kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 13/21] hw/serial: Refactor trap handler
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:22:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c91e8f2-7bdf-4c4a-1da3-08dac79fd9a4@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201210142908.169597-14-andre.przywara@arm.com>

Hi Andre,

Patch looks good, nitpicks below.

On 12/10/20 2:29 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> With the planned retirement of the special ioport emulation code, we
> need to provide an emulation function compatible with the MMIO prototype.
>
> Adjust the trap handler to use that new function, and provide shims to
> implement the old ioport interface, for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
>  hw/serial.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/serial.c b/hw/serial.c
> index b0465d99..2907089c 100644
> --- a/hw/serial.c
> +++ b/hw/serial.c
> @@ -242,36 +242,31 @@ void serial8250__inject_sysrq(struct kvm *kvm, char sysrq)
>  	sysrq_pending = sysrq;
>  }
>  
> -static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
> -			   void *data, int size)
> +static bool serial8250_out(struct serial8250_device *dev, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +			   u16 offset, u8 data)
>  {
> -	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> -	u16 offset;
>  	bool ret = true;
> -	char *addr = data;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>  
> -	offset = port - dev->iobase;
> -
>  	switch (offset) {
>  	case UART_TX:
>  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB) {
> -			dev->dll = ioport__read8(data);
> +			dev->dll = data;
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
>  		/* Loopback mode */
>  		if (dev->mcr & UART_MCR_LOOP) {
>  			if (dev->rxcnt < FIFO_LEN) {
> -				dev->rxbuf[dev->rxcnt++] = *addr;
> +				dev->rxbuf[dev->rxcnt++] = data;
>  				dev->lsr |= UART_LSR_DR;
>  			}
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
>  		if (dev->txcnt < FIFO_LEN) {
> -			dev->txbuf[dev->txcnt++] = *addr;
> +			dev->txbuf[dev->txcnt++] = data;
>  			dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_TEMT;
>  			if (dev->txcnt == FIFO_LEN / 2)
>  				dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_THRE;
> @@ -283,18 +278,18 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
>  		break;
>  	case UART_IER:
>  		if (!(dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB))
> -			dev->ier = ioport__read8(data) & 0x0f;
> +			dev->ier = data & 0x0f;
>  		else
> -			dev->dlm = ioport__read8(data);
> +			dev->dlm = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_FCR:
> -		dev->fcr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->fcr = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LCR:
> -		dev->lcr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->lcr = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_MCR:
> -		dev->mcr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->mcr = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LSR:
>  		/* Factory test */
> @@ -303,7 +298,7 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
>  		/* Not used */
>  		break;
>  	case UART_SCR:
> -		dev->scr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->scr = data;
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = false;
> @@ -336,46 +331,43 @@ static void serial8250_rx(struct serial8250_device *dev, void *data)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static bool serial8250_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +static bool serial8250_in(struct serial8250_device *dev, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +			  u16 offset, u8 *data)
>  {
> -	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> -	u16 offset;
>  	bool ret = true;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>  
> -	offset = port - dev->iobase;
> -
>  	switch (offset) {
>  	case UART_RX:
>  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB)
> -			ioport__write8(data, dev->dll);
> +			*data = dev->dll;
>  		else
>  			serial8250_rx(dev, data);
>  		break;
>  	case UART_IER:
>  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB)
> -			ioport__write8(data, dev->dlm);
> +			*data = dev->dlm;
>  		else
> -			ioport__write8(data, dev->ier);
> +			*data = dev->ier;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_IIR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->iir | UART_IIR_TYPE_BITS);
> +		*data = dev->iir | UART_IIR_TYPE_BITS;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LCR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->lcr);
> +		*data = dev->lcr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_MCR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->mcr);
> +		*data = dev->mcr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LSR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->lsr);
> +		*data = dev->lsr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_MSR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->msr);
> +		*data = dev->msr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_SCR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->scr);
> +		*data = dev->scr;
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = false;
> @@ -389,6 +381,47 @@ static bool serial8250_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void serial8250_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len,
> +			    u8 is_write, void *ptr)
> +{
> +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ptr;
> +	u8 value = 0;
> +
> +	if (is_write) {
> +		 value = *data;

Extra space before value.

> +
> +		serial8250_out(dev, vcpu, addr - dev->iobase, value);
> +	} else {
> +		if (serial8250_in(dev, vcpu, addr - dev->iobase, &value))
> +			*data = value;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static bool serial8250_ioport_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +				  u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +{
> +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> +	u8 value = ioport__read8(data);
> +
> +	serial8250_mmio(vcpu, port, &value, 1, true, dev);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool serial8250_ioport_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +				 u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +{
> +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> +	u8 value = 0;
> +
> +
> +	serial8250_mmio(vcpu, port, &value, 1, false, dev);
> +
> +	ioport__write8(data, value);

This is correct, but confusing. You pass the address of a local variable as *data
to serial8250_mmio, serial8250_mmio conditionally updates the value at data (which
is &value from here), and then here we update the *data unconditionally. Why not
pass data directly to serial8250_mmio and skip the local variable? Am I missing
something?

Thanks,

Alex

> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_LIBFDT
>  
>  char *fdt_stdout_path = NULL;
> @@ -427,8 +460,8 @@ void serial8250_generate_fdt_node(void *fdt, struct device_header *dev_hdr,
>  #endif
>  
>  static struct ioport_operations serial8250_ops = {
> -	.io_in			= serial8250_in,
> -	.io_out			= serial8250_out,
> +	.io_in			= serial8250_ioport_in,
> +	.io_out			= serial8250_ioport_out,
>  };
>  
>  static int serial8250__device_init(struct kvm *kvm,

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-16 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-10 14:28 [PATCH kvmtool 00/21] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 01/21] ioport: Remove ioport__setup_arch() Andre Przywara
2021-02-10 17:44   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 17:16     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:32       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:46         ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 10:23           ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 15:01             ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 02/21] hw/serial: Use device abstraction for FDT generator function Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 12:05   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 17:45     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 03/21] ioport: Retire .generate_fdt_node functionality Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 14:05   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 15:54     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 16:06       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 04/21] mmio: Extend handling to include ioport emulation Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 16:10   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 17:43     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 15:50       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 05/21] hw/i8042: Clean up data types Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 16:55   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 17:46     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 06/21] hw/i8042: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:23   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 10:34     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 11:17       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 11:48         ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 16:03           ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 07/21] hw/i8042: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 10:41   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 12:09     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 16:19       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 08/21] x86/ioport: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:14   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 09/21] x86/ioport: Switch to new " Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:27   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 14:05     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 10/21] hw/rtc: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:56   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 11/21] hw/rtc: Switch to new trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 12:02   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 12/21] hw/vesa: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 17:50   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 13/21] hw/serial: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:22   ` Alexandru Elisei [this message]
2021-02-18 14:41     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 17:40       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-24 14:54         ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 14/21] hw/serial: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:31   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 15/21] vfio: Refactor ioport trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:47   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 15:51     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 16/21] vfio: Switch to new ioport trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:52   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 17/21] virtio: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 17:03   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:13     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 18/21] pci: " Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 15:14   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 19/21] Remove ioport specific routines Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 15:49   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:11     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:34       ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 20/21] hw/serial: ARM/arm64: Use MMIO at higher addresses Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 16:48   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 12:18     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:38       ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 21/21] hw/rtc: " Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 13:33   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:41     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-10 17:44 ` [PATCH kvmtool 00/21] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5c91e8f2-7bdf-4c4a-1da3-08dac79fd9a4@arm.com \
    --to=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).