* [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64
@ 2021-09-07 18:09 Ricardo Koller
2021-09-07 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent Ricardo Koller
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2021-09-07 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, kvmarm; +Cc: maz, pshier, Paolo Bonzini, maciej.szmigiero
Enable memslot_modification_stress_test and memslot_perf_test in ARM64
(second patch). memslot_modification_stress_test builds and runs in
aarch64 without any modification. memslot_perf_test needs some nits
regarding ucalls (first patch).
Can anybody try these two tests in s390, please?
Changes:
v2: Makefile tests in the right order (from Andrew).
Ricardo Koller (2):
KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent
KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 +
.../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 56 +++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
--
2.33.0.153.gba50c8fa24-goog
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent
2021-09-07 18:09 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64 Ricardo Koller
@ 2021-09-07 18:09 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-07 18:18 ` Andrew Jones
2021-09-07 19:06 ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-07 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 Ricardo Koller
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2021-09-07 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, kvmarm; +Cc: maz, pshier, Paolo Bonzini, maciej.szmigiero
memslot_perf_test uses ucalls for synchronization between guest and
host. Ucalls API is architecture independent: tests do not need to know
details like what kind of exit they generate on a specific arch. More
specifically, there is no need to check whether an exit is KVM_EXIT_IO
in x86 for the host to know that the exit is ucall related, as
get_ucall() already makes that check.
Change memslot_perf_test to not require specifying what exit does a
ucall generate. Also add a missing ucall_init.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
.../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 56 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
index d6e381e01db7..1727f75e0c2c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
@@ -127,43 +127,54 @@ static bool verbose;
pr_info(__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
+static void check_mmio_access(struct vm_data *vm, struct kvm_run *run)
+{
+ TEST_ASSERT(vm->mmio_ok, "Unexpected mmio exit");
+ TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.is_write, "Unexpected mmio read");
+ TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.len == 8,
+ "Unexpected exit mmio size = %u", run->mmio.len);
+ TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.phys_addr >= vm->mmio_gpa_min &&
+ run->mmio.phys_addr <= vm->mmio_gpa_max,
+ "Unexpected exit mmio address = 0x%llx",
+ run->mmio.phys_addr);
+}
+
static void *vcpu_worker(void *data)
{
struct vm_data *vm = data;
struct kvm_run *run;
struct ucall uc;
- uint64_t cmd;
run = vcpu_state(vm->vm, VCPU_ID);
while (1) {
vcpu_run(vm->vm, VCPU_ID);
- if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO) {
- cmd = get_ucall(vm->vm, VCPU_ID, &uc);
- if (cmd != UCALL_SYNC)
- break;
-
+ switch (get_ucall(vm->vm, VCPU_ID, &uc)) {
+ case UCALL_SYNC:
+ TEST_ASSERT(uc.args[1] == 0,
+ "Unexpected sync ucall, got %lx",
+ (ulong)uc.args[1]);
sem_post(&vcpu_ready);
continue;
- }
-
- if (run->exit_reason != KVM_EXIT_MMIO)
+ case UCALL_NONE:
+ if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_MMIO)
+ check_mmio_access(vm, run);
+ else
+ goto done;
break;
-
- TEST_ASSERT(vm->mmio_ok, "Unexpected mmio exit");
- TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.is_write, "Unexpected mmio read");
- TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.len == 8,
- "Unexpected exit mmio size = %u", run->mmio.len);
- TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.phys_addr >= vm->mmio_gpa_min &&
- run->mmio.phys_addr <= vm->mmio_gpa_max,
- "Unexpected exit mmio address = 0x%llx",
- run->mmio.phys_addr);
+ case UCALL_ABORT:
+ TEST_FAIL("%s at %s:%ld, val = %lu",
+ (const char *)uc.args[0],
+ __FILE__, uc.args[1], uc.args[2]);
+ break;
+ case UCALL_DONE:
+ goto done;
+ default:
+ TEST_FAIL("Unknown ucall %lu", uc.cmd);
+ }
}
- if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO && cmd == UCALL_ABORT)
- TEST_FAIL("%s at %s:%ld, val = %lu", (const char *)uc.args[0],
- __FILE__, uc.args[1], uc.args[2]);
-
+done:
return NULL;
}
@@ -268,6 +279,7 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots,
TEST_ASSERT(data->hva_slots, "malloc() fail");
data->vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, mempages, guest_code);
+ ucall_init(data->vm, NULL);
pr_info_v("Adding slots 1..%i, each slot with %"PRIu64" pages + %"PRIu64" extra pages last\n",
max_mem_slots - 1, data->pages_per_slot, rempages);
--
2.33.0.153.gba50c8fa24-goog
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64
2021-09-07 18:09 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64 Ricardo Koller
2021-09-07 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent Ricardo Koller
@ 2021-09-07 18:09 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-07 18:18 ` Andrew Jones
2021-09-07 19:05 ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-07 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64 Andrew Jones
2021-10-21 12:47 ` Marc Zyngier
3 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2021-09-07 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, kvmarm; +Cc: maz, pshier, Paolo Bonzini, maciej.szmigiero
Add memslot_perf_test and memslot_modification_stress_test to the list
of aarch64 selftests.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index 5832f510a16c..5ed203b9314c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_perf_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_page_table_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += memslot_modification_stress_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += memslot_perf_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += set_memory_region_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += steal_time
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_binary_stats_test
--
2.33.0.153.gba50c8fa24-goog
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64
2021-09-07 18:09 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64 Ricardo Koller
2021-09-07 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent Ricardo Koller
2021-09-07 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 Ricardo Koller
@ 2021-09-07 18:17 ` Andrew Jones
2021-09-07 20:52 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-10-19 21:17 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-10-21 12:47 ` Marc Zyngier
3 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jones @ 2021-09-07 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Koller; +Cc: kvm, maz, pshier, Paolo Bonzini, maciej.szmigiero, kvmarm
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:09:55AM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Enable memslot_modification_stress_test and memslot_perf_test in ARM64
> (second patch). memslot_modification_stress_test builds and runs in
> aarch64 without any modification. memslot_perf_test needs some nits
> regarding ucalls (first patch).
>
> Can anybody try these two tests in s390, please?
>
> Changes:
> v2: Makefile tests in the right order (from Andrew).
Hi Ricardo,
You could have collected all the r-b's too.
Thanks,
drew
>
> Ricardo Koller (2):
> KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent
> KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64
>
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 +
> .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 56 +++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.33.0.153.gba50c8fa24-goog
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent
2021-09-07 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent Ricardo Koller
@ 2021-09-07 18:18 ` Andrew Jones
2021-09-07 19:06 ` Oliver Upton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jones @ 2021-09-07 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Koller; +Cc: kvm, maz, pshier, Paolo Bonzini, maciej.szmigiero, kvmarm
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:09:56AM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> memslot_perf_test uses ucalls for synchronization between guest and
> host. Ucalls API is architecture independent: tests do not need to know
> details like what kind of exit they generate on a specific arch. More
> specifically, there is no need to check whether an exit is KVM_EXIT_IO
> in x86 for the host to know that the exit is ucall related, as
> get_ucall() already makes that check.
>
> Change memslot_perf_test to not require specifying what exit does a
> ucall generate. Also add a missing ucall_init.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 56 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64
2021-09-07 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 Ricardo Koller
@ 2021-09-07 18:18 ` Andrew Jones
2021-09-07 19:05 ` Oliver Upton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jones @ 2021-09-07 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Koller; +Cc: kvm, maz, pshier, Paolo Bonzini, maciej.szmigiero, kvmarm
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:09:57AM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Add memslot_perf_test and memslot_modification_stress_test to the list
> of aarch64 selftests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> index 5832f510a16c..5ed203b9314c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_perf_test
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_page_table_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += memslot_modification_stress_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += memslot_perf_test
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += set_memory_region_test
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += steal_time
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_binary_stats_test
> --
> 2.33.0.153.gba50c8fa24-goog
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64
2021-09-07 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 Ricardo Koller
2021-09-07 18:18 ` Andrew Jones
@ 2021-09-07 19:05 ` Oliver Upton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Upton @ 2021-09-07 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Koller; +Cc: kvm, maz, pshier, Paolo Bonzini, maciej.szmigiero, kvmarm
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:10 PM Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com> wrote:
>
> Add memslot_perf_test and memslot_modification_stress_test to the list
> of aarch64 selftests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent
2021-09-07 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent Ricardo Koller
2021-09-07 18:18 ` Andrew Jones
@ 2021-09-07 19:06 ` Oliver Upton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Upton @ 2021-09-07 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Koller; +Cc: kvm, maz, pshier, Paolo Bonzini, maciej.szmigiero, kvmarm
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:10 PM Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com> wrote:
>
> memslot_perf_test uses ucalls for synchronization between guest and
> host. Ucalls API is architecture independent: tests do not need to know
> details like what kind of exit they generate on a specific arch. More
> specifically, there is no need to check whether an exit is KVM_EXIT_IO
> in x86 for the host to know that the exit is ucall related, as
> get_ucall() already makes that check.
>
> Change memslot_perf_test to not require specifying what exit does a
> ucall generate. Also add a missing ucall_init.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 56 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64
2021-09-07 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64 Andrew Jones
@ 2021-09-07 20:52 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-10-19 21:17 ` Ricardo Koller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2021-09-07 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Jones; +Cc: kvm, maz, pshier, Paolo Bonzini, maciej.szmigiero, kvmarm
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 08:17:37PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:09:55AM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> > Enable memslot_modification_stress_test and memslot_perf_test in ARM64
> > (second patch). memslot_modification_stress_test builds and runs in
> > aarch64 without any modification. memslot_perf_test needs some nits
> > regarding ucalls (first patch).
> >
> > Can anybody try these two tests in s390, please?
> >
> > Changes:
> > v2: Makefile tests in the right order (from Andrew).
>
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> You could have collected all the r-b's too.
Thanks Andrew. Will try to do it next time (if changes are small like
in this patch set.
Thanks,
Ricardo
>
> Thanks,
> drew
>
> >
> > Ricardo Koller (2):
> > KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent
> > KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64
> >
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 +
> > .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 56 +++++++++++--------
> > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.33.0.153.gba50c8fa24-goog
> >
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64
2021-09-07 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64 Andrew Jones
2021-09-07 20:52 ` Ricardo Koller
@ 2021-10-19 21:17 ` Ricardo Koller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2021-10-19 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Jones; +Cc: kvm, maz, pshier, Paolo Bonzini, maciej.szmigiero, kvmarm
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 08:17:37PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:09:55AM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> > Enable memslot_modification_stress_test and memslot_perf_test in ARM64
> > (second patch). memslot_modification_stress_test builds and runs in
> > aarch64 without any modification. memslot_perf_test needs some nits
> > regarding ucalls (first patch).
> >
> > Can anybody try these two tests in s390, please?
> >
> > Changes:
> > v2: Makefile tests in the right order (from Andrew).
>
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> You could have collected all the r-b's too.
>
> Thanks,
> drew
>
Friendly ping on this one, please.
> >
> > Ricardo Koller (2):
> > KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent
> > KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64
> >
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 +
> > .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 56 +++++++++++--------
> > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.33.0.153.gba50c8fa24-goog
> >
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64
2021-09-07 18:09 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64 Ricardo Koller
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-09-07 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64 Andrew Jones
@ 2021-10-21 12:47 ` Marc Zyngier
3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2021-10-21 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm, kvm, Ricardo Koller; +Cc: pshier, Paolo Bonzini, maciej.szmigiero
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 11:09:55 -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Enable memslot_modification_stress_test and memslot_perf_test in ARM64
> (second patch). memslot_modification_stress_test builds and runs in
> aarch64 without any modification. memslot_perf_test needs some nits
> regarding ucalls (first patch).
>
> Can anybody try these two tests in s390, please?
>
> [...]
Applied to next, thanks!
[1/2] KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent
commit: ffb4ce3c49366f02f1c064fbe2e66a96ab5f98b8
[2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64
commit: 358928fd5264f069b9758f8b29297c7bff2a06de
Cheers,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-21 12:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-09-07 18:09 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64 Ricardo Koller
2021-09-07 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent Ricardo Koller
2021-09-07 18:18 ` Andrew Jones
2021-09-07 19:06 ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-07 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 Ricardo Koller
2021-09-07 18:18 ` Andrew Jones
2021-09-07 19:05 ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-07 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64 Andrew Jones
2021-09-07 20:52 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-10-19 21:17 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-10-21 12:47 ` Marc Zyngier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).