Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 14/14] arm/arm64: ITS: pending table migration test

[Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 02:21:37PM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Drew,
> 
> On 2/7/20 3:06 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:34:59AM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> Add two new migration tests. One testing the migration of
> >> a topology where collection were unmapped. The second test
> >> checks the migration of the pending table.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> v2 -> v3:
> >> - tests belong to both its and migration groups
> >> ---
> >>  arm/gic.c         | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  arm/unittests.cfg |  16 +++++
> >>  2 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
> >> index fa8626a..ec3dd3a 100644
> >> --- a/arm/gic.c
> >> +++ b/arm/gic.c
> >> @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static void lpi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
> >>  	smp_rmb(); /* pairs with wmb in lpi_stats_expect */
> >>  	lpi_stats.observed.cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
> >>  	lpi_stats.observed.lpi_id = irqnr;
> >> +	acked[lpi_stats.observed.cpu_id]++;
> >>  	smp_wmb(); /* pairs with rmb in check_lpi_stats */
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> @@ -239,6 +240,18 @@ static void secondary_lpi_test(void)
> >>  	while (1)
> >>  		wfi();
> >>  }
> >> +
> >> +static void check_lpi_hits(int *expected)
> >> +{
> >> +	int i;
> >> +
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
> >> +		if (acked[i] != expected[i])
> >> +			report(false, "expected %d LPIs on PE #%d, %d observed",
> >> +			       expected[i], i, acked[i]);
> > 
> > report_info
> > pass = false
> > 
> >> +		}
> >> +	report(true, "check LPI on all vcpus");
> > 
> > report(pass, ...);
> I still don't get the issue.

Your messages aren't consistent and have dynamic info. You need

report_info(...); // dynamic info
if (failure_condition) {
   pass_boolean = false;
}
report(pass_boolean, single_message_for_both_pass_and_failure);

> > 
> >> +}
> >>  #endif
> >>  
> >>  static void gicv2_ipi_send_self(void)
> >> @@ -594,6 +607,8 @@ static void gic_test_mmio(void)
> >>  static void test_its_introspection(void) {}
> >>  static void test_its_trigger(void) {}
> >>  static void test_its_migration(void) {}
> >> +static void test_migrate_unmapped_collection(void) {}
> >> +static void test_its_pending_migration(void) {}
> > 
> > I'm not sure what's worse. This pile of stubs or one #ifdef in main()
> > wrapping all the calls.
> Those stubs now are in the arm header.
> > 
> >>  
> >>  #else /* __arch64__ */
> >>  
> >> @@ -666,6 +681,18 @@ static bool its_prerequisites(int nb_cpus)
> >>  	return false;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> +static void set_lpi(struct its_device *dev, u32 eventid, u32 physid,
> >> +		    struct its_collection *col)
> >> +{
> >> +	if (!dev || !col)
> > 
> > I don't think col can be null, and this doesn't look like the right place
> > to check if dev is null.  If we're bothiner to call set_lpi, then I
> > think we should already expect dev to be good to go.
> put an assert() instead
> > 
> >> +		report_abort("wrong device or collection");
> >> +
> >> +	its_send_mapti(dev, physid, eventid, col);
> >> +
> >> +	gicv3_lpi_set_config(physid, LPI_PROP_DEFAULT);
> >> +	its_send_invall(col);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  /*
> >>   * Setup the configuration for those mappings:
> >>   * dev_id=2 event=20 -> vcpu 3, intid=8195
> >> @@ -806,6 +833,121 @@ static void test_its_migration(void)
> >>  	its_send_int(dev7, 255);
> >>  	check_lpi_stats();
> >>  }
> >> +
> >> +static void test_migrate_unmapped_collection(void)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct its_collection *col;
> >> +	struct its_device *dev2, *dev7;
> >> +	u8 config;
> >> +
> >> +	if (its_setup1())
> >> +		return;
> >> +
> >> +	col = its_create_collection(nr_cpus - 1, nr_cpus - 1);
> >> +	dev2 = its_get_device(2);
> >> +	dev7 = its_get_device(7);
> >> +
> >> +	/* MAPTI with the collection unmapped */
> >> +	set_lpi(dev2, 0, 8192, col);
> >> +
> >> +	puts("Now migrate the VM, then press a key to continue...\n");
> >> +	(void)getchar();
> >> +	report(true, "Migration complete");
> > 
> > report_info
> yep
> > 
> >> +
> >> +	/* on the destination, map the collection */
> >> +	its_send_mapc(col, true);
> >> +
> >> +	lpi_stats_expect(2, 8196);
> >> +	its_send_int(dev7, 255);
> >> +	check_lpi_stats();
> >> +
> >> +	config = gicv3_lpi_get_config(8192);
> >> +	report(config == LPI_PROP_DEFAULT,
> >> +	       "Config of LPI 8192 was properly migrated");
> >> +
> >> +	lpi_stats_expect(nr_cpus - 1, 8192);
> >> +	its_send_int(dev2, 0);
> >> +	check_lpi_stats();
> >> +
> >> +	/* unmap the collection */
> >> +	its_send_mapc(col, false);
> >> +
> >> +	lpi_stats_expect(-1, -1);
> >> +	its_send_int(dev2, 0);
> >> +	check_lpi_stats();
> >> +
> >> +	/* remap event 0 onto lpiid 8193 */
> >> +	set_lpi(dev2, 0, 8193, col);
> >> +	lpi_stats_expect(-1, -1);
> >> +	its_send_int(dev2, 0);
> >> +	check_lpi_stats();
> >> +
> >> +	/* remap the collection */
> >> +	its_send_mapc(col, true);
> >> +	lpi_stats_expect(nr_cpus - 1, 8193);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void test_its_pending_migration(void)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct its_device *dev;
> >> +	struct its_collection *collection[2];
> >> +	int expected[NR_CPUS];
> > 
> > expected = malloc(nr_cpus * sizeof(int));
> > 
> > I know there are other places using NR_CPUS right now that don't have to,
> > but we shouldn't add more. Eventually I'll change the other places too.
> OK
> > 
> >> +	u64 pendbaser;
> >> +	void *ptr;
> >> +	int i;
> >> +
> >> +	if (its_prerequisites(4))
> >> +		return;
> >> +
> >> +	dev = its_create_device(2 /* dev id */, 8 /* nb_ites */);
> >> +	its_send_mapd(dev, true);
> >> +
> >> +	collection[0] = its_create_collection(nr_cpus - 1, nr_cpus - 1);
> >> +	collection[1] = its_create_collection(nr_cpus - 2, nr_cpus - 2);
> >> +	its_send_mapc(collection[0], true);
> >> +	its_send_mapc(collection[1], true);
> >> +
> >> +	/* disable lpi at redist level */
> >> +	gicv3_lpi_rdist_ctrl(nr_cpus - 1, false);
> >> +	gicv3_lpi_rdist_ctrl(nr_cpus - 2, false);
> >> +
> >> +	/* even lpis are assigned to even cpu */
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
> >> +		struct its_collection *col = i % 2 ? collection[0] :
> >> +						     collection[1];
> >> +		int vcpu = col->target_address >> 16;
> > 
> > I'm lost with the even/odd (nr_cpus - 1)/(nr_cpus - 2) stuff, and won't
> > it swap if nr_cpus is odd vs. even?
> > 
> > Shouldn't we just have something like
> > 
> >   pe1 = nr_cpus - 1;
> >   pe2 = nr_cpus - 2;
> >   col1 = its_create_collection(pe1, pe1);
> >   col2 = its_create_collection(pe2, pe2);
> > 
> > without mentioning even and odd?
> OK
> > 
> >> +
> >> +		its_send_mapti(dev, 8192 + i, i, col);
> >> +		gicv3_lpi_set_config(8192 + i, LPI_PROP_DEFAULT);
> >> +		gicv3_lpi_set_pending_table_bit(vcpu, 8192 + i, true);
> >> +	}
> >> +	its_send_invall(collection[0]);
> >> +	its_send_invall(collection[1]);
> >> +
> >> +	/* Set the PTZ bit on each pendbaser */
> >> +
> >> +	expected[nr_cpus - 1] = 128;
> >> +	expected[nr_cpus - 2] = 128;
> >> +
> >> +	ptr = gicv3_data.redist_base[nr_cpus - 1] + GICR_PENDBASER;
> >> +	pendbaser = readq(ptr);
> >> +	writeq(pendbaser & ~GICR_PENDBASER_PTZ, ptr);
> >> +
> >> +	ptr = gicv3_data.redist_base[nr_cpus - 2] + GICR_PENDBASER;
> >> +	pendbaser = readq(ptr);
> >> +	writeq(pendbaser & ~GICR_PENDBASER_PTZ, ptr);
> >> +
> >> +	gicv3_lpi_rdist_ctrl(nr_cpus - 1, true);
> >> +	gicv3_lpi_rdist_ctrl(nr_cpus - 2, true);
> >> +
> >> +	puts("Now migrate the VM, then press a key to continue...\n");
> >> +	(void)getchar();
> >> +	report(true, "Migration complete");
> > 
> > report_info
> OK
> > 
> >> +
> >> +	mdelay(1000);
> > 
> > This delay needs a comment explaining why it's here.
> OK
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> > 
> >> +
> >> +	check_lpi_hits(expected);
> >> +}
> >>  #endif
> >>  
> >>  int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >> @@ -847,6 +989,14 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >>  		report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
> >>  		test_its_migration();
> >>  		report_prefix_pop();
> >> +	} else if (!strcmp(argv[1], "its-pending-migration")) {
> >> +		report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
> >> +		test_its_pending_migration();
> >> +		report_prefix_pop();
> >> +	} else if (!strcmp(argv[1], "its-migrate-unmapped-collection")) {
> >> +		report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
> >> +		test_migrate_unmapped_collection();
> >> +		report_prefix_pop();
> >>  	} else if (strcmp(argv[1], "its-introspection") == 0) {
> >>  		report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
> >>  		test_its_introspection();
> >> diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
> >> index 8b8ec79..d917157 100644
> >> --- a/arm/unittests.cfg
> >> +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
> >> @@ -144,6 +144,22 @@ extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'its-migration'
> >>  groups = its migration
> >>  arch = arm64
> >>  
> >> +[its-pending-migration]
> >> +file = gic.flat
> >> +smp = $MAX_SMP
> >> +accel = kvm
> >> +extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'its-pending-migration'
> >> +groups = its migration
> >> +arch = arm64
> >> +
> >> +[its-migrate-unmapped-collection]
> >> +file = gic.flat
> >> +smp = $MAX_SMP
> >> +accel = kvm
> >> +extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'its-migrate-unmapped-collection'
> >> +groups = its migration
> >> +arch = arm64
> >> +
> >>  # Test PSCI emulation
> >>  [psci]
> >>  file = psci.flat
> >> -- 
> >> 2.20.1
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > drew 
> > 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm