From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 19/21] Remove ioport specific routines
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:11:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <389aa087-b079-cafb-b018-eab599e337ed@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05a0df3a-625f-74de-8014-e78aee9e8427@arm.com>
Hi Andre,
On 2/17/21 3:49 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 12/10/20 2:29 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Now that all users of the dedicated ioport trap handler interface are
>> gone, we can retire the code associated with it.
>>
>> This removes ioport.c and ioport.h, along with removing prototypes from
>> other header files.
>>
>> This also transfers the responsibility for port I/O trap handling
>> entirely into the new routine in mmio.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> ---
>> Makefile | 1 -
>> include/kvm/ioport.h | 20 -----
>> include/kvm/kvm.h | 2 -
>> ioport.c | 173 -------------------------------------------
>> mmio.c | 2 +-
>> 5 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 197 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 ioport.c
>>
>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>> index 35bb1182..94ff5da6 100644
>> --- a/Makefile
>> +++ b/Makefile
>> @@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ OBJS += framebuffer.o
>> OBJS += guest_compat.o
>> OBJS += hw/rtc.o
>> OBJS += hw/serial.o
>> -OBJS += ioport.o
>> OBJS += irq.o
>> OBJS += kvm-cpu.o
>> OBJS += kvm.o
>> diff --git a/include/kvm/ioport.h b/include/kvm/ioport.h
>> index a61038e2..38636553 100644
>> --- a/include/kvm/ioport.h
>> +++ b/include/kvm/ioport.h
>> @@ -17,28 +17,8 @@
>>
>> struct kvm;
> Looks to me like the above forward declaration can be removed; same for all the
> includes except linux/byteorder.h, needed for the lexx_to_cpu/cpu_to_lexx
> functions, and linux/types.h for the uxx typedefs. Otherwise looks good.
Actually, ignore the part about removing the includes, it opens a new can of worms
- byteorder.h doesn't include compiler.h where __always_inline is defined, and
various files where struct kvm_cpu is used don't include kvm-cpu.h (like pci.c,
hw/serial.c, etc). The header removal is not trivial and I think it should be part
of another cleanup patch.
Thanks,
Alex
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
>>
>> -struct ioport {
>> - struct rb_int_node node;
>> - struct ioport_operations *ops;
>> - void *priv;
>> - struct device_header dev_hdr;
>> - u32 refcount;
>> - bool remove;
>> -};
>> -
>> -struct ioport_operations {
>> - bool (*io_in)(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size);
>> - bool (*io_out)(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size);
>> -};
>> -
>> void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq);
>>
>> -int __must_check ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct ioport_operations *ops,
>> - int count, void *param);
>> -int ioport__unregister(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port);
>> -int ioport__init(struct kvm *kvm);
>> -int ioport__exit(struct kvm *kvm);
>> -
>> static inline u8 ioport__read8(u8 *data)
>> {
>> return *data;
>> diff --git a/include/kvm/kvm.h b/include/kvm/kvm.h
>> index 14f9d58b..e70f8ef6 100644
>> --- a/include/kvm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/include/kvm/kvm.h
>> @@ -119,8 +119,6 @@ void kvm__irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, int level);
>> void kvm__irq_trigger(struct kvm *kvm, int irq);
>> bool kvm__emulate_io(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int direction, int size, u32 count);
>> bool kvm__emulate_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 phys_addr, u8 *data, u32 len, u8 is_write);
>> -bool kvm__emulate_pio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data,
>> - int direction, int size, u32 count);
>> int kvm__destroy_mem(struct kvm *kvm, u64 guest_phys, u64 size, void *userspace_addr);
>> int kvm__register_mem(struct kvm *kvm, u64 guest_phys, u64 size, void *userspace_addr,
>> enum kvm_mem_type type);
>> diff --git a/ioport.c b/ioport.c
>> deleted file mode 100644
>> index 204d8103..00000000
>> --- a/ioport.c
>> +++ /dev/null
>> @@ -1,173 +0,0 @@
>> -#include "kvm/ioport.h"
>> -
>> -#include "kvm/kvm.h"
>> -#include "kvm/util.h"
>> -#include "kvm/rbtree-interval.h"
>> -#include "kvm/mutex.h"
>> -
>> -#include <linux/kvm.h> /* for KVM_EXIT_* */
>> -#include <linux/types.h>
>> -
>> -#include <stdbool.h>
>> -#include <limits.h>
>> -#include <stdlib.h>
>> -#include <stdio.h>
>> -
>> -#define ioport_node(n) rb_entry(n, struct ioport, node)
>> -
>> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(ioport_lock);
>> -
>> -static struct rb_root ioport_tree = RB_ROOT;
>> -
>> -static struct ioport *ioport_search(struct rb_root *root, u64 addr)
>> -{
>> - struct rb_int_node *node;
>> -
>> - node = rb_int_search_single(root, addr);
>> - if (node == NULL)
>> - return NULL;
>> -
>> - return ioport_node(node);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int ioport_insert(struct rb_root *root, struct ioport *data)
>> -{
>> - return rb_int_insert(root, &data->node);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void ioport_remove(struct rb_root *root, struct ioport *data)
>> -{
>> - rb_int_erase(root, &data->node);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static struct ioport *ioport_get(struct rb_root *root, u64 addr)
>> -{
>> - struct ioport *ioport;
>> -
>> - mutex_lock(&ioport_lock);
>> - ioport = ioport_search(root, addr);
>> - if (ioport)
>> - ioport->refcount++;
>> - mutex_unlock(&ioport_lock);
>> -
>> - return ioport;
>> -}
>> -
>> -/* Called with ioport_lock held. */
>> -static void ioport_unregister(struct rb_root *root, struct ioport *data)
>> -{
>> - ioport_remove(root, data);
>> - free(data);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void ioport_put(struct rb_root *root, struct ioport *data)
>> -{
>> - mutex_lock(&ioport_lock);
>> - data->refcount--;
>> - if (data->remove && data->refcount == 0)
>> - ioport_unregister(root, data);
>> - mutex_unlock(&ioport_lock);
>> -}
>> -
>> -int ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct ioport_operations *ops, int count, void *param)
>> -{
>> - struct ioport *entry;
>> - int r;
>> -
>> - entry = malloc(sizeof(*entry));
>> - if (entry == NULL)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> -
>> - *entry = (struct ioport) {
>> - .node = RB_INT_INIT(port, port + count),
>> - .ops = ops,
>> - .priv = param,
>> - /*
>> - * Start from 0 because ioport__unregister() doesn't decrement
>> - * the reference count.
>> - */
>> - .refcount = 0,
>> - .remove = false,
>> - };
>> -
>> - mutex_lock(&ioport_lock);
>> - r = ioport_insert(&ioport_tree, entry);
>> - if (r < 0)
>> - goto out_free;
>> - mutex_unlock(&ioport_lock);
>> -
>> - return port;
>> -
>> -out_free:
>> - free(entry);
>> - mutex_unlock(&ioport_lock);
>> - return r;
>> -}
>> -
>> -int ioport__unregister(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port)
>> -{
>> - struct ioport *entry;
>> -
>> - mutex_lock(&ioport_lock);
>> - entry = ioport_search(&ioport_tree, port);
>> - if (!entry) {
>> - mutex_unlock(&ioport_lock);
>> - return -ENOENT;
>> - }
>> - /* The same reasoning from kvm__deregister_mmio() applies. */
>> - if (entry->refcount == 0)
>> - ioport_unregister(&ioport_tree, entry);
>> - else
>> - entry->remove = true;
>> - mutex_unlock(&ioport_lock);
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static const char *to_direction(int direction)
>> -{
>> - if (direction == KVM_EXIT_IO_IN)
>> - return "IN";
>> - else
>> - return "OUT";
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void ioport_error(u16 port, void *data, int direction, int size, u32 count)
>> -{
>> - fprintf(stderr, "IO error: %s port=%x, size=%d, count=%u\n", to_direction(direction), port, size, count);
>> -}
>> -
>> -bool kvm__emulate_io(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int direction, int size, u32 count)
>> -{
>> - struct ioport_operations *ops;
>> - bool ret = false;
>> - struct ioport *entry;
>> - void *ptr = data;
>> - struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>> -
>> - entry = ioport_get(&ioport_tree, port);
>> - if (!entry)
>> - return kvm__emulate_pio(vcpu, port, data, direction,
>> - size, count);
>> -
>> - ops = entry->ops;
>> -
>> - while (count--) {
>> - if (direction == KVM_EXIT_IO_IN && ops->io_in)
>> - ret = ops->io_in(entry, vcpu, port, ptr, size);
>> - else if (direction == KVM_EXIT_IO_OUT && ops->io_out)
>> - ret = ops->io_out(entry, vcpu, port, ptr, size);
>> -
>> - ptr += size;
>> - }
>> -
>> - ioport_put(&ioport_tree, entry);
>> -
>> - if (ret)
>> - return true;
>> -
>> - if (kvm->cfg.ioport_debug)
>> - ioport_error(port, data, direction, size, count);
>> -
>> - return !kvm->cfg.ioport_debug;
>> -}
>> diff --git a/mmio.c b/mmio.c
>> index 4cce1901..5249af39 100644
>> --- a/mmio.c
>> +++ b/mmio.c
>> @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ out:
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> -bool kvm__emulate_pio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data,
>> +bool kvm__emulate_io(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data,
>> int direction, int size, u32 count)
>> {
>> struct mmio_mapping *mmio;
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-17 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-10 14:28 [PATCH kvmtool 00/21] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 01/21] ioport: Remove ioport__setup_arch() Andre Przywara
2021-02-10 17:44 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 17:16 ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:32 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:46 ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 10:23 ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 15:01 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 02/21] hw/serial: Use device abstraction for FDT generator function Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 12:05 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 17:45 ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 03/21] ioport: Retire .generate_fdt_node functionality Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 14:05 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 15:54 ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 16:06 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 04/21] mmio: Extend handling to include ioport emulation Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 16:10 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 17:43 ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 15:50 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 05/21] hw/i8042: Clean up data types Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 16:55 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 17:46 ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 06/21] hw/i8042: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:23 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 10:34 ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 11:17 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 11:48 ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 16:03 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 07/21] hw/i8042: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 10:41 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 12:09 ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 16:19 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 08/21] x86/ioport: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:14 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 09/21] x86/ioport: Switch to new " Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:27 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 14:05 ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 10/21] hw/rtc: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:56 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 11/21] hw/rtc: Switch to new trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 12:02 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 12/21] hw/vesa: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 17:50 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 13/21] hw/serial: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:22 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 14:41 ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 17:40 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-24 14:54 ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 14/21] hw/serial: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:31 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 15/21] vfio: Refactor ioport trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:47 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 15:51 ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 16/21] vfio: Switch to new ioport trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:52 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 17/21] virtio: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 17:03 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:13 ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 18/21] pci: " Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 15:14 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 19/21] Remove ioport specific routines Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 15:49 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:11 ` Alexandru Elisei [this message]
2021-02-18 16:34 ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 20/21] hw/serial: ARM/arm64: Use MMIO at higher addresses Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 16:48 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 12:18 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:38 ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 21/21] hw/rtc: " Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 13:33 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:41 ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-10 17:44 ` [PATCH kvmtool 00/21] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Alexandru Elisei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=389aa087-b079-cafb-b018-eab599e337ed@arm.com \
--to=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).