* [PATCH] kvm: x86: some tsc debug cleanup
@ 2019-07-05 17:10 Yi Wang
2019-07-15 4:50 ` Yi Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yi Wang @ 2019-07-05 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pbonzini
Cc: rkrcmar, tglx, mingo, bp, hpa, x86, kvm, linux-kernel,
xue.zhihong, wang.yi59, up2wing, wang.liang82
There are some pr_debug in TSC code, which may have
been no use, so remove them as Paolo suggested.
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index fafd81d..86f9861 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1518,9 +1518,6 @@ static void kvm_get_time_scale(uint64_t scaled_hz, uint64_t base_hz,
*pshift = shift;
*pmultiplier = div_frac(scaled64, tps32);
-
- pr_debug("%s: base_hz %llu => %llu, shift %d, mul %u\n",
- __func__, base_hz, scaled_hz, shift, *pmultiplier);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
@@ -1763,12 +1760,10 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz == kvm->arch.last_tsc_khz) {
if (!kvm_check_tsc_unstable()) {
offset = kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset;
- pr_debug("kvm: matched tsc offset for %llu\n", data);
} else {
u64 delta = nsec_to_cycles(vcpu, elapsed);
data += delta;
offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data);
- pr_debug("kvm: adjusted tsc offset by %llu\n", delta);
}
matched = true;
already_matched = (vcpu->arch.this_tsc_generation == kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation);
@@ -1787,8 +1782,6 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
kvm->arch.cur_tsc_write = data;
kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset = offset;
matched = false;
- pr_debug("kvm: new tsc generation %llu, clock %llu\n",
- kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation, data);
}
/*
@@ -6857,7 +6850,6 @@ static void kvm_timer_init(void)
cpufreq_register_notifier(&kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier_block,
CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
}
- pr_debug("kvm: max_tsc_khz = %ld\n", max_tsc_khz);
cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_X86_KVM_CLK_ONLINE, "x86/kvm/clk:online",
kvmclock_cpu_online, kvmclock_cpu_down_prep);
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: some tsc debug cleanup
2019-07-05 17:10 [PATCH] kvm: x86: some tsc debug cleanup Yi Wang
@ 2019-07-15 4:50 ` Yi Wang
2019-07-15 11:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yi Wang @ 2019-07-15 4:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yi Wang, Paolo Bonzini
Cc: pbonzini, rkrcmar, tglx, mingo, bp, hpa, x86, kvm, linux-kernel,
xue.zhihong, wang.liang82
Hi Paolo,
Would you help to review this patch, plz?
Many thanks.
---
Best wishes
Yi Wang
> 在 2019年7月6日，01:10，Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> 写道：
>
> There are some pr_debug in TSC code, which may have
> been no use, so remove them as Paolo suggested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index fafd81d..86f9861 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -1518,9 +1518,6 @@ static void kvm_get_time_scale(uint64_t scaled_hz, uint64_t base_hz,
>
> *pshift = shift;
> *pmultiplier = div_frac(scaled64, tps32);
> -
> - pr_debug("%s: base_hz %llu => %llu, shift %d, mul %u\n",
> - __func__, base_hz, scaled_hz, shift, *pmultiplier);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> @@ -1763,12 +1760,10 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
> vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz == kvm->arch.last_tsc_khz) {
> if (!kvm_check_tsc_unstable()) {
> offset = kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset;
> - pr_debug("kvm: matched tsc offset for %llu\n", data);
> } else {
> u64 delta = nsec_to_cycles(vcpu, elapsed);
> data += delta;
> offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data);
> - pr_debug("kvm: adjusted tsc offset by %llu\n", delta);
> }
> matched = true;
> already_matched = (vcpu->arch.this_tsc_generation == kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation);
> @@ -1787,8 +1782,6 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
> kvm->arch.cur_tsc_write = data;
> kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset = offset;
> matched = false;
> - pr_debug("kvm: new tsc generation %llu, clock %llu\n",
> - kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation, data);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -6857,7 +6850,6 @@ static void kvm_timer_init(void)
> cpufreq_register_notifier(&kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier_block,
> CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
> }
> - pr_debug("kvm: max_tsc_khz = %ld\n", max_tsc_khz);
>
> cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_X86_KVM_CLK_ONLINE, "x86/kvm/clk:online",
> kvmclock_cpu_online, kvmclock_cpu_down_prep);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: some tsc debug cleanup
2019-07-15 4:50 ` Yi Wang
@ 2019-07-15 11:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2019-07-15 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yi Wang, Yi Wang
Cc: rkrcmar, tglx, mingo, bp, hpa, x86, kvm, linux-kernel,
xue.zhihong, wang.liang82
On 15/07/19 06:50, Yi Wang wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
> Would you help to review this patch, plz?
> Many thanks.
I have queued it now.
Paolo
> ---
> Best wishes
> Yi Wang
>
>> 在 2019年7月6日，01:10，Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> 写道：
>>
>> There are some pr_debug in TSC code, which may have
>> been no use, so remove them as Paolo suggested.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 --------
>> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index fafd81d..86f9861 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -1518,9 +1518,6 @@ static void kvm_get_time_scale(uint64_t scaled_hz, uint64_t base_hz,
>>
>> *pshift = shift;
>> *pmultiplier = div_frac(scaled64, tps32);
>> -
>> - pr_debug("%s: base_hz %llu => %llu, shift %d, mul %u\n",
>> - __func__, base_hz, scaled_hz, shift, *pmultiplier);
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> @@ -1763,12 +1760,10 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
>> vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz == kvm->arch.last_tsc_khz) {
>> if (!kvm_check_tsc_unstable()) {
>> offset = kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset;
>> - pr_debug("kvm: matched tsc offset for %llu\n", data);
>> } else {
>> u64 delta = nsec_to_cycles(vcpu, elapsed);
>> data += delta;
>> offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data);
>> - pr_debug("kvm: adjusted tsc offset by %llu\n", delta);
>> }
>> matched = true;
>> already_matched = (vcpu->arch.this_tsc_generation == kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation);
>> @@ -1787,8 +1782,6 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
>> kvm->arch.cur_tsc_write = data;
>> kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset = offset;
>> matched = false;
>> - pr_debug("kvm: new tsc generation %llu, clock %llu\n",
>> - kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation, data);
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -6857,7 +6850,6 @@ static void kvm_timer_init(void)
>> cpufreq_register_notifier(&kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier_block,
>> CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
>> }
>> - pr_debug("kvm: max_tsc_khz = %ld\n", max_tsc_khz);
>>
>> cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_X86_KVM_CLK_ONLINE, "x86/kvm/clk:online",
>> kvmclock_cpu_online, kvmclock_cpu_down_prep);
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-15 11:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-05 17:10 [PATCH] kvm: x86: some tsc debug cleanup Yi Wang
2019-07-15 4:50 ` Yi Wang
2019-07-15 11:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).