kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/17] arm64: Provide an 'upgrade to VHE' stub hypercall
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 08:24:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2dad221aeef58d380d73c9768e430cd3@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAdAUtgPCOfzKZZioMAG6KOY23MMnJdZ1Nsi5Z=0jHUbe2mbUw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2021-01-04 23:39, Jing Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 4:50 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>> 
>> As we are about to change the way a VHE system boots, let's
>> provide the core helper, in the form of a stub hypercall that
>> enables VHE and replicates the full EL1 context at EL2, thanks
>> to EL1 and VHE-EL2 being extremely similar.
>> 
>> On exception return, the kernel carries on at EL2. Fancy!
>> 
>> Nothing calls this new hypercall yet, so no functional change.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h |  7 +++-
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S  | 70 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h 
>> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
>> index ee6a48df89d9..7379f35ae2c6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
>> @@ -35,8 +35,13 @@
>>   */
>>  #define HVC_RESET_VECTORS 2
>> 
>> +/*
>> + * HVC_VHE_RESTART - Upgrade the CPU from EL1 to EL2, if possible
>> + */
>> +#define HVC_VHE_RESTART        3
>> +
>>  /* Max number of HYP stub hypercalls */
>> -#define HVC_STUB_HCALL_NR 3
>> +#define HVC_STUB_HCALL_NR 4
>> 
>>  /* Error returned when an invalid stub number is passed into x0 */
>>  #define HVC_STUB_ERR   0xbadca11
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S 
>> b/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
>> index 160f5881a0b7..6ffdc1f7778b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
>> @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@
>> 
>>  #include <linux/init.h>
>>  #include <linux/linkage.h>
>> -#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
>> 
>>  #include <asm/assembler.h>
>> +#include <asm/el2_setup.h>
>>  #include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
>>  #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
>>  #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>> @@ -47,10 +47,16 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__hyp_stub_vectors)
>> 
>>  SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(el1_sync)
>>         cmp     x0, #HVC_SET_VECTORS
>> -       b.ne    2f
>> +       b.ne    1f
>>         msr     vbar_el2, x1
>>         b       9f
>> 
>> +1:     cmp     x0, #HVC_VHE_RESTART
>> +       b.ne    2f
>> +       mov     x0, #HVC_SOFT_RESTART
>> +       adr     x1, mutate_to_vhe
>> +       // fall through...
>> +
>>  2:     cmp     x0, #HVC_SOFT_RESTART
>>         b.ne    3f
>>         mov     x0, x2
>> @@ -70,6 +76,66 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(el1_sync)
>>         eret
>>  SYM_CODE_END(el1_sync)
>> 
>> +// nVHE? No way! Give me the real thing!
>> +SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(mutate_to_vhe)
>> +       // Sanity check: MMU *must* be off
>> +       mrs     x0, sctlr_el2
>> +       tbnz    x0, #0, 1f
>> +
>> +       // Needs to be VHE capable, obviously
>> +       mrs     x0, id_aa64mmfr1_el1
>> +       ubfx    x0, x0, #ID_AA64MMFR1_VHE_SHIFT, #4
>> +       cbz     x0, 1f
>> +
>> +       // Engage the VHE magic!
>> +       mov_q   x0, HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS
>> +       msr     hcr_el2, x0
>> +       isb
>> +
>> +       // Doesn't do much on VHE, but still, worth a shot
>> +       init_el2_state vhe
>> +
>> +       // Use the EL1 allocated stack, per-cpu offset
>> +       mrs     x0, sp_el1
>> +       mov     sp, x0
>> +       mrs     x0, tpidr_el1
>> +       msr     tpidr_el2, x0
>> +
>> +       // FP configuration, vectors
>> +       mrs_s   x0, SYS_CPACR_EL12
>> +       msr     cpacr_el1, x0
>> +       mrs_s   x0, SYS_VBAR_EL12
>> +       msr     vbar_el1, x0
>> +
>> +       // Transfert the MM state from EL1 to EL2
> 
> Transfert, typo?

Yes, thanks.

If you are going to review this, may I suggest you look at v2 [1]
instead? The initial version had so many issues that I'm trying
to pretend it never happened.

Cheers,

         M.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210104135011.2063104-1-maz@kernel.org
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-05  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-28 10:49 [PATCH 00/17] arm64: Early CPU feature override, and an application to VHE Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 01/17] arm64: Fix labels in el2_setup macros Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 02/17] arm64: Fix outdated TCR setup comment Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 03/17] arm64: Turn the MMU-on sequence into a macro Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 04/17] arm64: Provide an 'upgrade to VHE' stub hypercall Marc Zyngier
2021-01-04 23:39   ` Jing Zhang
2021-01-05  8:24     ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 05/17] arm64: Initialise as nVHE before switching to VHE Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 06/17] arm64: Move VHE-specific SPE setup to mutate_to_vhe() Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 07/17] arm64: Simplify init_el2_state to be non-VHE only Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 08/17] arm64: Move SCTLR_EL1 initialisation to EL-agnostic code Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 09/17] arm64: cpufeature: Add global feature override facility Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 10/17] arm64: Extract early FDT mapping from kaslr_early_init() Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 11/17] arm64: cpufeature: Add an early command-line cpufeature override facility Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 12/17] arm64: Allow ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1.VH to be overridden from the command line Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 13/17] arm64: Honor VHE being disabled from the command-line Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 14/17] arm64: Add an aliasing facility for the idreg override Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 15/17] arm64: Make kvm-arm.mode={nvhe, protected} an alias of id_aa64mmfr1.vh=0 Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 16/17] KVM: arm64: Document HVC_VHE_RESTART stub hypercall Marc Zyngier
2020-12-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 17/17] arm64: Move "nokaslr" over to the early cpufeature infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2020-12-29 19:27 ` [PATCH 00/17] arm64: Early CPU feature override, and an application to VHE Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2dad221aeef58d380d73c9768e430cd3@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).