remove ioport__setup_arch() Andre Przywara
2021-02-10 17:44   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 17:16     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:32       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:46         ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 10:23           ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 15:01             ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 02/21] hw/serial: Use device abstraction for FDT generator function Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 12:05   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 17:45     ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 03/21] ioport: Retire .generate_fdt_node functionality Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 14:05   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 15:54     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 16:06       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 04/21] mmio: Extend handling to include ioport emulation Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 16:10   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 17:43     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 15:50       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 05/21] hw/i8042: Clean up data types Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 16:55   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 17:46     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 06/21] hw/i8042: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:23   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 10:34     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 11:17       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 11:48         ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 16:03           ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 07/21] hw/i8042: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 10:41   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 12:09     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 16:19       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 08/21] x86/ioport: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:14   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 09/21] x86/ioport: Switch to new " Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:27   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 14:05     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 10/21] hw/rtc: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:56   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 11/21] hw/rtc: Switch to new trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 12:02   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 12/21] hw/vesa: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 17:50   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 13/21] hw/serial: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:22   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 14:41     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 17:40       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-24 14:54         ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 14/21] hw/serial: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:31   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 15/21] vfio: Refactor ioport trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:47   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 15:51     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 16/21] vfio: Switch to new ioport trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:52   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 17/21] virtio: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 17:03   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:13     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 18/21] pci: " Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 15:14   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 19/21] Remove ioport specific routines Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 15:49   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:11     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:34       ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 20/21] hw/serial: ARM/arm64: Use MMIO at higher addresses Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 16:48   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 12:18     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:38       ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 21/21] hw/rtc: " Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 13:33   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:41     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-10 17:44 ` [PATCH kvmtool 00/21] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210211174547.2bf5a5a0@slackpad.fritz.box \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).